slug.com slug.com

4 1

[foxnews.com]

What are your thoughts on this? NOT on whether we should vaccinate, but what YOUTUBE is doing in terms of demonetizing and censorship. I think we should vaccinate our kids, but I also have some views about AGW that goes against the mainstream. If they consider anit-vax "dangerous and harmful", couldn't they do the same thing with youtubers who take a position contrary to the AGW theory by putting it in the same catagory? Or maybe my video about teaching my kid how to safely handle a firearm......"dangerous and harmful"? Slippery slope?

Ringersoll 4 Feb 25
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

The Slippery Slope has always been considered a Logical Fallacy in civil debate. While it can be a bad tactic, it seems to be almost prophetic when considering against the arguments of the Progressive Left.
The most outlandish scenario that the Conservatives put at the end of a Slippery Slope argument is invariably surpassed by the Radical Left in short order.

0

I don't agree to censorahip, however if you do not own the site (or app) then you don't get to make the rules. This is partly the reason why the Admin guy on here created this site, for members to hold civil discussions, promote ideas, and not worry so much about getting censored.

0

Very slippery. Most people don't even understand what shadow banning is either. On a slightly unrelated note, how can one be pro-choice but all for forced vaccinations? Make Neo-cortex's function again!

1

It's a frustrating hypocrisy to understand the guidelines, and how they implement them. It's a private platform at the end of the day.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:20741
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.