Like
Haha
Sad
Wow
Hmmm
Grrr/Dislike
Send SmileNavigation
Bio
Born in West Orange, New Jersey, 1958.
1 oldest sister
2 older brothers
2 younger brothers
My first experience with data that did not fit the Official Narrative (propaganda) was a book I read in School for a book report. The book described data concerning the sinking of the Ocean Liner (false flag) that was the casus belli (excuse: false flag) for Americans to be deceived into fighting the Central Banker War called World War One. The ship that was sunk (murdering people aboard) to move power to the criminals running the Central Bank Cabal was the Lusitania.
The next big event which caused me to fully reject the Official Narrative (propaganda) was the massacre at Waco misreported on National Television (Corporate Propaganda Organ of the Nation-State Aristocracy).
Full BioThat event in Waco lead to my discovery of many other facts that support the more accurate narrative that I have been developing since Waco. I also managed to get on the National House of Representatives official Ballot for California District 40 (the number since then has changed). I ran against those who allow the National government to perpetrate capital conspiracy murder on men, women, , and babies in a Church; burning them alive after torturing them, experimenting on them, for months.
I've been a member of, fan of, student of, and thrown out of, or asked to leave:
The NRA
John Birch Society
United We Stand (Ross Perot)
JPFO (I won honorable mention for an essay)
Fully Informed Jury Association (removed me summarily from their forum)
Free State Project (removed me summarily from their forum)
Mises Institute (removed me summarily from their forum)
Libertarian Party (ran for National office)
Republican Party (joined to vote in primary for Ron Paul)
National Liberty Alliance (asked to leave after a year at the top spot in California)
Jury Duty (once on a jury, asked to leave by both prosecutor and defense, the judge wanted me to stay)
I worked about 70 hours a week while running for office, and at construction I worked for just over 25 years, then suffered a list of health problems, currently semi-retired.
Married for good, 2 already grown up.
I wrote a book, published it, printed it (misprinted) and am working on a second book.
Comments
Wikileaks documents : “KRAKEN” is a CIA Hacking Program.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 22, 2020:
I was looking for that, thanks.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 22, 2020:
I was looking for that, thanks.
Breaking COVID19 – Evidence of Global Fraud [lewrockwell.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 22, 2020:
Good find, thanks.
The whole Article:
COVID19 – Evidence Of Global Fraud
Iain Davis
https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/17/covid19-evidence-of-global-fraud/
The criminals tend to say one thing, and then they say the opposite thing: confession by action, not by their lying words.
The process by which "isolation" follows "The Gold Standard" is mapped out in Koch's Principles, and this process is the scientific method by which a suspected cause of a known set of symptoms is accurately identified IN ISOLATION.
Here is the suspect, alone, and no longer combined with anything else, it is only this, and this is the suspected cause of that set of symptoms. That is one test along the way following Koch's Principles. The next step is to take the suspected cause of the set of symptoms and "infect" a test subject to see of - in fact - that ISOLATED suspect is the cause of those symptoms. If the suspected cause, during testing, does not cause those sets of symptoms, then it is by Scientific Method NOT the cause of those symptoms proven in those tests where the suspected cause does not cause those sets of symptoms.
If you do any reading on "The Germ Theory," and you fail to find examples where "The Germ Theory," fails to be proven using The Scientific Method, then you are not looking in the places where those failures - during testing - have failed miserably to prove "The Germ Theory." There have been many Scientists since Louis Pasteur vs. Antoine Bechamp battled over CONTROL of KNOWLEDGE vs BELIEF.
Example:
Louis Pasteur vs. Antoine Bechamp
https://dreddymd.com/2018/03/10/louis-pasteur-vs-antoine-bechamp-know-the-true-causes-of-disease/
So...
In the Evidence Of Global Fraud Article by Iain Davis, is the following:
"The Chinese authorities identified a new type of coronavirus, which was isolated on 7 January 2020……On 12 January 2020, China shared the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus for countries to use in developing specific diagnostic kits.”
That is from a Globally Connected Foreign (to the U.S.) Political (pay to play) Bureaucracy euphemistically (fraudulently) named WHO or World (Global) Heath (Death) Organization (Treasonous Criminal Cabal). If you think the criminals at the WHO are working for your health, then I'm a Prince from Africa and you can open a bank account for me.
The WHO (the criminals running it) also claim:
"Working directly from sequence information, the team developed a series of genetic amplification (PCR) assays used by laboratories.”
Here is where the "authorities" are caught in their fraud, as the "Evidence Of Global Fraud" article points out:
"However, such protein structures are not unique. They look just like other round vesicles, such as endocytic vesicles and ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 22, 2020:
Good find, thanks.
The whole Article:
COVID19 – Evidence Of Global Fraud
Iain Davis
https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/17/covid19-evidence-of-global-fraud/
The criminals tend to say one thing, and then they say the opposite thing: confession by action, not by their lying words.
The process by which "isolation" follows "The Gold Standard" is mapped out in Koch's Principles, and this process is the scientific method by which a suspected cause of a known set of symptoms is accurately identified IN ISOLATION.
Here is the suspect, alone, and no longer combined with anything else, it is only this, and this is the suspected cause of that set of symptoms. That is one test along the way following Koch's Principles. The next step is to take the suspected cause of the set of symptoms and "infect" a test subject to see of - in fact - that ISOLATED suspect is the cause of those symptoms. If the suspected cause, during testing, does not cause those sets of symptoms, then it is by Scientific Method NOT the cause of those symptoms proven in those tests where the suspected cause does not cause those sets of symptoms.
If you do any reading on "The Germ Theory," and you fail to find examples where "The Germ Theory," fails to be proven using The Scientific Method, then you are not looking in the places where those failures - during testing - have failed miserably to prove "The Germ Theory." There have been many Scientists since Louis Pasteur vs. Antoine Bechamp battled over CONTROL of KNOWLEDGE vs BELIEF.
Example:
Louis Pasteur vs. Antoine Bechamp
https://dreddymd.com/2018/03/10/louis-pasteur-vs-antoine-bechamp-know-the-true-causes-of-disease/
So...
In the Evidence Of Global Fraud Article by Iain Davis, is the following:
"The Chinese authorities identified a new type of coronavirus, which was isolated on 7 January 2020……On 12 January 2020, China shared the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus for countries to use in developing specific diagnostic kits.”
That is from a Globally Connected Foreign (to the U.S.) Political (pay to play) Bureaucracy euphemistically (fraudulently) named WHO or World (Global) Heath (Death) Organization (Treasonous Criminal Cabal). If you think the criminals at the WHO are working for your health, then I'm a Prince from Africa and you can open a bank account for me.
The WHO (the criminals running it) also claim:
"Working directly from sequence information, the team developed a series of genetic amplification (PCR) assays used by laboratories.”
Here is where the "authorities" are caught in their fraud, as the "Evidence Of Global Fraud" article points out:
"However, such protein structures are not unique. They look just like other round vesicles, such as endocytic vesicles and ...
Geller Report: Team Trump Legal Counsel Powell: It was US forces that seized election servers in ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 21, 2020:
I got: "OOPS THAT PAGE CAN'T BE FOUND"
Dangerous:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IL85RbuYCJE
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 21, 2020:
I got: "OOPS THAT PAGE CAN'T BE FOUND"
Dangerous:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IL85RbuYCJE
Will YOU Submit to the Election Coup?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 21, 2020:
" When or if Courts refuse to look at evidence due to MASSIVE interference by the Media and the Dem-Marxists, as I have written before … the U.S. Constitution becomes a worthless piece of paper. IF YOU want to live in an America inspired by its Founding Fathers, YOU might wish read (hopefully re-read) America’s Declaration of Independence penned by Thomas Jefferson and signed by Americans FULLY AWARE their signature placed a British target on their heads."
Why do people claim to know something, while blaming other people for failing to know something (massive election fraud evidence) and then when shown something, it is they who censor?
The original "election fraud" coup was 1787 through 1789, and modern treasonous criminals have that example to guild their efforts to reach their goals.
The (or any example of a common law Solemn Notice of Mixed War) Delaration of Independence shown above clearly acknowledges the right (duty) to reject (with a Solemn Notice of Mixed War) despotic (criminal) governments run by despotic (criminal) members of a despotic (criminal) government.
Previous to the criminal take-over of America in 1789, slavery was fought with common law on the side of the freedom fighters:
“A jury of twelve local farmers, all men and all white according to Levinson, rule in favor of Freeman in 1781, giving her freedom and awarding her 30 shillings in damages.”
Not a good enough example? That does not pass your bullshit detector test?
Here:
No. 15 – Rhode Island Is Right!
This essay appeared in The Massachusetts Gazette, December 7, 1787, as reprinted From The Freeman's Journal; (Or, The North-American Intelligencer?)
"The abuse which has been thrown upon the state of Rhode Island seems to be greatly unmerited. Popular favor is variable, and those who are now despised and insulted may soon change situations with the present idols of the people. Rhode Island has out done even Pennsylvania in the glorious work of freeing the Negroes in this country, without which the patriotism of some states appears ridiculous. The General Assembly of the state of Rhode Island has prevented the further importation of Negroes, and have made a law by which all blacks born in that state after March, 1784, are absolutely and at once free.
"They have fully complied with the recommendations of Congress in regard to the late treaty of peace with Great Britain, and have passed an act declaring it to be the law of the land. They have never refused their quota of taxes demanded by Congress, excepting the five per cent impost, which they considered as a dangerous tax, and for which at present there is perhaps no great necessity, as the western territory, of which a part has very lately been sold at a considerable price, may ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 21, 2020:
" When or if Courts refuse to look at evidence due to MASSIVE interference by the Media and the Dem-Marxists, as I have written before … the U.S. Constitution becomes a worthless piece of paper. IF YOU want to live in an America inspired by its Founding Fathers, YOU might wish read (hopefully re-read) America’s Declaration of Independence penned by Thomas Jefferson and signed by Americans FULLY AWARE their signature placed a British target on their heads."
Why do people claim to know something, while blaming other people for failing to know something (massive election fraud evidence) and then when shown something, it is they who censor?
The original "election fraud" coup was 1787 through 1789, and modern treasonous criminals have that example to guild their efforts to reach their goals.
The (or any example of a common law Solemn Notice of Mixed War) Delaration of Independence shown above clearly acknowledges the right (duty) to reject (with a Solemn Notice of Mixed War) despotic (criminal) governments run by despotic (criminal) members of a despotic (criminal) government.
Previous to the criminal take-over of America in 1789, slavery was fought with common law on the side of the freedom fighters:
“A jury of twelve local farmers, all men and all white according to Levinson, rule in favor of Freeman in 1781, giving her freedom and awarding her 30 shillings in damages.”
Not a good enough example? That does not pass your bullshit detector test?
Here:
No. 15 – Rhode Island Is Right!
This essay appeared in The Massachusetts Gazette, December 7, 1787, as reprinted From The Freeman's Journal; (Or, The North-American Intelligencer?)
"The abuse which has been thrown upon the state of Rhode Island seems to be greatly unmerited. Popular favor is variable, and those who are now despised and insulted may soon change situations with the present idols of the people. Rhode Island has out done even Pennsylvania in the glorious work of freeing the Negroes in this country, without which the patriotism of some states appears ridiculous. The General Assembly of the state of Rhode Island has prevented the further importation of Negroes, and have made a law by which all blacks born in that state after March, 1784, are absolutely and at once free.
"They have fully complied with the recommendations of Congress in regard to the late treaty of peace with Great Britain, and have passed an act declaring it to be the law of the land. They have never refused their quota of taxes demanded by Congress, excepting the five per cent impost, which they considered as a dangerous tax, and for which at present there is perhaps no great necessity, as the western territory, of which a part has very lately been sold at a considerable price, may ...
Info dump follow the crumbs...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 20, 2020:
After the muzzle is firmly in place the next battle is in hell.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 20, 2020:
After the muzzle is firmly in place the next battle is in hell.
How many of these groups do you think are in the us? This boggles my mind.
[youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 20, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARPJJSPcFhM
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 20, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARPJJSPcFhM
Can somebody help me?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 20, 2020:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/?fbclid=IwAR2zm9mnRd4AhUDkxfb2ENFkZldSpJH3ukf3H21eCkZbKzuRJw87-KdY1l4
Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election
September 12, 2018
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 20, 2020:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/?fbclid=IwAR2zm9mnRd4AhUDkxfb2ENFkZldSpJH3ukf3H21eCkZbKzuRJw87-KdY1l4
Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election
September 12, 2018
Joe Bidens secret phone call
[facebook.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 19, 2020:
Broken link?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 19, 2020:
Broken link?
"YOU WANT TO SAVE LIVES?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 19, 2020:
Good point. Like if a cure is need for something killing the most people, then how about the STARVATION virus and the FOOD cure.
Their actual agenda is the PEOPLE virus and their cure is DEATH.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 19, 2020:
Good point. Like if a cure is need for something killing the most people, then how about the STARVATION virus and the FOOD cure.
Their actual agenda is the PEOPLE virus and their cure is DEATH.
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 19, 2020:
https://www.greatlakesjc.org/cases/costantino_v_detroit/?fbclid=IwAR1wF3G9kuuFQL6gD_kBlIjH8cUePQdNsqpjCF4m9Oj0qwhsqk7p-dlOt_U
"The Great Lakes Justice Center (GLJC) filed an action in Wayne County Circuit Court alleging massive fraud in the election vote-counting procedures. The suit states Wayne County election officials allowed illegal, unlawful, and fraudulent processing of votes cast in last Tuesday’s election. Numerous witnesses have filed sworn affidavits under oath attesting to the fraudulent activities they observed directly. These acts disenfranchised lawful voters and potentially changed the outcome of the election. The various acts of fraud are itemized in the Complaint. The Complaint alleges:
Violation of Plaintiffs’ Constitutional right to Election Accuracy and Integrity.
Violation of Plaintiffs’ Quo Warranto right to a fraud-free Election.
Violation of Plaintiffs’ Constitutional Equal Protection Rights.
Violation of Statutory Election Laws."
______________________________
I know now that releasing the Kraken was a play on words, because there are many synchronicities involved, including specifically named election tampering software called Kraken. But above is releasing the mythological beast feared by all despots, and I know that because of the use of the term Quo Warranto. There is history behind this Latin term that has common law applications involving the adaptations to the common law adopted during the Revolutionary War. Simply put, the Quo Warranto POWER (right?) was an invention stolen from English common law, stolen by the Criminals who took over England, turning a common law right into a "prerogative" right, or a POWER employed only by a King whose claim of Divine Right was erased from "authority" by the America Patriots. Now, or at least before the criminals took over America (they took over the federation in 1789) common law, the right of Quo Warranto POWER was in each individuals hand, each member of the voluntary defense association (federal association) in each county, in each state, in the federation (before it became a Legal Fiction Corporation by the Judiciary Act of 1789). Quo Warranto power is the power to pull the plug (stop paying for) a fraudulent legal fiction. There is an allowed (no longer allowed) challenge of authority with a Quo Warranto Writ, and by right, in America, those in power have to address that challenge, and if by common law, then the challenge goes before a jury. If the jury agrees that the government has no authority, because their authority was fraudulently, criminally, treasonously, acquired, then their "authority" is officially rendered null and void by the jury, and any monies in the FUND (the loot) return to The People. Is that not The Kraken? Release!
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 19, 2020:
https://www.greatlakesjc.org/cases/costantino_v_detroit/?fbclid=IwAR1wF3G9kuuFQL6gD_kBlIjH8cUePQdNsqpjCF4m9Oj0qwhsqk7p-dlOt_U
"The Great Lakes Justice Center (GLJC) filed an action in Wayne County Circuit Court alleging massive fraud in the election vote-counting procedures. The suit states Wayne County election officials allowed illegal, unlawful, and fraudulent processing of votes cast in last Tuesday’s election. Numerous witnesses have filed sworn affidavits under oath attesting to the fraudulent activities they observed directly. These acts disenfranchised lawful voters and potentially changed the outcome of the election. The various acts of fraud are itemized in the Complaint. The Complaint alleges:
Violation of Plaintiffs’ Constitutional right to Election Accuracy and Integrity.
Violation of Plaintiffs’ Quo Warranto right to a fraud-free Election.
Violation of Plaintiffs’ Constitutional Equal Protection Rights.
Violation of Statutory Election Laws."
______________________________
I know now that releasing the Kraken was a play on words, because there are many synchronicities involved, including specifically named election tampering software called Kraken. But above is releasing the mythological beast feared by all despots, and I know that because of the use of the term Quo Warranto. There is history behind this Latin term that has common law applications involving the adaptations to the common law adopted during the Revolutionary War. Simply put, the Quo Warranto POWER (right?) was an invention stolen from English common law, stolen by the Criminals who took over England, turning a common law right into a "prerogative" right, or a POWER employed only by a King whose claim of Divine Right was erased from "authority" by the America Patriots. Now, or at least before the criminals took over America (they took over the federation in 1789) common law, the right of Quo Warranto POWER was in each individuals hand, each member of the voluntary defense association (federal association) in each county, in each state, in the federation (before it became a Legal Fiction Corporation by the Judiciary Act of 1789). Quo Warranto power is the power to pull the plug (stop paying for) a fraudulent legal fiction. There is an allowed (no longer allowed) challenge of authority with a Quo Warranto Writ, and by right, in America, those in power have to address that challenge, and if by common law, then the challenge goes before a jury. If the jury agrees that the government has no authority, because their authority was fraudulently, criminally, treasonously, acquired, then their "authority" is officially rendered null and void by the jury, and any monies in the FUND (the loot) return to The People. Is that not The Kraken? Release!
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 18, 2020:
Time 4:40 or so... "...it is easy to judge who is good and who is evil..."
