@RafaelMspt Interestingly, it seems to me, looking at humans as a big pool of data, that the current feminist narrative of subduing various male tendencies; particularly the various occasions we look at or approach them for example, will deter a significant number of advances from less toxic, more thoughtful men, who more often than not have done little wrong anyway. The group disproportionately more likely to ignore these concerns and still pursue as many women and with as much gusto as they have previously regardless of any narrative, are the most toxic, possibly narcissistic and/or sociopathic men. So it wouldn't surprise me if, a couple of generations down the line, there could be perhaps 5%, perhaps 20% more toxic men!

I think women would be better served not railing against all men, but analysing their own choices in what they put up with and who they choose to procreate with (with the obvious exceptions of when a man literally is violently controlling which is definitely all the man's responsibility). Evolution has presented us with the range of psychological characteristics present throughout humanity today. These personalities, tendencies, desires, shortcomings etc, will never disappear just because people click their fingers and demand it. If such characters are not rewarded with sex - yet still currently the most domineering, powerful and on many occasions malevolent men still definitely are - then a generation or two later the trends will go in the direction desired by women. But it won't happen overnight