I mean it is pretty clear, and it is good for a source to acknowledge basic facts.

I saw a good analysis of Trumps "staged photo" defense. As if the problem was whether Trump had strewn about the documents on the floor, not that he just had them in his possession. Take a drug bust for example. If a law enforcement agency showed a photo of their drug bust, as attached, think about if the culprit complained that the photo was staged as a legit defense. Just replace the word "documents" with "drugs" in the tweet... er, I mean, "truth".