slug.com slug.com
1
1 Like Show

Born in West Orange, New Jersey, 1958.
1 oldest sister
2 older brothers
2 younger brothers

My first experience with data that did not fit the Official Narrative (propaganda) was a book I read in School for a book report. The book described data concerning the sinking of the Ocean Liner (false flag) that was the casus belli (excuse: false flag) for Americans to be deceived into fighting the Central Banker War called World War One. The ship that was sunk (murdering people aboard) to move power to the criminals running the Central Bank Cabal was the Lusitania.

The next big event which caused me to fully reject the Official Narrative (propaganda) was the massacre at Waco misreported on National Television (Corporate Propaganda Organ of the Nation-State Aristocracy).

Full Bio

Comments

This represents THEFT from our parents and, potentially us. Is anyone familiar with this?
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 24, 2020:
Central Banking Fraud?
Q-Vote Please test drive this.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 24, 2020:
The law is not defined and therefore I cannot assume what is meant by the law. Do you mean the law as a criminal version or the law as a method by which people are held accountable for their actions? One version of law (counterfeit) affects me in an opposite way compared to the genuine version of law.
our death injection are we been sentenced for a crime or should we be rounding up a bunch of big ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 23, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4BU5mizwtM
Wow, I think they are going to have a problem when trying to give that shot to the ones who are ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 23, 2020:
What is described as Anitbody Immune Enhancement (vaccine injection causes severe illness and death) sounds exactly like the current Wuhan Virus or Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud, for those people who are getting severely ill and dying. The consensus (junk science) is "we don't know what is causing this." I think that some people know exactly what is causing this, as it is the same cause that causes them to exponentially gain even more power over their victims.
Hi everyone, I have a dilemma/question for all of you.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 23, 2020:
Typically a disputed source is either disputed based upon specific measurable (can be tested for validity) errors, or, unspecific measurable (cannot be tested for validity) opinions that are typically opinions about the character of the people being disputed. So two paths: A. Ask for specific reasons why the disputed sources are wrong. B. Attack the character of the trauma therapist with the liberal view and attack the character of the scientists who are right according to the trauma therapist with the liberal view, and in your own mind you can win the argument that way. The liberal with the liberal view may actually offer useful information so as to make an informed decision as to who is right or wrong about very specific things that can be tested for validity.
The truth on the shutdown...we can’t afford it. [fee.org]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 23, 2020:
"But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program. "To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter." Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and their Legacy by William Watkins "First in the importance of its evil influence they considered the money monopoly, which consists of the privilege given by the government to certain individuals, or to individuals holding certain kinds of property, of issuing the circulating medium, a privilege which is now enforced in this country by a national tax of ten per cent., upon all other persons who attempt to furnish a circulating medium, and by State laws making it a criminal offense to issue notes as currency. "It is claimed that the holders of this privilege control the rate of interest, the rate of rent of houses and buildings, and the prices of goods, – the first directly, and the second and third indirectly. ...
China is a threat to the world.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 23, 2020:
China (a thing) is many people fighting each other for dominance in China, along with China being ONE dominant group of a few people currently overpowering all the other people fighting each other for dominance. China in that light explained above is a Legal Fiction: a thing. When the dominant power employs any means by which to gain that dominance it is thereby defining "its" self as a criminal power. If "it" is a criminal power, then "it" will do whatever it takes, without moral limit, to retain power for "it." How is that any different than any other dominant Legal Fiction on this planet today? The dominant legal fiction criminal power in China is a threat to every single individual alive on this planet including the membership of "it." The term MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) and DUMB (Deep Underground Military Bases) suggest a thing that is real. It (China, and all the other dominant legal fiction criminal powers East to West) threaten everyone everywhere right now because of it (MAD). It ought to be defined as the worst offender first on a list that goes on an indictment for a trial at law (Court of Law, not Court of Admiralty or Equity) whereby the worst offender threatening everyone everywhere now on this planet faces a judgment of, by, and for those threatened people: a jury. If the worst offender is someone "leading" China, then that name goes on that list, if the next worst is someone "leading" England, that one goes on the list, and if during each trial worse offenders are discovered during discovery, then those worse offenders go on the list. That is the method by which the people defend themselves from the criminals that threaten the people: the law. Since there is no law it is therefore obvious that that fact (it) is the problem that threatens mankind today. Our problem today (it) is the fact that there is no law on this planet, and the worst offenders run the counterfeit versions of it: it being the law. China means what exactly? Do you mean those few people in China who routinely consume the people of China in order for those few people to maintain dominance over all the people in China? Routinely the people today will blame everyone in a certain area on earth for the crimes perpetrated by a few people in that area, and as that is being done those few people who perpetrate those crimes are thereby afforded all the power they need to continue doing so, as any defensive effort that could be effecting a defense of the innocent people in that area is shunted in the effort to blame the innocent in that area for the crimes perpetrated by the criminals in that area. It is well past time for people on this planet to return to rule of law, or perish, or hide in bunkers underground and...
