slug.com slug.com

0 1

Something remembined me of this today. It's a strange little gold mine of shit.

First it goes off on the federal goverment for allowing people to be discerning of who they rent to.

Then it goes into the need for responsible people being subservient to the irresponsible. Not just to provide them a house via a racial tax siphoning, but by catering to there choice to be in your renatl property. Single mom with 5 kids? Don't just give her your tax money. Give them your rentals and make your cash flow depend on them. You knwo from the fact they have no job and a ton of kids that they will never treat your property eight and no one will want to be near them.

Then it goes into how places that take section 8 are bad. And by bad they mean the people there are the same culture and "look like them" as the people with section 8 that say they don't to be anywhere near them. They want to live in your nice white areas and bring there problems there. They don't want to be in the bad areas.

The big overall thing is that we need to mix what they themselves consider bad your community
your property rights of you be damned. Wait till they claim imminent domain and you'll have to rent your unused spare bedroom by law to shitty people whos rent is from your taxed out ass.

[propublica.org]

Slugo 6 May 21
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:98296