slug.com slug.com

3 3

Could we get some discussion going on Pro-life versus Pro-Abortion?

A question I have (and have had for years) is why both sides are warring with such rhetoric when a very simple solution is possible simply by people taking responsibility for their own lives.

Mention either group and there is immediate polarization, ANGRY polarization, and self-satisfied and self-congratulatory rhetoric.

Why does neither of these groups advocate changing funding from the government to their organizations over to medical tubal ligation procedures which can now be done in one day and is reversible?

For that matter, why have our politicians not suggested it?

Why not take responsibility for the fact that you are fertile and will most likely have sex at some point, either willingly or otherwise and have the procedure done to be safe until one decides to have children.
Given the fact that some women use numerous abortions as after the fact birth control, surely it would reduce not only abortion procedures but the cost involved in them as at the most there would be only 2 surgeries involved. Also, costs of birth control would be reduced as well as remove the risk of physical side effects of birth control pills.

I believe this question makes sense, however from experience I do not advise broaching it with members of either group without having an open door at your back.

Phoenix 5 Feb 26
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

I got stuck on your second sentence..."people taking responsibility for their own lives". It's actually laughable that would be your solution! Many abortions are performed on CHILDREN. Would you suggest they take responsibility? How would you go about having such influence on these children to keep them from acting on their base desires? How might one get millions of people to suddenly dump all programming and begin taking responsibility when they can't even drive a car properly; can't get off drugs; can't keep a job, relationships, etc? The only person I can change is me. Influencing people to change through example is ALL ONE CAN DO. So your simple solution is a farce. (Hugs)

1

I don't see why having that discussion with pro-lifers would be a problem except possibly where funding is involved. I'm also not sure that all tubal ligations are reversible, so there's that. The problem as I see it, is a political one,that there is little interest in solving.Follow the money honey! I have to say that it is absolutely appalling that the pro-choice fraction is no longer satisfied with Roe vs Wade and the 20 week limit and keep moving the bar further and further. Unfortunately, young women are taught to believe that having an abortion is no worse then removing a polyp and have thus far been able (quite easily )to buy into that, when talking about no more than 20 weeks. I don't see how that self deception can continue when we are talking about abortions at the time of delivery. I'm sure you can tell by my last statement that I am indeed pro-life. That said, I have to admit that I have come full circle over the years.When I was younger I bought into the aforementioned polyp idea and was really too young and naive to give it serious thought.Therein lies the rub, because it is young,naive women making this choice. I know this isn't the conversation you were trying to have but I will say, as a pro-lifer, I would certainly be open to the one you proposed.Anything to stop the currant madness!

Actually, I am interested in any thoughts I can get, as I said, over the years when I tried to speak to this I got a lecture rather than thought. Talking points rather than thought.

Tubal ligations are reversible if the doctor doing them is aware that there may be a reversal in the future and of course depending on age.

That is what is confusing to me, it would cost so much less to fund and there would still be room for both parties to continue their platform with a great deal less death involved. Yet any time I have mentioned it, the idea has been (well up until now at least 🙂 ) dismissed.

@Phoenix Sounds reasonable to me. Just goes to show that money is being made (most assuredly on all sides),so a solution is not the desired result. Cynical? Maybe.

1

I think the problem is even when both are responsible and practice safe sex accidents can still happen even tho they are rare. The fault is that because of that rare occasion some people will use it to justify legal abortion for "just because I'm not ready" abortions to absolve the woman but at the same time hold men accountable across the board by threat of jail time if they aren't at the least a source of income for the child. People have the nerve to attack "dear beat dad's" then turn around and support abortion and not see the woman as a dead beat for dodging her responsibility with killing the child.

The issue isn't about finding solutions or working together to reach a compromise from my perspective. It's about "winning" the fight at all cost. It serves to divide and keep people arguing over it for years so politicians can avoid other topics that donors don't want changed. That's why even tho abortion is 100% legal we still have people fighting for abortion to be legal. Until there is a change the topic should be on the back burner while we work at other issues but fear tactics from politicians are used to control people and they work beautifully.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:20868
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.