So I have had many interesting discussions with the mandatory mask Nazis recently.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 21, 2020:
Thanks.
Democracy. You know what I find really interesting?
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 21, 2020:
"Criticism of democracy: Economists since Milton Friedman have strongly criticized the efficiency of democracy. They base this on their premise of the irrational voter. Their argument is that voters are highly uninformed about many political issues, especially relating to economics, and have a strong bias about the few issues on which they are fairly knowledgeable." Speaking of quotes, the above is a bastardization of the meaning of the word democracy as if democracy was synonymous with electoral politics. Two useful quotes follow: "In the Athenian state, as in any other, we can distinguish legislative, judicial, and executive functions. The Athenian legislative branch consisted of two bodies, a Council of 500 and an Assembly of 6000. At first glance, this system resembles the American bicameral legislature, with a small, select upper house and a larger, more popular lower house. But this appearance is deceptive. To begin with, neither the Council nor the Assembly consisted of elected representatives. The members of the Council were selected not by election but by sortition — i.e., by lot. In other words, the 500 Councillors were selected randomly from the (male) citizen population. (And no Councillor could serve more than two terms.) The practice of selecting government officials randomly (and the Athenians developed some fairly sophisticated mechanical gadgets to ensure that the selection really was random, and to make cheating extremely difficult) is one of the most distinctive features of the Athenian constitution. We think of electoral politics as the hallmark of democracy; but elections were almost unknown at Athens, because they were considered paradigmatically anti-democratic. Proposals to replace sortition with election were always condemned as moves in the direction of oligarchy. Why? Well, as the Athenians saw it, under an electoral system no one can obtain political office unless he is already famous: this gives prominent politicians an unfair advantage over the average person. Elections, they thought, favor those wealthy enough to bribe the voters, powerful enough to intimidate the voters, flashy enough to impress the voters, or clever enough to deceive the voters. The most influential political leaders were usually Horsemen anyway, thanks to their social prominence and the political following they could obtain by dispensing largesse among the masses. (One politician, Kimon, won the loyalty of the poor by leaving his fields and orchards unfenced, inviting anyone who was hungry to take whatever he needed.) If seats on the Council had been filled by popular vote, the Horsemen would have disproportionately dominated it — just as, today, Congress is dominated by those who can afford expensive campaigns, either through their ...
Many dissidents advocate some form of self-improvement to resist the degrading effects of the modern...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 21, 2020:
Meditation is my suggestion so long as the meaning of the word is understood as a conscious effort to know better from worse. The degrading effects of the modern world are rooted in the lies told and believed by the people that constitute the modern world. We are forcibly, coercively, deceptively booted up with a false operating system at birth that is summed up as: Do unto others before others can do unto you those things that you yourself would defend against having people do those same things to you. I call that the operating system for members of The Cult of Might Makes Right. The natural order of human existence is summed up on the following words that describe the naturally born Operating System of Mankind (human conscience): Do unto others that which you would have others do to you. Meditation (as defined above) can help each individual move out of the box that enslaves them (the false operating system) and help each individual move into a freedom of mind, which then moves to freedom of action, creativity, adaptability, productivity, cooperative competition, as each individual finds their own way to stardom as they alone are capable of defining on their own authority.
Is Freedom a Universal Value?