Is that so? How can someone judge who is good and who is evil if the news is Fake?
"In June of 1775, George Washington was appointed Major General and elected by Congress to be commander in chief of the American revolutionary forces. Although he took up his tasks energetically, Washington accomplished nothing militarily for the remainder of the year and more, nor did he try. His only campaign in 1775 was internal rather than external; it was directed against the American army as he found it, and was designed to extirpate the spirit of liberty pervading this unusually individualistic and democratic army of militiamen. In short, Washington set out to transform a people's army, uniquely suited for a libertarian revolution, into another orthodox and despotically ruled statist force after the familiar European model.
"His primary aim was to crush the individualistic and democratic spirit of the American forces. For one thing, the officers of the militia were elected by their own men, and the discipline of repeated elections kept the officers from forming an aristocratic ruling caste typical of European armies of the period. The officers often drew little more pay than their men, and there were no hierarchical distinctions of rank imposed between officers and men. As a consequence, officers could not enforce their wills coercively on the soldiery. This New England equality horrified Washington's conservative and highly aristocratic soul.
"To introduce a hierarchy of ruling caste, Washington insisted on distinctive decorations of dress in accordance with minute gradations of rank. As one observer phrased it: "New lords, new laws. … The strictest government is taking place, and great distinction is made between officers and soldier. Everyone is made to know his place and keep it." Despite the great expense involved, he also tried to stamp out individuality in the army by forcing uniforms upon them; but the scarcity of cloth made this plan unfeasible.
"At least as important as distinctions in decoration was the introduction of extensive inequality in pay. Led by Washington and the other aristocratic southern delegates, and over the objections of Massachusetts, the Congress insisted on fixing a pay scale for generals and other officers considerably higher than that of the rank and file.
"In addition to imposing a web of hierarchy on the Continental Army, Washington crushed liberty within by replacing individual responsibility by iron despotism and coercion. Severe and brutal punishments were imposed upon those soldiers whose sense of altruism failed to override their instinct for self-preservation. Furloughs were curtailed and girlfriends of soldiers were expelled ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 18, 2020:
Time 4:40 or so... "...it is easy to judge who is good and who is evil..."
Is that so? How can someone judge who is good and who is evil if the news is Fake?
"In June of 1775, George Washington was appointed Major General and elected by Congress to be commander in chief of the American revolutionary forces. Although he took up his tasks energetically, Washington accomplished nothing militarily for the remainder of the year and more, nor did he try. His only campaign in 1775 was internal rather than external; it was directed against the American army as he found it, and was designed to extirpate the spirit of liberty pervading this unusually individualistic and democratic army of militiamen. In short, Washington set out to transform a people's army, uniquely suited for a libertarian revolution, into another orthodox and despotically ruled statist force after the familiar European model.
"His primary aim was to crush the individualistic and democratic spirit of the American forces. For one thing, the officers of the militia were elected by their own men, and the discipline of repeated elections kept the officers from forming an aristocratic ruling caste typical of European armies of the period. The officers often drew little more pay than their men, and there were no hierarchical distinctions of rank imposed between officers and men. As a consequence, officers could not enforce their wills coercively on the soldiery. This New England equality horrified Washington's conservative and highly aristocratic soul.
"To introduce a hierarchy of ruling caste, Washington insisted on distinctive decorations of dress in accordance with minute gradations of rank. As one observer phrased it: "New lords, new laws. … The strictest government is taking place, and great distinction is made between officers and soldier. Everyone is made to know his place and keep it." Despite the great expense involved, he also tried to stamp out individuality in the army by forcing uniforms upon them; but the scarcity of cloth made this plan unfeasible.
"At least as important as distinctions in decoration was the introduction of extensive inequality in pay. Led by Washington and the other aristocratic southern delegates, and over the objections of Massachusetts, the Congress insisted on fixing a pay scale for generals and other officers considerably higher than that of the rank and file.
"In addition to imposing a web of hierarchy on the Continental Army, Washington crushed liberty within by replacing individual responsibility by iron despotism and coercion. Severe and brutal punishments were imposed upon those soldiers whose sense of altruism failed to override their instinct for self-preservation. Furloughs were curtailed and girlfriends of soldiers were expelled ...
[theepochtimes.com]
Rudy Giuliani: Several Election Lawsuits ‘Ready to Go’ to the Supreme Court
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 17, 2020:
No trail by jury? No transcripts for Public Consumption?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 17, 2020:
No trail by jury? No transcripts for Public Consumption?
Yes, not conceding is literally a Holocaust, it's definitely exactly what Hitler did when he refused...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 16, 2020:
I think in no uncertain terms concession is broadcast far and wide: fraud is afoot.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 16, 2020:
I think in no uncertain terms concession is broadcast far and wide: fraud is afoot.
Federalist: Three things we must do to ensure a clean vote.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 16, 2020:
No evidence claims notwithstanding.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2MkvWh7poY=emb_logo=IwAR0YdYFKQL0OB1boqgWfFjEdYQNyMPG6jMWVnKbngNUUQoCbL0u7eian0Ow
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 16, 2020:
No evidence claims notwithstanding.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2MkvWh7poY=emb_logo=IwAR0YdYFKQL0OB1boqgWfFjEdYQNyMPG6jMWVnKbngNUUQoCbL0u7eian0Ow
Is it possible to talk about Jewish political influence without being called anti-Semitic?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 16, 2020:
Jews like Germans and Americans are not all the same, not all accountable for all the same actions.
Nazis were eventually tried in a Court (not a Court of Law) and found guilty of crimes against humanity. Many Germans were against the Nazis, and many paid the price for their opposition.
Zionists are currently perpetrating virtually the same crimes perpetrated by the Nazis, and one example of such a crime is the attack on the U.S.S. Liberty, there are many more documented crimes against humanity accountable to Zionists (not all Zionists). Many Jews are against Zionism and they paid the price, are paying the price, or will pay a heavy price for that opposition.
Not all Americans are RINOS (Republican in Name Only), Fascists, Neocons, DINOS (Democratic in Name Only) Marxists/Communists, Globalist, Antifa, BLM, whatnot.
Those in power have used their power to censor opposition that opposes their power when the power in question is despotic, and those against it, everywhere, all throughout history, have to pay a cost for opposing tyranny. America is no different. The British censored opposition by initiating an aggressive war for profit, the same crimes the Nazi's were found guilty of perpetrating almost 2 centuries later. The British Loyalist Party in America after 1789 (the so-called Federalist Party) was also opposed and the standard censorship in that case was published in the form known as The Alien and Sedition Acts.
I'm not concerned with what a "group" is claimed to be responsible for perpetrating criminally, because there is no way to account for anyone in the "group" when claims are made that the "group" did it.
Claims that the "group" did something is like claiming that a gun does something. Some ONE some PLACE some TIME does some ACT and an innocent victim is injured as a result, not a group, not even when there is an angry mob claimed to be guilty of a lynching. Some ONE fomented the mob into anger, typically with liberal use of deception, and someone provided the rope, someone kidnaps the victim, someone forces the victim into the rope, someone applies the forces that end the victims life. If it takes two people to pull the weight of the victim off the ground, then those two people, each one, is guilty of that specific act, the two do not constitute a fictitious guilty being that is held accountable while those two move to the next rope and the next victim; unless the angry mob believes in lies.
P.S.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCcGzp1JTk4
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 16, 2020:
Jews like Germans and Americans are not all the same, not all accountable for all the same actions.
Nazis were eventually tried in a Court (not a Court of Law) and found guilty of crimes against humanity. Many Germans were against the Nazis, and many paid the price for their opposition.
Zionists are currently perpetrating virtually the same crimes perpetrated by the Nazis, and one example of such a crime is the attack on the U.S.S. Liberty, there are many more documented crimes against humanity accountable to Zionists (not all Zionists). Many Jews are against Zionism and they paid the price, are paying the price, or will pay a heavy price for that opposition.
Not all Americans are RINOS (Republican in Name Only), Fascists, Neocons, DINOS (Democratic in Name Only) Marxists/Communists, Globalist, Antifa, BLM, whatnot.
Those in power have used their power to censor opposition that opposes their power when the power in question is despotic, and those against it, everywhere, all throughout history, have to pay a cost for opposing tyranny. America is no different. The British censored opposition by initiating an aggressive war for profit, the same crimes the Nazi's were found guilty of perpetrating almost 2 centuries later. The British Loyalist Party in America after 1789 (the so-called Federalist Party) was also opposed and the standard censorship in that case was published in the form known as The Alien and Sedition Acts.
I'm not concerned with what a "group" is claimed to be responsible for perpetrating criminally, because there is no way to account for anyone in the "group" when claims are made that the "group" did it.
Claims that the "group" did something is like claiming that a gun does something. Some ONE some PLACE some TIME does some ACT and an innocent victim is injured as a result, not a group, not even when there is an angry mob claimed to be guilty of a lynching. Some ONE fomented the mob into anger, typically with liberal use of deception, and someone provided the rope, someone kidnaps the victim, someone forces the victim into the rope, someone applies the forces that end the victims life. If it takes two people to pull the weight of the victim off the ground, then those two people, each one, is guilty of that specific act, the two do not constitute a fictitious guilty being that is held accountable while those two move to the next rope and the next victim; unless the angry mob believes in lies.
P.S.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCcGzp1JTk4
How Biden Stole The Election
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 16, 2020:
I'm more inclined to read the existing evidence.
Each case of voter fraud proven, beyond reasonable doubt, could be documented in each case tried in a Court of Law.
Reading memes versus reading Trial Transcripts.
________________________________
Q. Let me ask you finally -- this has
been a long road -- how you regard -- what is
your explanation for the fact that there has
been such little national media coverage of
these -- of this trial and this evidence and
this event here in this Memphis courtroom,
which is the first trial ever to be able to
produce evidence on this assassination --
what has happened here that Mighty Wurlitzer
is not sounding but is in fact totally
silent -- almost totally silent?
A. Oh, but -- as we know, silence can be
deafening. Disinformation is not only
getting certain things to appear in print,
it's also getting certain things not to
appear in print. I mean, the first -- the
first thing I would say as a way of
explanation is the incredibly powerful effect
of disinformation over a long period of time
that I mentioned before. For 30 years the
official line has been that James Earl Ray
killed Martin Luther King and he did it all
by himself. That's 30 years, not -- nothing
like the short period when the line was that
the Cubans raped the Angolan women. But for
30 years it's James Earl Ray killed Dr. King,
did it all by himself.
And when that is imprinted in the
minds of the general public for 30 years, if
somebody stood up and confessed and said: I
did it. Ray didn't do it, I did it. Here's
a movie. Here's a video showing me do it. 99
percent of the people wouldn't believe him
because it just -- it just wouldn't click in
the mind. It would just go right to -- it
couldn't be. It's just a powerful
psychological effect over 30 years of
disinformation that's been imprinted on the
brains of the -- the public. Something to
the country couldn't -- couldn't be.
_____________________________
https://thekingcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/King_Family_Trial_Transcript.pdf
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 16, 2020:
I'm more inclined to read the existing evidence.
Each case of voter fraud proven, beyond reasonable doubt, could be documented in each case tried in a Court of Law.
Reading memes versus reading Trial Transcripts.
________________________________
Q. Let me ask you finally -- this has
been a long road -- how you regard -- what is
your explanation for the fact that there has
been such little national media coverage of
these -- of this trial and this evidence and
this event here in this Memphis courtroom,
which is the first trial ever to be able to
produce evidence on this assassination --
what has happened here that Mighty Wurlitzer
is not sounding but is in fact totally
silent -- almost totally silent?
A. Oh, but -- as we know, silence can be
deafening. Disinformation is not only
getting certain things to appear in print,
it's also getting certain things not to
appear in print. I mean, the first -- the
first thing I would say as a way of
explanation is the incredibly powerful effect
of disinformation over a long period of time
that I mentioned before. For 30 years the
official line has been that James Earl Ray
killed Martin Luther King and he did it all
by himself. That's 30 years, not -- nothing
like the short period when the line was that
the Cubans raped the Angolan women. But for
30 years it's James Earl Ray killed Dr. King,
did it all by himself.
And when that is imprinted in the
minds of the general public for 30 years, if
somebody stood up and confessed and said: I
did it. Ray didn't do it, I did it. Here's
a movie. Here's a video showing me do it. 99
percent of the people wouldn't believe him
because it just -- it just wouldn't click in
the mind. It would just go right to -- it
couldn't be. It's just a powerful
psychological effect over 30 years of
disinformation that's been imprinted on the
brains of the -- the public. Something to
the country couldn't -- couldn't be.
_____________________________
https://thekingcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/King_Family_Trial_Transcript.pdf
Or when you have been voted out of office.....
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 16, 2020:
When someone claims to speak for EVERY "expert," it might be time to check with a few experts on the subject of fraudulent claims of absolute authority.
"It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Spooner
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 16, 2020:
When someone claims to speak for EVERY "expert," it might be time to check with a few experts on the subject of fraudulent claims of absolute authority.
"It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Spooner
Tic Tac Toe
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 16, 2020:
Funny, wrong face.
2.7 Million Votes Potentially Lost; Dominion Voting Strong Ties to CCP and Dems| Beyond The Noise
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl3H-rSaFlU=IwAR30-vQCmC3D4lmWYtzuPIdmIPolMHZzwGCgmhOFCF-2FKtpw6vXsw0UhtE
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 16, 2020:
Funny, wrong face.
2.7 Million Votes Potentially Lost; Dominion Voting Strong Ties to CCP and Dems| Beyond The Noise
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl3H-rSaFlU=IwAR30-vQCmC3D4lmWYtzuPIdmIPolMHZzwGCgmhOFCF-2FKtpw6vXsw0UhtE
🚨 AlexJonesShow LIVE: Trump Set To Release Proof of Systematic Election Fraud By Democrats/Deep ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 16, 2020:
2.7 Million Votes Potentially Lost; Dominion Voting Strong Ties to CCP and Dems| Beyond The Noise
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl3H-rSaFlU=IwAR30-vQCmC3D4lmWYtzuPIdmIPolMHZzwGCgmhOFCF-2FKtpw6vXsw0UhtE
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 16, 2020:
2.7 Million Votes Potentially Lost; Dominion Voting Strong Ties to CCP and Dems| Beyond The Noise
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl3H-rSaFlU=IwAR30-vQCmC3D4lmWYtzuPIdmIPolMHZzwGCgmhOFCF-2FKtpw6vXsw0UhtE
yes it in my view they should choked and died
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 15, 2020:
For those who think that this is a new phenomenon:
To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine
November 15, 1802
"But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property. It is, therefore, no wonder that the "Rights of Man" was attacked by that faction, and its author continually abused. But let them go on; give them rope enough and they will put an end to their own insignificance. There is too much common sense and independence in America to be long the dupe of any faction, foreign or domestic.
"But, in the midst of the freedom we enjoy, the licentiousness of the papers called Federal (and I know not why they are called so, for they are in their principles anti-federal and despotic), is a dishonor to the character of the country, and an injury to its reputation and importance abroad. They represent the whole people of America as destitute of public principle and private manners.
"As to any injury they can do at home to those whom they abuse, or service they can render to those who employ them, it is to be set down to the account of noisy nothingness. It is on themselves the disgrace recoils, for the reflection easily presents itself to every thinking mind, that those who abuse liberty when they possess it would abuse power could they obtain it; and, therefore, they may as well take as a general motto, for all such papers, we and our patrons are not fit to be trusted with power.
"There is in America, more than in any other country, a large body of people who attend quietly to their farms, or follow their several occupations; who pay no regard to the clamors of anonymous scribblers, who think for themselves, and judge of government, not by the fury of newspaper writers, but by the prudent frugality of its measures, and the encouragement it gives to the improvement and prosperity of the country; and who, acting on their own judgment, never come forward in an election but on some important occasion.
"When this body moves, all the little barkings of scribbling and witless curs pass for nothing. To say to this independent description of men, "You must turn out such and such persons at the next election, for they have taken off a great many taxes, and lessened the expenses of government, they have dismissed my son, or my brother, or myself, from a lucrative office, in which there was nothing to do"-is to show the cloven foot of faction, and preach the language of ill-disguised mortification.
"In every part of the Union, this faction is in the agonies of death, and in proportion as its fate approaches, gnashes its teeth and struggles. My arrival has struck it as with an ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 15, 2020:
For those who think that this is a new phenomenon:
To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine
November 15, 1802
"But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property. It is, therefore, no wonder that the "Rights of Man" was attacked by that faction, and its author continually abused. But let them go on; give them rope enough and they will put an end to their own insignificance. There is too much common sense and independence in America to be long the dupe of any faction, foreign or domestic.
"But, in the midst of the freedom we enjoy, the licentiousness of the papers called Federal (and I know not why they are called so, for they are in their principles anti-federal and despotic), is a dishonor to the character of the country, and an injury to its reputation and importance abroad. They represent the whole people of America as destitute of public principle and private manners.
"As to any injury they can do at home to those whom they abuse, or service they can render to those who employ them, it is to be set down to the account of noisy nothingness. It is on themselves the disgrace recoils, for the reflection easily presents itself to every thinking mind, that those who abuse liberty when they possess it would abuse power could they obtain it; and, therefore, they may as well take as a general motto, for all such papers, we and our patrons are not fit to be trusted with power.
"There is in America, more than in any other country, a large body of people who attend quietly to their farms, or follow their several occupations; who pay no regard to the clamors of anonymous scribblers, who think for themselves, and judge of government, not by the fury of newspaper writers, but by the prudent frugality of its measures, and the encouragement it gives to the improvement and prosperity of the country; and who, acting on their own judgment, never come forward in an election but on some important occasion.
