Question.
If the technology is available to make any video/ audio recordings of people doing and saying things, that never happened and those (fake) video/audio recordings are indistinguishable from (real) video/audio.
How can any video/audio recording be admissible in court from now on.
Can't it be said that if it has the possibility of being fabricated, that it must be considered fabricated until proven to be genuine.
Like innocent until proven guilty.
Fake until proven real?
There's rarely one piece of evidence they gets a conviction. Testimony alone, some video aren't typically enough for convictions