Kamala Harris: ‘We Should Have an Assault Weapons Ban’
7
Be part of the movement!
Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.Create your free account
6 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.There already is a law on the books, its called the National Fire Arms act, which was enacted in 1934. There have been amendments, Title 2 added in 1968, and then again again in a limited fashion and allowed to run out its time limits without being renewed because it was not effective. The NFA. The original purpose was to control “gangland” violence using fully automatic guns and explosives from the WW1 And WW2 wars (military grade) that were not regulated. The so-called assault weapons are NOT military grade weapons, and trying to “shoehorn” them into that class is problematic and un-constitutional, not that that has ever stopped a gun hater......
RonTillerson
Level 6
Apr 26, 2021
1
What an uninformed idiot, embarassing that she is the US vice president.
TrevL67
Level 5
Apr 25, 2021
1
It is even worse than that. We already tried such a ban and it lasted for 10 years. It was allowed to "expire" as no one could show that it had any effect on crime, shootings, whatever. Totally useless -- an example of liberal theater. Of course, you are not allowed to bring that up, sorta like bringing up her deliberate action as Ca AttGen in hiding data that would have exonerated blacks sent to prison, and BeijingBiden's action as senator in pushing a law that imprisoned tens of thousands of young blacks for no bloody reason -- except he didn't like blacks. Hilary's statement seems to be new rule: "At this point what does it matter?!".
CAMALAss would not know the difference between an assault weapon and a deer rifle!!!
Funny thing is a WWI or WWII assault weapon is NOW a deer rifle!!!
What will become of today's assault weapons?????
Serg97
Level 8
Apr 25, 2021
3
Except no assault weapon has ever been a hunting rifle. (Assault weapons by definition are fully automatic.)
@TrevL67 Where did you come up with that definition? Please cite.
@Zeitgeist234 It is the FEDERAL LAW, I sell class three weapons and suppressors!!
I have to know what is required!!! If you have a Class three item and no tax stamp, I wish you the best!!!
@Zeitgeist234 , sorry for my simplified definition, I should have specified "select fire" capable but wanted to dummy it down as it is the auto fire mode that is/should be the only point of concern/discussion as semi-auto is common in all types of firearms.
Ref.
[dictionary.com]
Are not ALL weapons designed to 'assault'? I thought that by definition, that was the very thing that made an item a 'weapon' and not just a tool
Tom81
Level 8
Apr 25, 2021
4
Assault is an action, firearms are a tool. Some are optimized for hunting, some for competition, some for "plinking" some for defense, and some for combat. Saying all firearms are for assault is like saying all autos are for basic transportation, race cars, trucks, limos are transport but are by no means good for that. An "assault rifle" is a purposely misused term to cloud the gun-control/gun-rights issue.
Be part of the movement!
Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.