"When this body moves, all the little barkings of scribbling and witless curs pass for nothing. To say to this independent description of men, "You must turn out such and such persons at the next election, for they have taken off a great many taxes, and lessened the expenses of government, they have dismissed my son, or my brother, or myself, from a lucrative office, in which there was nothing to do"-is to show the cloven foot of faction, and preach the language of ill-disguised mortification.
"In every part of the Union, this faction is in the agonies of death, and in proportion as its fate approaches, gnashes its teeth and struggles. My arrival has struck it as with an ...
Make A Difference!
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 15, 2020:
I've been boycotting since WACO (1993), so...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 15, 2020:
I've been boycotting since WACO (1993), so...
The Great Awakening TV: FULL INVESTIGATION: DONALD TRUMP VS THE DEEP STATE --- UNCOVERING ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 14, 2020:
See also
https://gnews.org/558953/
"On Nov. 14, Mr. Guo said on GTV Live that President Donald Trump’s declaration of a state of emergency in the U.S. officially started the U.S.-China economic and cyber war.
"According to Mr. Guo Live, the state of national emergency was issued by Trump to prepare for decoupling, and President Trump can decouple from the Chinese Communist Party without any influence or approval from anyone. This means that all Communist corporate assets (regardless of company) in the US will be seized. Moreover, the preparation behind economic warfare is the beginning of modern cyber warfare. Trump’s declaration of a state of emergency in the United States is more central to targeting online businesses."
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 14, 2020:
See also
https://gnews.org/558953/
"On Nov. 14, Mr. Guo said on GTV Live that President Donald Trump’s declaration of a state of emergency in the U.S. officially started the U.S.-China economic and cyber war.
"According to Mr. Guo Live, the state of national emergency was issued by Trump to prepare for decoupling, and President Trump can decouple from the Chinese Communist Party without any influence or approval from anyone. This means that all Communist corporate assets (regardless of company) in the US will be seized. Moreover, the preparation behind economic warfare is the beginning of modern cyber warfare. Trump’s declaration of a state of emergency in the United States is more central to targeting online businesses."
Sky News: THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA IS THE REAL ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE - BERNARDI EXPLAINS THE DEAD OF MSM...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 14, 2020:
Bombshell Truth How China's CCP Controls The US Deepstate!…
15,659 views•Oct 21, 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZqhgzgTkK0=emb_logo=IwAR1yEAv895AW7Yi_62we5GT31Jpv7tBfU_0zM9o3QA2YwX9RmXMFHnSVx_s
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 14, 2020:
Bombshell Truth How China's CCP Controls The US Deepstate!…
15,659 views•Oct 21, 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZqhgzgTkK0=emb_logo=IwAR1yEAv895AW7Yi_62we5GT31Jpv7tBfU_0zM9o3QA2YwX9RmXMFHnSVx_s
RedState: Alex Parker: Alan Dershowtiz says Trump will win the PA lawsuit.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 14, 2020:
Logic fails to visit the minds of some people, as does reason, and morality.
A fraud is - as a rule - unlawful, illegal, and criminal.
A fraud is therefore - as a rule - not lawful, not legal, and immoral when the fraud causes injury to innocent people on purpose, for personal gain received by the criminal perpetrating the fraud.
Fraud includes a false accusation made intentionally by the criminal perpetrating the fraud known as false accusation.
The law in America (at least before criminals counterfeited it: fraudulently) is Trial by Jury, also known as The Common Law, also known as The Law of the Land: see the Latin term legem terrae.
If during a lawful, legal, moral, legitimate, reasonable, logical, function such as an election, there are criminals perpetrating a fraud, then those discovering evidence of that clear and present danger to innocent people whose lives can be injured by the frauds perpetrating fraud during the election are duty bound to set the wheels of due process in motion to place the suspects of the fraud before The People in a Court of Law, so as to have The People decide the facts that matter in that case of fraud.
To fail to do so could result in a fraudulently elected individual, a criminal even if the criminal is unaware of the fraud initially, a criminal when discovery of the facts inspires an additional fraud to cover up the original fraud, a criminal because the election was fraudulent, and the office is duty bound to ensure lawful elections: nonfeasance, and a fraud cannot be legal, it is an obvious, self-evident, contradiction.
A fraud cannot be legal.
Perhaps in dystopia a fraud is warranted, so as to win something by fraud, "for the greater good" (of the frauds, at the expense of their victims).
"It is a matter well known, and well understood, that by the laws of our country, every question which affects a man's life, reputation, or property, must be tried by twelve of his peers; and that their unanimous verdict is, alone, competent to determine the fact in issue." M'Kean, Chief Justice
U.S. Supreme Court
RESPUBLICA v. SHAFFER, 1 U.S. 236 (1788)
Court of Oyer and Terminer, at Philadelphia
EX TURPI CAUSE NON ORITUR ACTIO: OUT OF A BASE/DISGRACEFUL/ILLEGAL CAUSE, AN ACTION DOES NOT ARISE.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 14, 2020:
Logic fails to visit the minds of some people, as does reason, and morality.
A fraud is - as a rule - unlawful, illegal, and criminal.
A fraud is therefore - as a rule - not lawful, not legal, and immoral when the fraud causes injury to innocent people on purpose, for personal gain received by the criminal perpetrating the fraud.
Fraud includes a false accusation made intentionally by the criminal perpetrating the fraud known as false accusation.
The law in America (at least before criminals counterfeited it: fraudulently) is Trial by Jury, also known as The Common Law, also known as The Law of the Land: see the Latin term legem terrae.
If during a lawful, legal, moral, legitimate, reasonable, logical, function such as an election, there are criminals perpetrating a fraud, then those discovering evidence of that clear and present danger to innocent people whose lives can be injured by the frauds perpetrating fraud during the election are duty bound to set the wheels of due process in motion to place the suspects of the fraud before The People in a Court of Law, so as to have The People decide the facts that matter in that case of fraud.
To fail to do so could result in a fraudulently elected individual, a criminal even if the criminal is unaware of the fraud initially, a criminal when discovery of the facts inspires an additional fraud to cover up the original fraud, a criminal because the election was fraudulent, and the office is duty bound to ensure lawful elections: nonfeasance, and a fraud cannot be legal, it is an obvious, self-evident, contradiction.
A fraud cannot be legal.
Perhaps in dystopia a fraud is warranted, so as to win something by fraud, "for the greater good" (of the frauds, at the expense of their victims).
"It is a matter well known, and well understood, that by the laws of our country, every question which affects a man's life, reputation, or property, must be tried by twelve of his peers; and that their unanimous verdict is, alone, competent to determine the fact in issue." M'Kean, Chief Justice
U.S. Supreme Court
RESPUBLICA v. SHAFFER, 1 U.S. 236 (1788)
Court of Oyer and Terminer, at Philadelphia
EX TURPI CAUSE NON ORITUR ACTIO: OUT OF A BASE/DISGRACEFUL/ILLEGAL CAUSE, AN ACTION DOES NOT ARISE.
Here’s Why We Don’t See Missing Kids On Milk Cartons Anymore
[youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 13, 2020:
Johnny Gosch on a Milk Carton at time 0:46 or so...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZdosLxESaU
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 13, 2020:
Johnny Gosch on a Milk Carton at time 0:46 or so...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZdosLxESaU
What are your thoughts on Operation Warp speed?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 13, 2020:
A.
Trump et al. are producing a placebo for The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud, for political smoke and mirrors.
B.
Trump et al. are in bed with The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud, and the "vaccine" will cause a pandemic, so as to "fix" that one similarly.
C.
The moon of made of cheese, the earth is flat, and we all live in a simulation, so wake up tomorrow as a player in a better game.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 13, 2020:
A.
Trump et al. are producing a placebo for The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud, for political smoke and mirrors.
B.
Trump et al. are in bed with The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud, and the "vaccine" will cause a pandemic, so as to "fix" that one similarly.
C.
The moon of made of cheese, the earth is flat, and we all live in a simulation, so wake up tomorrow as a player in a better game.
Enjoy another from JP [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 13, 2020:
These guys are kind-off above the law?
The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots
Page 40
Private Prosecutors
"For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action.
Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, however, private prosecutors were prohibited from withdrawing the action pursuant to private agreement with the defendant. Court intervention was occasionally required to compel injured crime victims to appear against offenders in court and "not to make bargains to allow [defendants] to escape conviction, if they...repair the injury."
Page 42
Law Enforcement as a Universal Duty
"Law enforcement in the Founders' time was a duty of every citizen. Citizens were expected to be armed and equipped to chase suspects on foot, on horse, or with wagon whenever summoned. And when called upon to enforce the laws of the state, citizens were to respond "not faintly and with lagging steps, but honestly and bravely and with whatever implements and facilities [were] convenient and at hand. Any person could act in the capacity of a constable without being one, and when summoned by a law enforcement officer, a private person became a temporary member of the police department. The law also presumed that any person acting in his public capacity as an officer was rightfully appointed."
...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 13, 2020:
These guys are kind-off above the law?
The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots
Page 40
Private Prosecutors
"For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action.
Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, however, private prosecutors were prohibited from withdrawing the action pursuant to private agreement with the defendant. Court intervention was occasionally required to compel injured crime victims to appear against offenders in court and "not to make bargains to allow [defendants] to escape conviction, if they...repair the injury."
Page 42
Law Enforcement as a Universal Duty
"Law enforcement in the Founders' time was a duty of every citizen. Citizens were expected to be armed and equipped to chase suspects on foot, on horse, or with wagon whenever summoned. And when called upon to enforce the laws of the state, citizens were to respond "not faintly and with lagging steps, but honestly and bravely and with whatever implements and facilities [were] convenient and at hand. Any person could act in the capacity of a constable without being one, and when summoned by a law enforcement officer, a private person became a temporary member of the police department. The law also presumed that any person acting in his public capacity as an officer was rightfully appointed."
...
Enjoy another from JP [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 13, 2020:
Why has this house of cards been setup this way?
"But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program.
"To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter."
Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and their Legacy
by William Watkins
"The judiciary of the United States is so constructed and extended, as to absorb and destroy the judiciaries of the several states; thereby rendering laws as tedious, intricate, and expensive, and justice as unattainable by a great part of the community, as in England; and enabling the rich to oppress and ruin the poor."
George Mason, 1787
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 13, 2020:
Why has this house of cards been setup this way?
"But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program.
"To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter."
Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and their Legacy
by William Watkins
"The judiciary of the United States is so constructed and extended, as to absorb and destroy the judiciaries of the several states; thereby rendering laws as tedious, intricate, and expensive, and justice as unattainable by a great part of the community, as in England; and enabling the rich to oppress and ruin the poor."
George Mason, 1787
Enjoy another from JP [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 13, 2020:
Impartial Judges?
Who in the world came up with that CON? "Impartial" Judges?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 13, 2020:
Impartial Judges?
Who in the world came up with that CON? "Impartial" Judges?
Huge Legal Victory for President Trump in Pennsylvania
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 12, 2020:
Here is a score card:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/election-2020?fbclid=IwAR2i0prvGENndA-fvBg3QsxVB4PUEEylpuqGHWh9L6YPhAlwqJ2jnyFkYKI
Here is another score card:
https://www.270towin.com/
The first score card claims:
Trump: 232
Pedo: 227
The fellow pedo's are probably sweating.
The second score card claims:
Pedo: 279
Trump: 163
Pennsylvania is shown in the second score card as affording the "winner" of that State 20 units of game tokens.
So...
Score Card 1:
Trump: 232 + 20 = 252
Pedo: 227
Score Card 2:
Pedo: 279 - 20 = 259
Trump: 163 + 20 = 183
Does it matter?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 12, 2020:
Here is a score card:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/election-2020?fbclid=IwAR2i0prvGENndA-fvBg3QsxVB4PUEEylpuqGHWh9L6YPhAlwqJ2jnyFkYKI
Here is another score card:
https://www.270towin.com/
The first score card claims:
Trump: 232
Pedo: 227
The fellow pedo's are probably sweating.
The second score card claims:
Pedo: 279
Trump: 163
Pennsylvania is shown in the second score card as affording the "winner" of that State 20 units of game tokens.
So...
Score Card 1:
Trump: 232 + 20 = 252
Pedo: 227
Score Card 2:
Pedo: 279 - 20 = 259
Trump: 163 + 20 = 183
Does it matter?
The HIDDEN TRUTH About Politics | Jordan Peterson (Trump vs Biden 2020 Election) - YouTube
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 10, 2020:
I often do not agree with Peterson and this is no exception to the rule.
Any mention of law from Peterson, so far as I have found, is ambiguous to a point of uselessness, as if the idea is to purposefully fail to account for it, so at then to have the wiggle room to break it.
That self-evident fact is again broadcast in that message in that media titled The HIDDEN TRUTH About Politics.
So...
Why keep it hidden? What is the motive?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 10, 2020:
I often do not agree with Peterson and this is no exception to the rule.
Any mention of law from Peterson, so far as I have found, is ambiguous to a point of uselessness, as if the idea is to purposefully fail to account for it, so at then to have the wiggle room to break it.
That self-evident fact is again broadcast in that message in that media titled The HIDDEN TRUTH About Politics.
So...
Why keep it hidden? What is the motive?
Where are intellectual conversations happening? Let me know. 😁 😆
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 10, 2020:
The highest forms of intellectual conversation happening are those I have with my alter-ego.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 10, 2020:
The highest forms of intellectual conversation happening are those I have with my alter-ego.
Where are intellectual conversations happening? Let me know. 😁 😆
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 10, 2020:
I often find information during family events, information that I would otherwise not find were I to attempt to find information through other channels such as so-called discussion groups.
I think that this fact that matters is part of the motives behind so-called lock-downs, and "social distancing."
Print media, television, and now "face time," tend to be one-way transfers of information, not the type of information found during family events, in my experience.
Personal contact, as if in arms reach, at arms length, or within striking distance, tends to cause a level of respect, lending toward peaceful discourse.
Another example is this type of information exchange (not dictatorial: one-way) occurred in a jury trial in which I was one of the 12 trusted with lawful jurisdiction: power. The level of importance, significance, and justification for speaking the truth, or speaking with authority concerning the facts that matter in the case at hand, tended to weed out behavior that is now commonly understood as trolling.
Trolling can be seen in many ways by many people from many angles of view, while it (trolling) is what it is in each case where it becomes another example of behavior belonging into that category of behavior now known as trolling.
Trolling can be someone lighting fires to start a flame war. Trolling can be someone baiting a hook to see what can be caught. Trolling can be a troll under a bridge exacting a toll if anyone dares to attempt to cross the bridge.
Mathew 7:12 applies here as everywhere else, it is a natural law, it affords few exceptions to the rule. Trolls, deceivers, and other forms of libelers, catch fire, jumping from one to another place, and that type of behavior creates a place where angels fear to tread, not wanting to be lit on fire.
What is the attraction to lowbrow, mindless, physical, lowbrowed, philistine, anti-intellectual, uncultivated, nonintellectual conversations? Are some people lured into such things when the trolls pirate the media flying false flags? Once caught, are the victims able to acknowledge that fact considering the fact that those caught are deceived enough to get caught?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 10, 2020:
I often find information during family events, information that I would otherwise not find were I to attempt to find information through other channels such as so-called discussion groups.
I think that this fact that matters is part of the motives behind so-called lock-downs, and "social distancing."
Print media, television, and now "face time," tend to be one-way transfers of information, not the type of information found during family events, in my experience.
Personal contact, as if in arms reach, at arms length, or within striking distance, tends to cause a level of respect, lending toward peaceful discourse.
Another example is this type of information exchange (not dictatorial: one-way) occurred in a jury trial in which I was one of the 12 trusted with lawful jurisdiction: power. The level of importance, significance, and justification for speaking the truth, or speaking with authority concerning the facts that matter in the case at hand, tended to weed out behavior that is now commonly understood as trolling.
Trolling can be seen in many ways by many people from many angles of view, while it (trolling) is what it is in each case where it becomes another example of behavior belonging into that category of behavior now known as trolling.
Trolling can be someone lighting fires to start a flame war. Trolling can be someone baiting a hook to see what can be caught. Trolling can be a troll under a bridge exacting a toll if anyone dares to attempt to cross the bridge.
Mathew 7:12 applies here as everywhere else, it is a natural law, it affords few exceptions to the rule. Trolls, deceivers, and other forms of libelers, catch fire, jumping from one to another place, and that type of behavior creates a place where angels fear to tread, not wanting to be lit on fire.
What is the attraction to lowbrow, mindless, physical, lowbrowed, philistine, anti-intellectual, uncultivated, nonintellectual conversations? Are some people lured into such things when the trolls pirate the media flying false flags? Once caught, are the victims able to acknowledge that fact considering the fact that those caught are deceived enough to get caught?
Bill Barr Opens DOJ Probe of Election Fraud, 3342
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 10, 2020:
Very good, thanks.
Bill Still goes way back in Patriot history, look up Money Masters.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 10, 2020:
Very good, thanks.
Bill Still goes way back in Patriot history, look up Money Masters.
THE TAR BABY OF THE POST ELECTION FALSE NARRATIVE
What happens if an election is stolen but no ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 9, 2020:
As to the question concerning if the MEDIA does not report a crime does it make a difference?
Answers abound, and I'll give one to you all.
You are the media, you get stuff, you give stuff, some of you take stuff, you lie to take stuff, you threaten to take stuff, and you assault people to take stuff too.
If someone takes stuff from you, and you don't know it, is that stealing?
Witch MEDIA?
"It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Spooner
Spooner is MEDIA.
How about this:
The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots
Page 40
Private Prosecutors
"For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action.
Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 9, 2020:
As to the question concerning if the MEDIA does not report a crime does it make a difference?
Answers abound, and I'll give one to you all.
