*Proposition Planets start cold and get warmer and bigger.

The anomalous behavior of early space craft, the implausible gigantism of early mega fauna, gravitationally anomalous’ phenomena observed on Terra and the perfect fit of Terra’s land masses - minus the oceans - have led to an an independent investigation by interested persons which, as is now common with such things, led to a new interdisciplinary field of science; which mainstream science denies all knowledge of and pours the usual vitriol on the originators of the new data that conflicts with the 'settled' science.

It is conveniently forgotton that all current mainstream scientific theories were once bombarded with invective with proponents academically destroyed or even imprisoned. Orthodoxy = Radicalism + Time. One should therefore never take notice of an established ‘expert’ about any new concept. Nor should one confront them. They are always the last to know about or accept change and often go to their graves denying palpable truths.

The implications of this concept are profound and are too important to allow suppression. Not least, that our maximum length of tenancy on Terra may be far shorter than we thought!
*Proposition Due primarily to the heating effects of:-
a.) the decay of radio-active elements in the crust
b.) Solar telluric electrical currents
c.) tidal forces from Luna and sol
Enough heat was generated in Terra’s interior to eventually boil the liquid interior and expand gasses trapped below the crust to cause enough pressure for the crust to fail allowing oceanic crust to form (including the oceans) pushing the continents apart from the single land mass encompassing the globe and Terra begin to expand.

This expansion will continue accelerating, probably exponentially, until pressure / gravity equilibrium is reached when Terra will finally be a gas giant of, perhaps, Neptune’s size. The current expansion rate (according to NASA’s ‘anomalous’ figures), is 18mm per year. This will increase in real time to verify this hypothesis and computer modeling should give a timescale before Terra becomes uninhabitable.

Terra is 12,742km in diameter. So far, the expansion of the diameter of Terra is approximately 12,742 – 7,120km = 5,640km; mostly over the last 300 million years. Overall matter density has remained constant throughout that expansion. No new matter is created or deposited in significant amounts. This will be happening on all similarly formed celestial bodies as witnessed by Hubble, Galileo and Cassini etc. on Planetary Moons – including the Terran Moon. The theory needs no violations with currently understood laws of physics and the phenomenon is a normal method of planetary development.

*Gravity Distribution
350 million years ago, Terra has more of its’ mass closer to its’ geometric centre; at around 3,560km from the surface. Now, it is at around 1,800km from the surface. as one decends to the centre of Terra, from 1800km depth, the experienced gravitational force will be towards the surface.

Therefore, due to the inverse square law, early Terra had only 1/4 of the gravity at the surface of current Terra. The distribution of the matter comprising Terra has changed most in the last 350 million years as expansion rate has increased. This has caused the increase in surface gravity as the attraction centre has moved upward towards the surface

Gravitational law for surface gravity is incorrect. F= GM/R squared. R squared should be the distance from the geometric centre to the centre of mass distribution The centre of mass force is not at the centre of the planetary body but at the Centre of it’s Mass Distribution. The correct formula is F=GM/Rc squared.

Current Terra gravity, measured at an elevation of 6,000m, actually corresponds to this figure as it is a 0.6% reduction from a geometric centre for the centre of gravity. This applies to the entirety of the Solar System and all stellar masses; including Suns, Moons, Asteroids Planets Dust and particles.

*Mass
Bodies that formed by Birkland Current Z-pinch in the deep cold of space will indeed be cold. Terra had a core of solid ice with heavier elements forming the upper mantle and crust. This is demonstrated by 0g experiments of how fluid dynamics distributes elements with spin in a vacuum. As it heated through radio-active decay, tidal forces etc., the ice melted releasing gasses and eventually creating steam. Pressure built, the shell cracked, and ocean crust began to form and spread out.
The accepted value of mass for Terra is 6x10 to the power 24 KG. Without the iron core and a with a gaseous interior, it is only around 11% of that at 6.5 x 10 to the power 23 KG– all of it now having only 11% of the accepted mass. The original gravitational binding energy, which is proportional to 1/R would not then turn early Terra into a boiling cauldron.

Structure
Terran descending structure is: atmosphere, crust, gelatinous mantle, transition gas, water, gas core; the mantle and crust being the pressure vessel containing the gas - No solid iron core. The expansion. is driven by radio-active decay in the mantle boiling the water and other gasses to create pressure, which splits the crust and forms the ocean basins. The recent discovery of Ringwoodites and frozen elements around stars by the Atacama Array has confirmed this is a likely scenario
**

Surface:
The original Terran surface area can be deduced by taking the current total surface area and subtracting the area of oceanic crust; (as expansion is driven through the central ocean ridges creating new, shallower crust) and is around 59% of current total crust. This venting driven mixing of matter could well be a crucial factor in abiogenesis
The pre-expansion Terran day would have been around 8 hours. It is still slowing down due to the expansion reducing the angular momentum. From the spin rate alone, the angular momentum of any epoch can be calculated.

Under the Ellectric Universe model, there is no need for an iron core to generate Terra’s magnetic field so these theories could fit hand in glove. I would be most interested to know of any contribution other EU proponents have on how this fluid dynamic model can be refined by EU input
The gravity anomalies exhibited ubiquitously and inerrant in Space Craft trajectories sine the 1950s have long been compensated for in mission calculations so this understanding is likely to be well known but has been classified since the increasing understanding of the electro-gravitic relationship would lead to the wider knowledge of directed energy propulsion technology.