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 21, 2020:
I'm not buying it. "The result is a balance in which a strong national freedom is deeply rooted in constitutional liberty and the inalienable rights of the individual." Nations (States) were many at the time of the American formation of a Sanctuary from Slavery place for Slaves to Run and earn that Sanctuary. 13 Nations (States) were Federated into a Voluntary Mutual Defense Association because those who were hell bent on enslaving the slaves invaded many of the Nations so as to enforce slavery upon Americans. The root of the principles defining the ideologies of the defenders is the common law, which has been traced back to at least the Saxons. "That this right of resistance was recognized as a common law right, when the ancient and genuine trial by jury was in force, is not only proved by nature of the trial itself, but is acknowledged by history.* *Hallam says, “The relation established between a lord and his vassal by the feudal tenure, far from containing principles of any servile and implicit obedience, permitted the compact to be dissolved in case of its violation by either party. This extended as much to the sovereign as to inferior lords. If a vassal was aggrieved, and if justice was denied him, he sent a defiance, that is, a renunciation of fealty to the king, and was entitled to enforce redress at the point of his sword. It then became a contest of strength as between two independent potentates, and was terminated by treaty, advantageous or otherwise, according to the fortune of war. * * There remained the original principle, that allegiance depended conditionally upon good treatment, and that an appeal might be lawfully made to arms against an oppressive government. Nor was this, we may be sure, left for extreme necessity, or thought to require a long enduring forbearance. In modern times, a king, compelled by his subjects’ swords to abandon any pretension, would be supposed to have ceased to reign; and the express recognition of such a right as that of insurrection has been justly deemed inconsistent with the majesty of law. But ruder ages had ruder sentiments. Force was necessary to repel force; and men accustomed to see the king’s authority defied by a private riot, were not much shocked when it was resisted in defence of public freedom.” - 3 Middle Ages, 240-2." Lysander Spooner, Essay on the Trial by Jury, 1852 Freedom from criminals who enslave people is precisely what it is in time and place, as determined by the capacity of the free to defend themselves from the criminals. Why does that have to be complicated into 3 forms of freedom? Bad guys attack, good guys defend, if the bad guys win the slaves are enslaved, of the good guys win there is a precious moment of freedom, and it is always ...
Human Trafficking AllisonMack, known for her role on Smallville, has plead guilty to human ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 21, 2020:
"A jury took less than five hours to find Raniere guilty of all counts of sex trafficking and other charges accusing him of coercing women into sex." The cult is no longer well hidden, what about Maxwell?
A Coin Shortage Or Push For Digital Currency [andmagazine.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 21, 2020:
http://coinapps.com/copper/penny/calculator/ 100 Pennies = 1.925 USD Free Money Markets are good, as the quality of money and the cost of money is pushed up by market forces (people demanding and people supplying higher quality and lower cost money). Treasonous Central Banking Fraud Money Monopoly Control crushes competition on purpose, and that leads to ever lower quality of money at an ever greater cost. https://usdebtclock.org/
"What Anticapitalist Christian Economists Get Wrong" -- this is a brief overview of how socialist ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 20, 2020:
As I read this I find reason to comment. "As for the basic economic doctrine of scarcity, Calvin’s authors declared that scarcity was a fallacy invented by ignorant free market economists, since everyone knows God has provided the world with lots of wonderful resources." The use of words to mean something specific for every occasion is akin to using a standard measure of length for every occasion: changing the length arbitrarily can lead to an increase in the costs of production. I need 100 - 3 foot 2x4s, demands the carpenter. The supplier arbitrarily changes the meaning of the word foot and sends 100 3 foot 2x4s to the carpenter in exchange for something of value demanded by the supplier. The word scarcity can mean just about anything to anyone. Example: "Here human self-interest finds an incentive to make itself felt, and where the available quantity does not suffice for all, every individual will attempt to secure his own requirements as completely as possible to the exclusion of others." Carl Menger So, in that context, scarcity can mean that each individual "will attempt to secure his own requirements as completely as possible to the exclusion of others," in that context. This context: "We saw that economic goods are goods whose available quantities are smaller than the requirements for them. Wealth can therefore also be defined as the entire sum of goods at an economizing individual’s command, the quantities of which are smaller than the requirements for them. Hence, if there were a society where all goods were available in amounts exceeding the requirements for them, there would be no economic goods nor any “wealth.”" Carl Menger So scarcity according to that context means wealth, because without scarcity there "would be no economic goods nor any "wealth." From the Article titled: "What Anticapitalist Christian Economists Get Wrong" is this too: "The art of economics consists in looking not merely at the immediate but at the longer effects of any act or policy; it consists in tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all groups." What happens when those who value helping other people, because no one needs any help anymore as far as the one demanding to be supplied by people needing help can see, are faced with that absolute level of scarcity? The poor broken charitable person is destitute without any means to supply himself with the wealth he so clearly desires? "Here human self-interest finds an incentive to make itself felt, and where the available quantity does not suffice for all, every individual will attempt to secure his own requirements as completely as possible to the exclusion of others." So...the poor broken charitable person who values ...
