slug.com slug.com

2 3

The lesson to be learned is the liberal media engage in laziness or deliberate misrepresentation when they cherry-pick certain peer-reviewed studies and claim that anybody who questions them is “attacking science,” “attacking scientists,” or being a “denialist.”

Sound science requires critically testing theories and predictions – including those published in peer-reviewed science journals – against objective evidence.

1patriot 9 Jan 9
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

I want to read about a media executive getting blasted away.

1

Peer reviewed is utter bullshit, every peer reviewed basketball game I ever played 99 percent of the time had the score wrong

yes this was written in i think 2006

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:433741
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.