You are the media, you get stuff, you give stuff, some of you take stuff, you lie to take stuff, you threaten to take stuff, and you assault people to take stuff too.
If someone takes stuff from you, and you don't know it, is that stealing?
Witch MEDIA?
"It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Spooner
Spooner is MEDIA.
How about this:
The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots
Page 40
Private Prosecutors
"For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action.
Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, ...
THE TAR BABY OF THE POST ELECTION FALSE NARRATIVE
What happens if an election is stolen but no ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 9, 2020:
Excellent again warminster100, thanks.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 9, 2020:
Excellent again warminster100, thanks.
Will the court decide or will congress?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 9, 2020:
I don't know about any of those particulars that someone might conjure up with a crystal ball. Those in power make up the rules they abide by at their pleasure WHEN they are in agreement with each other. The rulers have split up into The Globalists and The Nationalists.
Now it is a battle to see which "Side" will overpower the other side, and anything goes in total war, anything at all, for Christ's Sake people, they are either pedos or they protect the pedo racket, so what can they do that is worse?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 9, 2020:
I don't know about any of those particulars that someone might conjure up with a crystal ball. Those in power make up the rules they abide by at their pleasure WHEN they are in agreement with each other. The rulers have split up into The Globalists and The Nationalists.
Now it is a battle to see which "Side" will overpower the other side, and anything goes in total war, anything at all, for Christ's Sake people, they are either pedos or they protect the pedo racket, so what can they do that is worse?
Will the court decide or will congress?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 9, 2020:
"The only way President Trump won’t be President is if he concedes the election and that will never happen."
That explains the following false propaganda:
https://idw.community/group/ConspiracyResearch/post/148715/https-youtu-be-wzwrhlw7y8w-what-if-a-us-presidential-candidate-refuses-to-concede-after-an-electi
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 9, 2020:
"The only way President Trump won’t be President is if he concedes the election and that will never happen."
That explains the following false propaganda:
https://idw.community/group/ConspiracyResearch/post/148715/https-youtu-be-wzwrhlw7y8w-what-if-a-us-presidential-candidate-refuses-to-concede-after-an-electi
[youtu.be]
What if a US presidential candidate refuses to concede after an election?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 9, 2020:
I am going to comment further on this MEDIA, which I am qualifying as Propaganda.
The guy, speaking about the tradition of a "Concession Speech" reports at time 3:19:
"...that candidate still has at her command..."
Why would this individual choose to use the female gender in that message?
The main point worth pointing out is that this narrative is false for anyone who has not yet given up on their own power to decide what they will or will do, in any situation, such as when an individual is facing the edits, dictates, orders, statutes, acts, or other commands issued by anyone upon any number of people anywhere, anytime, under any conditions.
Those who have given up on their own power to make reasonable, moral, intelligent, logical, productive, non-criminal decisions can be illustrated with a historical example.
"When a federal marshal called on citizens to help guard an escaped
slave in Pennsylvania, the crowd not only refused to take part in his posse
but also freed his captive."
Posse Comitatus (ACT)
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1251/MR1251.AppD.pdf
People ordered to assist (subsidized) African Slavery said no. They said, in so many words and actions, "No, Satan, not on my watch."
That is one example of how, in American history, people maintain their internal bullshit detectors that they can use whenever some crook claims to be the law while they are perpetrating a kidnapping or worse.
So the guy above is apparently reinforcing the dogma that Americans are merely slaves who follow their leader even if their leader leads them off a cliff.
I may watch more of that propaganda, if for no other reason than a laugh, and an opportunity to speak out against such stupidity and servility.
""It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Spooner
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 9, 2020:
I am going to comment further on this MEDIA, which I am qualifying as Propaganda.
The guy, speaking about the tradition of a "Concession Speech" reports at time 3:19:
"...that candidate still has at her command..."
Why would this individual choose to use the female gender in that message?
The main point worth pointing out is that this narrative is false for anyone who has not yet given up on their own power to decide what they will or will do, in any situation, such as when an individual is facing the edits, dictates, orders, statutes, acts, or other commands issued by anyone upon any number of people anywhere, anytime, under any conditions.
Those who have given up on their own power to make reasonable, moral, intelligent, logical, productive, non-criminal decisions can be illustrated with a historical example.
"When a federal marshal called on citizens to help guard an escaped
slave in Pennsylvania, the crowd not only refused to take part in his posse
but also freed his captive."
Posse Comitatus (ACT)
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1251/MR1251.AppD.pdf
People ordered to assist (subsidized) African Slavery said no. They said, in so many words and actions, "No, Satan, not on my watch."
That is one example of how, in American history, people maintain their internal bullshit detectors that they can use whenever some crook claims to be the law while they are perpetrating a kidnapping or worse.
So the guy above is apparently reinforcing the dogma that Americans are merely slaves who follow their leader even if their leader leads them off a cliff.
I may watch more of that propaganda, if for no other reason than a laugh, and an opportunity to speak out against such stupidity and servility.
""It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Spooner
[youtu.be]
What if a US presidential candidate refuses to concede after an election?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 9, 2020:
This authority is counterfeit.
In the first place Elections to Government Offices are not democratic, they are Oligarchical.
In the second place, all government is voluntary, none of government is involuntary, so claims of how everyone follows the single fearless leader belong in the dogma of organized crime as criminals routinely counterfeit government, turning government from a voluntary association into organized crime where the criminals enslave everyone by deceit, by threat of violence, and by aggression (involuntary servitude).
The alteration from a Federation of Independent States, a voluntary association for mutual defense, was an alteration from government to organized crime (counterfeit government) and that happened in 1789.
Previous to 1789 the President of the Federation of Independent States was elected by Congress. The President of Congress was the president of a Voluntary Association for Mutual Defense. The Federation served the States, and the States served the people in the States, as self-evident facts are, and as self-evident facts are reported in a Declaration of Independence.
Under government (voluntary association) the people from Ancient history have employed law, such as the common law, whereby each individual is on an equal footing at law with each other individual, and the volunteers volunteer to defend each other by holding each other to account whenever one of the volunteers decides, voluntarily, to step outside the sanctuary of voluntary association.
When America started as a voluntary association for mutual defense, it was a defensive move in response to British Aggression as The British Empire Tyrants were expanding their territory in which they enslave everyone, because "they can."
They could not enslave America, the defense was sufficient to defeat the largest military force then on planet Earth.
Americans - as a rule - adopted the common law, the Ancient law, the law of the land, known in Latin as Legem Terrae. That fact is expressed in the first Federal congress, and that fact is expressed in many of the Independent State constitutions, and that fact is expressed with such documents as a Declaration of Independence and any of the many Bills of Rights.
The common law is above any other claims of law, such as edicts, statutes, acts, or other ORDERS that are claims to be mandated, and enforced brutally upon innocent people.
Example:
“A jury of twelve local farmers, all men and all white according to Levinson, rule in favor of Freeman in 1781, giving her freedom and awarding her 30 shillings in damages.”
Slavery in America was brought here by the British Empire Tyrants, and once the Tyrants were shown the door after their Military defeat, Slavery was on the way out of ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 9, 2020:
This authority is counterfeit.
In the first place Elections to Government Offices are not democratic, they are Oligarchical.
In the second place, all government is voluntary, none of government is involuntary, so claims of how everyone follows the single fearless leader belong in the dogma of organized crime as criminals routinely counterfeit government, turning government from a voluntary association into organized crime where the criminals enslave everyone by deceit, by threat of violence, and by aggression (involuntary servitude).
The alteration from a Federation of Independent States, a voluntary association for mutual defense, was an alteration from government to organized crime (counterfeit government) and that happened in 1789.
Previous to 1789 the President of the Federation of Independent States was elected by Congress. The President of Congress was the president of a Voluntary Association for Mutual Defense. The Federation served the States, and the States served the people in the States, as self-evident facts are, and as self-evident facts are reported in a Declaration of Independence.
Under government (voluntary association) the people from Ancient history have employed law, such as the common law, whereby each individual is on an equal footing at law with each other individual, and the volunteers volunteer to defend each other by holding each other to account whenever one of the volunteers decides, voluntarily, to step outside the sanctuary of voluntary association.
When America started as a voluntary association for mutual defense, it was a defensive move in response to British Aggression as The British Empire Tyrants were expanding their territory in which they enslave everyone, because "they can."
They could not enslave America, the defense was sufficient to defeat the largest military force then on planet Earth.
Americans - as a rule - adopted the common law, the Ancient law, the law of the land, known in Latin as Legem Terrae. That fact is expressed in the first Federal congress, and that fact is expressed in many of the Independent State constitutions, and that fact is expressed with such documents as a Declaration of Independence and any of the many Bills of Rights.
The common law is above any other claims of law, such as edicts, statutes, acts, or other ORDERS that are claims to be mandated, and enforced brutally upon innocent people.
Example:
“A jury of twelve local farmers, all men and all white according to Levinson, rule in favor of Freeman in 1781, giving her freedom and awarding her 30 shillings in damages.”
Slavery in America was brought here by the British Empire Tyrants, and once the Tyrants were shown the door after their Military defeat, Slavery was on the way out of ...
A wise man once said.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 9, 2020:
And servile.
"It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Spooner
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 9, 2020:
And servile.
"It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Spooner
Do you believe the election results?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 8, 2020:
Electing the new Boss to extort Protection Money is known for the fact that the next Boss will stab the old Boss in the back.
When in Rome.
Et tu, Brute?
In a functioning Federation of Independent States UNDER the common law (see: Bill of Rights), it is the self-evident duty HELD by The People (as a whole, each on an equal legal footing as each other) to HOLD each other to account for their forays outside the law (the common law).
If elections are going to return INSIDE the law, then The People are duty bound to facilitate that end, with the means at their disposal.
Every county can assemble an Independent Grand Jury to investigate any of many charges of voter fraud (witness testimony is common law evidence, there is no better evidence, under penalty of perjury), and those non-government investigators command all civil and legal jurisdiction including subpoena and the power to hire magistrates or employ existing government officials including the county sheriff, and any military, state or federal: see the common law precedent known as posse comitatus (not the "Statute" called an "Act").
The facts that matter in each case move the law power (common law) from step to step reaching a verdict by The People whose representatives are pulled out of The People Group by LOT (not by vote), and if the treasonous criminals who perpetrate voter fraud do not accept their invitation to their court date in a Court of Law (not Admiralty, Equity, Exchequer, Family, etc.), they are then self-evidently, self-confessed, criminals outside the law and therefore subject to Private Justice.
This may seem harsh to some, but what are you going to do, check with your Boss to see if it is really true? Why don't you read the Bill of Rights, or the Original Declaration of Independence.
How about it?
In the Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. I. p. 10
"The clause, too, reprobating the enslaving the inhabitants of Africa, was struck out in complaisance to South Carolina and Georgia, who had never attempted to restrain the importation of slaves, and who, on the contrary, still wished to continue it. Our northern brethren also, I believe felt a little tender under those censures; for, though their people had very few slaves themselves, yet they had been pretty considerable carriers of them to others."
http://teachingamericanhistory.org/ratification/elliot/vol1/approaches/
Thomas Jefferson
Declaration of Independence
"he has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating it's most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. this piratical warfare, the ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 8, 2020:
Electing the new Boss to extort Protection Money is known for the fact that the next Boss will stab the old Boss in the back.
When in Rome.
Et tu, Brute?
In a functioning Federation of Independent States UNDER the common law (see: Bill of Rights), it is the self-evident duty HELD by The People (as a whole, each on an equal legal footing as each other) to HOLD each other to account for their forays outside the law (the common law).
If elections are going to return INSIDE the law, then The People are duty bound to facilitate that end, with the means at their disposal.
Every county can assemble an Independent Grand Jury to investigate any of many charges of voter fraud (witness testimony is common law evidence, there is no better evidence, under penalty of perjury), and those non-government investigators command all civil and legal jurisdiction including subpoena and the power to hire magistrates or employ existing government officials including the county sheriff, and any military, state or federal: see the common law precedent known as posse comitatus (not the "Statute" called an "Act").
The facts that matter in each case move the law power (common law) from step to step reaching a verdict by The People whose representatives are pulled out of The People Group by LOT (not by vote), and if the treasonous criminals who perpetrate voter fraud do not accept their invitation to their court date in a Court of Law (not Admiralty, Equity, Exchequer, Family, etc.), they are then self-evidently, self-confessed, criminals outside the law and therefore subject to Private Justice.
This may seem harsh to some, but what are you going to do, check with your Boss to see if it is really true? Why don't you read the Bill of Rights, or the Original Declaration of Independence.
How about it?
In the Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. I. p. 10
"The clause, too, reprobating the enslaving the inhabitants of Africa, was struck out in complaisance to South Carolina and Georgia, who had never attempted to restrain the importation of slaves, and who, on the contrary, still wished to continue it. Our northern brethren also, I believe felt a little tender under those censures; for, though their people had very few slaves themselves, yet they had been pretty considerable carriers of them to others."
http://teachingamericanhistory.org/ratification/elliot/vol1/approaches/
Thomas Jefferson
Declaration of Independence
"he has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating it's most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. this piratical warfare, the ...
we should all be concerned.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 8, 2020:
Cleanup on Isle 4:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsxUremL4nc=emb_logo
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 8, 2020:
Cleanup on Isle 4:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsxUremL4nc=emb_logo
Joe Biden and the Dems have to demand an honest count of all legal ballots to verify the final ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 7, 2020:
Elections are undemocratic so...
The Athenian Constitution:
Government by Jury and Referendum
by Roderick T. Long
"The practice of selecting government officials randomly (and the Athenians developed some fairly sophisticated mechanical gadgets to ensure that the selection really was random, and to make cheating extremely difficult) is one of the most distinctive features of the Athenian constitution. We think of electoral politics as the hallmark of democracy; but elections were almost unknown at Athens, because they were considered paradigmatically anti-democratic. Proposals to replace sortition with election were always condemned as moves in the direction of oligarchy.
"Why? Well, as the Athenians saw it, under an electoral system no one can obtain political office unless he is already famous: this gives prominent politicians an unfair advantage over the average person. Elections, they thought, favor those wealthy enough to bribe the voters, powerful enough to intimidate the voters, flashy enough to impress the voters, or clever enough to deceive the voters. The most influential political leaders were usually Horsemen anyway, thanks to their social prominence and the political following they could obtain by dispensing largesse among the masses. (One politician, Kimon, won the loyalty of the poor by leaving his fields and orchards unfenced, inviting anyone who was hungry to take whatever he needed.) If seats on the Council had been filled by popular vote, the Horsemen would have disproportionately dominated it — just as, today, Congress is dominated by those who can afford expensive campaigns, either through their own resources or through wealthy cronies. Or, to take a similar example, in the United States women have had the vote for over half a century, and yet, despite being a majority of the population, they represent only a tiny minority of elected officials. Obviously, the persistence of male dominance in the economic and social sphere has translated into women mostly voting for male candidates. The Athenians guessed, probably rightly, that the analogous prestige of the upper classes would lead to commoners mostly voting for aristocrats.
"That is why the Athenians saw elections as an oligarchical rather than a democratic phenomenon. Above all, the Athenians feared the prospect of government officials forming a privileged class with separate interests of their own. Through reliance on sortition, random selection by lot, the Council could be guaranteed to represent a fair cross-section of the Athenian people — a kind of proportional representation, as it were. Random selection ensured that those selected would be representatives of the people as a whole, whereas selection by vote made those selected into mere representatives of...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 7, 2020:
Elections are undemocratic so...
The Athenian Constitution:
Government by Jury and Referendum
by Roderick T. Long
"The practice of selecting government officials randomly (and the Athenians developed some fairly sophisticated mechanical gadgets to ensure that the selection really was random, and to make cheating extremely difficult) is one of the most distinctive features of the Athenian constitution. We think of electoral politics as the hallmark of democracy; but elections were almost unknown at Athens, because they were considered paradigmatically anti-democratic. Proposals to replace sortition with election were always condemned as moves in the direction of oligarchy.
"Why? Well, as the Athenians saw it, under an electoral system no one can obtain political office unless he is already famous: this gives prominent politicians an unfair advantage over the average person. Elections, they thought, favor those wealthy enough to bribe the voters, powerful enough to intimidate the voters, flashy enough to impress the voters, or clever enough to deceive the voters. The most influential political leaders were usually Horsemen anyway, thanks to their social prominence and the political following they could obtain by dispensing largesse among the masses. (One politician, Kimon, won the loyalty of the poor by leaving his fields and orchards unfenced, inviting anyone who was hungry to take whatever he needed.) If seats on the Council had been filled by popular vote, the Horsemen would have disproportionately dominated it — just as, today, Congress is dominated by those who can afford expensive campaigns, either through their own resources or through wealthy cronies. Or, to take a similar example, in the United States women have had the vote for over half a century, and yet, despite being a majority of the population, they represent only a tiny minority of elected officials. Obviously, the persistence of male dominance in the economic and social sphere has translated into women mostly voting for male candidates. The Athenians guessed, probably rightly, that the analogous prestige of the upper classes would lead to commoners mostly voting for aristocrats.
"That is why the Athenians saw elections as an oligarchical rather than a democratic phenomenon. Above all, the Athenians feared the prospect of government officials forming a privileged class with separate interests of their own. Through reliance on sortition, random selection by lot, the Council could be guaranteed to represent a fair cross-section of the Athenian people — a kind of proportional representation, as it were. Random selection ensured that those selected would be representatives of the people as a whole, whereas selection by vote made those selected into mere representatives of...
I hear that there's a new book coming out, "Honest vote count" by Shirley U. Jest.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 6, 2020:
"Pay your Bills Now!" by Joe King
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 6, 2020:
"Pay your Bills Now!" by Joe King
💥BREAKING! Roger Stone: Trump Is Going To Win 270!
