If people are people as you suggested above (which I agree by the way), then I stand by my comments, as it's not about judging a group but rather on an individual basis there. Never said not all police can be trusted. Furthermore, would the same then apply to groups such as BLM or ANTIFA, as conceivably not all of those involved in such groups are hostile or dangerous? I'm willing to wager that most of those who lean to the right and who are opposed to BLM and their allies would have no qualms whatsoever in judging them as a whole, while making exceptions to other groups (like the police). With that said, if you still stand by your words then fair enough, I hope you apply such though to all groups/factions evenly then and make no exceptions even for those of groups you may disagree with.

@SpikeTalon Our Constitution demands that we convict by actions of individuals. Events like Nazi Germany are examples of judging by group, which must always wrongly convict the innocents within them.

You're right about that, just wish more of my fellow Americans were aware of that. Police and bodyguards/security guards are two different things.

@SpikeTalon Thugs are Thugs.