slug.com slug.com
1
1 Like Show

Born in West Orange, New Jersey, 1958.
1 oldest sister
2 older brothers
2 younger brothers

My first experience with data that did not fit the Official Narrative (propaganda) was a book I read in School for a book report. The book described data concerning the sinking of the Ocean Liner (false flag) that was the casus belli (excuse: false flag) for Americans to be deceived into fighting the Central Banker War called World War One. The ship that was sunk (murdering people aboard) to move power to the criminals running the Central Bank Cabal was the Lusitania.

The next big event which caused me to fully reject the Official Narrative (propaganda) was the massacre at Waco misreported on National Television (Corporate Propaganda Organ of the Nation-State Aristocracy).

Full Bio

Comments

Anyone hear about this??
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 22, 2020:
I have books that document the usurpation of "medicine" in the U.S. (limited liability corporation) dating back to the crimes perpetrated by the "founders" of the AMA (American Medical Association) which was yet another treasonous fraud in collusion with treasonous criminals in government to MONOPOLIZE power and profit through SOCIALIZED MEDICINE. So...why would that be a surprise at all?
AIDS, Opium, Diamonds, and Empire - Nancy Turner Banks, M.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 22, 2020:
I just want to point out the free markets in the above is in parentheses, and therefore not a fact, but rather a fiction, or in a better term: a counterfeit. Free markets (liberty) affords everyone an equal legal footing to compete to raise quality and lower costs without exorbitant cost associated with the paying the counterfeiters to "defended" us from their attacks.
Time to arrest the traitors for treason
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 22, 2020:
If it is the law then the people have to enforce it, not the government. If instead the people are fooled into stupid servility, then the people get what they pay for, don't they? The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots Page 40 Private Prosecutors "For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action. Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, however, private prosecutors were prohibited from withdrawing the action pursuant to private agreement with the defendant. Court intervention was occasionally required to compel injured crime victims to appear against offenders in court and "not to make bargains to allow [defendants] to escape conviction, if they...repair the injury." Page 42 Law Enforcement as a Universal Duty "Law enforcement in the Founders' time was a duty of every citizen. Citizens were expected to be armed and equipped to chase suspects on foot, on horse, or with wagon whenever summoned. And when called upon to enforce the laws of the state, citizens were to respond "not faintly and with lagging steps, but honestly and bravely and with whatever implements and facilities [were] convenient and at hand. Any person could act in the capacity of a constable without being one, and when summoned by a law enforcement officer, a private person became a temporary ...
Shouldn't Covid-19's lethality inform the response to it?
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 22, 2020:
The steps required to accurately identify an infectious organism were not followed, as was the case with so-called AIDS, and that was done to use an existing sickness to then seize power by fomenting fear. If someone has evidence of a specific infectious organism then that information would be supplied. If people are so servile and stupid as to not even know if they ought to demand that information, then you get what you pay for, don't you?
Paradigm shifts are very hard.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 22, 2020:
Ectropy at work, on the job.
[fda.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 22, 2020:
https://www.fda.gov/media/136148/download "Based on the totality of scientific evidence available to FDA, it is reasonable to believe that LabCorp’s COVID-19 RT-PCR Test may be effective in diagnosing COVID-19, and that the known and potential benefits of the COVID-19 RT-PCR Test, when used for diagnosing COVID-19, outweigh the known and potential risks of such product; and" "... COVID-19 RT-PCR Test is a qualitative test for the detection of nucleic acid from SARS-CoV-2..." "Positive results do not rule out bacterial infection or coinfection with other viruses." "To perform LabCorp’s COVID-19 RT-PCR Test, SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid is first extracted, isolated and purified from upper and lower respiratory specimens (such as nasal, nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs, sputum, lower respiratory tract aspirates, bronchoalveolar lavage, and nasopharyngeal wash/aspirate or nasal aspirate). The purified nucleic acid is then reverse transcribed into cDNA followed by PCR amplification and detection using an authorized realtime (RT) PCR instrument.." What is the degree of (number of) amplifications? "FDA has reviewed the scientific information available to FDA, including the information supporting the conclusions described in Section I above, and concludes that LabCorp’s COVID19 RT-PCR Test, when used for qualitative detection of the SARS-CoV-2 in the specified population (as described in the Scope of Authorization of this letter (Section II)), meets the criteria set forth in Section 564(c) of the Act concerning safety and potential effectiveness." https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2011-title21/USCODE-2011-title21-chap9-subchapV-partE-sec360bbb-3 I can't find "Section 564(c) of the Act" to find "criteria set forth" "concerning safety and potential effectiveness." "I am waiving the following requirements for LabCorp’s COVID-19 RT-PCR Test during the duration of this EUA: • Current good manufacturing practice requirements, including the quality system requirements under 21 CFR Part 820 with respect to the design, manufacture, packaging, labeling, storage, and distribution of the COVID-19 RT-PCR Test " Does that mean immunity from liability for "bad" (not good) manufacturing practice? "Test have a process in place for reporting test results to healthcare providers and relevant public health authorities, as appropriate." Again, what is the measure of accuracy for this test to be able to identify individual people who are infected with a specific virus (a virus not identified the standard Gold Standard way), and what are the percentage of false positives expected or known during the testing of this test? "... may be effective...' means may not be effective. It detects "nucleic acid from ...
Why in the Hell Is This Traitor and the other Traitors Not in Prison for treason Yet ???
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 22, 2020:
This isn't that hard to conceptualize, so long as the brainwashing is somehow nullified. Has anyone heard of Assassination Politics by Jim Bell? The idea is a lottery of chances to win millions of dollars, and it depends entirely upon a trust that the players remain anonymous, hence the need for solid, trustworthy, encryption. The players guess when someone will die, and if someone dies on the date of the player's guess, then that player receives a portion of the Pot of Gold collected from total tickets sold in this Futures Market. It is based on a number of existing markets, and market processes, such as that process called Put Options. Well, Jim Bell spent some time in jail for that fictional Essay, but he is out and about these days, so anyone can look that up if they care to do so. The idea is also likened to Direct Democracy. Voters vote to get rid of bad or collectively perceived to be bad people, and that works like a bounty, a funding device to fund bounty hunters, assassins, head hunters, whatever you want to call it, and it has nothing to do with traditional governments that work basically the same way in principle. A group of people decide to knock someone out of competition and they then form a monopoly once all the competition is out of the game. So people need to know this fact, as it does matter, whereby these modern governments are merely organized crime hiding behind a very thin facade of "protection" as a monopoly racket: counterfeit government. But what would happen if America turned back to rule of law, or turned forward to rule of law if the backward word is unsavory to some? In each county an individual decides to accuse a Traitor like the one on the left above, or even the sell out, prostitute, comedian on the right above, and in each county there is actual rule of law, one county at a time, or all of them at once. The accusation moves along in the process according to the law of the land, because the evidence strongly suggests probable cause to warrant a court date for the accused on behalf of the private accuser, who may also be a private prosecutor in the case, there is then an investigation on behalf of the accuser, and the independent members of the independent grand jury assembled for this cause of action decide to present the accused with a court date. A registered letter is sent, and if the accused refuses to attend his opportunity to clear his name, then a warrant is issued for his arrest if that felonious fugitive accused of treason happens to wander into that county, again one county at a time, or all of them independently at once. Each county has at least one accuser, and each county actually follows the law of the land. I have not found a case yet, but it may be worth understanding ...
Why in the Hell Is This Traitor and the other Traitors Not in Prison for treason Yet ???
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 22, 2020:
"The judiciary of the United States is so constructed and extended, as to absorb and destroy the judiciaries of the several states; thereby rendering laws as tedious, intricate, and expensive, and justice as unattainable by a great part of the community, as in England; and enabling the rich to oppress and ruin the poor." George Mason, 1787 It is a much shorter step from One National Government to One World Government compared to a leap to a One World Government from 50 Competitive and Adaptive Independent States all preserving the common law where the power to present criminals in office with a court date before the people is preserved by the PRIVATE prosecutors, not a "government" that monopolizes that power so as to profit. To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine November 15, 1802 "But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property."
[facebook.com] Has anyone else heard a Rand Paul speech live?
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 21, 2020:
Title: Rand Paul Drops a NUKE From Senate Floor After Recovering From Coronavirus Rand Paul is back and he is FIRED UP. Every moment of this explosive speech is worth … See More
I thought you might like this authors perspective on how the internet influences how we think.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 21, 2020:
I read the whole thing and I thought about the ideas offered, and my conclusion is such that the writer tells a very obvious (to me) half truth. Missing from the data is the malignant malfeasance injected into society by specific people who constitute a specific group: parasites. To claim that Google (the people running it) are working to reach the goal of the best search engine, for example, misses the point at which they also have a goal to offer a second best search engine to the public, while they preserve the better search engine for their own use, and this was confessed by Elon Musk. If it were not malfeasance born from a malignant mind, driven by malice, then the best search engine, the most powerful one, would be offered to everyone, not just those who seek to divide so as to conquer. Why, for example, would those people running these better mouse traps (media, science, religion, law/government, industry, entertainment, nutrition/food, water supply, air supply, weather supply) design their better mouse traps with an obvious method by which power transfers from those who produce it to those who steal it with these devices they invent and produce under false slogans of universal benefit? They want to consolidate (monopolize) power and profit, and they know very well how to reach that goal, and all one has to do to understand this is to document the precise data that is censored by these oligarchs, the same oligarchs that one dare call them such: the Emperors that wear no clothes. Look at a modern spell checker and see if the word inculpatory exists in that world? How about ectropy? In the half truth there is a stick with a good end. The whole truth uncovers the end that stinks.
I thought you might like this authors perspective on how the internet influences how we think.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 21, 2020:
"In deciding when to eat, to work, to sleep, to rise, we stopped listening to our senses and started obeying the clock."
I thought you might like this authors perspective on how the internet influences how we think.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 21, 2020:
"But the machine had a subtler effect on his work. One of Nietzsche’s friends, a composer, noticed a change in the style of his writing. His already terse prose had become even tighter, more telegraphic. “Perhaps you will through this instrument even take to a new idiom,” the friend wrote in a letter, noting that, in his own work, his “‘thoughts’ in music and language often depend on the quality of pen and paper.” “You are right,” Nietzsche replied, “our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts.” Under the sway of the machine, writes the German media scholar Friedrich A. Kittler , Nietzsche’s prose “changed from arguments to aphorisms, from thoughts to puns, from rhetoric to telegram style.” "The human brain is almost infinitely malleable. People used to think that our mental meshwork, the dense connections formed among the 100 billion or so neurons inside our skulls, was largely fixed by the time we reached adulthood. But brain researchers have discovered that that’s not the case. James Olds, a professor of neuroscience who directs the Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study at George Mason University, says that even the adult mind “is very plastic.” Nerve cells routinely break old connections and form new ones. “The brain,” according to Olds, “has the ability to reprogram itself on the fly, altering the way it functions.” Worth reading in my opinion.