[infowars]
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 4, 2020:
"This site can’t be reached"
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 4, 2020:
"This site can’t be reached"
I am in favor of a recount. Some quality checking so to speak.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 4, 2020:
I want a do over, and a None-of-the-above box on the ballot.
If no one wins: do over.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 4, 2020:
I want a do over, and a None-of-the-above box on the ballot.
If no one wins: do over.
The circus showed up at Rittenhouse's hearing.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 3, 2020:
Thanks for keeping this up-to-date.
When the persecution of Eric Parker was reported dutifully by his wife Andrea Parker that fact was, in my opinion, a leading cause for acquittal in that case.
When the light is turned on the rats and roaches run for cover.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 3, 2020:
Thanks for keeping this up-to-date.
When the persecution of Eric Parker was reported dutifully by his wife Andrea Parker that fact was, in my opinion, a leading cause for acquittal in that case.
When the light is turned on the rats and roaches run for cover.
Celebrities who want you disarmed hire armed security for Election night-
[bearingarms.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 3, 2020:
Criminals who are in the process of lying to you, robbing you, raping you, torturing you, WILL - as a rule - claim that they are helping you, so long as you do not attempt to defend yourself, but as soon as you resist (disobey) that criminal - as a rule - will claim that you are lying to them, you are robbing them, you are raping them, and you are torturing them, right up until you are murdered by them, and then they will claim that you attempted to murder them, so you were rightly exterminated for your aggression upon them.
This is not hard to understand.
Deception - as a rule - only works on those who are deceived.
People WILL be deceived.
Be aware.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 3, 2020:
Criminals who are in the process of lying to you, robbing you, raping you, torturing you, WILL - as a rule - claim that they are helping you, so long as you do not attempt to defend yourself, but as soon as you resist (disobey) that criminal - as a rule - will claim that you are lying to them, you are robbing them, you are raping them, and you are torturing them, right up until you are murdered by them, and then they will claim that you attempted to murder them, so you were rightly exterminated for your aggression upon them.
This is not hard to understand.
Deception - as a rule - only works on those who are deceived.
People WILL be deceived.
Be aware.
D’you think you know who you’re voting for?
Research “Scorecard” and “Hammer”
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 3, 2020:
How about the following?
Steve Bannon: “We’re going to pull the plug on Hammer and Scorecard”
November 2, 2020 by IWB
https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/steve-bannon-were-going-to-pull-the-plug-on-hammer-and-scorecard/
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 3, 2020:
How about the following?
Steve Bannon: “We’re going to pull the plug on Hammer and Scorecard”
November 2, 2020 by IWB
https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/steve-bannon-were-going-to-pull-the-plug-on-hammer-and-scorecard/
There's nothing political about this video, but the information is interesting.
[youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 3, 2020:
That is the storyline claimed to be derived from science when the predetermined conclusion is employed from The Germ Theory Dogma. In the Germ Theory Dogma the "cause" of the set of symptoms is a microorganism or "germ" or "virus."
The science used to determine the cause of the sickness is "majority rules," or "science by consensus."
Competitive diagnosis other than The Germ Theory with The Germ Theory Dogma include the identification of things called exozomes.
I decided to stop watching The Germ Theory Dogma (political false propaganda) when the "Germ" reproduces itself by instructing the human body to crreate copies of the "Germ."
The competitive diagnosis, as far as I have read so far, is such that poisons invading the body (non-living toxic substances, heavy metals, including radioactive heavy metals, chemicals such as pesticides, etc.) trigger processes in the body to defend against the invasion by toxin.
An analogy of the two competitive diagnosis is:
Germ Theory Dogma:
One lie invades the system, once in the system the lie convinces a healthy cell in the system to start lying, then the two liars move to two more healthy cells in the system, soon the whole system if a big pile of lies.
Alternative Theories:
Actual identification of the actual cause of any specific set of symptoms, tested for consistent reproducing of the same exact results as the same isolated suspected cause of the specific set of symptoms causes the same set of symptoms each time the same suspected cause of the same specific set of symptoms is injected into a healthy body, instead of assuming, and the confirming by consensus an assumption, that happens to make a few people very rich, that the "cause" of the specific set of symptoms is also the "cure" of the poverty on the horizon for those who confirm by consensus.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 3, 2020:
That is the storyline claimed to be derived from science when the predetermined conclusion is employed from The Germ Theory Dogma. In the Germ Theory Dogma the "cause" of the set of symptoms is a microorganism or "germ" or "virus."
The science used to determine the cause of the sickness is "majority rules," or "science by consensus."
Competitive diagnosis other than The Germ Theory with The Germ Theory Dogma include the identification of things called exozomes.
I decided to stop watching The Germ Theory Dogma (political false propaganda) when the "Germ" reproduces itself by instructing the human body to crreate copies of the "Germ."
The competitive diagnosis, as far as I have read so far, is such that poisons invading the body (non-living toxic substances, heavy metals, including radioactive heavy metals, chemicals such as pesticides, etc.) trigger processes in the body to defend against the invasion by toxin.
An analogy of the two competitive diagnosis is:
Germ Theory Dogma:
One lie invades the system, once in the system the lie convinces a healthy cell in the system to start lying, then the two liars move to two more healthy cells in the system, soon the whole system if a big pile of lies.
Alternative Theories:
Actual identification of the actual cause of any specific set of symptoms, tested for consistent reproducing of the same exact results as the same isolated suspected cause of the specific set of symptoms causes the same set of symptoms each time the same suspected cause of the same specific set of symptoms is injected into a healthy body, instead of assuming, and the confirming by consensus an assumption, that happens to make a few people very rich, that the "cause" of the specific set of symptoms is also the "cure" of the poverty on the horizon for those who confirm by consensus.
Sh... Just let her be happy.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 3, 2020:
My wife appreciates CONSTRUCTIVE criticism, so long as it is rare. Choose your battles.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 3, 2020:
My wife appreciates CONSTRUCTIVE criticism, so long as it is rare. Choose your battles.
Organized crime.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 2, 2020:
Top 10?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 2, 2020:
Top 10?
If you had a mail-in ballot, absentee ballot, or early voting, make sure to verify that your ballot ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 2, 2020:
Your African Prince has received your e-mail reply, and as soon as you open the account with 5,000 dollars your million dollar facilitator fee will be sent in the mail.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 2, 2020:
Your African Prince has received your e-mail reply, and as soon as you open the account with 5,000 dollars your million dollar facilitator fee will be sent in the mail.
For those who hadn't heard yet.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 2, 2020:
Here is a confession:
"Under Illinois law, no bail was allowed."
Under the common law, which predates the English Language, and predates Magna Carta, and known as The Law of the Land, and adopted by moral people in America since 1774, does not agree with the quote above, and that is why I call it a confession.
Here:
14th of October, 1774
"On the same day, Congress unanimously resolved, “that the respective colonies are entitled to the common law of England, and more especially to the great and inestimable privilege of being tried by their peers of the vicinage according to the course of that law.” They further resolved, “that they were entitled to the benefit of such of the English statutes as existed at the time of their colonization, and which they have, by experience, respectively found to be applicable to their several and local circumstances.” They also resolved, that their ancestors, at the time of their immigration, were “entitled to all the rights, liberties, and immunities, of free and natural-born subjects within the realms of England.”
Here:
VIII - Excessive bail, cruel punishment
"Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."
Those who gain power and profit by deception cannot admit that NO BAIL is excessive bail.
So, it may be useful to translate the confession into something more obviously a confession.
"Under Illinois law, no bail was allowed."
That is what that says, but it is obviously false, because the law of the land (common law) includes the common law process eluded to in the Eighth Amendment of the Bill of Rights, which is claimed to be The Law of The Land in any Independent State that is allowed to join the Federation of Independent States.
The idea is that any criminal take-over of one State is then a cause of action in defense of all the formerly free people in that State, a duty bound to all the people in all the other States.
Criminal take-over in one State (confession):
"Under Illinois law, no bail was allowed."
So rewritten as:
"Under the rules enforced by the criminals who took-over Illinois, slaves have no rights."
I hope that helps clear things up.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 2, 2020:
Here is a confession:
"Under Illinois law, no bail was allowed."
Under the common law, which predates the English Language, and predates Magna Carta, and known as The Law of the Land, and adopted by moral people in America since 1774, does not agree with the quote above, and that is why I call it a confession.
Here:
14th of October, 1774
"On the same day, Congress unanimously resolved, “that the respective colonies are entitled to the common law of England, and more especially to the great and inestimable privilege of being tried by their peers of the vicinage according to the course of that law.” They further resolved, “that they were entitled to the benefit of such of the English statutes as existed at the time of their colonization, and which they have, by experience, respectively found to be applicable to their several and local circumstances.” They also resolved, that their ancestors, at the time of their immigration, were “entitled to all the rights, liberties, and immunities, of free and natural-born subjects within the realms of England.”
Here:
VIII - Excessive bail, cruel punishment
"Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."
Those who gain power and profit by deception cannot admit that NO BAIL is excessive bail.
So, it may be useful to translate the confession into something more obviously a confession.
"Under Illinois law, no bail was allowed."
That is what that says, but it is obviously false, because the law of the land (common law) includes the common law process eluded to in the Eighth Amendment of the Bill of Rights, which is claimed to be The Law of The Land in any Independent State that is allowed to join the Federation of Independent States.
The idea is that any criminal take-over of one State is then a cause of action in defense of all the formerly free people in that State, a duty bound to all the people in all the other States.
Criminal take-over in one State (confession):
"Under Illinois law, no bail was allowed."
So rewritten as:
"Under the rules enforced by the criminals who took-over Illinois, slaves have no rights."
I hope that helps clear things up.
For those who hadn't heard yet.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 2, 2020:
So...
The local criminal gang extorting "protection money" hires murderous pedo criminals to riot in the blood of the innocent, so as to scare the slaves into blind obedience as some of the victims grow restless and dare to defend themselves.
An example is made of just what happens to disobedient slaves ordered to die at the hands of the mercenaries - felons at war with society. When those slaves do not obey, and those slaves instead defend themselves, they must be beat back into submission, and a tried and true method is to kidnap one of the guilty disobedient slaves, punish them cruelly in the local dungeon, ship them far away into a foreign dungeon, torture them more, extract a confession if possible, make a deal for "leniency" if possible, torture some more, attempt to make the charge of guilty official in a kangaroo, summary justice, debt collection court, and avoid by any means any further disobedience involving the angry mob known as a jury trial in a Court of Law.
Offer an option to pacify the rest of the slaves foolish enough to credit the criminals with lawful authority, in which the kidnapped, tortured, morally and financially bankrupt example of just what happens to disobedient slaves another kangaroo court which pays off the still living (somehow) victim "civil damages" paid out of the "Public Fund" or pile of plunder: loot.
The victim is already morally tortured, as per the schedule. He went to what he thought were the "authorities" to seek "protection" from the mercenary army of hired rioters. The mercenary army of hired "police" were ordered to "stand down" and allow the hired rioters to riot in the blood of the innocent, errrr, that is to say riot in the blood of those who are guilty of failing to obey the order to die.
The rioters were hired to riot. What does that mean?
If you were a Private Prosecutor, or an Independent member of an Independent Grand Jury, looking at the evidence in this case, would you fail to see an obvious example of treason? No, you can't, your orders are very specific concerning what is or is not treason, what is or is not a riot, what is or is not a peaceful protest, and what is or is not lawful authority. Obey or else.
If Kyle is already being tortured, a little for now, or a lot, mentally, and physically, then added to the kidnapping charge is assault. Kidnapping is a felony. The felons guilty of kidnapping Kyle, which may now be additional felons guilty of assaulting Kyle, are doing so while occupying a government office, so add a list of charges to kidnapping (a felony) and assault (a felony) such as nonfeasance (they didn't do their job, they should be defending the innocent, not "standing down"), misfeasance (their warrant is bogus, the grand jury is controlled by the ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 2, 2020:
So...
The local criminal gang extorting "protection money" hires murderous pedo criminals to riot in the blood of the innocent, so as to scare the slaves into blind obedience as some of the victims grow restless and dare to defend themselves.
An example is made of just what happens to disobedient slaves ordered to die at the hands of the mercenaries - felons at war with society. When those slaves do not obey, and those slaves instead defend themselves, they must be beat back into submission, and a tried and true method is to kidnap one of the guilty disobedient slaves, punish them cruelly in the local dungeon, ship them far away into a foreign dungeon, torture them more, extract a confession if possible, make a deal for "leniency" if possible, torture some more, attempt to make the charge of guilty official in a kangaroo, summary justice, debt collection court, and avoid by any means any further disobedience involving the angry mob known as a jury trial in a Court of Law.
Offer an option to pacify the rest of the slaves foolish enough to credit the criminals with lawful authority, in which the kidnapped, tortured, morally and financially bankrupt example of just what happens to disobedient slaves another kangaroo court which pays off the still living (somehow) victim "civil damages" paid out of the "Public Fund" or pile of plunder: loot.
The victim is already morally tortured, as per the schedule. He went to what he thought were the "authorities" to seek "protection" from the mercenary army of hired rioters. The mercenary army of hired "police" were ordered to "stand down" and allow the hired rioters to riot in the blood of the innocent, errrr, that is to say riot in the blood of those who are guilty of failing to obey the order to die.
The rioters were hired to riot. What does that mean?
If you were a Private Prosecutor, or an Independent member of an Independent Grand Jury, looking at the evidence in this case, would you fail to see an obvious example of treason? No, you can't, your orders are very specific concerning what is or is not treason, what is or is not a riot, what is or is not a peaceful protest, and what is or is not lawful authority. Obey or else.
If Kyle is already being tortured, a little for now, or a lot, mentally, and physically, then added to the kidnapping charge is assault. Kidnapping is a felony. The felons guilty of kidnapping Kyle, which may now be additional felons guilty of assaulting Kyle, are doing so while occupying a government office, so add a list of charges to kidnapping (a felony) and assault (a felony) such as nonfeasance (they didn't do their job, they should be defending the innocent, not "standing down"), misfeasance (their warrant is bogus, the grand jury is controlled by the ...
This has been the worst Election in American history-
[thefederalist.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 2, 2020:
All the steps toward absolute despotism up to today were steps launched at the first fraudulent "election" which anointed Generalissimo Washington to the throne of a purely fictitious corporate entity of nebulous limited liability.
Before that arguably worse "Election" the office of President of the United States of America was determined by the Assembled Congress. The President was the President of the Federation when The United States were Independent people in Independent counties, in Independent States, formed into a voluntary mutual defense association kept voluntary with common laws binding common people within clearly defined boundaries of legality, lawfulness, morality, and a common interest: defense.
Failing to learn from history can lead to repeated misdiagnoses and mistreatment.
A.
"Damn the criminals took over again.
B.
"I know! Find another criminal to take the place of the last one."
"In June of 1775, George Washington was appointed Major General and elected by Congress to be commander in chief of the American revolutionary forces. Although he took up his tasks energetically, Washington accomplished nothing militarily for the remainder of the year and more, nor did he try. His only campaign in 1775 was internal rather than external; it was directed against the American army as he found it, and was designed to extirpate the spirit of liberty pervading this unusually individualistic and democratic army of militiamen. In short, Washington set out to transform a people's army, uniquely suited for a libertarian revolution, into another orthodox and despotically ruled statist force after the familiar European model.
"His primary aim was to crush the individualistic and democratic spirit of the American forces. For one thing, the officers of the militia were elected by their own men, and the discipline of repeated elections kept the officers from forming an aristocratic ruling caste typical of European armies of the period. The officers often drew little more pay than their men, and there were no hierarchical distinctions of rank imposed between officers and men. As a consequence, officers could not enforce their wills coercively on the soldiery. This New England equality horrified Washington's conservative and highly aristocratic soul.
"To introduce a hierarchy of ruling caste, Washington insisted on distinctive decorations of dress in accordance with minute gradations of rank. As one observer phrased it: "New lords, new laws. … The strictest government is taking place, and great distinction is made between officers and soldier. Everyone is made to know his place and keep it." Despite the great expense involved, he also tried to stamp out individuality in the army by forcing uniforms upon them; but the scarcity of...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 2, 2020:
All the steps toward absolute despotism up to today were steps launched at the first fraudulent "election" which anointed Generalissimo Washington to the throne of a purely fictitious corporate entity of nebulous limited liability.
Before that arguably worse "Election" the office of President of the United States of America was determined by the Assembled Congress. The President was the President of the Federation when The United States were Independent people in Independent counties, in Independent States, formed into a voluntary mutual defense association kept voluntary with common laws binding common people within clearly defined boundaries of legality, lawfulness, morality, and a common interest: defense.
Failing to learn from history can lead to repeated misdiagnoses and mistreatment.
A.
"Damn the criminals took over again.
B.
"I know! Find another criminal to take the place of the last one."
"In June of 1775, George Washington was appointed Major General and elected by Congress to be commander in chief of the American revolutionary forces. Although he took up his tasks energetically, Washington accomplished nothing militarily for the remainder of the year and more, nor did he try. His only campaign in 1775 was internal rather than external; it was directed against the American army as he found it, and was designed to extirpate the spirit of liberty pervading this unusually individualistic and democratic army of militiamen. In short, Washington set out to transform a people's army, uniquely suited for a libertarian revolution, into another orthodox and despotically ruled statist force after the familiar European model.
"His primary aim was to crush the individualistic and democratic spirit of the American forces. For one thing, the officers of the militia were elected by their own men, and the discipline of repeated elections kept the officers from forming an aristocratic ruling caste typical of European armies of the period. The officers often drew little more pay than their men, and there were no hierarchical distinctions of rank imposed between officers and men. As a consequence, officers could not enforce their wills coercively on the soldiery. This New England equality horrified Washington's conservative and highly aristocratic soul.