Important video, especially in light of the recent Nick Cannon "anti-Semitism" controversy.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 20, 2020:
Blaming a group for what individuals do is defenseless, powerless, unaccountable, and irresponsible. Cases in point can be pointed out, and I will point out a similar case. The American process started out as the process by which slaves escaped slavery and found sanctuary in America. People like Alexander Hamilton, John Adams, and George Washington, to name 3 precisely as individuals, were accountable, and responsible for altering the American process from a process by which slaves escaped slavery and found sanctuary in America, to Subsidized Slavery instead. Please be clear about this in a factual manner. Please be clear about this is an accountable manner: a process. Please be clear about this in a responsible manner; an ability to respond factually, accountably, reasonably, morally, lawfully, legally, justly, equitably, and doing so by avoiding the mistake of blaming the group instead of holding individuals accountable for their individual contributions to the crimes perpetrated by the group of criminals who belong in the group of criminals because they are, in fact, criminals. Blaming 3 people (Hamilton, Adams, Washington) blames each individual, so as to avoid blaming those who were not to blame, such as Patrick Henry, George Mason, and Richard Henry Lee. Blaming the Slave Traders blames the Slave Traders, whereby those who considered People as their Property belong in that specific group of criminals who considered People as Property. Blaming those who worked to end slavery for the crimes of the Slave Traders is weak. Who benefits when those who could help in the process of maintaining sanctuary from criminals are instead turned into those who aid and abet the slave traders? Who benefits when the good guys are collectively punished instead of the bad guys being accounted for as individual bad guys who are accountable and responsible for the crimes they themselves perpetrate? June 17, 1788 George Mason: "Mr. Chairman, this is a fatal section, which has created more dangers than any other. The first clause allows the importation of slaves for twenty years. Under the royal government, this evil was looked upon as a great oppression, and many attempts were made to prevent it; but the interest of the African merchants prevented its prohibition. No sooner did the revolution take place, than it was thought of. It was one of the great causes of our separation from Great Britain. Its exclusion has been a principal object of this state, and most of the states in the Union. The augmentation of slaves weakens the states; and such a trade is diabolical in itself, and disgraceful to mankind; yet, by this Constitution, it is continued for twenty years. As much as I value a union of all the states, I would not admit ...
Ghislaine Maxwell reportedly thinks Epstein was murdered, fears the same fate [nypost.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 20, 2020:
Filed under "Conspiracy Theories" Because...?
Jordan Peterson - Diversity, Inclusivity & Equity [youtube.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 20, 2020:
I do not see the reasoning for redefining the word equity to be a synonym for inequity, other than willful deception being the reason, or the reason may possibly be someone parroting the lies that make up the effective deception. Equity means something, so why does it somehow become polar opposite meanings working as an ongoing internal conflict? One example: "...the quality of being fair and impartial..." That is a meaning that has specified uses, such as the effort to ensure that a Jury is not stacked in favor of unfair and partial, biased, unjust, distrustful, judgment at law. In other words, equity is the foundation from which the process of law is constituted, or law is nothing more than a tool used by an individual criminal, or an organized group of criminals, make their slaves work harder to ensure their enslavement: Subsidized Slavery. So... Equity on the one hand is the basis of law, while at the same time (apparently) equity is the basis of crime. Is that not the defining of cognitive dissonance? I smell a rat.
