slug.com slug.com

5 4

WHY SOME SUFFER ADVERSE REACTIONS FROM VACCINES AND SOME DON'T
(very short video)
[brandnewtube.com]

brandnewtube often is difficult to post or so I have found in the past. If you are having trouble following the link to the right video,

go to brandnewtube.com

Then search this: why-some-suffer-adverse-reactions-and-some-dont

toronto_Georgia 8 Dec 6
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

That's exactly what I've said since January, although I wasn't sure of the ratios, I certainly was sure of the strategy and tactics obviously being employed.

2

Link is working fine.

1

Found the video.

1

In fact the vast majority don't suffer any adverse reactions at all.

She made it very clear in the video, 70% of the population is getting a saline solution, utterly harmless, while 30% receive the real deal. Great way to lull people into ease of use.

The problem there is that "comfort" level will eventually disappear. Each shot one receives is actually Russian Roulette. Eventually there will be a live bullet in the chamber as they push for more and more boosters.

@toronto_Georgia You really believe that?

@Lightman Absolutely. It explains clearly why some are totally unaffected by their two shot intro, and others have their lives devastated by even a single shot. If every one were getting the real shot this whole charade would have been over in early spring of 2020. For months I have been looking for an explanation of this phenomenon. From a strategic point of view, this or similar numbers is the only explanation as to why so many are impervious to the MRNA assault. What better way to infiltrate large populations then create two disparate results weighing in heavily on the saline control group.

COVID-19 has an extremely high recovery rate on its own which explains why the saline control group eventually succumbs to "break through" infections as the "flu" spreads. However, by using Remdesavir only in advanced hospital cases do so many deaths occur. All the studies previously conducted with Remdesavir had to be terminated because the drug shuts down the kidneys. CDC eliminated use of any other drug for COVID-19 patients. Countries like India had far fewer deaths when alternate drugs were used. Our 770,000+ deaths were all people with co-morbidities who, under normal circumstances would have been high risk when hit with any serious flu., were given a failed drug and only that drug, were sure to die -- terrifying the population into believing COVID-19 kills. By having hospitals only administer a drug known for causing kidney failure, the nudge to mortality was guaranteed. This set the stage for the public to believe COVID-19 was the killer.

I actually suspect the ratio is closer to 85/15, which would give you a cull rate of 15%. Any population control proponent would be quite happy to see a 15% cull rate roll through a population with each successive booster round culling an additional 15%. You do the math on how long it would take to drastically reduce a terrorized unsuspecting population.

@toronto_Georgia My opinion is that is delusional only Conspiranuts believe such things

@Lightman LOL

@toronto_Georgia actually its not funny that so many people are taken in by idiotic liars or misguided fools.
If this was true the whistle blower would be rich beyond belief and the class action would break big pharma.

@Lightman One might well say the same back at you who blindly trust government implicitly to do no harm.

Law suits are forming all over the world and slowly being met with positive outcomes. There are hundreds of whistle blowers and thousands of experts and medical professionals involved. But of course, they're all misguided fools right? When it all finally breaks big pharma is only one of the perpetrators of this pandemic to be put through Nuremberg 2.

@toronto_Georgia Well I am not a conspiranut and I have facts and truth on my side. Not rumour innuendo and lies.

@Lightman No prob. Time will tell.

@Lightman
19,532 - 28,689 Deaths from the Fauxvaxes represents approximately 1% of actual deaths reported to VAERS based on the Harvard Pilgrim study. Therefore, (using the smaller number) 1,953,200 people in the states have ACTUALLY died as a direct result of the Lethal Fauxvax Injections.

IF EVERY ONE OF THOSE NOW DECEASED men and women had contracted Fauxvid 1984, 1,952,614 of them would still be alive based on the broad survivability ratios supported by data (99.97% survivability, better than Influenza survivability).

586 would have died from Fauxvid without the lethal injection.
Almost 2,000,000 died as a direct result OF the Lethal Fauxvax Injections.

@Heresiarch I'm not a conspiranut I'm also not american and it is in case you missed it a global pandemic different countries handle it in different ways check out Australia's stats.
People are not being killed by lethal injection all over the world that is just too wacky to even contemplate.

@Lightman
I'm not owned by the Evil Empire either, so keep in mind the ONLY countries not experiencing excess mortality compared to 2020, 2019 and five year averages are those that aren't pushing the Lethal Injections on their people. (Note, I have about 30 more such graphs by nation state)

@Heresiarch ROTFLMAO
Australia is 90% double dosed you have no credibility and 100% gullibility like most Conspiranuts

@Lightman
Your anecdotal assessment is without credibility.
How many women have set themselves on fire in Oz to draw attention to the effects of government mandates lately?

Here's some credibility that can't be denied -
Here in Aotearoa/New Zealand, there have been a total of 29 deaths allegedly WITH Fauxvid 1984 since the beginning of the Scamdemic. All of them had terminal comorbidities and you are literally more likely to die in a bicycle accident.

49 people had died from the Lethal Fauxvax Injections as of 12 October 2021 according to CARM, the government's VAERS -like reporting system, but just as is the case with VAERS, those who have studied the history of reporting conclude that only 5% of adverse reactions are reported to CARM, so the best "government estimate" of Fauxvax deaths is 980 men, women and children, 33.8 TIMES HIGHER THAN the alleged Fauxvid deaths.

Therefor 980 men, women and children have died from the lethal injections, and 905 WOULD STILL BE ALIVE if they contracted the Flu known as Fauxvid 1984

@Heresiarch Stop wasting my time you bore me and you are stupid to believe the stuff you do end of story

0

Hmmm... I tried both ways and found nothing there

That's unfortunate. Basically what she said was that out of 100 doses, 70 were saline solution while only 30 were the real deal. That meant for 70 people absolutely nothing untoward happened and they quite happily deny the 30 who were truly exposed. The old "nothing to it, I'm fine" undermines those who were vaccine damaged. This ratio automatically undermined any "resistance" in the majority of the populations' mind.

@toronto_Georgia Hmmm. That’s a smart strategy. Not only do they spend less money on the clot shots and have fewer people being harmed, it uses the power of placebo to enable the body’s natural immune system boosted by positivity to reduce the effects of the actual virus which only kills a fraction of one percent of the people who get the virus.

The only thing they need to take advantage of this strategy is a black heart and a fear filled ignorant populace.

This graphic represents both the strategy and tactics -

@toronto_Georgia
At this very moment I'm watching the Catherine Austin Fitts interview with the Last American Vagabond, and the discussion touched on the verified "fact," not suspicion, that the majority of Fauxvax mRNA injections are in fact placebo presently. This is one of the reasons that tight chain of possession is intended for the vials and that all unused doses are supposed to be destroyed at the end of the day. You literally have to commit a crime (steal) the vials in order to perform any independent analysis of contents.


@Heresiarch Excellent video. Any time Catherine Fitts speaks I am ALL EARS. So much great content in this vid. I'll bet dollars to donuts @Lightman is incapable of understanding or ingesting this content to any good use. Sad, but true.

I've been trying to figure out the link to this, but I suspect I'll have to go to Solari.com to get the true link. Allegory of the Cave.

Again, thank you <3

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:293625
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.