"To introduce a hierarchy of ruling caste, Washington insisted on distinctive decorations of dress in accordance with minute gradations of rank. As one observer phrased it: "New lords, new laws. … The strictest government is taking place, and great distinction is made between officers and soldier. Everyone is made to know his place and keep it." Despite the great expense involved, he also tried to stamp out individuality in the army by forcing uniforms upon them; but the scarcity of...
Where is AG Barr?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 2, 2020:
Third one from the left.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 2, 2020:
Third one from the left.
[youtu.be]
Paul Weston - Do You Trust The Government?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 1, 2020:
Ah, no, those who currently occupy the government are crooks, have been since 1789.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 1, 2020:
Ah, no, those who currently occupy the government are crooks, have been since 1789.
Guilty! 🐶 😆
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 1, 2020:
Yup, not the go to jail part, but we talk FOR the cats all the time. One cat is Leroy (badest cat in the whole damn yard) and he often goes to the kitchen window from outside and says: "Give me my five chickens." But stretches, yup, "OHHHHHH, that was a BIIIIIGGGGGG STTTTTTTTTTREEEEEEETCH."
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 1, 2020:
Yup, not the go to jail part, but we talk FOR the cats all the time. One cat is Leroy (badest cat in the whole damn yard) and he often goes to the kitchen window from outside and says: "Give me my five chickens." But stretches, yup, "OHHHHHH, that was a BIIIIIGGGGGG STTTTTTTTTTREEEEEEETCH."
Trump's (64-Day) Post-Election Endgame (Or, Can A Criminal Be Inaugurated President?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 31, 2020:
“Already these allegations have provided much further de-legitimacy of the Biden campaign beyond the candidate himself. The virtual black-out of all four stories and the excuses offered by the news directors of many censors have not blinded the public. Instead, this obvious censorship has rocketed this developing story to a massive new viewership. Questions about the related FBI cover-up in burying the laptop allegations have further increased calls for an investigation. The outrage of America’s awakening public is rising daily, with at least sixty-four plus days to go.”
See:
“The Streisand effect is a social phenomenon that occurs when an attempt to hide, remove, or censor information has the unintended consequence of further publicizing that information, often via the Internet. It is named after American entertainer Barbra Streisand, whose attempt to suppress the California Coastal Records Project's photograph of her residence in Malibu, California, taken to document California coastal erosion, inadvertently drew further attention to it in 2003.” Wikipedo
Then:
“Post-election day, should these allegations bear scrutiny there are three possible investigative bodies available to Trump.”
I may read the rest of this article, but my view is such that the fools who are stupified by all this deception (electoral politics = election cycle = election psycho) can pause, use their own brains – rare these days – and consider the contradictions contained in the above message.
The law is only the law when it is unbiased, and does not favor the continued injury of innocent people, such as would be any deception crafted and perpetrated, any extorting threat perpetrated, or any aggressive violence perpetrated, with the aim thereby of injuring innocent people. In other words: the law is the law when innocent people are effectively defended because guilty people can no longer extract value from their victims. In other words: the law is the law when crime no longer pays, and the law is no longer the law when the law is the device used to make crime pay more than having no law at all.
The message just offered in the last paragraph may not be as entertaining as the messages offered from ZeroHedge quoted again:
“Post-election day, should these allegations bear scrutiny there are three possible investigative bodies available to Trump.”
The law, when it is the law, is a device that prevents, deters, defunds, disincentivizes, discredits, does not aid, does not abet, does not protect, does not defend, the willful injury of innocent victims so as to make crime pay very well, which then leads inexorably to more, and more, and more, crime, because failing to pull the plug creates a very attractive opportunity for people to ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 31, 2020:
“Already these allegations have provided much further de-legitimacy of the Biden campaign beyond the candidate himself. The virtual black-out of all four stories and the excuses offered by the news directors of many censors have not blinded the public. Instead, this obvious censorship has rocketed this developing story to a massive new viewership. Questions about the related FBI cover-up in burying the laptop allegations have further increased calls for an investigation. The outrage of America’s awakening public is rising daily, with at least sixty-four plus days to go.”
See:
“The Streisand effect is a social phenomenon that occurs when an attempt to hide, remove, or censor information has the unintended consequence of further publicizing that information, often via the Internet. It is named after American entertainer Barbra Streisand, whose attempt to suppress the California Coastal Records Project's photograph of her residence in Malibu, California, taken to document California coastal erosion, inadvertently drew further attention to it in 2003.” Wikipedo
Then:
“Post-election day, should these allegations bear scrutiny there are three possible investigative bodies available to Trump.”
I may read the rest of this article, but my view is such that the fools who are stupified by all this deception (electoral politics = election cycle = election psycho) can pause, use their own brains – rare these days – and consider the contradictions contained in the above message.
The law is only the law when it is unbiased, and does not favor the continued injury of innocent people, such as would be any deception crafted and perpetrated, any extorting threat perpetrated, or any aggressive violence perpetrated, with the aim thereby of injuring innocent people. In other words: the law is the law when innocent people are effectively defended because guilty people can no longer extract value from their victims. In other words: the law is the law when crime no longer pays, and the law is no longer the law when the law is the device used to make crime pay more than having no law at all.
The message just offered in the last paragraph may not be as entertaining as the messages offered from ZeroHedge quoted again:
“Post-election day, should these allegations bear scrutiny there are three possible investigative bodies available to Trump.”
The law, when it is the law, is a device that prevents, deters, defunds, disincentivizes, discredits, does not aid, does not abet, does not protect, does not defend, the willful injury of innocent victims so as to make crime pay very well, which then leads inexorably to more, and more, and more, crime, because failing to pull the plug creates a very attractive opportunity for people to ...
Take that global warming!
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 30, 2020:
Early Polling on this one is: "It hits way too close to home: self-censored!"
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 30, 2020:
Early Polling on this one is: "It hits way too close to home: self-censored!"
Woman behind Trump at rally hilariously rips pics of Pelosi, Schumer and Schiff in half-
...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 30, 2020:
"This redstate.com page can’t be found"
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 30, 2020:
"This redstate.com page can’t be found"
Take that global warming!
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 30, 2020:
I'm using this one, thanks.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 30, 2020:
I'm using this one, thanks.
Thoughts on this one?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 30, 2020:
"The new normal is right in front of us, right now: populist right versus populist left."
That articles is pure fiction.
Voting is like buying Shark Bite insurance for someone who lives in a desert and never goes to a beach, let alone traveling in a boat. The odds of winning with Shark Bite insurance are higher than winning with voting. The odds of winning in a lottery are higher than winning with voting: at least there is evidence of a winner who bought into the scam.
The use of the word "populist" is evidence proving the fact that it is fraudulent, in my opinion.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 30, 2020:
"The new normal is right in front of us, right now: populist right versus populist left."
That articles is pure fiction.
Voting is like buying Shark Bite insurance for someone who lives in a desert and never goes to a beach, let alone traveling in a boat. The odds of winning with Shark Bite insurance are higher than winning with voting. The odds of winning in a lottery are higher than winning with voting: at least there is evidence of a winner who bought into the scam.
The use of the word "populist" is evidence proving the fact that it is fraudulent, in my opinion.
These are the two most powerful men in the world.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 29, 2020:
Defensive
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 29, 2020:
Defensive
Other great white men have already predicted what we are now witnessing.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 28, 2020:
That is extensive. I found: "Fying blind is always a risky endeavor."
I think that is why it is a good idea to look at things from as many views as is humanly possible, so as not to fly blind, or worse.
Thomas Jefferson also wrote on the subject in his Notes on the State of Virginia.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 28, 2020:
That is extensive. I found: "Fying blind is always a risky endeavor."
I think that is why it is a good idea to look at things from as many views as is humanly possible, so as not to fly blind, or worse.
Thomas Jefferson also wrote on the subject in his Notes on the State of Virginia.
Did you know this?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 28, 2020:
Thanks but...
"The report was eye-opening, to say the least: over 500,000 children have tested positive for the novel coronavirus in America."
I stopped reading there, since "testing positive" is a known fraud. The inventor of the PCR test does not support, and warns against, using a PCR test for diagnosis: testing for viruses.
It is unscientific at best, and obviously fraudulent for many people, including doctors, lawyers, scientists, and people now working to defend against this fraud.
If there are breaking discoveries having to do with how people fight these specific symptoms, on a molecular level, or deeper (micro), such as the identification of "Researchers identified a cytokine, IL-17A, which appears to protect children from the ravages of COVID-19" or on a more general level (macro), such as immune system strength in children is generally higher than in people past their "prime," then precisely what is the usefulness of that information just now discovered?
"Researchers identified a cytokine, IL-17A, which appears to protect children from the ravages of COVID-19"
A vaccine is an attempt to inject the suspected cause of the set of symptoms targeted for defense, and that inoculation (injecting someone with the suspected cause of the sickness) is designed to stimulate (and not overstimulate) the natural immune system of the patient or many patients.
One thing I've read so far in this dive down this rabbit hole is the often repeated warning that every single individual is individually more or less capable of fighting and wining the battle against toxins, poisons, invasions of harmful substances, and it is therefore categorically wrong to suggest that there is a ONE FIX for everyone on such things as these very wide ranging sets of symptoms, that typically attack people with existing health problems, and lowered immune systems for whatever reason their immune system is lowered.
"This is really a call to say rather than waiting to see if we have an effective vaccine for adults, let's begin that work of at least evaluating the vaccines in adolescents and ever-decreasing ages, so that we get a good lead on the dosing, the dose schedule, and the potential effectiveness of that kind of a vaccine."
Inoculation is the process by which the target is injected with the suspected cause of a set of symptoms: vaccination.
A bait and switch routine, a fraud, is to claim something is one thing, and then inject something else into the target.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 28, 2020:
Thanks but...
"The report was eye-opening, to say the least: over 500,000 children have tested positive for the novel coronavirus in America."
I stopped reading there, since "testing positive" is a known fraud. The inventor of the PCR test does not support, and warns against, using a PCR test for diagnosis: testing for viruses.
It is unscientific at best, and obviously fraudulent for many people, including doctors, lawyers, scientists, and people now working to defend against this fraud.
If there are breaking discoveries having to do with how people fight these specific symptoms, on a molecular level, or deeper (micro), such as the identification of "Researchers identified a cytokine, IL-17A, which appears to protect children from the ravages of COVID-19" or on a more general level (macro), such as immune system strength in children is generally higher than in people past their "prime," then precisely what is the usefulness of that information just now discovered?
"Researchers identified a cytokine, IL-17A, which appears to protect children from the ravages of COVID-19"
A vaccine is an attempt to inject the suspected cause of the set of symptoms targeted for defense, and that inoculation (injecting someone with the suspected cause of the sickness) is designed to stimulate (and not overstimulate) the natural immune system of the patient or many patients.
One thing I've read so far in this dive down this rabbit hole is the often repeated warning that every single individual is individually more or less capable of fighting and wining the battle against toxins, poisons, invasions of harmful substances, and it is therefore categorically wrong to suggest that there is a ONE FIX for everyone on such things as these very wide ranging sets of symptoms, that typically attack people with existing health problems, and lowered immune systems for whatever reason their immune system is lowered.
"This is really a call to say rather than waiting to see if we have an effective vaccine for adults, let's begin that work of at least evaluating the vaccines in adolescents and ever-decreasing ages, so that we get a good lead on the dosing, the dose schedule, and the potential effectiveness of that kind of a vaccine."
Inoculation is the process by which the target is injected with the suspected cause of a set of symptoms: vaccination.
A bait and switch routine, a fraud, is to claim something is one thing, and then inject something else into the target.
Headlines the Facebook Police Can't Censor!
Give us 3 minutes and we will get you caught up on ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 28, 2020:
I looked into that and found references to The Federalist Papers, and a link that actually loads those specific works. Those works were clearly shown to be specifically not written by people supporting Federalism, rather those people writing The Federalist Papers were supporting Consolidation of the Independent States into a Nation-State: Nationalism.
I also looked into the link the UndergroundUSA site has for so-called "Anti" Federalist Papers, but the link goes to a different site, apparently requiring a membership, and there was no direct link to the works published by the actual Federalists who supported Federalism, such as George Mason, Patrick Henry, Robert Yates, Richard Henry Lee, etc.
June 14, 1788
Patrick Henry:
"Mr. Chairman, it is now confessed that this is a national government. There is not a single federal feature in it. It has been alleged, within these walls, during the debates, to be national and federal, as it suited the arguments of gentlemen.
"But now, when we have heard the definition of it, it is purely national."
Papers of Dr. James McHenry on the Federal Convention of 1787.
""Mr. E. Gerry. Does not rise to speak to the merits of the question before the Committee but to the mode.
A distinction has been made between a federal and national government. We ought not to determine that there is this distinction for if we do, it is questionable not only whether this convention can propose an government totally different or whether Congress itself would have a right to pass such a resolution as that before the house. The commission from Massachusets empowers the deputies to proceed agreeably to the recommendation of Congress. This the foundation of the convention. If we have a right to pass this resolution we have a right to annihilate the confederation."
FRIDAY, June 20, 1788
Melancton Smith
"He was pleased that, thus early in debate, the honorable gentleman had himself shown that the intent of the Constitution was not a confederacy, but a reduction of all the states into a consolidated government. He hoped the gentleman would be complaisant enough to exchange names with those who disliked the Constitution, as it appeared from his own concessions, that they were federalists, and those who advocated it were anti-federalists."
Somethings never change. RINO, DINO, FINO, Fascists and Marxists fraudulently (treason at that level) claiming to be Republicans and Democrats.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 28, 2020:
I looked into that and found references to The Federalist Papers, and a link that actually loads those specific works. Those works were clearly shown to be specifically not written by people supporting Federalism, rather those people writing The Federalist Papers were supporting Consolidation of the Independent States into a Nation-State: Nationalism.
I also looked into the link the UndergroundUSA site has for so-called "Anti" Federalist Papers, but the link goes to a different site, apparently requiring a membership, and there was no direct link to the works published by the actual Federalists who supported Federalism, such as George Mason, Patrick Henry, Robert Yates, Richard Henry Lee, etc.
June 14, 1788
Patrick Henry:
"Mr. Chairman, it is now confessed that this is a national government. There is not a single federal feature in it. It has been alleged, within these walls, during the debates, to be national and federal, as it suited the arguments of gentlemen.
"But now, when we have heard the definition of it, it is purely national."
Papers of Dr. James McHenry on the Federal Convention of 1787.
""Mr. E. Gerry. Does not rise to speak to the merits of the question before the Committee but to the mode.
A distinction has been made between a federal and national government. We ought not to determine that there is this distinction for if we do, it is questionable not only whether this convention can propose an government totally different or whether Congress itself would have a right to pass such a resolution as that before the house. The commission from Massachusets empowers the deputies to proceed agreeably to the recommendation of Congress. This the foundation of the convention. If we have a right to pass this resolution we have a right to annihilate the confederation."
FRIDAY, June 20, 1788
Melancton Smith
"He was pleased that, thus early in debate, the honorable gentleman had himself shown that the intent of the Constitution was not a confederacy, but a reduction of all the states into a consolidated government. He hoped the gentleman would be complaisant enough to exchange names with those who disliked the Constitution, as it appeared from his own concessions, that they were federalists, and those who advocated it were anti-federalists."
Somethings never change. RINO, DINO, FINO, Fascists and Marxists fraudulently (treason at that level) claiming to be Republicans and Democrats.
[thefreedomarticles.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 28, 2020:
Great find!
"In a previous article, I talked about how SARS-CoV-2 is a stitched-together, Frankenstein virus, because it is a computer-generated, digital, abstract creation, not a real living virus. It has never been properly purified and isolated so that it could be sequenced from end-to-end once derived from living tissue; instead, it’s just digitally assembled from a computer viral database. The CDC scientists state they took just 37 base pairs from a genome of 30,000 base pairs! That means that about 0.001% of the viral sequence is derived from actual living samples or real bodily tissue. Here is the quote:"
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 28, 2020:
Great find!
"In a previous article, I talked about how SARS-CoV-2 is a stitched-together, Frankenstein virus, because it is a computer-generated, digital, abstract creation, not a real living virus. It has never been properly purified and isolated so that it could be sequenced from end-to-end once derived from living tissue; instead, it’s just digitally assembled from a computer viral database. The CDC scientists state they took just 37 base pairs from a genome of 30,000 base pairs! That means that about 0.001% of the viral sequence is derived from actual living samples or real bodily tissue. Here is the quote:"
Mask
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
"This site can’t be reached"
I believe that an order (to be obeyed without question) such as "pay or die" is effective. The same despotic control works Globally when the criminals are running The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud.
Masks are effective for making sure that the victims do not know WHO is enslaving them or killing them one calorie at a time or all at once.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
"This site can’t be reached"
I believe that an order (to be obeyed without question) such as "pay or die" is effective. The same despotic control works Globally when the criminals are running The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud.
Masks are effective for making sure that the victims do not know WHO is enslaving them or killing them one calorie at a time or all at once.
Are you a White Supreme Pedophobe?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
That is an obvious false choice, none of the above.
Those who I talk to about Subsidized Slavery (we pay to make criminals rich) fall into two general categories with few (few that I know of) exceptions to the rule:
A. Those who ignore what I say, and do not respond for fear of giving legs to defensive actions against their con game.
B. Those who agree with the facts that matter in the case, and then stop responding.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
That is an obvious false choice, none of the above.
Those who I talk to about Subsidized Slavery (we pay to make criminals rich) fall into two general categories with few (few that I know of) exceptions to the rule:
A. Those who ignore what I say, and do not respond for fear of giving legs to defensive actions against their con game.
B. Those who agree with the facts that matter in the case, and then stop responding.
[theepochtimes.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
Allegiance to a flag is not allegiance to your fellow human being.