[naturalnews.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 21, 2020:
It may be worth the effort to look even deeper into the deep state: At around time 1:41 or so there is mention of The Not So Obvious Establishment (agent provocateurs controlling the opposition) and Bobby Kennedy who twice supported Killary Clinton. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgVs2H11weU&t=3262s
The swamp gets a little protection... from the judiciary. [govexec.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 21, 2020:
The National Judiciary is a product of the swamp, so... Why would this not be expected? "The judiciary of the United States is so constructed and extended, as to absorb and destroy the judiciaries of the several states; thereby rendering laws as tedious, intricate, and expensive, and justice as unattainable by a great part of the community, as in England; and enabling the rich to oppress and ruin the poor." George Mason, 1787 "The judicial power of the United States is to be vested in a supreme court, and in such inferior courts as Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The powers of these courts are very extensive; their jurisdiction comprehends all civil causes, except such as arise between citizens of the same state; and it extends to all cases in law and equity arising under the constitution. One inferior court must be established, I presume, in each state at least, with the necessary executive officers appendant thereto. It is easy to see, that in the common course of things, these courts will eclipse the dignity, and take away from the respectability, of the state courts. These courts will be, in themselves, totally independent of the states, deriving their authority from the United States, and receiving from them fixed salaries; and in the course of human events it is to be expected, that they will swallow up all the powers of the courts in the respective states." Robert Yates, 1787 "A number of characters, of the greatest eminence in this country, object to this government for its consolidating tendency. This is not imaginary. It is a formidable reality. If consolidation proves to be as mischievous to this country as it has been to other countries, what will the poor inhabitants of this country do? This government will operate like an ambuscade. It will destroy the state governments, and swallow the liberties of the people, without giving previous notice. If gentlemen are willing to run the hazard, let them run it; but I shall exculpate myself by my opposition and monitory warnings within these walls. But then comes paper money. We are at peace on this subject. Though this is a thing which that mighty federal Convention had no business with, yet I acknowledge that paper money would be the bane of this country. I detest it. Nothing can justify a people in resorting to it but extreme necessity. It is at rest, however, in this commonwealth. It is no longer solicited or advocated." Patrick Henry, 1788 "It is an observation of an approved writer, that judicial power is of such a nature, that when we have ascertained and fixed its limits, with all the caution and precision we can, it will yet be formidable, somewhat arbitrary and despotic — that is, after all our cares, we must leave a vast deal to the ...
Hippodrome anyone
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 20, 2020:
Good bait, rewarding consequence.
Thoughts ?
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 20, 2020:
The concept of mind control, or reaching the goal of blind obedience to falsehood without question, can be a tested for effect. An order issued (to be obeyed without question or else) that is something people would do on their own, had they thought of it, does not prove the fact of control, all that proves is competitive leadership. An order issued (to be obeyed without question or else) that is something a moron would not do, and people do it anyway, proves that the power is in fact reached: arbitrary government, also known as Subsidized Slavery of everyone to the detriment of everyone including the criminal counterfeiters who steal and corrupt the law power.
Anyone else been keeping up with this one?
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 20, 2020:
"Rep. Adam Schiff Is a Rotten, No-Good, Two-Faced Liar" When I see an indictment, then I can expect a Public Trial where the accused faces the country trough the representatives of the country: trial jurors. I can call Kilary Clinton a pedo mass murderer because the evidence strongly suggest that she is, but there is no indictment, no Public Trial, no "consent of the governed," is there? No, Joe, there is not, there has been no law in America since the criminals took over in 1789. So why pretend that the Naked Emperor is wearing any clothes? I'm curious.
Another installment of me "Thinking out Loud" When we see the word "addiction" images of pitiable ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 20, 2020:
Good song. The power struggle is at a crossroad, as demonstrated in many ways, not the least of which are demonstrations. Individuals deciding to invent their own solution by joining crowds gathering to demonstrate against the oder to obey without question or else, an order to separate: so-called "Social Distancing." Note: "Social Distancing" is a catch-phrase, and it is evidence of an obvious concerted effort to control people with massive injections of repetitive messages. The obvious goal is mind control, social engineering, false-advertising, fraud, and since these brain-washing techniques involve the organs of government, these "slogans" constitute inculpatory evidence of treason, if the people do ever return to rule of law. That brings up invention two, which is much more effective than forming crowds that can then be manipulated with agent provocateurs, to turn peaceful demonstrations into violent ones, which is then used to escalate violence exponentially. Invention two is a return to rule of law as if no such thing ever existed before, which is not difficult to understand since generations have lived in America since rule of law was swept under the rug in 1789. Invention two has two components. 1. Defense against criminal aggression perpetrated by criminals in government. 2. Offense against criminal aggressors perpetrating criminal aggression while they occupy government positions. Defense includes such public published notices lawfully transferred to criminal aggressors who occupy government positions. Examples: 1. Solemn Notice of Mixed War 2. Notice of Liability Those devices (lawful devices) are based upon the same principles as the Declaration of Independence. They are based upon the Military Lien Right and the Commercial Lien Right. Offense requires a more direct return from lawlessness perpetrated by people in government and a return to actual law which places each individual on an equal legal footing with each other individual: no divine right of kings, queens, oligarchs, aristocrats, rich people, powerful people, popular people, or people “deemed” essential by aggressive criminals occupying government positions. Examples: 1. Return to independent grand juries constituted from non-government office holders known as magistrates or justices of the peace, who work without pay (without profit, but may receive compensation for their time) and are therefore not “in it for the money” and therefore not biased to “protect and serve” the government with the government positions that pay so well and are immune from prosecution. 2. Return to trial by jury based upon common laws of free people as eluded to (not in detail) in the Bill of Rights (failed) amendments to the 1789 ...
Crude oil at 3.56 a barrel ... Anybody want to take a guess at what that means to the economy?
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 20, 2020:
A way of looking at this is as if the current situation is a moment in an ongoing power struggle between the power of individuals free to compete against all other individuals on an equal legal footing, and on the other side are those fighting to annihilate competition on an equal legal footing: monopoly of profit and power. The Age of Oil has lasted about 200 years or more about 1850 to 2020 and it has been a case study for this way of looking at the current situation as a moment in an ongoing power struggle. The Age of Oil neatly combined Central Banking Monopoly (The FED) with Subsidized Industry based upon Petroleum (Fossil Fuels is a fraudulent concept) Products which includes at least transportation and plastics. When, for example, Middle Eastern Oil producing areas began a return to competition instead of monopoly cartelization, that time period coincided with military enforcement of monopoly, as demonstrated in at least the Iranian "nationalization" of oil example in the 1950s and the Iraqi turn from "The Dollar Hegemony" (oil exchanged by U.S. denominated currency) to competitive alternatives. One was covert the other less covert. If this power struggle can be viewed in the light of truth versus the power of mind control, brain-washing, indoctrination (fraudulent education systems, and fraudulent information services: NEWS), then once again the same competition versus monopoly power struggle emerges. Going back in time to 1789 it becomes very clear as to when the forces fighting to consolidate power and profit (monopoly) won big as the competitive former colonies, which existed very briefly as independent competitive states, were consolidated into one Nation-State Legal Fiction Monopoly Power. All forms of aggressive violence depend upon effective falsehoods because people find ways to invent a competitive alternative when people know that they were, are, or will be subjected to aggressive attack, enslavement, and all the lies required to maintain Subsidized Slavery. That is why the Age of Oil is either going to move back to competition or a replacement monopoly condition will emerge. The Age of Virus?
Who do we trust to tell the truth? Who decides?
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 19, 2020:
In the comments below I read words that appear to me to be cases of so-called "moral relativism," and I don't know if that is true or not: are they cases of moral relativism? The example I am perceiving (from my unique angle of view) is the case where a criminal named Clinton spoke a now infamous message having to do with what "is is." Either someone willfully murders someone or not, and finding the facts that matter in that case become difficult when someone - as a matter of fact - willfully distorts the facts: commits fraud. Either someone then murders someone else, where now that one murderer begins a series of murders, a serial murderer, or not. The bodies could be claimed to have died of natural causes, depending upon what "natural" is?
This is a primer, I'd love questions and feedback to make it friendlier to someone who hasn't been ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 19, 2020:
"Tp Perceived Time Ip+ time seems to pass more quickly than Ip- time." Some notes on that above follows. In the mid 1800s in America a number of people were working on something similar and that group became the Anarchists, which was a title that was rejected by some of them. In their work they eluded to this qualitative or perceptive valuation of time. In "Equitable Commerce" by Josiah Warren the result of his work was to consider the value of employing a Time Store methodology for market exchanges where equity was a shared goal among traders, meaning that no one was disagreeing with that idea, so no one was out to get the other one during a trade. No one was willfully gaining at someone else's expense, as expressed in such sayings as "making a killing," or "taken to the cleaners." An evaluation of "Equitable Commerce" was published in "The Science of Society" by Stephen Pearl Andrews, and where "Equitable Commerce" factored Time as neutral, it was Andrews who pointed out a potential improvement in the calculation (used for equitable trades, voluntarily, as a goal) is what Andrews called "repugnance." In other words the measure of "repugnance" was Andrew's way of adding that positive and negative aspect of Time. Someone who hates cleaning toilets will evaluate an hour of labor for cleaning toilets much higher on his scale compared to someone who does not hate cleaning toilets. The one hating cleaning toilets may prefer, even enjoy, sweeping floors, while the one having little "repugnance" cleaning toilets may find sweeping floors very repugnant. Equitable Commerce: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Equitable_Commerce/gWhZMoa39mcC?hl=en=1=frontcover The Science of Society: http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/bright/andrews/scienceofsociety.pdf
This is a primer, I'd love questions and feedback to make it friendlier to someone who hasn't been ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 19, 2020:
There are at least one other individual working on this type of thing, at least as far as I can tell at this point. The following was well worth my time (2 hours): Systems Health. Foundations of Real Science. Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgVs2H11weU&t=22s Time 54:20 shows a chart similar to Physix 101, so I wonder if there are similarities, or benefits in comparing these viewpoints.
Guaranteed or your coins back.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 19, 2020:
No, no, no, I'm telling you for your own good. You are right, and once again I am wrong.
Who do we trust to tell the truth? Who decides?
