I think it can be redistributed by free market, investment and charity. Maybe other ways which I haven't thought of. Regarding tax, I think anything other than a low flat simple tax rate for all is heading in the direction of socialist theft. That is my current position on that topic.

Investment, employment, spending.

First of all, the wealthy are part of the economy. Secondly, wealth is legitimately transferred to the less wealthy by wages, charitable donations, and in other, secondary, ways. In other words, voluntarily. All else is sanctioned theft.

Game shows, investments, grants, charity, and,simply, the act of buying things. The problem is the financial illiteracy of people. They don't build wealth and just spend outside their means. Rich people buy a lot of stuff. If people would save and re invest those earnings they too could climb the ladder.

The free market. Anything else is immoral.

Investment is the best way.

[parncutt.org]

Why do you think it's moral to steal other people's money?

A 'progressive income tax' regime, whereby low-income earners pay only standard taxes on goods and services, but the higher brackets get taxed on income at different rates (i.e.: you get taxed at X rate until whatever line is considered appropriate, and then anything above that and until the next threshold is subject to Y rate, and so so). That way, you don't reduce the incentive to make millions (thus, not curbing innovation or economic growth), but you redistribute the high end margins of the billionaire's top profits to provide services to low-income populations which typically have more liquid assets and will spur economic growth via spending. A stable base and welfare net is the most effective long-run solution, though it might be less palatable than an appeal to 'individual responsibility'. Progressive tax regimes might be a good compromise on that front.

THrough spending on goods, services or creating jobs