Allegiance to a Nation-State-Legal-Fiction is also not allegiance to your fellow human being.
Allegiance to a Corporate Subsidized Slavery "Constitution" is also not allegiance to your fellow human being.
Often those who are fooled into aligning themselves with deceivers intent upon consuming mankind are misled.
I suppose that there are exceptions to that rule.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
Allegiance to a flag is not allegiance to your fellow human being.
Allegiance to a Nation-State-Legal-Fiction is also not allegiance to your fellow human being.
Allegiance to a Corporate Subsidized Slavery "Constitution" is also not allegiance to your fellow human being.
Often those who are fooled into aligning themselves with deceivers intent upon consuming mankind are misled.
I suppose that there are exceptions to that rule.
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
"...right to trial by jury..."
"The judiciary of the United States is so constructed and extended, as to absorb and destroy the judiciaries of the several states; thereby rendering laws as tedious, intricate, and expensive, and justice as unattainable by a great part of the community, as in England; and enabling the rich to oppress and ruin the poor."
George Mason, 1787
George Mason Debate in Virginia Ratifying Convention
June 6, 1788:
"Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions should arise under this government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of those powers; could not Congress, under the idea of providing for the general welfare, and under their own construction, say that this was destroying the general peace, encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people? And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury?"
To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine
November 15, 1802
"But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property. It is, therefore, no wonder that the "Rights of Man" was attacked by that faction, and its author continually abused. But let them go on; give them rope enough and they will put an end to their own insignificance. There is too much common sense and independence in America to be long the dupe of any faction, foreign or domestic."
"As many thousands who were minors are grown up to manhood since the name of Federalist began, it became necessary, for their information, to go back and show the origin of the name, which is now no longer what it originally was; but it was the more necessary to do this, in order to bring forward, in the open face of day, the apostasy of those who first called themselves Federalists.
"To them it served as a cloak for treason, a mask for tyranny. Scarcely were they placed in the seat of power and office, than federalism was to be destroyed, and the representative system of government, the pride and glory of America, and the palladium of her liberties, was to be over- thrown and abolished. The next generation was not to be free. The son was to bend his neck beneath ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
"...right to trial by jury..."
"The judiciary of the United States is so constructed and extended, as to absorb and destroy the judiciaries of the several states; thereby rendering laws as tedious, intricate, and expensive, and justice as unattainable by a great part of the community, as in England; and enabling the rich to oppress and ruin the poor."
George Mason, 1787
George Mason Debate in Virginia Ratifying Convention
June 6, 1788:
"Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions should arise under this government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of those powers; could not Congress, under the idea of providing for the general welfare, and under their own construction, say that this was destroying the general peace, encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people? And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury?"
To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine
November 15, 1802
"But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property. It is, therefore, no wonder that the "Rights of Man" was attacked by that faction, and its author continually abused. But let them go on; give them rope enough and they will put an end to their own insignificance. There is too much common sense and independence in America to be long the dupe of any faction, foreign or domestic."
"As many thousands who were minors are grown up to manhood since the name of Federalist began, it became necessary, for their information, to go back and show the origin of the name, which is now no longer what it originally was; but it was the more necessary to do this, in order to bring forward, in the open face of day, the apostasy of those who first called themselves Federalists.
"To them it served as a cloak for treason, a mask for tyranny. Scarcely were they placed in the seat of power and office, than federalism was to be destroyed, and the representative system of government, the pride and glory of America, and the palladium of her liberties, was to be over- thrown and abolished. The next generation was not to be free. The son was to bend his neck beneath ...
Are we in for a Covid-19 "Dark Winter"?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
I know someone who works in the Medical field and some of my reporting here is personal information transferred via that source, for example:
1. Orders Top Down to Nurses "Hand over your masks, don't wear them." Nurses refuse Top Down order for cause: we know better.
2. People die from specific symptoms, standardized treatments of specific treatments are still not Top Down orders, whereby Top Down initial orders (intubation) was MISTREATMENT, based upon obvious MISDIAGNOSIS, and at least locally the "better" treatments are not - again - standardized Top Down.
3. There was no first wave of pandemic proportion, it was much less than reported, and specific symptoms that threaten life were rare when compared to the "pandemic" predictions. Here it is important to note the "call for intubating machines" to MISTREAT a MISDIAGNOSIS was, and apparently is endemic.
The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud is one thing.
A set of symptoms which had lead to deaths is factual, and worldwide.
False and misleading diagnosis is factual, and worldwide.
False and misleading treatment is factual, and worldwide.
The claimed Authorities (people associated with corporations known as WHO, CDC, NIH, etc.) have not reported that they have identified the cause of the "set of symptoms that lead to death" other than to call the set of symptoms that lead to death by the names Covid-19, Pandemic, and to then issue reports suggesting treatment, based upon an obvious, admitted, NONDIAGNOSIS.
Other claimed Authorities (people no longer associated with the opposing authorities listed as Who, CDC, NIH, etc.) have identified the cause of a specific set of symptoms leading to death as a Bioweapon of very specific design, and there is a Patent on the design, as far as I know, so far.
Group A, which I will call those who have accurately identified the cause of the set of symptoms that cause death, which is a Patented Bioweapon include people who treat the cause of this set of symptoms with advice that includes methods by which people strengthen their natural, internal, immune systems, such as detox, nutrition, sunlight, clean air, clean water, exercise, human contact, etc.
Group B, which I will call those who have NOT accurately identified the cause of the set of symptoms that cause death, and I know this because they claim that the way to accurately identify the cause of the set of symptoms that cause death is The Gold Standard, which is to isolate the suspected "virus" (microorganism) using Standard Procedures (see: Koch's Postulates) known to identify suspected microorganisms, and then match the introduction of that specific microorganism to the specific set of symptoms Scientifically. That group apparently does not want to have the connections ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
I know someone who works in the Medical field and some of my reporting here is personal information transferred via that source, for example:
1. Orders Top Down to Nurses "Hand over your masks, don't wear them." Nurses refuse Top Down order for cause: we know better.
2. People die from specific symptoms, standardized treatments of specific treatments are still not Top Down orders, whereby Top Down initial orders (intubation) was MISTREATMENT, based upon obvious MISDIAGNOSIS, and at least locally the "better" treatments are not - again - standardized Top Down.
3. There was no first wave of pandemic proportion, it was much less than reported, and specific symptoms that threaten life were rare when compared to the "pandemic" predictions. Here it is important to note the "call for intubating machines" to MISTREAT a MISDIAGNOSIS was, and apparently is endemic.
The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud is one thing.
A set of symptoms which had lead to deaths is factual, and worldwide.
False and misleading diagnosis is factual, and worldwide.
False and misleading treatment is factual, and worldwide.
The claimed Authorities (people associated with corporations known as WHO, CDC, NIH, etc.) have not reported that they have identified the cause of the "set of symptoms that lead to death" other than to call the set of symptoms that lead to death by the names Covid-19, Pandemic, and to then issue reports suggesting treatment, based upon an obvious, admitted, NONDIAGNOSIS.
Other claimed Authorities (people no longer associated with the opposing authorities listed as Who, CDC, NIH, etc.) have identified the cause of a specific set of symptoms leading to death as a Bioweapon of very specific design, and there is a Patent on the design, as far as I know, so far.
Group A, which I will call those who have accurately identified the cause of the set of symptoms that cause death, which is a Patented Bioweapon include people who treat the cause of this set of symptoms with advice that includes methods by which people strengthen their natural, internal, immune systems, such as detox, nutrition, sunlight, clean air, clean water, exercise, human contact, etc.
Group B, which I will call those who have NOT accurately identified the cause of the set of symptoms that cause death, and I know this because they claim that the way to accurately identify the cause of the set of symptoms that cause death is The Gold Standard, which is to isolate the suspected "virus" (microorganism) using Standard Procedures (see: Koch's Postulates) known to identify suspected microorganisms, and then match the introduction of that specific microorganism to the specific set of symptoms Scientifically. That group apparently does not want to have the connections ...
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
"...I found that Ideas were weapons..."
This is a Neocon before the Modern Manifestation of the Psychotic Cabal.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
"...I found that Ideas were weapons..."
This is a Neocon before the Modern Manifestation of the Psychotic Cabal.
How much do we know about slavery in the United States?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
Time 3: "...white people with a political agenda..."
How about CRIMINALS with a political agenda?
Whose pro-bono job is it to turn an obvious crime into racial polarization for political gain: power and profit?
How about 12 white guys:
“A jury of twelve local farmers, all men and all white according to Levinson, rule in favor of Freeman in 1781, giving her freedom and awarding her 30 shillings in damages.”
As far as I know (but I do not have original trial transcripts at my disposal) that above is verified history.
That is 1781 (...before the "Civil" War...")
How about the ORIGINAL Federal Political Position on Slavery during the Revolutionary War (all men are equal under the law: common law):
First Federal (not National) Congress United States of America:
On the 20th day of October 1774
“This agreement contained a clause to discontinue the slave trade, and a provision not to import East India tea from any part of the world. In the article respecting non-exportations, the sending of rice to Europe was excepted."
On the 1st of April, 1775
"On this occasion, the importation of slaves was expressly prohibited."
Now, to put in perspective this issue of "Slavery in American History," one may consider why prices are so low as people in America send money to profitable corporations being run in China, or other places on earth where people are enslaved by government force. Are you setting those slaves free, doing what you can as a moral citizen to end Slavery in American History NOW?
Who, and what army, in American History, were enforcing Slavery of people on The People as a whole? Was it a racial political issue? If so was is a racial political issue against Indians, Irish, and Africans, or in your mind, only against Africans?
June 17, 1788
George Mason:
“Mr. Chairman, this is a fatal section, which has created more dangers than any other. The first clause allows the importation of slaves for twenty years. Under the royal government, this evil was looked upon as a great oppression, and many attempts were made to prevent it; but the interest of the African merchants prevented its prohibition. No sooner did the revolution take place, than it was thought of. It was one of the great causes of our separation from Great Britain. Its exclusion has been a principal object of this state, and most of the states in the Union. The augmentation of slaves weakens the states; and such a trade is diabolical in itself, and disgraceful to mankind; yet, by this Constitution, it is continued for twenty years. As much as I value a union of all the states, I would not admit the Southern States into the Union unless they agree to the discontinuance of this disgraceful trade, because it would bring weakness, and not ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
Time 3: "...white people with a political agenda..."
How about CRIMINALS with a political agenda?
Whose pro-bono job is it to turn an obvious crime into racial polarization for political gain: power and profit?
How about 12 white guys:
“A jury of twelve local farmers, all men and all white according to Levinson, rule in favor of Freeman in 1781, giving her freedom and awarding her 30 shillings in damages.”
As far as I know (but I do not have original trial transcripts at my disposal) that above is verified history.
That is 1781 (...before the "Civil" War...")
How about the ORIGINAL Federal Political Position on Slavery during the Revolutionary War (all men are equal under the law: common law):
First Federal (not National) Congress United States of America:
On the 20th day of October 1774
“This agreement contained a clause to discontinue the slave trade, and a provision not to import East India tea from any part of the world. In the article respecting non-exportations, the sending of rice to Europe was excepted."
On the 1st of April, 1775
"On this occasion, the importation of slaves was expressly prohibited."
Now, to put in perspective this issue of "Slavery in American History," one may consider why prices are so low as people in America send money to profitable corporations being run in China, or other places on earth where people are enslaved by government force. Are you setting those slaves free, doing what you can as a moral citizen to end Slavery in American History NOW?
Who, and what army, in American History, were enforcing Slavery of people on The People as a whole? Was it a racial political issue? If so was is a racial political issue against Indians, Irish, and Africans, or in your mind, only against Africans?
June 17, 1788
George Mason:
“Mr. Chairman, this is a fatal section, which has created more dangers than any other. The first clause allows the importation of slaves for twenty years. Under the royal government, this evil was looked upon as a great oppression, and many attempts were made to prevent it; but the interest of the African merchants prevented its prohibition. No sooner did the revolution take place, than it was thought of. It was one of the great causes of our separation from Great Britain. Its exclusion has been a principal object of this state, and most of the states in the Union. The augmentation of slaves weakens the states; and such a trade is diabolical in itself, and disgraceful to mankind; yet, by this Constitution, it is continued for twenty years. As much as I value a union of all the states, I would not admit the Southern States into the Union unless they agree to the discontinuance of this disgraceful trade, because it would bring weakness, and not ...
Paglia: The Dumbing Down of America Began in Public Schools
[intellectualtakeout.org]
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
"John Adams would likely agree."
Really? My guess is that whoever believes that is a parrot subjected to Public School. Adams was accountable for The Alien and Sedition Acts once he extorted, distorted, his way to the Top of the Pyramid Scheme.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
"John Adams would likely agree."
Really? My guess is that whoever believes that is a parrot subjected to Public School. Adams was accountable for The Alien and Sedition Acts once he extorted, distorted, his way to the Top of the Pyramid Scheme.
How is it decided if posts show up in trending?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
Bump for new members of the glorious SENATE! And where is...The Batman?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
Bump for new members of the glorious SENATE! And where is...The Batman?
I didn't get a welcome!!!
;)
Both newer additions are great additions to the discussions we ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
So... light it up!
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
So... light it up!
Pathetic Queen of the Shrill; Hillary Clinton still fuming: 'I was born' to be president; it makes ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
That can't be true, seriously, why give so much? Why be so generous? If poetic justice or pathos or irony or whatever is wanted, demanded, why volunteer to fill that vacancy? I mean, considering it is Killary and all.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
That can't be true, seriously, why give so much? Why be so generous? If poetic justice or pathos or irony or whatever is wanted, demanded, why volunteer to fill that vacancy? I mean, considering it is Killary and all.
A wrong potion, a wrong spell...ing.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
Fraud-ian slip?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
Fraud-ian slip?
I didn't get a welcome!!!
;)
Both newer additions are great additions to the discussions we ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
The "Senate" is dead, so...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
The "Senate" is dead, so...
Did every body watch manbaby Trump on 60 minutes?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
How does one accurately identify a troll?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
How does one accurately identify a troll?
Why Does Barr Let Wray Lie and Flout the Law?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
331 Million people and one man is the only one with the power to indict a known criminal? I think that is proof positive that the criminals have taken-over the government. There is no law in America, hasn't been since 1789.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
331 Million people and one man is the only one with the power to indict a known criminal? I think that is proof positive that the criminals have taken-over the government. There is no law in America, hasn't been since 1789.
News Break.
War Room: Pandemic Ep 456 - The CCP and Election 2020 Pt.2
[youtube.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 25, 2020:
Note:
The Authorities behind The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud have not gone through the standard procedures by which a so-called "virus" (microorganism) is isolated, identified as the cause of specific symptoms, so as to thereby test and confirm THE cause of THE symptoms that can lead to death (cause of death).
Why?
or
If you have evidence confirming THE cause (the microorganism) of THE symptoms, then show that evidence.
No, I did not say that there is no evidence, I said that the individuals causing The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud have not gone through the standard procedures to scientifically identify the microorganism responsible for the deaths of anyone, let alone anyone being claimed as a result of a SPECIFIED virus (Covid-19).
Evidence is claimed and offered in the video above, as someone claiming to prove that Civid-19 is a bio-weapon does so (according to her claims) by identifying the construction of the virus as an unnatural construction. She claims to know precisely what is the cause of these deaths, and it is a bio-weapon.
If The Authorities (criminals) responsible and accountable for The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud are to admit that the cause of the symptoms is precisely identified as the SPECIFIED microorganism, they would then admit the evidence that could then lead to precisely what the cause of death of all these people is in fact.
The term here is Plausible Deniability.
The Global Treasonous Pandemic Frauds require falsehood, lies, deceit, false statements, contradictory statements, confusion, misdirection, ambiguity, uncertainty, etc., only so long as their monopoly of power and profit is insecure. Once secure, the monopolists can simply do as they please with impunity, such as issue orders to inject everyone with a known poison, a poison known to case death.
Cause of death: murderers who are pleased when they can murder with impunity anyone who may dare to threaten their absolute power to do whatever pleases them.
That is the warning offered in history, from anyone who has been subjected to absolute despotism, dictatorship, or whatever word you want to use, the word is not the thing, the thing is murderous: cause of death.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 25, 2020:
Note:
The Authorities behind The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud have not gone through the standard procedures by which a so-called "virus" (microorganism) is isolated, identified as the cause of specific symptoms, so as to thereby test and confirm THE cause of THE symptoms that can lead to death (cause of death).
Why?
or
If you have evidence confirming THE cause (the microorganism) of THE symptoms, then show that evidence.
No, I did not say that there is no evidence, I said that the individuals causing The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud have not gone through the standard procedures to scientifically identify the microorganism responsible for the deaths of anyone, let alone anyone being claimed as a result of a SPECIFIED virus (Covid-19).
Evidence is claimed and offered in the video above, as someone claiming to prove that Civid-19 is a bio-weapon does so (according to her claims) by identifying the construction of the virus as an unnatural construction. She claims to know precisely what is the cause of these deaths, and it is a bio-weapon.
If The Authorities (criminals) responsible and accountable for The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud are to admit that the cause of the symptoms is precisely identified as the SPECIFIED microorganism, they would then admit the evidence that could then lead to precisely what the cause of death of all these people is in fact.
The term here is Plausible Deniability.
The Global Treasonous Pandemic Frauds require falsehood, lies, deceit, false statements, contradictory statements, confusion, misdirection, ambiguity, uncertainty, etc., only so long as their monopoly of power and profit is insecure. Once secure, the monopolists can simply do as they please with impunity, such as issue orders to inject everyone with a known poison, a poison known to case death.
