slug.com slug.com

1 2

She said he said he saw demons. Then he had to give his guns up-
[reason.com]

The allegations against Kevin Morgan were alarming. They described just the sort of circumstances that Florida legislators had in mind when they approved that state's "red flag" law in 2018, three weeks after the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland.

Morgan's estranged wife, Joanie, claimed he was depressed, suicidal, and obsessed with the apocalypse, which he thought was imminent. She said he was stockpiling food, gold, guns, and ammunition in anticipation of the end times; that he talked about seeing, hearing, and wrestling with demons; and that he had performed a ritual that involved rubbing "oils" on their children and the walls of their house. She reported that he was abusing the drugs he had been prescribed for chronic pain, had talked about dismembering his former wife, had intimated he would do the same to her if she ever disrespected him, and had threatened to kill her with succinylcholine, a paralytic agent used during surgery and intubation.

On a side note guys, I have a small confession to make. I too see demons, have now every day for years, it's very disturbing. These demons have a name, they go by the name Democrat. Please don't red flag me now...

SpikeTalon 10 Mar 5
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

If the things the wife reported about her husband are true then I for one would be glad to see his firearms taken away. The question I have is do the "authorities" verify the truthfulness of such reports before they take the guns.
There should be a minimal standard whereby such reports can be substantiated by more than one person before taking away the mans guns.
If he were behaving as she described then he's just the kind of person who should not be anywhere near a firearm
I would prefer they just take the man into custody and place him in a mental hospital rather than take his guns. But I think you can't legally commit anyone to a mental facility without their consent. Let me know if that is true or not true.
Take the crazy guy away for a while and let the family handle the disposition of the guns...

I've no qualms with confiscating weapons from the truly mentally deranged, but I do take issue with circumventing due process and especially if the narrative is in serious question. Think you're correct on the committing someone to a mental health facility... and I disagree with such an approach for the obvious reason.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:81613
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.