slug.com slug.com

2 1

‘Gutfeld!’ slams Judge Jackson for not defining ‘woman’

guru 9 Mar 24
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

Another remark Jackson made was a bit disturbing as well. She said that she "as a judge" has based her opinions and decisions upon her "life experience" - she did not make mention of "the law" in response to the question. To me this sounded like an oblique reference to "social justice" and "righting past wrongs" via Supreme Court edict and not according to properly legislated and codified Law.
Her presence on the SCOTUS bench will be an affront - a direct insult to the body of laws that define the parameters - the very boundaries on which we depend to maintain law and order in our Society.
Notions of "fairness" are arbitrary to put it mildly and they can only corrupt the entire body of Law.

0

And Jesus was born of the Virgin Joseph? Might as well make it two miracles.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:324988
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.