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 18, 2020:
"It is a matter well known, and well understood, that by the laws of our country, every question which affects a man's life, reputation, or property, must be tried by twelve of his peers; and that their unanimous verdict is, alone, competent to determine the fact in issue." Court of Oyer and Terminer, at Philadelphia February Sessions, 1788 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGbYHJcMbz8=youtu.be=IwAR0cQitxuM-Iq3VAUcr9tQmO9DpUKFj8PfrG9ryrLzxNb81dZ2hZTBkW4eQ
Teen ordered to delete Instagram post about virus or face arrest- [bearingarms.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 18, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgVs2H11weU That one is long, but well worth the effort, and if you think that this is not orchestrated, then in my opinion you don't think.
Teen ordered to delete Instagram post about virus or face arrest- [bearingarms.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 18, 2020:
Dr. Andrew Kaufman https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sHqJaSZvHs=PLOj1z9M-_IItsYVTi_ro_gI1I9xDyZx7f=5&t=0s=IwAR1P5owNrgPRgjY9H6nc2lcXwoVXbDz_yY7TV4kztEHU3Y30SEy4Kz3G6-8 "What did they do to prove a virus? "1. Collect bronchoalvolar (lung) fluid and other samples 2. Find and separate genetic material from the sample 3. Sequence the genetic material 4. “rapidly developed a qualitative PCR detection...” (diagnostic test) 5. What about purifying the “virus” first??? Where did the genetic material come from?" That is also a Dr. explaining the Gold Standard process of purifying the infectious agent (product) from the victims of the infection, so as to "...know that a certain disease or certain set of symptoms is caused by a micro-organism..."
Teen ordered to delete Instagram post about virus or face arrest- [bearingarms.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 18, 2020:
Dr. Thomas Cowan: https://www.bitchute.com/video/TEThRUAWIxR1/?fbclid=IwAR11lmuSyo8POD9lwvJJRom-aIIDAAJm6I6VMwl2z9h2xeajqxwiqzne1cE Time: 6:54 or so... "...how we know that a certain disease or certain set of symptoms is caused by a micro-organism at all..." Mention of Koch's Postulates, explaining the procedure. I can enumerate some of the steps: 1. Use the procedure if a "virus" is suspected (don't assume) 2. Example: meningococcal meningitis 3. Everyone has the same symptoms (don't assume any symptom is good enough to fit the assumed virus) 4. Blood culture (grow culture of 100% pure meningococcus from blood taken from victims) 5. All people with this sickness have that one product growing out in their blood, and only that product found in the culture. 6. None of the healthy people tested have this product growing in their blood. 7. Isolate and purify the product (bacteria) from the blood culture, then inject that pure product into a susceptible Lab Rat (or if you are Bill Gates inject that into innocent people in Africa). 8. 100% of the injected Lab Rats (or undefended innocent people in Africa if you are Bill Gates) succumb to the same, or nearly the same, symptoms as everyone else whose blood grows this product. 9. 100% of the Lab Rats (or undefended innocent people) can be farmed to grow the same pure product from their blood. 10. The Way We Prove Infectious Ideology That is how it is done. That would prove something. If something is not proven, then it is not proven. Who decides to launch a campaign to control the people on the planet earth based upon an assumption? I can use my brain, with my moral conscience, logic, and reason, to piece the evidence together and claim right now that no one is that stupid, not if they have that much power. They know exactly what they are doing on a very specific schedule, based upon current realities. If you do not want to continue to be a Lab Rat, then my suggestion is to look into the actual law power: please.
[truepundit.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 17, 2020:
When ubiquitous, world-wide, parroting of falsehoods is a given, it may be a good idea to look at those who are using that opportunity to consume innocent people: Subsidized Slavery. "But let us not forget that violence does not live alone and is not capable of living alone: it is necessarily interwoven with falsehood. Between them lies the most intimate, the deepest of natural bonds. Violence finds its only refuge in falsehood, falsehood its only support in violence. Any man who has once acclaimed violence as his METHOD must inexorably choose falsehood as his PRINCIPLE. At its birth violence acts openly and even with pride. But no sooner does it become strong, firmly established, than it senses the rarefaction of the air around it and it cannot continue to exist without descending into a fog of lies, clothing them in sweet talk. It does not always, not necessarily, openly throttle the throat, more often it demands from its subjects only an oath of allegiance to falsehood, only complicity in falsehood." Alexandr I. Solzhenitsyn, Nobel Lecture, 1970
Covid-19 has exposed governmental failures. It might also offer hope for change- [reason.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 17, 2020:
The fraud (hoax is amoral not criminal) known as Covid-19 is a crime perpetrated by individuals upon individuals. Each one responsible for the fraud is guilty in fact, failing to account for those facts is analogous to the actual fraud. 1. The fraud involves willfully avoiding the process used to scientifically identify the precise cause of the common symptoms. 2. The fraud is allowed to then proceed to administer false cures. That is analogous to this: 1. The frauds are willfully not prosecuted as frauds because the "governments" are in on the fraud. 2. The frauds (including the frauds in government) proceed to rob the entire productive population of wealth under the guise of protecting them.
China and Democrats welcome economic devastation wrought by Covid-19.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 17, 2020:
Why is this fraud propagated by so many otherwise reasonable people? If there is no evidence that there is a virus, then why would anyone claim that there is one, without evidence? As it is with false accusation that potentially punish the innocent, the damage done includes: 1. The innocent is harmed by the very process that is in place (financed) to protect the innocent. 2. The guilty are free to continue harming innocent people undetected. 3. Those investing in the process in place to protect the innocent from the guilty pay for a process that harms innocent people unknowingly. 4. Innocent people become weaker as they are harmed by continued false accusations. 5. Guilty people become stronger as the power used to stop them is used instead to harm innocent people. It may be a good time to stop reading from the false script. It may be a good time to insist upon proof positive that the cause of injury in any case is in fact what the snake oil salesmen are claiming: again.
Well worth watching, on the origins of the Wuhan Flu. [youtube.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 17, 2020:
If there is no proof that it is a virus, then why claim that it is a virus? Why parrot the lie?
Teen ordered to delete Instagram post about virus or face arrest- [bearingarms.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 17, 2020:
I would like to point out that there is no evidence that there is a virus in this case, as with many other frauds perpetrated by very powerful criminals. So...why do people follow each other like lemmings off the cliff? Why parrot the lies? There is a standard procedure for accurately identifying a virus as explained by many people in the field of viral science. That procedure is willfully set aside so as to avoid the proof that would either prove that the virus in this case does exist as one, or prove otherwise. 1. A virus does exist. 2. A virus does not exist, effort to discover the actual cause is warranted. 3. Don't use the standard procedure to identify the cause of the symptoms when it is suspected that the cause may be a virus. 4. There is a very good chance that the cause is not a virus, which is then a lost opportunity to sell a vaccine to each of over 7 Billion people. Cui bono? The answer is very clearly an indictable crime, and at this level of potential damage the crime falls into the category of crimes against humanity. To willfully cause so much injury, so as then to sell snake oil to so many people, is not just treason, and treason is a capital crime. So rather than indict very powerful criminals perpetrating very serious crimes people instead start following the pied piper to the edge, and then what?
breitbart.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 17, 2020:
Note: People cannot bring suit in America, so how is it more important to sue "China?" If the law was in America then a law suit would be available to all the people as if all the people were treated on the same legal footing, in other words the law power would not be exclusively a power employed only by people with enough power and profit to spend the exorbitant costs of employing the law power: bring suit.
Democrats weaponize Covid-19 to advance anti-constitutional agenda.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 17, 2020:
That is demonstrably false. The "Constitution" was written so as to transfer power from individual people in individual States and to Consolidate that power into the hands of much fewer individuals who then run the Nation. That was clearly demonstrated as fact as soon as the Nation was then run by an all-powerful National President, an all-powerful National Congress, and an all-powerful National Judiciary. 1. Judiciary Act of 1789 That set-up the destruction of the common law, and therefore the destruction of the Bill of Rights. This was all warned about by the way during the Con Job behind the change from a Federation (voluntary association) of Independent Nations (States) turning by criminal means to a single, consolidated, Monopoly Nation State, created to Centralize Power and Profit, and turn all the people into property. Before the Con Job (Constitution of 1789) a "President" of the Federation could not call up a CONSCRIPTED (enslaved, involuntary) Army (kidnapping "soldiers" from every formerly Independent State) so as to invade one State and force people to pay a tax. What was The Whiskey Rebellion Proclamation? It was a total disregard for the common law, natural (inalienable) rights, and the Bill of Rights. What was the Alien and Sedition Acts? Warnings during the Con Job: George Mason: "Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions should arise under this government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of those powers; could not Congress, under the idea of providing for the general welfare, and under their own construction, say that this was destroying the general peace, encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people? And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury?" This essay appeared in The Massachusetts Gazette, December 7, 1787, as reprinted From The Freeman's Journal; (Or, The North-American Intelligencer?): "The abuse which has been thrown upon the state of Rhode Island seems to be greatly unmerited. Popular favor is variable, and those who are now despised and insulted may soon change situations with the present idols of the people. Rhode Island has out done even Pennsylvania in the glorious work of freeing the Negroes in this ...
For this present effort (currently) the idea is to bridge the gap between reasonable defensive ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 16, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eP98ZKt709A “The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.”
I've been having these visions for a long time now but I think it's time to share them.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 16, 2020:
It is not rich versus poor, so the black majic works on someone who thinks that it is rich versus poor. The power of falsehood (those who know are powerful, those who do not know are powerless) convinces people that toilet paper money (if you had the license to print it) makes someone rich. Rather than seeing that there is an individual who dreamed up the idea to monopolize (give himself license to take away everyone else's license) everything of value (truth/media/information, science, medical care, defense, monetary exchange/economy, religion, entertainment, etc.) people are led to believe that the cause of their lack of power is a mythical Corporation: Legal Fiction.
This is a good description of the geopolitical tension between China and the US and the rest of the ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 15, 2020:
I have a real hard time with some of this shit: Time: 31:OO or so.... "...all we have is a 230 year old constitution..." There are people who do not obey dictates without question in America, because to do so, without thinking, is absolutely irresponsible. That is what we have in America. Along with those types of people in command of their own moral conscience, their own authority, are people who might as well be robots. Why is this discussion moving along as if it is a given, an assumption of fact, that "we" are one? Our oneness is one against the oneness of China. What a bunch of baloney.
This is a good description of the geopolitical tension between China and the US and the rest of the ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 15, 2020:
Time 29:00 or so... The guy invests in (promotes) the idea that this "pandemic" is a "virus" and therefore "we" must get a "vaccine" in order to deal with this "virus." Where is the evidence that this is a virus? "We" are supposed to believe Bill Gates, because he is such a nice guy?
