slug.com slug.com

7 5

Your thoughts on this? I agree with the article.

We should teach our children to be capable of violence-
[thelibertarianrepublic.com]

SpikeTalon 10 Feb 25
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

7 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Etymology of "nice"

Middle English (in the sense ‘stupid&rsquo😉: from Old French, from Latin nescius ‘ignorant’, from nescire ‘not know’. Other early senses included ‘coy, reserved’, giving rise to ‘fastidious, scrupulous’: this led both to the sense ‘fine, subtle’ (regarded by some as the ‘correct’ sense), and to the main current senses.

3

People don’t try to push you around if, when they look into your eyes, they see an small but still potential chance that you will kill them.

3

We've spent enough time trying to teach kids how to "be the bigger" person. It ignores the human condition. Kids have been bullies for eons. It's time to teach kids how to defend themselves verbally and, if absolutely necessary, physically. A good swift kick in the shin speaks loudly to a bully and generally you'll be left alone from then on.

5

Encouraging and rewarding the aggressors by walking away from them without a fight, will only make them more belligerent in their pursuit. That's exactly why we got here with the lefties

I concur. It's time to fight back.

3

I read the original article about a week ago.
Personally I’m horrified at the deliberate wussification that’s being pushed on Our Kids but, even worse, how many parents meekly accept or even promote this concept.

Same here.

2

Yes. Martial arts, weapons, and a fire-breathing voice.

0

After a quick read, I would certainly say it is a good direction to explore in an effort to raise children to be more protective of things that ought to be defended. I was raised in a similar high-road fashion and often feel like a doormat. I would like to encourage my children to differentiate between (for example) that which is a debate and that which is an attack and respond appropriately and assertively. A sort of honor should be instilled in people and it should be reserved for things of great importance as part of a greater moral standard and it should be defended with only what is necessary to protect it. Though in the situation the article describes I would see the figures of authority as incompetent in modeling a proper respect for the moral standards of society. I mean they should at least look at it as they would using Wikipedia as a source and cheating or plagiarizing.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:79879
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.