We shut down the world for a flu virus! Arrest everyone associated with Event 201! Geller Report: ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 20, 2020:
Questioning information is a scientific principle: don't settle for baseless statements of alleged facts, demand proof. Supply proof positive. https://www.gracevanberkum.com/post/we-are-being-played-please-read?fbclid=IwAR20lvlx8xq2QRtQ4SlgagTS5VuMgk1Y8NYyTjbuPWO33pqCbT0wOkEw4bo
Hate Trump - Love Trump?
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 19, 2020:
I see another one of those boxes created and propagandized by the Cult of Might Makes Right. Their game plan includes a shell game type fraud purporting to offer "the" choices available. This is also part and parcel to the Monopoly Game where competition is never allowed if it is within the power of the Monopolists to CRUSH all competition anywhere it may spontaneously erupt out of grass roots. Voting in an (rigged) Electoral Politics (crime spree) "Election" was known to be Oligarchical: leading to the most powerful criminal gangs to take-over and counterfeit the principles and the means governing government.. So... A. Disagree! B. Are you nuts? I'm writing in Kanye! C. None of the above (let them eat cake)
Why Would the White House Cut CDC Out of Wuhan Data Collection and Forbid It to Testify Before ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 18, 2020:
"Quite honestly, I’m not really sure which is worse; the nation’s premier public health agency being so enmeshed in partisan politics that it is willing to kill large numbers of people to win or the CDC being so blindingly incompetent that it killed a crap-ton of people because it can’t find its ass with both hands." Criminal negligence or treason as determined by the jury if the law was back in America; actual Court of Law, not Admiralty or Equity.
CONSPIRACIES AND CONSPIRANUTS.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 17, 2020:
None of the above. No trial in a Court of Law, so these are assholes: opinions, everyone has one.
Huge Turn of events. Where are the independent (common law) Grand Jury members?
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 16, 2020:
Standard procedure for "government" (State Organized Crime) is to "throw the book" at anyone deemed guilty and worthy of consumption, so as to ensure that plenty of "leverage" is available for a "plea" deal. Why are the "government" (State Organized Crime) agents donning the kid gloves on this case? Special Interest, National Interest, Elite Protection Services, what? You tell me? Do I need to write up a Poll?
What if things are much worse than even the pessimists among us suspect?
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 14, 2020:
"Like it or not, and whatever laws you think are on the books, that is now your reality." Each individual lives each day uniquely. The above is just another case of someone claiming that "we" are all "collectively" "collected" into one "monopoly" of experience. I don't buy into such obvious falsehoods, it is unreasonable, and therefore both stupid and servile. ""It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Lysander Spooner, Essay on The Trial by Jury, 1852
Let's make a hypothetical.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 13, 2020:
So...no rule of law in the list?
When is inequality just and fair?
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 11, 2020:
"Is there a way other than using pitchforks to know who's right?" Lies. If the problem is error, then the solution is to account for the error. If the problem is lies, then the solution is to account for the lies told by the liars. The law power is in place to account for the liars, and people found out in Ancient times that there can be no official truth teller, so the people gave the power of truth telling to randomly selected representatives of the whole people (as one species), and those people are then jurors on a jury. If one individual in a group can whisper a lie into the ear of another individual in the same group, it is a proven fact that the lie told can set in motion a conflict that would otherwise never exist. Example: Men are bad, see that one, he is plotting to steal everything you have, and the only thing you can do to stop him is to attack him first. That is a variation on the same basic lie that props up the dogma of a cult that has so many names that listing them all would add way too many words to a response that is neither brief nor witty. I will call all the cults variations of the one main Cult: The Cult of Might Makes Right. Cult Dogma (lies): "Do unto others what you would never allow anyone to do to you." The first to the last action perpetrated according to the basic non-principles (lies) causes inequity. Inequity is the willful transfer of power from those who produce it to those who steal it by deceit, by threat of violence combined with deceit, by threat of violence that can be backed up without deceit, and by aggressive violence that tortures as well as enslaves the targeted victims of inequity. If the law is equal, so as to deter inequity, then who is afforded equitable access to the law power: if the law power is in place to deter transfers of power from victims to criminals? If someone says that they are the government while they secure themselves from investigation or prosecution for crimes (pedo human trafficking for example), then some people may believe such lies, while others do not, and that means that people are unequal and unfairly subject to the lies told by criminals. Perhaps those who are not so easily fooled into abject poverty at the hands of criminals running fake governments ought to be helped along in a cooperative effort to uncover the truth in any case where criminals use deception to transfer power inequitably from those who create it, to those who steal it criminally. "It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some ...