This is a good description of the geopolitical tension between China and the US and the rest of the ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 15, 2020:
OK, once again, as if the idea was somehow confirmed as true, which can't happen, this guy claims that the mechanisms put in place by "our" founders was to prevent a majority from changing our government. What does he think happened in 1789? The criminal Federalist Party turned a former Federation of States (a voluntary mutual defense association where each state had an equal footing) into a Monopoly Government Power or Nation-State Corporation Legal Fiction. There can be no greater change of government as this change. From voluntary mutual defense against a foreign invader, the change was then to domestic invader government taking money from everyone to finance the enslavement of everyone. From voluntary mutual defense to Subsidized Slavery of everyone in every state to finance those who run the dictatorship. From rule of law to no law. How can a government ever change more than that, and how was that accomplished? A Majority in each State managed to be bought, lured, or extorted into voting for the change from federation to Consolidation (Nationalization) during the RATification process. A very slim Majority was eventually worn down, forced, or lured into voting for the change from lawful government to criminals running the government. And this guy claims to know what was the cause and what is the cure? How about a return to rule of law? If there are a set of rules that almost everyone is subjected to: must be obeyed or else, and those who write those rules exempt themselves, then what do you have in fact?
This is a good description of the geopolitical tension between China and the US and the rest of the ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 15, 2020:
Time 25:00 or so... The guy on the right claims falsely that the way "our" founders set-up our system was to make it difficult to get anything done. In the first place "our" founders were locked in a dire power struggle between 2 opposing groups: 1. Nationalists (Oligarchs, Aristocrats, Slave Consumers and Slave Traders-Human Traffickers, Central Banking Frauds and the accompanying Summary Justice Court System investors, Warmongers and the collectivist mercantile corporatist investors who finance all sides in war for profit) 2. Proponents of Rule of Law, common law, the law of the land, and this group were proponents of federalism The Nationalists were able to move forward Nationalism (a Profitable Government Monopoly whereby the Aristocrats running it consider the people as property to be consumed) under - the Nationalists moved from Federation to a Monopoly Nation-State - under a facade (a false front) of Federalism. In other words the Federalist Party did not promote, invest in, found, frame, or construct a federation under federalist principles, they were Nationalists (virtually identical to Marxist Communism) seeking to create and enforce a National Government Monopoly Power, and this group was behind the first Con Con, which was a Con Job. The Federalists were for a Federal Association under federalist principles, but this group was falsely labeled as "anti" federalists by the Nationalists who ran the Fake News Federalist Papers. That is explained well enough by Thomas Paine here: To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine November 15, 1802 "But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property. It is, therefore, no wonder that the "Rights of Man" was attacked by that faction, and its author continually abused. But let them go on; give them rope enough and they will put an end to their own insignificance. There is too much common sense and independence in America to be long the dupe of any faction, foreign or domestic. "But, in the midst of the freedom we enjoy, the licentiousness of the papers called Federal (and I know not why they are called so, for they are in their principles anti-federal and despotic), is a dishonor to the character of the country, and an injury to its reputation and importance abroad. They represent the whole people of America as destitute of public principle and private manners." A major cause for the fragmentation of society was the turn from federal principles (equal footing under the law) and the move to National Monopoly Enforcement, that happened in 1789. We lost our social solidarity when the incompetent and...
Surplus Power lowers the cost of innovation.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 14, 2020:
"Ix * T + W → $ Idea/Influence over time plus work yields money." Does money mean P where P is power, as in power to purchase? "Ix+ * T + W → $+ Innovation/Positive Influence over time plus work yields profit." Is "profit" (+) "money" calculated due to the fact that influence no longer means a set of thoughts and actions that can be both (or either) destructive or productive, and by adding the qualification of "Positive" (+) to "influence" the idea is to calculate only productive influence and to no longer calculate both forms of influence? Example: counterfeit money (fraud = destructive = power transfer, not power produced) no one profits, while positive investments using available power to create more power to create = profit? An example is offered in the phrasing: give a man a fish and the man eats a meal, teach a man to fish (innovation/positive influence) and the man can teach someone else to fish too? "∞Ix+ * T + W → ∞$+ Infinite Innovation/Positive Influence over time plus work yields infinite profit." Adding the idea of infinity (or infinite time while the formula accurately works as stated) can be demonstrated incrementally. Is that helpful? Example: 1 innovation/positive influence unit, such as "the wheel," or "jury duty," to the 10th power (a whole laundry list of very many innovations/positive influences) still take time to spawn in human brains and then distribute from brain to brain, and then as time passes a Star Trek type "Replicator" works by gathering sunlight and fed with basic elements to give people any item on a food menu in seconds. Now, unlike the Start Trek version, the user of the innovation merely speaks "Hot-dog A" and a Hot-dog formerly made at Yankee Stadium in 1998 is created in the device, for consumption, rather than having to type in a code on a keypad: voice activation innovation. "∞Ix+ * T → ∞$+ - W Infinite Innovation/Positive Influence over time yields infinite profit without work." So the "without work" is a theoretical "Replicator" "3D printing" "AI Robotic" future where people still demand more innovation/positive influence (humans still wake up and want new experiences, and want things they can't do themselves) and therefore other people still supply to meet those demands, so there are still "jobs" and "employment" and reasons to wake up in the morning, but those future markets are less labor intensive? "Infinite money yields infinite Ideas, Time, or Work. ∞$ → ∞I ∥ ∞T ∥ ∞W" I got to here the first time I read through the formulas and arrive again at the same demand: What definition works in that formula for $: What exactly is money in that formula?
The Key Difference Between Conservatives and Libertarians, and Why It Matters
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 14, 2020:
"Conservatism is a political theory designed to secure the blessings of liberty, while libertarianism is simply and only a market theory." If someone belongs in a group, then that can be an accurate account of that fact, or someone can by making up false reasons for claiming that people (fictional people) belong in fictional groups. Ask any individual if they belong in any group and note the answer. Then ask why that individual belongs in that group and note the answer. Do that until 100 people independently place themselves in specified groups for specified reasons. Publish your findings, and then have authority to speak about 100 people belonging to groups. How many groups did you find? How many reasons did you find for people claiming to belong to those groups?
SOMETHING TO CONSIDER ... Do WE Really KNOW What “COVID-19” Is?
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 14, 2020:
"All that hilariously misguided and counterproductive criticism the media piled on chloroquine (purely for political reasons) as a viable treatment will now go down as the biggest Fake News blunder to rule them all. The media actively engaged their activism to fight ‘bad orange man’ at the cost of thousands of lives. Shame on them."
FACTS OR THEORY?
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 13, 2020:
"Fact 1. The Covid19 virus likely came from bats - the intermediate horseshoe bat." Is that likely a pseudo-fact?
BITCHUTE EXCLUSIVE: Dr Thomas Cowan Systematically Decimates the COVID-19 Lie! [bitchute.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 13, 2020:
https://theinfectiousmyth.com/ The Infectious Myth A Book Project by David Crowe
Surplus Power lowers the cost of innovation.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 13, 2020:
I will have to spend some time looking at that above. Rather than start another Post I will paste the following here: Left v Right A tale of one coin. First it may be a good idea to visualize a sphere and to understand that no matter which way the ball is turned the sphere looks round. While speaking with a man from the East a very basic thought entered my brain and caused one of those moments of clarity eluded to in the word epiphany. Up until this particular moment in time and place I had been conceptualizing both Left and Right in such a way as to attempt to make sense of all the various and often opposite meanings for Left and Right ideas. I could call Left v Right a battle between ideologies, but that is an entirely different coin. That was what clicked in my brain at that moment of that epiphany: this must have a basic, principled origin, a foundation from which this Left v Right idea (coin) was launched. So what can I do with this epiphany? How about the idea that finds its way to an individual in time and place, what happens during that process? Someone thinking (the coin of Left v Right) either thinks “How do I…?” or “How do we…?” That can happen any time, any place, for any reason, or for any cause that inspires an individual to think. That is much more obvious when dealing with an Economic RIGHT leaning brain exercise known as the Robinson Crusoe Problem. For practical (reasonable) reasons Robinson Crusoe is less likely to think LEFT leaning thoughts: “How do we…?” Robinson Crusoe is all alone on an Island for the purposes of this RIGHT leaning economic problem solving exercise. We, as a species, are stranded on a planet, and reason, logic, and moral duty dictates that we ask LEFT leaning questions. How do we, for example, hold each other accountable, so as not to feed the criminals, because feeding the criminals makes the criminals stronger. The criminals can become so strong that they claim to be the only ONE group worthy of the power to solve the criminal problem. How do I solve the criminal problem? I look in the mirror. How do we solve the criminal problem? I suggest strongly that we look in the mirror before joining the ONE group claiming to be the only ONE group worthy of the power to solve the criminal problem.
The NYT is extremely skeptical of Tara Reade's sexual assault accusation against Joe Biden.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 12, 2020:
These types of messages may be purged.
Liberals want fair results.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 12, 2020:
To be fair the word fair can mean just about anything under the sun. True Civilization. Warren, Josiah (1863) Boston, Mass. 496. Constitutions, statutes, rules, axioms, and all verbal formulas are subject to various and conflicting interpretations, all growing out of the inherent and indestructible Individuality of different minds. A compact between parties who do not understand it alike is null and void, because they have not consented to the same thing, even if they have signed it! What is to be done with this fact? We can do nothing with it but accept it as an irrefutable truth, and provide means of dispensing with whatever conflicts with it. http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/bright/warren/conclusion.html
Joe's Law What is it? Please post it again.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 12, 2020:
Productive power produced (such as sunlight, oxygen, food, a better mouse trap, etc.) into oversupply (much more than ever before) reduces the price of productive power (think a very low cost for all "utilities" and transportation fuel which is power) while purchasing power increases (a unit of the highest quality and lowest cost money is worth more and more and more: increases) because productive power reduces the cost of producing productive power. How much more productive power can be produced if less, and less, and less power was stolen by criminals claiming to be the ONLY government? That is not actually a difficult question. As to Left v Right (while I am at it) If Right is one single individual (stranded on a deserted island) and Left is everyone all at once (everyone in some way or another connecting and therefore affecting each other in some accurately measurable way), then the current versions of Right and Left are comparatively less powerful.
