slug.com slug.com

3 2

Does the Toronto Star willfully and knowingly advocate a position which supports Islamist extremism? Do they defend individuals and groups who support the killing of apostates, the beating of wives and the execution of gays? Does the Toronto Star have any process in place whereby they check out the reliability of their sources and the credibility of the information they present to the public?

[soundcloud.com]

QuigginReport 4 Mar 29
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Hahahahaha! Now Tom!? Why would they verify propoganda?
The Globalists who control the purse strings, pay for propoganda and penalize those telling the truth.. one could actually, say kill those telling the truth given the number of truth tellers that have been found dead under very suspicious circumstances...after reporting factual truth... called suicides. You know! Like the guy with two bullets through the back of his skull, declared a suicide!? Uh hu!

1
3

100 years ago , it would have been unthinkable that media could be a destructive influence . Today , it is common practice .

Um... I’m not so sure about that... didn’t Mark Twain complain about news lying and politicians weren’t to be believed?
I think this has been a problem since the beginning of time... the rate of increase in propoganda May be increasing.. but, in the two world wars.. reality was not reported.. propoganda was.. so I’m not too sure about that either.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:25656
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.