Should G Soros be declared an enemy to USA and the UK and be tried for treason?
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 10, 2020:
If there is law, then yes. If there is no law, then no. If there is no law then there can't be any treason. Treason against what?
Not even the bus is safe
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 10, 2020:
I...can't...resist... downloaded and uploaded Thanks.
Biggest GOP CON INC Cuck or phony fake guy???
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 10, 2020:
Some people claim that Mccain was executed for treason.
Write at least 10 characters
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 10, 2020:
Bill, a real loser, was always lowering the douch bag bar. Henry tried as he might but diligent effort was never enough to clue in Bill, who always complained about being lonely. Cindy was one of the favorite victims of Bill's uncanny ability to exemplify the fine art of douchbaggery, she wouldn't stick up for herself. Carl tried to step in and help Cindy during one of Bill's unwarranted attacks on Cindy, but Carl was ill equipped to handle such an overpowering ego, Carl like Cindy was actually very meek, despite the sudden leap into the path of the King of Douchery. Tim saw everything but had no stake in the game so he returned to reading the next chapter in the anarchist's cookbook, a particularly interesting bit on bomb making. Beth walked in on the scene triggering Bill to make a cowards exit immediately upon seeing Beth. Beth has initiated several successive defensive efforts against the aggressive Bill, including a scene in which Beth literally kicked shit right out of Bills ass, soiling his pants. Tom was just a kid, and he was way too busy playing "some damn game" on his tablet, his mom Jill wouldn't approve, so Tom was hiding out in the cafeteria where Bill had just exited. Jill was looking for Tom, she was a real character when it came to Tom and his games, often mocking the poor kid in a vain effort to shame him. Jill's husband Terry was off on yet another robbery to pay for his coke habit, which took all of Terry's former boisterous personality. And then there is Horatius the one character who was ever so demanding, but coy.
Pedophilia goes deeper than Jeffrey Epstein.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 9, 2020:
The concept of a trial by jury is such that no longer is it a probable cause to act in defense, it is the official establishment of the facts that matter in the case, and a judgment made by the people in the local area where the alleged crimes were perpetrated by the accused perpetrator. Trials in the Media are not helpful because there is at least two problems: 1. Jury tampering (jurors are no longer unbiased when they are exposed to potentially false and misleading information from various media sources) 2. Double Jeopardy (the dominant media uses their power to convict someone innocent or acquit someone guilty before an actual trial where the facts that matter in the case are stated to the jurors for adjudication by the jurors in a Court of Law; which is a trial by the country, thereby constituting a second trial after the first trial perpetrated by the false media criminals) A picture is only worth a thousand words if those who are aware of precisely what is in the picture. A video is not worth anything of it is an intentionally false account of what actually happens, and videos can be manufactured out of nothing with modern technology: anyone can be made to be guilty of anything on "video" What are the facts in this case? Is it important to convict only those who are guilty so as to avoid injuring innocent people? Many accounts of an army of children marching through a meat grinder known as "human trafficking" ought to inspire people to get the facts that matter in each case, and not to settle for false accusations made by the real perpetrators so as to distract the defenders and render the defenders powerless in defense.