Want Freedom Vote Libertarian [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 12, 2020:
When the Libertarian Party membership combines with the Oath Keepers, 3 Percenters, and Grand Jury proponents, the result may be a combined effort to return to rule of law: Voluntary Association for Mutual Defense, with common law due process. If that happens then power is moved from the few to the many and a vote that counts is a vote to invest into the process that hold to account the worst criminals ever to disgrace the human gene pool: actually draining the swamp. People may eventually learn a lesson about dictatorships, a lesson learned (but forgotten) long ago. The Athenian Constitution: Government by Jury and Referendum by Roderick T. Long "The practice of selecting government officials randomly (and the Athenians developed some fairly sophisticated mechanical gadgets to ensure that the selection really was random, and to make cheating extremely difficult) is one of the most distinctive features of the Athenian constitution. We think of electoral politics as the hallmark of democracy; but elections were almost unknown at Athens, because they were considered paradigmatically anti-democratic. Proposals to replace sortition with election were always condemned as moves in the direction of oligarchy. "Why? Well, as the Athenians saw it, under an electoral system no one can obtain political office unless he is already famous: this gives prominent politicians an unfair advantage over the average person. Elections, they thought, favor those wealthy enough to bribe the voters, powerful enough to intimidate the voters, flashy enough to impress the voters, or clever enough to deceive the voters. The most influential political leaders were usually Horsemen anyway, thanks to their social prominence and the political following they could obtain by dispensing largesse among the masses. (One politician, Kimon, won the loyalty of the poor by leaving his fields and orchards unfenced, inviting anyone who was hungry to take whatever he needed.) If seats on the Council had been filled by popular vote, the Horsemen would have disproportionately dominated it — just as, today, Congress is dominated by those who can afford expensive campaigns, either through their own resources or through wealthy cronies. Or, to take a similar example, in the United States women have had the vote for over half a century, and yet, despite being a majority of the population, they represent only a tiny minority of elected officials. Obviously, the persistence of male dominance in the economic and social sphere has translated into women mostly voting for male candidates. The Athenians guessed, probably rightly, that the analogous prestige of the upper classes would lead to commoners mostly voting for aristocrats. "That is why the Athenians saw elections as an ...
Bill Gates Responds To Coronavirus Vaccine Conspiracy [youtube.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 12, 2020:
"...crazy rummors..." "In 2010, Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO saying, “We must make this the decade of vaccines.” https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/government-corruption/gates-globalist-vaccine-agenda-a-win-win-for-pharma-and-mandatory-vaccination/
Should the Lock Down Be Stopped Let things get back to normal and ban all 5G towers the cause of ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 12, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSu8Yz823lo We ought to do our due diligence. Not only defensively, but those clear and present dangers, who wear clothes and eat food, have names, and endanger so many people, warrant prosecution: accountability of the facts that matter in this case.
CBS News. "New York State Has More Coronavirus Cases Than Any Country On Earth." [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 12, 2020:
Total Reported Deaths in New York City 2016: 54,200 2015: 54,120 2014: 53,034 https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/doh/downloads/pdf/vs/2016sum.pdf Why would anyone today trust "NEWS" broadcasts as if it were The Gospel Truth?
2 billion Human Race Has To Die For Civilization To Be Sustainable, So How Do We Want To Do This?
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 11, 2020:
I'll play, Onion. Those who believe it take that cure. Those who don't invest in such bullshit, prove them wrong.
Assuming the constitution is to protect the rights of its citizens and entities, if a media entity ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 11, 2020:
"Assuming the constitution is to protect the rights of its citizens and entities, if a media entity has interests and controls out side our nation, should it be afforded the same protections?" That is a false assumption. The Constitution of 1789 was a fraudulent take-over of an existing federation of independent states, a fraud perpetrated by a group of powerful people whose power depended upon Central Banking Fraud, Slave Labor, Perpetual War, and the assumption of ownership of all the land in all the states. If you instead frame the question as a reference to the Bill of Rights, not the Constitution of 1789, then it can be assumed that you are speaking about the common law. Your question would then be: Assuming the common law is to protect the rights of all the people all the time without exception, then does that same use of that same tool apply to people who do not abide by the common law? The answer is no. If someone abides by the common law then someone will subject themselves to due process according to the common law, a voluntary agreement, so by reasonable application of logic someone who will not abide by the common law is someone who decides not to be protected by the common law, someone outside the law: an outlaw. Example: "That the question was not whether, by a declaration of independence, we should make ourselves what we are not; but whether we should declare a fact which already exists: That, as to the people or Parliament of England, we had always been independent of them, their restraints on our trade deriving efficacy from our acquiescence only, and not from any rights they possessed of imposing them; and that, so far, our connection had been federal only, and was now dissolved by the commencement of hostilities: That, as to the king, we had been bound to him by allegiance, but that this bond was now dissolved by his assent to the late act of Parliament, by which he declares us out of his protection, and by his levying war on us —a fact which had long ago proved us out of his protection, it being a certain position in law, that allegiance and protection are reciprocal, the one ceasing when the other is withdrawn:" Those are common law principles expressed by one of the members of the first congress in 1776 during the discussion about the idea of publishing a Declaration of Independence. Those who agree to protect each other (common law principles) do so, as demonstrated over time, as a matter of fact. Why would that change because someone from another area, Europe, Asia, Australia, wanders into the area that is under the common law principles? If anyone foreign or domestic turns from voluntary mutual defense of everyone (common law principles), then they decide, on their own authority, to ...
"Consider what is at stake if we don’t resist the blatant attempt at a power grab by the ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 11, 2020:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gOp7MhaIRWZC/
Gun-grabber desperation showing as more Americans buy firearms- [ammoland.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 10, 2020:
If it were not a Hoax (treasonous fraud at the top) then those who are essential would be the most protected, not the least. So...put on your Bullshit Detectors, and put on your Legalese Translator: Essential means Expendable
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 10, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeup9D0JGcU=emb_logo "ChiComs are liars and this is WAR! The main player are communist Chinese but there are plenty of other villians that shall be called out later. Xi is weak but desperate. Hear me out."
I first became aware of this story after coming across the attached meme.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 10, 2020:
Who benefits (cui bono)? https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/government-corruption/gates-globalist-vaccine-agenda-a-win-win-for-pharma-and-mandatory-vaccination/?fbclid=IwAR0E7wQgHckdPu9lywPfL9Vl-5h_9Z-IpygJ58Mdn1Lmu3S4xlShQq7hs6k Gates’ Globalist Vaccine Agenda: A Win-Win for Pharma and Mandatory Vaccination
The real "Chinese virus": rising authoritarianism in a pandemic world- [thelibertarianrepublic.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 10, 2020:
There is no LAW. If there were "Public Safety" laws, then why would serial murderers be making so much money on their past, present, and future victims? Come on people, this isn't rocket science. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/government-corruption/gates-globalist-vaccine-agenda-a-win-win-for-pharma-and-mandatory-vaccination/?fbclid=IwAR0-ra3q9c7zsK2utAepf40pmQJZiRy_8Ak-CJ31PN7_m-gPNYZRGdyLLA4 "In 2010, Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO saying, “We must make this the decade of vaccines.” A month later, Gates said in a Ted Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population”. In 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a “tetanus” vaccine campaign. Independent labs found a sterility formula in every vaccine tested. After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade. Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines."
Fauci: Americans Could Carry COVID-19 Immunity Papers | The Daily Caller
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 10, 2020:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/government-corruption/gates-globalist-vaccine-agenda-a-win-win-for-pharma-and-mandatory-vaccination/ Gates’ Globalist Vaccine Agenda: A Win-Win for Pharma and Mandatory Vaccination By Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Chairman, Children’s Health Defense
Fauci: Americans Could Carry COVID-19 Immunity Papers | The Daily Caller
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 10, 2020:
Alexander I. Solzhenitsyn describes personal experience dealing with the effects of brainwashing on people when criminals take-over the government. Those whose brains are washed so completely will be those suffering the tortures of the Gulag while they maintain the idea that their tormentors are STILL the lawful authorities, and they must have made a mistake. No amount of evidence can convince some people that they are subjected to lies. I call that Blind Obedience to Falsehood Without Question. It is a very powerful state of being. It is a virus, a cancer, and the cure is not to pile on even more lies.
As more death data becomes available, Covid-19 looks less and less like the Flu... [reason.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 9, 2020:
Cooking the numbers (fraud, treason, misprision, nonfeasance, misfeasance, malfeasance, and more crimes against humanity) may be a fact that matters in this case. Who cares to know? What is the process by which facts that matter are officially, legally, lawfully, morally, rightfully, found within the limits of human error?
Western Civilization is founded on values and sacrifice.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 9, 2020:
Money produced and enforced as a criminal Monopoly under the guise of "government," is not the same as money produced in free markets by well defended free people in liberty. Debt owned to the criminals running the counterfeit money monopoly power is not the same as the free exchange of value traded by free people trading in free markets. Marxist dogma is indistinguishable from Fascist or Nationalist dogma, as to what is or is not money: obey without question or suffer. "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned." https://www.usdebtclock.org/
Attack on self defense insurance: under reported news.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 7, 2020:
Un-freedom, un-free markets, un-free competition for insurance against future probable losses, is un-natural, it is dictatorial, tyrannical, and lacking that liberty to demand and produce the best (at the lowest cost) is un-adaptive, and therefore a cause of extinction.
Joe’s interview this week with Eric Weinstein -- a three hour plus marathon — opens with a ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 5, 2020:
At time 7 or so Eric claims that corporate interests are opposite American interests. That is a false statement, or half true, and my guess is that this guy is propagating the Legal Fiction Deception, or is subject to it. If a few units of power (or many) can be temporarily stolen (by slave labor or irresponsible pollution) with a decision to "move to China," then the decision maker makes a decision accountable to the decision maker: to invest in slave labor and to invest in irresponsible (unaccountable) pollution that will - in fact - injure the slaves. So...is it a good idea to know the whole truth, or is it better to listen only to the half truths told by people who get rich so long as they are not held to the whole truth?
DR KAUFMAN M.D. EXPLAINS HOW THIS IS ALL FAKE [youtube.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 5, 2020:
https://www.inpowermovement.com/ There Is Beauty In Freedom
Hand sanitizer production halted as FDA stands in the way.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 5, 2020:
"Unfortunately, the United States leads the world in COVID-19 cases, partially due to government failure and partially due to circumstances beyond the control of government." How accurate are these numbers?
[youtube.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 5, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ab1-UEOnHE
[youtube.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 5, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfeDhYQaGwU=emb_logo "GET BACK to WORK!"