Cause of death: murderers who are pleased when they can murder with impunity anyone who may dare to threaten their absolute power to do whatever pleases them.
That is the warning offered in history, from anyone who has been subjected to absolute despotism, dictatorship, or whatever word you want to use, the word is not the thing, the thing is murderous: cause of death.
Is Government Reaction to Covid-19 a Threat to Civil Liberties?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 25, 2020:
2 critical comments.
1. The Media representative (mass media) claimed that Sweden failed to follow the script (lock-down, etc.) and that was a mistake, which caused greater loss of life. His words I could quote, but the point here is to ask if his claim is true. The point worth pointing out, to anyone who makes these claims of "cause of death," in any place, at any time, anywhere, is by what authority is such a claim made in any individual case, let alone all across one country or the next, or the whole world? The cause (covid 19) is admittedly not been isolated (scientific Gold Standard: see Koch's Postulates), the tests to see if someone has what they haven't identified (PCR), does not - admittedly - test to find something they having identified, and therefore there is no science behind claiming anyone has died from something no one admits to have been found scientifically, with standard procedures used to find those causes?
2. The moderator asks WHO is behind all this, if it is nefarious (as these people obviously point out), and even the name Bill Gates is plopped on the table like a wet tar baby.
NO ONE ANSWERS, they all dodge the question. THE DODGE was the claim by the representative from Mass Media who claimed that "no one wants to be wrong" and he then offers up Sweden as the exception, as if what Sweden did was wrong. Again, by what measure? They admit that they feed garbage in, so how can they claim to get a rose smelling pile of shit?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 25, 2020:
2 critical comments.
1. The Media representative (mass media) claimed that Sweden failed to follow the script (lock-down, etc.) and that was a mistake, which caused greater loss of life. His words I could quote, but the point here is to ask if his claim is true. The point worth pointing out, to anyone who makes these claims of "cause of death," in any place, at any time, anywhere, is by what authority is such a claim made in any individual case, let alone all across one country or the next, or the whole world? The cause (covid 19) is admittedly not been isolated (scientific Gold Standard: see Koch's Postulates), the tests to see if someone has what they haven't identified (PCR), does not - admittedly - test to find something they having identified, and therefore there is no science behind claiming anyone has died from something no one admits to have been found scientifically, with standard procedures used to find those causes?
2. The moderator asks WHO is behind all this, if it is nefarious (as these people obviously point out), and even the name Bill Gates is plopped on the table like a wet tar baby.
NO ONE ANSWERS, they all dodge the question. THE DODGE was the claim by the representative from Mass Media who claimed that "no one wants to be wrong" and he then offers up Sweden as the exception, as if what Sweden did was wrong. Again, by what measure? They admit that they feed garbage in, so how can they claim to get a rose smelling pile of shit?
Is Government Reaction to Covid-19 a Threat to Civil Liberties?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 25, 2020:
Thanks for the link, it is a very good discussion in my opinion.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 25, 2020:
Thanks for the link, it is a very good discussion in my opinion.
Is Government Reaction to Covid-19 a Threat to Civil Liberties?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 25, 2020:
Time: 25:00 or so...
Statements were made about the propaganda campaign (from a few people in a small group) to cause fear and control the minds of the target population, to make them submit to the despotic orders that cause so much suffering upon so many innocent people. And the monopoly viewpoint (fear and blind obedience) was enforced as the monopolists did not allow alternative viewpoints, such as questioning the validity of the tests, (PCR), which had "...no known accuracy..." because they were not run through the rigors of scientific verification (gold standard, Koch's postulates, isolating the suspected "germ," verifying the cause as the cause of the symptoms, and then proving that the test used to test to find the isolated "germ" does in fact do so, repeatedly, but the PCR test - according to the inventor of it - is not a diagnosis test, and therefore why are people claiming it is?) so, why is this small group (of criminals) gaining so much power by deception and fear-mongering?
Could it be that there is no law in England as it is proven that there is no law in America? Criminals get away with Crimes against Humanity and the so-called "government" hides under the desk?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 25, 2020:
Time: 25:00 or so...
Statements were made about the propaganda campaign (from a few people in a small group) to cause fear and control the minds of the target population, to make them submit to the despotic orders that cause so much suffering upon so many innocent people. And the monopoly viewpoint (fear and blind obedience) was enforced as the monopolists did not allow alternative viewpoints, such as questioning the validity of the tests, (PCR), which had "...no known accuracy..." because they were not run through the rigors of scientific verification (gold standard, Koch's postulates, isolating the suspected "germ," verifying the cause as the cause of the symptoms, and then proving that the test used to test to find the isolated "germ" does in fact do so, repeatedly, but the PCR test - according to the inventor of it - is not a diagnosis test, and therefore why are people claiming it is?) so, why is this small group (of criminals) gaining so much power by deception and fear-mongering?
Could it be that there is no law in England as it is proven that there is no law in America? Criminals get away with Crimes against Humanity and the so-called "government" hides under the desk?
Is Government Reaction to Covid-19 a Threat to Civil Liberties?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 25, 2020:
Time: 6:00 or so...
There is a report that "...coded for "not for resuscitation...through diktat..." and "...no longer something negotiated with the doctor and nurse..." meaning the criminals claiming to be the government order the death sentence without consent from their lived ones.
As in...
When should a loved one no longer get health care, and who will be authorized to make that decision in time and place?
A. The individual needing health care lets it be known (authorizes) that they refuse further health care: "let me die, do not resuscitate me, under these types of conditions, particularly when there is no hope for my continued living, according to someone able to know, such as MY doctor or MY nurse, these people here, the ones I trust to make that decision, and if I am no longer able to negotiate the facts that matter in the case - due to incapacity from sickness at the time - then these people here (my loved one's named here) negotiate that decision to allow me to die or to attempt to revive.
B. A criminal who is part of a criminal gang claiming to be the government, because they can, because their lies are deceiving people well enough to allow them to get away with such crimes against humanity as The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3Vc33-QWHI
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 25, 2020:
Time: 6:00 or so...
There is a report that "...coded for "not for resuscitation...through diktat..." and "...no longer something negotiated with the doctor and nurse..." meaning the criminals claiming to be the government order the death sentence without consent from their lived ones.
As in...
When should a loved one no longer get health care, and who will be authorized to make that decision in time and place?
A. The individual needing health care lets it be known (authorizes) that they refuse further health care: "let me die, do not resuscitate me, under these types of conditions, particularly when there is no hope for my continued living, according to someone able to know, such as MY doctor or MY nurse, these people here, the ones I trust to make that decision, and if I am no longer able to negotiate the facts that matter in the case - due to incapacity from sickness at the time - then these people here (my loved one's named here) negotiate that decision to allow me to die or to attempt to revive.
B. A criminal who is part of a criminal gang claiming to be the government, because they can, because their lies are deceiving people well enough to allow them to get away with such crimes against humanity as The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3Vc33-QWHI
biden the supporter of chaos
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 24, 2020:
Maneuver Warfare, straight out of Boyd's artwork.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 24, 2020:
Maneuver Warfare, straight out of Boyd's artwork.
First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 24, 2020:
Failure to learn from history...
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/alsedact.asp
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 24, 2020:
Failure to learn from history...
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/alsedact.asp
This man was the best proponent of free of thought and rational investigation!
If I can be a ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 23, 2020:
I looked into this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0Z7KeNCi7g
It says:
Homeopathy, quackery and fraud
If someone is going to investigate this POWER STRUGGLE between Monopolists and Competitors in Free Markets, they can find information that is as their discovery.
Good luck.
I've done some homework, over decades, and this troll is trolling for the Monopoly.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 23, 2020:
I looked into this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0Z7KeNCi7g
It says:
Homeopathy, quackery and fraud
If someone is going to investigate this POWER STRUGGLE between Monopolists and Competitors in Free Markets, they can find information that is as their discovery.
Good luck.
I've done some homework, over decades, and this troll is trolling for the Monopoly.
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 23, 2020:
Very good, thanks.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 23, 2020:
Very good, thanks.
Do facts matter in elections anymore?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 23, 2020:
"How do you make sense of the world?"
I put the available pieces of the puzzle together and sense becomes obvious eventually. One puzzle piece is offered to those who choose to look in the past for puzzle pieces:
1. “Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it.” ― Edmund Burke.
2. “Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it” ― Sara Shepard, Wanted.
3. "Those unable to catalog the past are doomed to repeat it.” ― Lemony Snicket, The End.
4. “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." (George Santayana)
5. “We're doomed to repeat the past no matter what. That's what it is to be alive. It's pretty dense kids who haven't figured that out by the time they're ten.... Most kids can't afford to go to Harvard and be misinformed.”
― Kurt Vonnegut, Bluebeard
Some messages (signs on the previously traveled road) are lies, but how can one know this if history is replaced with falsehood?
6. "The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto
“Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.”
“The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.”
“How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.”
If someone can be intentionally, and successfully, demoralized, and stripped of their internal power of judgment, during their early years traveling down the road called life, then they can also be told not to look in the past, not to look for puzzle pieces at all, and told to scorn (or worse) anyone who dares to question the orders being issued from the authorities.
If you are no longer an authority over right and wrong, then who is?
I believe that solid evidence can be used to create a world view that works to make life better and less costly.
"Have you recalibrated how much evidence you need to see before you believe something?"
Evidence that fits reasonably into a logical order (my eyes hurt when staring at the sun, each time I try to stare at the sun), doing so without contradiction (never have I ever not suffered pain when staring at ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 23, 2020:
"How do you make sense of the world?"
I put the available pieces of the puzzle together and sense becomes obvious eventually. One puzzle piece is offered to those who choose to look in the past for puzzle pieces:
1. “Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it.” ― Edmund Burke.
2. “Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it” ― Sara Shepard, Wanted.
3. "Those unable to catalog the past are doomed to repeat it.” ― Lemony Snicket, The End.
4. “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." (George Santayana)
5. “We're doomed to repeat the past no matter what. That's what it is to be alive. It's pretty dense kids who haven't figured that out by the time they're ten.... Most kids can't afford to go to Harvard and be misinformed.”
― Kurt Vonnegut, Bluebeard
Some messages (signs on the previously traveled road) are lies, but how can one know this if history is replaced with falsehood?
6. "The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto
“Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.”
“The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.”
“How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.”
If someone can be intentionally, and successfully, demoralized, and stripped of their internal power of judgment, during their early years traveling down the road called life, then they can also be told not to look in the past, not to look for puzzle pieces at all, and told to scorn (or worse) anyone who dares to question the orders being issued from the authorities.
If you are no longer an authority over right and wrong, then who is?
I believe that solid evidence can be used to create a world view that works to make life better and less costly.
"Have you recalibrated how much evidence you need to see before you believe something?"
Evidence that fits reasonably into a logical order (my eyes hurt when staring at the sun, each time I try to stare at the sun), doing so without contradiction (never have I ever not suffered pain when staring at ...
The Constitution doesn't mean whatever you want it to-
[bearingarms]
For the past couple of ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 22, 2020:
I'm going to fact check that...
"The Constitution doesn't mean whatever you want it to-"
Debate in Virginia Ratifying Convention
1788 Elliot 3:89, 430--36, 439--42
[6 June]
George Mason:
"Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions should arise under this government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of those powers; could not Congress, under the idea of providing for the general welfare, and under their own construction, say that this was destroying the general peace, encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people? And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury?"
I guess it depends upon what is is...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4XT-l-_3y0
Judiciary Act 1789 (treason)
Enumeration Act 1790 (treason)
First Bank of the United States 1791 (treason) later reconstituted as The Federal Reserve
Excise Tax on Whiskey 1791 (treason) later reconstituted as The IRS
Whiskey Rebellion Proclamation 1794 (treason)
Alien and Sedition Acts 1798 (treason)
The secret, gag order, meetings in 1787 to usurp the common law and the original voluntary federation, turning lawful government into Subsidized Slavery (tyranny, empire, despotism, whatever) was TREASON.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 22, 2020:
I'm going to fact check that...
"The Constitution doesn't mean whatever you want it to-"
Debate in Virginia Ratifying Convention
1788 Elliot 3:89, 430--36, 439--42
[6 June]
George Mason:
"Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions should arise under this government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of those powers; could not Congress, under the idea of providing for the general welfare, and under their own construction, say that this was destroying the general peace, encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people? And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury?"
I guess it depends upon what is is...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4XT-l-_3y0
Judiciary Act 1789 (treason)
Enumeration Act 1790 (treason)
First Bank of the United States 1791 (treason) later reconstituted as The Federal Reserve
Excise Tax on Whiskey 1791 (treason) later reconstituted as The IRS
Whiskey Rebellion Proclamation 1794 (treason)
Alien and Sedition Acts 1798 (treason)
The secret, gag order, meetings in 1787 to usurp the common law and the original voluntary federation, turning lawful government into Subsidized Slavery (tyranny, empire, despotism, whatever) was TREASON.
'Social distancing' is just a politically correct way of saying 'isolation'-
[redstate]
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 22, 2020:
"Politically Correct" is just a treasonously fradulent way of saying treasonous fraud.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 22, 2020:
"Politically Correct" is just a treasonously fradulent way of saying treasonous fraud.
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 22, 2020:
Martin from Chicago?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 22, 2020:
Martin from Chicago?
[youtu.be]
Steve Bannon: The Rest of Hunter Biden's Emails
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 22, 2020:
Key points in that video as far as I am concerned are:
1. Bannon is back after daring to go after Kissinger
2. Pelosi may be President of the Corporate United States Monopoly of Power and Profit if things go her way
3. The FBI had the soon to be exposed evidence of Biden Treason (and other crimes) before the Impeachment of Trump, evidence that would likely have caused Warren or Sanders as Marxist Candidate, and prevented the Impeachment, which could have focused more preventative or defensive actions against The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud.
4. The Fake Debate Tonight (10-22-02020) may actually be even more entertaining than the last one.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 22, 2020:
Key points in that video as far as I am concerned are:
1. Bannon is back after daring to go after Kissinger
2. Pelosi may be President of the Corporate United States Monopoly of Power and Profit if things go her way
3. The FBI had the soon to be exposed evidence of Biden Treason (and other crimes) before the Impeachment of Trump, evidence that would likely have caused Warren or Sanders as Marxist Candidate, and prevented the Impeachment, which could have focused more preventative or defensive actions against The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud.
4. The Fake Debate Tonight (10-22-02020) may actually be even more entertaining than the last one.
[youtu.be]
Steve Bannon: The Rest of Hunter Biden's Emails
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 22, 2020:
Very good, thanks. I linked it on Brendon O'Connell's YouTube Channel.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 22, 2020:
Very good, thanks. I linked it on Brendon O'Connell's YouTube Channel.
You like Josf-Kelley
X
Details
- BirthdayJuly 5
- Education2-Year
- Top tags#government #USA #rights #video #truth #crime #money #world #reason #evidence #laws #freedom #justice #evil #god #children #death #federal #society #media
- Level8 (85,725pts)
- Posts777
-
Comments
Replies 1,895
1,213 - Followers 17
- Fans 0
- Following 1
- Referrals11
- Joined Oct 29th, 2019
- Last Visit 6+ months ago
Josf-Kelley's Groups
Q is for question
460 members, Host
Voluntary Mutual Defence
37 members, Host
End Game (formerly Ryan Faulk Fans)
14 members, Host
Controversial Charts
48186 members
Jordan Peterson Group
25438 members
Ben Shapiro Group
22987 members
Joe Rogan Group
16348 members
Just Jokes and Memes
14500 members
Tucker Carlson Fans
13551 members
Dinesh D'Souza Fans
10234 members
IDW Topic-of-the-Day
9847 members
News From All Views
7283 members
DaisyCousens
5899 members
Tim Pool Group
5879 members
Sydney Watson Fanspace
5512 members
Classical Liberalism
4844 members
Canadian Politics
4023 members
Arielle Scarcella FanSpace!
2806 members
IDW Political Party
2799 members
Politically Incorrect folks
2479 members
Anti-Socialism
2268 members
Learning from Christ
2239 members
President Donald J. Trump... Latest
2068 members
Saving Western Civilisation
2057 members
RamZPaul
1891 members
John Paul Watson Group
1610 members
Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder
1571 members
Alex Jones Fans
1301 members
Conspiracy Truth : Wolves And Sheeple
1227 members
Stefan Molyneux Fans
1049 members
Anti Communists
1022 members
Emergency Preparedness and Survival
947 members
Libertarian Freethinkers
896 members
COVID-19
764 members
The Great Reset
709 members
The Second Amendment Sanctuary
648 members
True Crime Discussion Group
599 members
Conspiracy Research
575 members
Words of Wisdom
480 members
Feminism = cancer
473 members
International News
396 members
Comedy, Laughs and Humor.
325 members
Vaccine Education & Discussion Group
307 members
Ideas of God
291 members
The Case Against Corona Panic
250 members
Dr. Steve Turley Group
185 members
Joe Biden Is Not My President
179 members
United We Stand
153 members
The History Corner
149 members
Brain soup
128 members
IDW.Community Senate
122 members
ORIGINAL MEMES ( GREGORY ALAN ELLIOTT )
118 members
Liz Wheeler Fans Page.
116 members
Red Pilled Hotties (Yes you can still flirt & remain politically engaged)
107 members
Propaganda Clearing House
95 members
MGTOW: Exodus From The Plantation
64 members
Anarcho-Capitalism / Voluntaryism
55 members
IDW Liberty Alliance Culture War Room
49 members
Now You Are Talking With
48 members
Rednecks Anonymous
44 members
Current Events
28 members
50 Policies
23 members
Anthony Brian Logan Fans
21 members
Freemerica
19 members
Children's Health Defense
16 members
UnCommon Sense 42020 PodCast
9 members