slug.com slug.com

0 0

At 1PM EST I'll be refereeing the first two parts of Steven Crowder's anti-trans debate: [twitch.tv]

Participant stats:
Steven Crowder - Culture War Faction: Conservative, Clout rank: B+
versus
Random College Kid Isaac - Culture War Faction: Stoner, Clout rank: F
Steven Monacelli - Culture War Faction: Neosocialist, Clout rank: D

This should be a walk in the park for young Steven. He is good at keeping his cool and being respectful, but will his arguments fall through and cost him the 2 round debate? Let's find out...using my autistically systematic debate reffing system! Points are attributed to each side of debate as follows:

-1: misuse word, ambiguity, losing train of thought, non sequitur,
very common and mistakes and errors, rambling
-2: tone policing, false analogy, false equivalence, questionable cause,
equivocating, special pleading, strawman, pivoting, appealing (to authority, emotion, etc)
-3: deflecting, gish galloping, incorrectly calling out fallacy, losing cool,
demanding more evidence than is reasonable
-5: ad hominem
+1: being a good sport and explicitly conceding or retracting claim,
bringing up interesting fact or good point that receives no rebuttal
+2: debunking any fact
+3: explicitly calling out fallacy
+5: logical refutation
Interruptions that have a winner and loser of a shouting match function as 2x multipliers.
You better have a damn good reason for shouting and cutting someone else off.

I record the time of every point I assign. Feel free to generate engagement by disagreeing with the Debateref's calls!

Multicast to:
[twitch.tv] (I mainly look at twitch chat btw)

[dlive.tv]
NEETpride 6 Mar 29
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:326333