COVID-19? [brighteon.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 5, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCBIAmtaKuA
Crowd Control on Aisle 5 [youtube.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 4, 2020:
InPower Notice of Liability https://support.inpowermovement.com/inpowers-notice-of-liability-nol-document-templates/
New member with a USMC name.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 2, 2020:
Part II (Real Military vs Fake Government): "The news of this Desertion filled the City with tumult and confusion; Those who Wished well to the army, made all the attempts they could to Scale the Walls to join it, for the gates were shut by the Senates order. The fathers who had Sons among the mutineers. Reproached their Degeneracy; Wives Lamented the absence of their husbands and all apprehended a Civil war. The Senate was not Less agitated then the Rest. Some were for violent measures and Repeling force by force others were of opinion that Gentle arts were to be used; and that even a Victory over such Enemies would be worse then a Defeat. Atlength therefore it was Resolved to Send a messenger to Entreat the army to Return home and Declare their grievances, promising at the Same time an oblivian of all that had passed. This message was Treated by the army with Disdain; So that the Senate were oblidged to begin afresh to Consult upon the proper Steps to be taken, and whether force or Condecention was the wisest Course to persue. Accordingly,! after Chosing new Consuls, tho not without Difficulty, as none at first would offer for the office. They Entered upon the Deliberation with ah Earnestness Equail to the Importance of the Cause. Menenius Agrippa one of the Wisest and best of the Senators was of opinion that the people were to be Indulged; because the Roman Dominions could neither be Extend nor preserved Without them. The Late Dictator Valerius Seconded his opinion With a warmth unusual to one of his advanced age. He upbraided the Senate With their Duplicity, and urged the necessity of the peoples shareing those advantages Which the Rich were Determined to Engross. Apius on the other hand Still adhereing to his principles. Declaimed with great Violence against making the smallest Concessions to the multitude. He observed that if they granted to the people when Ennemies What they had Refused them when friends, it would be an argument of their fears and not their justice; that the yo^ng patritions and their Clients Were able to Defend the City, Even tho its ungreatful Inhabittants Should Desert it; that the multitude never know where to Stop in their Demands and that Every Concession would be productive of fresh Claims and louder Importunities. The Body of the Senate to whom principly the people were Debtors, only wanted the Speciousness of Such arguments to cover their avarice, those of the younger Sort also who were flattered by the orator, applauded his speach with Indecent Zeal. The Consuls therefore who notwithstanding this show of a Debate, Saw the necessity there was of complying with the people in order to prevent such Violent measures as the Senate were Runing into, for that Day broke up the assembly, at the Same time Intimating to the ...
Will Covid-19 kill the Constitution?
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 1, 2020:
What was the Judiciary Act of 1789? What was the Enumeration Act of 1790? What was the Whiskey Rebellion Proclamation of 1794? What was the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798? Americans didn't get far from the end of the War of Aggression by the people running the English Empire before the Bill of Rights to the 1789 (slave trading) Constitution was thrown out the window entirely. Americans didn't even get out of the 18th Century before the criminals retook the law power, turning government into a profitable monopoly and the people as hereditary property.
[m.youtube.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 1, 2020:
So random selection of government employees is bad, but teaching (who teaches) people to "vote" a certain way is good, and the ship analogy serves to teach people to vote better? What about the following information? The Athenian Constitution: Government by Jury and Referendum by Roderick T. Long "The practice of selecting government officials randomly (and the Athenians developed some fairly sophisticated mechanical gadgets to ensure that the selection really was random, and to make cheating extremely difficult) is one of the most distinctive features of the Athenian constitution. We think of electoral politics as the hallmark of democracy; but elections were almost unknown at Athens, because they were considered paradigmatically anti-democratic. Proposals to replace sortition with election were always condemned as moves in the direction of oligarchy. "Why? Well, as the Athenians saw it, under an electoral system no one can obtain political office unless he is already famous: this gives prominent politicians an unfair advantage over the average person. Elections, they thought, favor those wealthy enough to bribe the voters, powerful enough to intimidate the voters, flashy enough to impress the voters, or clever enough to deceive the voters. The most influential political leaders were usually Horsemen anyway, thanks to their social prominence and the political following they could obtain by dispensing largesse among the masses. (One politician, Kimon, won the loyalty of the poor by leaving his fields and orchards unfenced, inviting anyone who was hungry to take whatever he needed.) If seats on the Council had been filled by popular vote, the Horsemen would have disproportionately dominated it — just as, today, Congress is dominated by those who can afford expensive campaigns, either through their own resources or through wealthy cronies. Or, to take a similar example, in the United States women have had the vote for over half a century, and yet, despite being a majority of the population, they represent only a tiny minority of elected officials. Obviously, the persistence of male dominance in the economic and social sphere has translated into women mostly voting for male candidates. The Athenians guessed, probably rightly, that the analogous prestige of the upper classes would lead to commoners mostly voting for aristocrats. "That is why the Athenians saw elections as an oligarchical rather than a democratic phenomenon. Above all, the Athenians feared the prospect of government officials forming a privileged class with separate interests of their own. Through reliance on sortition, random selection by lot, the Council could be guaranteed to represent a fair cross-section of the Athenian people — a kind of proportional ...
The Problems Facing the West | Stefan Molyneux Interview - YouTube
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 31, 2020:
About time 8:27 or so... "...normally revolutions were really about preventing tyranny..." No. The lie is a weapon. If a lie can convince people that the law (voluntary mutual defense association, common law, trial by jury, grand juries, trial juries, federation, free market government services) is aggressive enslavement of everyone under one tyrannical dictator running a dictatorship, then it would be, by that false narrative, revolutionary to fight against such tyranny. Why is that so hard for anyone (I know of no one alive today) to see?
I got the "Log into your SLUG account" AGAIN this morning Interesting, does anyone know what is ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 31, 2020:
I only have SLug, no IDW.
Indicted Harvard carbon nanotube bio-warfare professor Charles M.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 30, 2020:
"NESARA / GESARA a Law that would change our Lives!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=836&v=kbRiTFc-w1A=emb_logo
Indicted Harvard carbon nanotube bio-warfare professor Charles M.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 30, 2020:
"Dr. Charles Lieber According to court documents, since 2008, Dr. Lieber who has served as the Principal Investigator of the Lieber Research Group at Harvard University, which specialized in the area of nanoscience, has received more than $15,000,000 in grant funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Department of Defense (DOD). These grants require the disclosure of significant foreign financial conflicts of interest, including financial support from foreign governments or foreign entities. Unbeknownst to Harvard University beginning in 2011, Lieber became a “Strategic Scientist” at Wuhan University of Technology (WUT) in China and was a contractual participant in China’s Thousand Talents Plan from in or about 2012 to 2017. China’s Thousand Talents Plan is one of the most prominent Chinese Talent recruit plans that are designed to attract, recruit, and cultivate high-level scientific talent in furtherance of China’s scientific development, economic prosperity and national security. These talent programs seek to lure Chinese overseas talent and foreign experts to bring their knowledge and experience to China and reward individuals for stealing proprietary information. Under the terms of Lieber’s three-year Thousand Talents contract, WUT paid Lieber $50,000 USD per month, living expenses of up to 1,000,000 Chinese Yuan (approximately $158,000 USD at the time) and awarded him more than $1.5 million to establish a research lab at WUT. In return, Lieber was obligated to work for WUT “not less than nine months a year” by “declaring international cooperation projects, cultivating young teachers and Ph.D. students, organizing international conference[s], applying for patents and publishing articles in the name of” WUT." https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-and-two-chinese-nationals-charged-three-separate-china-related?fbclid=IwAR3ME0dx2U_kckO2JUVnPDlSElp1zKgHU5XFIGDk-Qlis8XqYGdLU1UT6_k
When Waco went wacko
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 29, 2020:
A superficial opinion is not warranted. Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum http://www.web-ak.com/waco/ Waco - The Big Lie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23cZdSvi8Ao Waco II, The Big Lie Continues https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABiCv_KP1BA No more free Wacos. A National Three Percent Declaration Regarding the Situation in Harney County, Oregon. "Why would I want to do that? There's plenty of you federal sonsabitches around here." http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2016/01/no-more-free-wacos-national-three.html
IDW political party? Bring it on, please!
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 28, 2020:
If people only knew what the purpose of actual government is, then they would have something to compare to that which is counterfeiting actual government, and each in turn would polarize in that way. A. Actual government is as a truth serum: people held to account, done so accurately, done so universally with the same principled process: such as due process, as in trial by jury according to the common law. B. Those who can't keep on stealing without lying won't want actual law, they will therefore go double down on the counterfeit version. Actual law is summed up on many phrases, such as Voluntary Mutual Defense Association. Another phrase is The Law of the Land, derived from Latin during the Roman Empire subjugating the English people to Roman Summary JustUS courts. Legem Terrae (the law of the land) is the ancient law brought to England by the Saxons after the inevitable fall of the dictatorial Roman Empire. Another word for Voluntary Mutual Defense Association is Federation, the example of which was the American Revolutionary government between 1774 and 1789, before the Nationalists (criminals) took-over, and they reinstated dictatorial rule in Summary JustUS courts. A problem occurs when the criminals have successfully brainwashed people for over 200 years causing them to fight each other for a carrot on a string, which is their false sense of power over their rivals in the Election Psycho, a cycle of fraudulent "elections" of successive dictators running the dictatorship. If people learn the actual law power, the actual law process, then they would have a real choice between option A (actual government) and option B (dictatorship). Actual law is covered up, but not completely, by those running the dictatorship, it takes a lot of LOOT to do so, hence the National Debt.
I’m sorry, but could someone explain what is a libertarian?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 27, 2020:
If you want to know the accurate answer then you ought to read a few Libertarian perspectives, an example worth reading is "Conceived in Liberty" by Murrary Rothbard: https://mises.org/library/conceived-liberty-2 Libertarianism opposes Statism; as a general rule. So the sample offered below, where someone (a statist) plays loud music is opposed by a Libertarian who first lets the aggressor know that the aggressor is aggressive and therefore wrong, and therefore asking for trouble. Examples of Libertarian documents are: Declaration of Independence Bill of Rights Solemn Notice of Mixed War Commercial Lean Right and The Military Lean Right Federal agreements such as The Articles of Confederation Libertarianism is indistinguishable from the common law as both are consequences of voluntary association for mutual defense, both are based upon natural law. The Declaration of Independence involves a number of people who exhausted all means of peaceful-resolutions-to-resolve-aggression by the aggressor group of people, the document documents those facts that matter in that case. The Bill of Rights attempts to nullify the aggressions of those who enforced the aggressive Constitution of 1789, an example would be a slave accusing a slave master of enslavement and the grand jury would then present the accused with a court date before the country in a trial by jury case according to the common law, thus beginning the end of African Slavery in America. Unfortunately the newly formed Statist Nation State marched on despite the efforts to contain its aggression with natural law, common law, libertarian defenses. A Solemn Notice of Mixed War is merely a micro version of the macro Declaration of Independence. "When a state, by and through its officials and agents, deprives a citizen of all of his remedies by the due process of law and deprives the citizen of the equal protection of the law, the state commits an act of mixed war against the citizen, and, by its behavior, the state declares war on the citizen. The citizen has the right to recognize this act by the publication of a solemn recognition of mixed war. This writing has the same force as the Declaration of Independence. It invokes the citizen's U.S. constitutional 9th and 10th so-called amend guarantees of the right to create an effective remedy where otherwise none exists." The Commercial Lean Right and The Military Lean Right also exemplifies the same principle, aggressors cause defensive action, defensive action ought to include clear notice of impending defensive action if the aggressor continues to perpetrate aggression while ignoring clear warnings. "In American history, the Declaration of Independence served the legal purpose of making a Solemn Recognition of ...
