slug.com slug.com

0 0

No Not good argument. Have you ever tried reaching for something while your mind and your eyes are on something else in a split of a second. Would you say 50/50?
Even if both arms are placed on different sides. But the rule was that they both are placed on the same side on her either right or left hip. That makes a tremendous difference, would it not?
2- Suppo she turned her head for even a split of a second. If he was armed he had the opportunity to fire his one and only gun.
#2he was wrestling as if he expected the officer to just stand still and not react to his fidgety. She couldn’t read in a crystal ball that he was not armed. The fact that he had a warrant for illegal possession, that alone had put her life at risk. She had the right to defend herself.
The jury we don’t know if they were anticops and or Defund the police could have played a role in their decision making.
I sensed judge Hu was a lefty.
I Potter didn’t have good représentation
This case was A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE because in this climate she happened to be white and a cop. GUILT BY ASSOCIATION.
This is not how our country’s legal system .

Saigon2o 7 Dec 25
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:299596