slug.com slug.com

3 4

What we have is compelling evidence that something very sinister is going on. People are dying and their deaths are directly connected to specific vaccine lots that can be positively identified and traced back to their source. Isn’t that enough to justify an independent probe?
[unz.com]

lawrenceblair 8 Dec 20
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

Frankly, I'm sick of so called "scientists" who won't do their own experiments to test the reports but instead rely on publications owned and operated by the Davos group who won't publish anything that sheds light on the falsehood of their narrative. Kudos to the brave researchers willing to look into what is really happening.

2

Rights of Man
Thomas Paine
Page 52.

"A government on the principles on which constitutional governments arising out of society are established, cannot have the right of altering itself. If it had, it would be arbitrary. It might make itself what it pleased; and wherever such a right is set up, it shows there is no constitution."

V - Provisons concerning prosecution
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury,..."

The People's Panel
The Grand Jury in the United States, 1634 - 1941
Richard D. Younger

Page 3

"They proved their effectiveness during the Colonial and Revolutionary periods in helping the colonists resist imperial interference. They provided a similar source of strength against outside pressure in the territories of the western United States, in the subject South following the Civil War, and in Mormon Utah. They frequently proved the only effective weapon against organized crime, malfeasance in office, and corruption in high places.

"But appreciation of the value of grand juries was always greater in times of crisis, and, during periods when threats to individual liberty were less obvious, legal reformers, efficiency experts, and a few who feared government by the people worked diligently to overthrow the institution. Proponents of the system, relying heavily on the democratic nature of the people's panel, on its role as a focal point for the expression of the public needs and the opportunity provided the individual citizen for direct participation in the enforcement of law, fought a losing battle. Opponents of the system leveled charges of inefficiency and tyranny against the panels of citizen investigators and pictured them as outmoded and expensive relics of the past. Charges of "star chamber" and "secret inquisition" helped discredit the institution in the eyes of the American people, and the crusade to abolish the grand jury, under the guise of bringing economy and efficiency to local government, succeeded in many states."

Self-confessed Treasonous Frauds - as a rule - assume immunity from accountability.

2

There will never be any independent probe because this isn’t a health issue and never was, this is a political power grab.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:298215
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.