slug.com slug.com

3 2

5 G; do the dangers outweigh the benefits? In my opinion they do until and unless it is proven that they do not:

Dr. Martin Pall says that the only safety guidelines in place are for thermal effects and thus are meaningless. He further postulates cellular DNA damage of several types, lowered fertility, apoptosis, free radical damage and cancer are side effects of exposure.

James 7 Feb 21
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

"There is almost no question that a 5G-world would place us all under an unprecedented level of surveillance and control; granting unheard-of powers to soulless corporate algorithms.

That should be enough to permanently delete the agenda right there, filed under “useful technology gone bad.”

Though perhaps an even bigger question for our time is: does 5G pose a major threat to all biological life? The independent evidence overwhelmingly indicates that it does."

[collective-evolution.com]

0

Can 5G technology be used to directly influence people's behavior?

More on 5G:

2

While it's generally good to question things such as that and be cautious, the concerns may prove to be unjust in this case. I will be doing more research on that topic, and in the meantime you must do what you think is right and or safe. Good post.

Thank you Sir.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:20407
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.