slug.com slug.com

1 3

Time to arrest the traitors for treason

JVIP-WTPNN 7 Apr 22
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

If it is the law then the people have to enforce it, not the government. If instead the people are fooled into stupid servility, then the people get what they pay for, don't they?

The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots
Page 40
Private Prosecutors
"For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action.
Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, however, private prosecutors were prohibited from withdrawing the action pursuant to private agreement with the defendant. Court intervention was occasionally required to compel injured crime victims to appear against offenders in court and "not to make bargains to allow [defendants] to escape conviction, if they...repair the injury."

Page 42
Law Enforcement as a Universal Duty
"Law enforcement in the Founders' time was a duty of every citizen. Citizens were expected to be armed and equipped to chase suspects on foot, on horse, or with wagon whenever summoned. And when called upon to enforce the laws of the state, citizens were to respond "not faintly and with lagging steps, but honestly and bravely and with whatever implements and facilities [were] convenient and at hand. Any person could act in the capacity of a constable without being one, and when summoned by a law enforcement officer, a private person became a temporary member of the police department. The law also presumed that any person acting in his public capacity as an officer was rightfully appointed."

Source:

@JVIP-WTPNN
"If it’s law then there will be a lot of People Breaking the Law"

Can you explain what you mean in that message so as to avoid miscommunication?

A Statute is not a law. If it were then a Statute that attempts to convince people that the solution to a problem is to murder a massive number of people, as exemplified in the "Final Solutions" to the Indian "problem" in America, and then later the "Final Solution" to the "Jewish Problem" in Germany would be "Laws," not Statutes (Statutes are orders that may or may not be obeyed, subject to the consent of the people judging the lawful, legal, validity of the Statute.)

If THE PEOPLE as a whole do not govern the government (with such methods as the common law with private prosecutors, independent grand juries, independent trial juries, etc.), then the "government" is absolute, arbitrary, and criminal by their actions, not their words: they lie, they rob, they steal, they rape, they torture, they murder, and they mass murder to gain power and profit as a very well established ROUTINE.

What exactly do you mean to say?

Please be specific.

@JVIP-WTPNN

From a book I just picked up:

Chapter 1

The Big Lie and the Art of War

Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur.
The world wants to be deceived so let it be deceived.

Racket: ( a ) a fraudulent scheme, enterprise, or activity; ( b ) usually an illegitimate enterprise made workable by bribery or intimidation; ( c ) an easy and lucrative means of livelihood.

A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep.
Saul Bellow, To Jerusalem and Back, 1976

You should never believe anyone, not even me. You can only trust your own research. If you just comfortably lie on your back and let people tell you everything then you’ll get some sort of answer, mostly the wrong one.
Dr. Kerry Mullis
Nobel Prize winner and inventor of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testimony

It is a great mistake to think that wars only concern armies, regulars or guerillas, involved in active engagement – blowing people and things to smithereens. In today’s world, nothing could be farther from the truth. The real forces of evil wage another kind of warfare. This warfare is principally financial. The dark princes of debt finance have gained practically unopposed leverage over every important social, economic, and political institution, including and especially the health care delivery system. As a result, death by iatrogenic medicine kills three quarters of a million people annually – more people in a year than either cancer or heart disease.
The demons of capital and “free market” ideology have created an information monopoly by gaining control of the pharmaceutical industry, the teaching of physicians, the major media, including medical journals, and the flow of research dollars. They control a clandestine intelligence agency, the Epedemic Intelligence Service, which has silently infiltrated every major health department, hospital, newspaper, and medical journal across the nation enabling its control of information and the mounting of a consolidated response at a moment’s notice. The research dollars determine if there is going to be a “war on cancer,” or a “war on AIDS,” or the promotion of the latest viral scare to sell more vaccines or worthless “anti-viral” products such as Tamiflu or Relenza. Such wars are planned and mounted with the same organizational and strategic planning as the Pentagon employs. What this ultimately leads to is the development of bad science and toxic drugs that are created ostensibly to fight cancer and AIDS but in effect cause more cancer and more AIDS – which is the point of the war. People die in war, and the profiteers substantially increase their wealth and power. The object of war is twofold: to establish power relationships and profit.
A more pernicious outcome of these medical was has been the silent loss of personal sovereignty and the loss of the most sacred and inalienable rights to the sanctity and security of our own bodies and the free choice and right to select the medical treatment that we deem best. Information is power, but access to accurate medical information has become “proprietary” because of the privatizing of public resources. The idea that an individual has the right to be adequately informed to make a medical decision has become an arcane notion.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:92571
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.