slug.com slug.com

5 0

Here's the latest on the arrest of Millie Weaver - Journalist for Info - Wars. She and her husband were arrested yesterday on trumped up charges. The cops only said there was a grand jury indictment and that the charge was "Burglary". They are in jail being held WITHOUT Bond!

iThink 9 Aug 16
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

I still don't understand why the indictment is sealed and why no bond was granted. I think they see a judge tomorrow so there should be more answers, maybe.

0

Those thieving truthers!!

0

They sure can manipulate.

0

I am still trying to figure out the "sealed indictment" and no bond. Those 2 things are questions in my head.

This may help:

  1. "The judiciary of the United States is so constructed and extended, as to absorb and destroy the judiciaries of the several states; thereby rendering laws as tedious, intricate, and expensive, and justice as unattainable by a great part of the community, as in England; and enabling the rich to oppress and ruin the poor."
    George Mason, 1787

  2. "It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States."
    Lysander Spooner, Essay on The Trial by Jury, 1852

  3. The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots
    Page 40
    Private Prosecutors
    "For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action.
    Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, however, private prosecutors were prohibited from withdrawing the action pursuant to private agreement with the defendant. Court intervention was occasionally required to compel injured crime victims to appear against offenders in court and "not to make bargains to allow [defendants] to escape conviction, if they...repair the injury."

Page 42
Law Enforcement as a Universal Duty
"Law enforcement in the Founders' time was a duty of every citizen. Citizens were expected to be armed and equipped to chase suspects on foot, on horse, or with wagon whenever summoned. And when called upon to enforce the laws of the state, citizens were to respond "not faintly and with lagging steps, but honestly and bravely and with whatever implements and facilities [were] convenient and at hand. Any person could act in the capacity of a constable without being one, and when summoned by a law enforcement officer, a private person became a temporary member of the police department. The law also presumed that any person acting in his public capacity as an officer was rightfully appointed."

Just those 3 sources of information allow you to see that the criminals had replaced the law with a counterfeit version. Out went the people (as ONE) policing themselves, and then policing any criminals, including criminals in government, and in place was placed (by fraud, by criminal means) Blind Obedience to Falsehood without question: obey

Obey, there is no other choice.

Some buy into it, some do not.

1

Have not been following that too closely, but will be now that you brought it up. If that be true, that's pretty disturbing.

I have been subbed to Viva Frei on you tube for quite some time now. He is a Canadian lawyer now vlogger...LOVE his content. He will be doing a live you tube podcast tomorrow with Atty Robert Barnes. Barnes is just brilliant. Together they have a very good and informational show. They talk about all of the current political stuff - mostly USA stuff but of what goes on in Canada as well.
I can't recommend their podcast enough.
I'll be tuned in tomorrow - as I usually do.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:122816
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.