Here is an interesting perspective to what's going on. [beforeitsnews.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 25, 2020:
"Greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the world And it seems the people are tolerating it. We haven’t had real news in 30 years." I think it has been a battle between accurate information (found by each individual, or found the lawful way) against lies. If people in the government lie, it is treason: a crime warranting prosecuting, more so than someone selling a plant. If it is people as part of a corporate Network Cartel, lying, then those they harm with the lie are victims of libel, also warranting criminal prosecution. So...what does the so-called "government" actually do other than treason?
Was the American Revolution a progressive or a conservative movement? What is your interpretation?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 25, 2020:
At the time of the Revolution in America the words progressive and conservative roughly mean the opposite meaning when compared with modern usage of those words. Past: Conservative: Religious Intolerance Progressive: Religous Tolerance Present: Conservative: Nationalist in opposition to Marxist Globalist Progressive: Marxist Globalist in opposition to Nationalist The governments in America started as either Mercantile Corporate Monopolies or Religious Corporate Monopolies that were strictly enforced wherever and whenever people were incapable of breaking free from those dictatorial organizations. The Revolution was a movement away from monopolies and a movement toward free markets, or freedom, or liberty, whereby The Law was the common law if there was any law other than natural law governing those people in those free markets that were only temporarily or locally free from the enforced dictates of the competing monopoly groups. So...some conservatives today may tend to agree with the ideas and actions of a progressive during the Revolutionary period, where people wanted to conserve their freedom to choose not to be enslaved by a nebulous Majority Rule or Communist Dictatorship or Profitable Monopoly where the people are considered as hereditary property. However...some conservatives today may tend to agree with the enforcement of Religious intolerance. Also...some progressives today may tend to agree with the competitive dictatorships methods of enforcing the rules that they enforce by some form of Majority Rule or Electoral Political System of decision making. An example could be the New England Puritan Pilgrims and their commune property ideology: modern Marxist dogma. Then again...some progressives today may tend to agree with the division of power from ONE to many, which is the essence of the Revolutionary Idea, whereby the ONE sovereign (State, King, Monarch, Empire, etc.) would eventually divide down to each individual as his or her own sovereign power. I hope that helps, and I have references for these reports.
What politician would sponsor the 28th Amendment?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 24, 2020:
"Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators and/or Representatives; and, Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators and/or Representatives that does not apply equally to the Citizens of the United States ..." When the criminals take over they alone make the rules. Why is that not easy to see? I know why so many people don't know it, but we are almost to the man and woman (very few exceptions to the rule) born with common sense.
Whats your opinion on :
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 23, 2020:
None of the above. The government (actual, real, honest, lawful, legal, voluntary) is not powerful enough to keep the criminals from perpetrating crimes at this time. The criminals have organized and have taken over government. Those criminals routinely cause fear so as to gain more power. This current case is exemplary.
Jordan Peterson. "12 Rules. The Inevitability, Utility and Dangers Of Hierarchies." [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 19, 2020:
Time: 25:00 or so... Jordan Peterson lays at the feet of the left the use of power in maintaining a hierarchal structure: pecking order. The group of chickens will peck an overly aggressive chicken to death for the crime of attempting to eat before all the food is gone? This guy appears to be intelligent, and I have not listened much past time 25:00 yet, so my problem with his part in the left versus right dialog is - to me, someone on neither side - the general use of the word power when a specific use can tell the whole truth, or at least more of a full picture, so as to solve a problem better. Aggressive power, also known as crime, if perpetrated by an individual driven by left or right dogma is still a crime in either case as the criminal builds and maintains a criminal hierarchy built with aggressive, criminal, power. Fast chickens get to the food first (there are two kinds of chickens: the quick and the hungry) and chickens who eat too much slow down, but if someone attempts to bully their way from the back to the front, cutting in line, well, watch out chicken. Is that a consequence of aggression on the part of the many chickens who take one peck at the hungry chicken forcing a path from the back of the line to the front of the line? If those claiming to be the left will, by their power of will, build and maintain a hierarchy by the choice to aggressively assault, rob, rape, enslave, dumb down, brain-wash, control, horrify, terrify, torture, murder, and mass murder anyone who does not agree with the hierarchy being built and maintained, then the word for that is organized crime, even if the left call it Communism, Socialism, Statism, or Chicken Shit. Those on the right, using the same means, can call it whatever they want, including Corporatism, Fascism, Nationalism, Aristocracy, Oligarchy, Monarchy, Empire, Statism, or Fried Chicken. What is in a false name but falsehood? Which power is the power used to build any hierarchy? They are not all built with the same values shared by the same judges of value, and when the bodies pile up the jig is up, the evidence proving beyond doubt that the dead bodies were murdered by murderers is self-evident at that point.
Looks like the smoking "gun" bioweapon has been traced back to the origin. [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 18, 2020:
"So what do you think this relates to, possible NWO plan to bankrupt a bunch of 1st world countries thru chaos maybe." 808scotty To be more precise: The NWO in so many other words: 1. New World Order 2. The Crazies 3. Marxist Progressives 4. Neocons 5. Globalists 6. PTB 7. Establishment 8. Monopolists The point with using all those names is not my intended point. The point worth knowing is that all the people belonging to those groups are people who share the same goals, and most of the same means by which they will reach their shared goals. They do not have to all meet together in a dark cave during a full moon. They belong in that club because they share the same goals. Their goal is to gain the most power over the most people soonest, to Monopolize Power and Profit. Two quotes worthy of note: Age of Reason, Thomas Paine "All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit." To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine November 15, 1802 "But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property. It is, therefore, no wonder that the "Rights of Man" was attacked by that faction, and its author continually abused. But let them go on; give them rope enough and they will put an end to their own insignificance. There is too much common sense and independence in America to be long the dupe of any faction, foreign or domestic." A Monopoly Power does not exist along side a competitive Monopoly Power, they are at odds, or they are in agreement. When two competitive powers form an agreement to become one Monopoly Power, the word for that is Cartel. "an association of manufacturers or suppliers with the purpose of maintaining prices at a high level and restricting competition." Returning to the question (to avoid too much detail): "So what do you think this relates to, possible NWO plan to bankrupt a bunch of 1st world countries thru chaos maybe." 808scotty On the other side of Monopoly (NWO) are the Nationalists. To me the Nationalists are the lesser of the two evils, but they are evil when compared to actual Federalists (Free Market Government Associations), but to understand this current problem it may help to know that the Nationalists are perfectly happy with rejecting offers to form a Cartel. Nationalists are Free Market Light people. They are happy to compete with other Nations, and let the chips fall where they may, and as a rule that includes expansion, also known as Empire, and Colonization. So you...
Looks like the smoking "gun" bioweapon has been traced back to the origin. [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 18, 2020:
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-and-two-chinese-nationals-charged-three-separate-china-related FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Tuesday, January 28, 2020 Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases
Tucker: Why would America's media take China's side amid coronavirus pandemic? - YouTube
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 18, 2020:
It isn't. Why would anyone conflate yellow journalism with actual journalism? Is Tucker not an example of the whole SET knowable as "America's media"? How about Gerald Celente's Trends Journal, or Alex Jones Prison Planet, or Steve Pieczenik Talks, or many other examples of media contained within the SET knowable as "America's media"? Marxist propaganda media in America is what it is, a knowable fact that matters. It is Marxist propaganda media because it propagandizes Marxist idiology in the effort to turn the "hearts and minds" of regular people into idiologues, also knowable as Marxists drones: sycophants. Idio-illogical-idiots can be knowable as subjects of evil propaganda imposed upon their unsuspecting souls. People who have actually thought through the illogic of Marxist propaganda know better: see for example Jordan Peterson. Is everyone in America guilty of the evil crimes perpetrated by the Marxist idiologues and their evil masters? We are all one village? Does it take a village? Does it take a village by subterfuge? Conflating yellow journalism with actual journalism is likely to result in two accurately measurable power transfers. The evil people gain more power by close association with actual journalism, the conflating process works as a cloak. The actual journalists are guilty by association with the evil people and their Marxist propaganda crimes that include misfeasance, malfeasance, non-feasance, fraud, and treason. Those in power would not long be in power if Law were to return to America: if we use it for the intended purpose.
WHAT IF?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 17, 2020:
I'm not buying the "China" against "Trump" road map. In China as in everywhere else on the planet there are very powerful, very evil, very much people who wear clothes and speak messages. Next to those very powerful people are lesser evil people. Next to those very powerful people are marginally good people. Next to those very powerful people are demonstrably good people. If there is a road map (a way of generalizing the power struggle) then it may be worth noting that in each place on earth those in power at any degree are going to gain or lose power for themselves and for their group. So which groups have the most power right now? How about a number, or a letter, and then a name? Group 2: Previously most powerful, now less powerful Group 1: Now most powerful, now more powerful than Group 2 Group B: Previously most powerful, now less powerful Group A: Now most powerful, now more powerful than Group 2 Globalist Deep State Marxist Political/Economic Cartel, Cabal, Faction: Previously most powerful, now less powerful Nationalist Capitalist Political/Economic Cartel, Cabal, Faction: Now most powerful, now more powerful than the Marxists, Deep State, greater evil monopolist Globalists "WHO PROFITS from this World Wide Pandemic and Panic?" If it isn't, then truth tellers profit, liars who lie dig a deeper hole of their own making. "Could this simply be an Actual Strategy on the CCP’s Part?" It is not likely that every single mind in China is controlled absolutely, so there are likely to be lesser evil forces in China working to overpower the greater evil forces just like the current situation everywhere else. "Could this have been DELIBERATE?" MIHOP? Made it happen on purpose? LIHOP? Let it happen on purpose? or No opportunity is allowed to escape exploitation by those seeking absolute power, for if they fail: the competition will seize the opportunity as sure as the sun will rise and the price of toilet paper will eventually be greater than Central Bank Paper.
