slug.com slug.com

4 5

Dear Democrats, how would you like it if the head of the CIA got a FOREIGN spy agency to investigate one of your presidential candidates? Warren, maybe? Booker?

In its 1947 charter, the CIA was prohibited from spying on American citizens in the US because Truman was afraid of the potential for political abuse. So how does Brennan, head of the CIA during Obama's tenure, get around that?

According to Rand Paul (see link below) Brennan made a deal with the MI5 in Britain to have THEM spy on Trump in exchange for some favour from the CIA. Brennan made a back-room deal with a FOREIGN spy agency to investigate an American citizen--guilty till proven innocent by a foreign agency. Talk about collusion, eh?

Do you think this should be investigated? If Rand Paul is correct (and there are many indications that he is), the same can happen to your side...one day.

[facebook.com]

CRBG 7 Apr 6
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

The pathetic thing is that because Obama OKed it . Trump's haters were turning a blind eye to spying on the Trump administration.
The whole house of cards is on fire as it falls into partisan limbo .
Perlosi casually ripping up the SOTU address surely is her death knell . Many life long Democrats are now politically homeless.

1

Smells like Treason...

2

Our intel bureaus have become tools of domestic and international corruption. While leetle 'o's(BHO) admin was running guns with Hillary/McCain through Libya to ISIS in Syria, Amb Stevens and 3 of his closest security were murdered and we're told it was reaction to a video. We all know the story.
There's more to it than we know, but, later, here's Putin sitting in on a forum of international leaders in Europe nonchalantly answering questions of our involvement in building up the resistance against Assad. In fact, we ARE getting better intel from Putin than from our own intel bureaus. Putin doesn't appear to show any real interest in revealing our activities; he's just answering the questions, holding back when possible.
So, when Trump says he can't trust his own intel, it's true, been true before he arrived, and it's deep into clerical areas.

5

Yes, it should be investigated. There are many unanswered questions about Hillary Clinton and her many dealings and connections. She had poor job performance, poor ethics, and thought her popularity would get her in. Once in, things would go away. The investigation into President Trump paved the way for this current push to look into Obama, Hillary, etc. Judicial Watch is conducting investigations into Hillary. They already had litigation on California and the issue of more voters on the rolls than are eligible to vote.

Thanks, TomLeVasseur. There's so much going on that looks like a corruption of political processes on the Dems side. Thanks for the reminder about California voter fraud. That definitely needs investigation.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:28057
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.