Pornography is protected by the First Amendment...
[reason.com]pornography-is-protected-by-the-first-amendment/
While I never cared much for pornography, I do find it ironic that the Party of minimal government involvement would seek to regulate such out of existence.
Porn is pretty much like the word "Fuck" - it has lost its shock value due to over indulgence.
Indeed.
"the party of minimal government involvement"? Republican politicians haven't cared about that in a long time. It was a talking point to help them win the reality TV show called election coverage. Libertarians are a better bet, but definitely not worth putting all your eggs in one basket.
I don't trust any political party these days, though the Libertarians are currently the best bet. On a side note, I host a Libertarian group on here instead of a flat out conservative one. Figured out who you were once I saw you change your name on Agnostic.
@SpikeTalon Found it and joined. Nice to see you btw
@Janus819 Glad to see you too on here.
Porn rocks!...just my humble and sexual opinion.
That is personal, but do the streets of cities in Canada deserve to exploit porn in the Pride parades? They show their fetish’s, their sexual preference, their exposed genital areas, and their continuous whine for more rights. Should it be advertised in plain sight of children and those who truly don’t care what their personal sexual fantasy’s are?