Strange thought; I have hurt some feelings on social media I am sure.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 17, 2020:
There was a suggestion about more judges. The concept of Trial by Jury, according to the common law (unwritten, ancient, law of the land, legem terrae), is to remove the power of government biased government agents whose pay check depends upon judgment in favor of funding the government with extortion payments enforced by the government upon anyone who dares to produce anything worth stealing. Any crime perpetrated by any non-government agent is lesser by exponential degree than the same crime perpetrated by a government agent. Crimes perpetrated by government agents cause increases in crimes by non-government agents, instead of preventing crime the government agents are guilty of crime, the power to defend is instead a power to offend. So all talk about using a criminal government to stop being so damn criminal, and instead do the job they were hired to do, is moot. Criminals, as a rule, do not obey moral rules, that is how they get into that club. The idea behind trial by the country, or trial by jury according to the common law, is to remove the power of government agents in judgment of what is or is not a fact in a crime, what is or is not lawful, what is or is not punishable, and what is or is not a just punishment. Just because people today have not been taught these facts that matter does not remove these facts as such, at least not outside the minds of those who ignore or are ignorant of these facts that matter. More biased judges spending the loot stolen from productive people means more stolen loot as a matter of demonstrable fact. Removing the dictatorial power from dictators removes the flow of loot from those who dare to produce anything worth stealing (including children) to the dictators. An example of a good start down that trial by the country road is here: "Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Anheuser-Bush Brewing co. V. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318. The Jury found there was no lawful consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing." STATE OF ...
Spectator: American media is caught in a Chinese finger trap. [spectator.us]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 17, 2020:
"Why are major media outlets in the United States running interference for the Chinese government? Several newspapers and cable news channels scrambled to decry any use of ‘Wuhan Virus’ as xenophobic and racist, after weeks of deploying the term themselves. This appeared to be a coordinated effort to deflect blame from China." Good find, thanks.
Voluntary Mutual Defense: Equitable Commerce: Free Market Government Service Provider ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 16, 2020:
From the new book I found: "The fact that Warren was critical of the state did not make him less traditional: the state as Warren knew it was a recent invention. There was nothing traditional in government established only fifty years ago in the course of a revolutionary war. It is rarely disputed that the development of the nation state is closely connected to the growth of the bourgeoisie and its main sphere of activity, the free market. Therefore, the ideas which we use to regard as socialist might be rather reactionary in their historical context." That is an amazing coincidence. This individual writer is working on an idea that Warren was either ignorant of history concerning the just price principle, or he was not ignorant of history and his claims of a "new" idea were fraudulent: he knew his ideas were not new. Above, by coincidence, is a claim by this author that is either his own ignorance concerning the topic he speaks about, or he does know better, and yet he chooses to fail to express the facts that matter in the case. Example: "It is rarely disputed that the development of the nation state is closely connected to the growth of the bourgeoisie and its main sphere of activity, the free market." The revolutionary idea, expressed in such works as the Declaration of Independence, and so many Bills of Rights, was essentially a move from involuntary association (un-free government markets) to voluntary associations for mutual defense or Free Market Government Markets. The "development of the nation state" was the intentional annihilation of the Free Government Market by specific people who chose to replace the Free Government Market with a Profitable Monopoly Nation-State (where the people become hereditary property). The critic of Warren claims: "There was nothing traditional in government established only fifty years ago in the course of a revolutionary war." A federation of independent states was established and was agreed upon by members from roughly 1775 to 1789. That is an established fact that matters in this case. The federation worked as a Free Market for competing government providers, as explained in the following work: Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy by William Watkins "Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking ...
Strange thought; I have hurt some feelings on social media I am sure.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 16, 2020:
Fact: "It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Lysander Spooner, Trial by Jury, 1852 It is a well established fact that in 1787 a group of criminals assembled to perpetrate the crime of treason upon all Americans then and now. Those criminals even signed their confession on a document called the Constitution. The homework I've done so far leads to the obvious conclusion based upon the facts that matter in the case. I have yet to find any evidence that could lead to a different conclusion. No one I know will dare to contend otherwise. Plenty of people have and I'm certain will attempt to shoot the messenger while counterfeiting a debate on the subject matter.
Liberty activist 'murdered as he slept' by swat team seizing his guns- [thefreethoughtproject.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 16, 2020:
"Lemp was Caucasian, according to Sandler. She did not know the race of the unidentified officer involved because she said the officers were wearing masks. The officer was placed on administrative leave, a standard procedure after police shootings." https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/14/duncan-socrates-lemp-maryland-shot-police-officer Standard procedure for designated targets designated as targets by the "government" is to conspired to murder them, and murder them. How does one know, beyond doubt, that the government is counterfeit? How does one know, beyond reasonable doubt, that the people running the government are criminals? Ask them? How does that work for you?
Sky News Australia.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 15, 2020:
I did not view the link. If criminals did not get away with the LOOT, would there be power to purchase good things with the LOOT that was stolen by the criminals at the FED? You say, Joe, Joe, Joe. In your authoritarian (aristocratic) tone. The FED is here to save us from ourselves, and you Joe, are a conspiracy theorist. So... "Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Anheuser-Bush Brewing co. V. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318. The Jury found there was no lawful consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing." STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF SCOTT First National Bank of Montgomery, Plaintiff vs Jerome Daly, Defendant. December 9, 1968 Sorry dude, the theorist is you, and your aristocratic soul, searching for the last dry place on the rat ship you and your kind sunk: on purpose. Oh, oh, but your fearless leaders didn't tell you in advance that it was time to jump ship? You are left holding the empty bag? Is that not some form of poetic justice? How about comic relief? If there are homes, then there is value, so long as people care to live in homes: an obvious measure of value and demand. But Mr. Dictator needs to INJECT liquidity into the National Economy to offset the destructive MOB RULE that inspires people to buy volumes of toilet paper with toilet paper money? And you have the nerve to call me stupid? 3 Trillion here, 9 Trillion there, who cares to keep score? You can't, by the way, it is against the "Law."
Politics U.S: Since When Is Joe Biden a 'Moderate'? [americanthinker.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 15, 2020:
Moderately satanistic, pedo without the blood sacrifice?
Australia. ABC. Public Broadcast. "Jordan Peterson Destroys Q and A." [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 15, 2020:
Time 57:40 or so... JP: "The Americans have a very tight respect for free speech." Explain then The Alien and Sedition Acts? The Bill of Rights were immediately thrown under the bus after 1789 and The Judiciary Act which placed a Supreme National Court Legal Fiction Power above the common law. If Jordan Peterson meant that the people as a whole "have a very tight respect for free speech," then why did he then change from speaking about the people as a whole and why did he then start speaking about the National Court members who publish their opinions under the false guise of "The Law of the Land"? The actual (common law) Law of the Land places lawful judgment in the whole people as one, through trial by jury, which is the method by which The People as a whole consent to, or do not consent to, government in any form whatsoever? Case in point: "Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Anheuser-Bush Brewing co. V. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318. The Jury found there was no lawful consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing." STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF SCOTT First National Bank of Montgomery, Plaintiff vs Jerome Daly, Defendant. December 9, 1968 If "they" aren't a bunch of criminal psychopaths, sociopaths, and a rapidly growing army of sycophants, then why are "they" still getting away with counterfeiting money? "They" just injected 1.5 Trillion dollars, according to "them," just the other day. What gives? Why are these people on this panel speaking about politics while the obvious elephant in the room is ignored as if that elephant wasn't shitting all over everything?
Australia. ABC. Public Broadcast. "Jordan Peterson Destroys Q and A." [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 15, 2020:
Time 55:00 or so... Jordan Peterson: "Never in the history of an English common law society had a government dared to regulate the actual voluntary contents of someone's speech except in a commercial situation." The problem there is this idea that "government" is responsible and therefore accountable. It, like the gun, isn't responsible, nor accountable, for it has no power of moral judgment, or power of action. Those on the panel are each one under a spell in which they either believe, or they pretend to believe, that "governments" in the modern world is in any way legitimate, lawful, legal, moral, right, good, or beneficial to anyone at all. This is not news. "It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Lysander Spooner, an Essay on The Trial by Jury, 1852 If Jordan Peterson is going to refer to a process used by people, such as the common law process, then he may need to refer to those people who actually use that process, not to people who pretend to use it. "All legitimate government is a mutual insurance company, voluntarily agreed upon by the parties to it, for the protection of their rights against wrong-doers. In its voluntary character it is precisely similar to an association for mutual protection against fire or shipwreck. Before a man will join an association for these latter purposes, and pay the premium for being insured, he will, if he be a man of sense, look at the articles of the association; see what the company promises to do; what it is likely to do; and what are the rates of insurance. If he be satisfied on all these points, he will become a member, pay his premium for a year, and then hold the company to its contract. If the conduct of the company prove unsatisfactory, he will let his policy expire at the end of the year for which he has paid; will decline to pay any further premiums, and either seek insurance elsewhere, or take his own risk without any insurance. And as men act in the insurance of their ships and dwellings, they would act in the insurance of their properties, liberties and lives, in the political association, or government. "The political insurance company, or government, have...

Give Love

Left to give: 0 Coins
Click here to get coins.

  • Level7 (45,262pts)
  • Posts287
  • Comments
      Replies
    1,283
    854
  • Followers 15
  • Fans 0
  • Referrals1
  • Joined Oct 29th, 2019
  • Last Visit Very recently
Josf-Kelley's Groups
Voluntary Mutual Defence
31 members, Host
Controversial Charts
48277 members
Jordan Peterson Group
23509 members
Joe Rogan Group
15049 members
Just Jokes and Memes
12838 members
Tucker Carlson Fans
11963 members
IDW Topic-of-the-Day
8802 members
News From All Views
6107 members
Classical Liberalism
4405 members
IDW Political Party
2540 members
Anti-Socialism
2204 members
Arielle Scarcella FanSpace!
2152 members
President Donald J. Trump... Latest
2020 members
Saving Western Civilisation
2009 members
RamZPaul
1605 members
John Paul Watson Group
1587 members
News, Politics & Policy
1270 members
Conspiracy Truth : Wolves And Sheeple
1195 members
Alex Jones Fans
1180 members
Stefan Molyneux Fans
1056 members
Emergency Preparedness and Survival
928 members
Libertarian Freethinkers
868 members
The Second Amendment Sanctuary
613 members
True Crime Discussion Group
563 members
Conspiracy Research
560 members
No Nonsense Philosophy
454 members
Qanon
453 members
Words of Wisdom
445 members
Vaccine Education & Discussion Group
281 members
Books
215 members
KEEP OUT
168 members
United We Stand
151 members
Brain soup
127 members
IDW.Community Senate
110 members
Red Pilled Hotties (Yes you can still flirt & remain politically engaged)
99 members
ORIGINAL MEMES ( POSTED BY CREATORS )
95 members
The Case Against Corona Panic
51 members
Topple the Globalists
48 members
Anarcho-Capitalism / Voluntaryism
48 members
Now You Are Talking With
46 members
Hibiscus Hoplites
33 members
Shadilay
14 members
50 Policies
13 members
Ryan Faulk Fans
12 members
Trusted Web
10 members