slug.com slug.com

1 0

Capitalism vs. Socialism

Decades after capitalism seemed to have triumphed over socialism, politicians are once again arguing about the merits and drawbacks of these opposing economic systems. Why are we still having this debate?

Andy Puzder, former CEO of the parent company of Hardee's and Carl's Jr., explains the misconceptions that keep the debate alive.

Obiwannosi 8 Dec 28
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

This capitalist explains a false narrative and that may be due to this crony capitalists experiences while operating in a fascist (criminal) government, where corporations are legal fictions afforded Special Treatment.

An example would be food made with any currently "legal" poisons, food advertised as food, when in reality it is categorically not food, unless of course there is no common meaning for the word food, or for the word government, or for the word is. In this example someone who is paying taxes to the (criminal) government for equal protection from frauds (false advertisers) finds a (criminal) injustice system heavily favoring corporate beings over actual human beings. Some corporations pay no taxes, such as one of the major military contractors. Other corporations are paid any amount of money they want to spend, such as the so-called Central Bank, falsely called (false advertising) The Federal Reserve Bank.

So a fascist who makes a killing in a fascist regime (criminal government exemplified by the Nazi's who were funded into being by Wall Street: see the work done by Anthony Sutton) will parrot the lie that "we" operate in a "free market," but no such thing is true. It is demonstrably false in fact.

So a fascist parroting the lie concerning how "we" operate in a "free market" will also claim that the major opposing faction are exclusively the criminal faction whereby those in the opposing faction are the only ones aiding, abetting, supporting, and employing a criminal "socialist" government.

In reality socialism was, is, and can continue to be a simple voluntary agreement made by people in society, that has no connection whatsoever with government at all. That is the original meaning of the word socialism: a social concept, not a government concept. Those who exemplified the move from socialism (a social concept) to a government concept were calling themselves Communists, as exemplified by the Bolsheviks under Stalin, who were also funding into power by Wall Street. The Communists, in their Communist Manifesto reject Socialism in fact.

So there are the simple facts.

Fascist claim to support free markets from their advantage in criminal governments, and they call the Communists by the name Socialists.

Communists, by any name other than a true name (criminals), call the opposition Conservatives, Republicans, anything but a true name: Criminals.

Meanwhile all the targets, who are those who still dare to produce anything worth stealing, are blinded by the mired pile of stinking falsehoods; divided and conquered.

Interesting that you mention "food"

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:66760
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.