Excerpts from.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 9, 2020:
OTHER The corporate (bought, paid-for, extorted, compromised, cajoled, threatened, enticed, but definitely "on-board") Democratic Party Membership (TM, Limited Liability) is... Marxists/Communist So NO, they are not democrats. The corporate (bought, paid-for, extorted, compromised, cajoled, threatened, enticed, but definitely "on-board") Republican Party Membership (TM, Limited Liability) is... Fascist/Capitalist Trump (unless he is one or both of the above in disguise) is neither, so the answer is other than the poll suggests. The Marxists/Communists are obviously shooting themselves in the foot, destroying their credibility, evaporating their Political Leverage, with all but the bought and paid-for Marxists/Communist membership. The Fascist/Capitalist (crony so-called capitalist not Free Market Individualist Capitalist) "party" already shot themselves in the foot with Bush and Bush, Perpetual War for Perpetual "Peace." RE-DO the Poll in more accurate terms: Are the Marxists Communists Winning? 1. No, they are on the way out, they have used up every shovel full in the hole they are digging into hell, everything they do now confesses their true motives: destruction of life on earth because that is what gives them a counterfeit happiness. 2. No, but the actual democrats are wondering what they are, how they have been fooled, and what to do next, but they won't, not in their lifetime join the Fascist/Capitalist Party. 3. No, but the actual republicans are already finding cause to back Trump because Trump appears (on the surface) to be helping people return to rule of law (accountability, responsibility, and prosperity as a result) 4. Yes, the actual democrats are winning because the criminals who took over government are all fighting each other, and hopefully they move off to some island (on the Lolita Express perhaps) to resolve their conflicts in the ways they are well practiced: deception, threat, fear mongering, terror, torture, rape, assault, murder, and mass murder. 5. Yes, the actual democrats know that democracy only works in small groups and they also know that larger groups can form republics where the people are secure in their pursuits of happiness, their lives, their liberties, and their properties, because republics work when we agree to defend each other with rule of law: the common law, with independent private prosecutors, independent grand jurors, independent grand juries, independent trial jurors, and independent trial juries, which are small groups and democrat thereby. 6. Maybe, Trump may be yet another bought and paid-for member of the dominant criminal gang and current events will become even worse as the dominant gang dictates that everyone will resort to ...
[youtu.be] USMCA set CANADA FREE! Canada Day! Private Prosecution - Norman Traversy
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 9, 2020:
Time 24:00 or so "...it goes back to Magna Carta..." No, it goes back to any place and any time where people are aware of the need to defend the innocent from the guilty because failure to do so feeds and increases crime. Natural laws, recognized by people, goes way back, including way back to Mathew 7:12 But, as to Magna Carta, there is this: (MAGNA CARTA.) Care, Henry, ed. English Liberties, Or The Free-Born Subject’s Inheritance: Containing Magna Charta . . . The Habeas Corpus Act, And Several Other Statutes Boston: Printed by J. Franklin, for N. Buttolph, B. Eliot, and D. Henchman, 1721 Notes on Magna Carta "Farther, though it be said here, that the king hath given and granted these liberties, yet it must not be understood that they were meer emanations of Royal favour, or new bounties granted, which the people could not justly challenge, or had not a right unto before; for as lord Coke in divers places asserts, and as is well known to every gentleman professing the law, this charter is, for the most part, only declaratory of the principal grounds of the fundamental laws and liberties of England. Not any new freedom is hereby granted, but a restitution of such as the subject lawfully had before, and to free them from the usurpations and incroachments of every power whatever. It is worthy observation, that this charter often mentions sua jura, their rights, and libertates suas, their liberties, which shews they were before intitled to and possessed them, and that those rights and liberties were by this charter not granted as before unknown, but confirmed, and that in the stile of liberties and privileges long before well known.” In other words it is a consequence of being human (born into the world as a human) that nature provides the law, even if people try to deceive people into believing that "the law" is a privilege afforded to a few people who claim to be the "elite." As to Private Prosecution I found this: The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots Page 40 Private Prosecutors "For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. ...
Get this, in the 1800's it was the democrats that fought the republicans from keeping the slaves ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 8, 2020:
It is no more Democrat and Republican (left and right) than it is Black and White. It is Slave Consumers (now called Human Trafficking) and the slaves. Buy one, set him or her free, buy a young one, fresh, not yet turned into a nut case from abuse, if you can't then perhaps you are the slave. I don't think that it is a coincidence that Maxwell is now ready for prime time or the door nob gallows. On the 20th day of October 1774 This agreement contained a clause to discontinue the slave trade, and a provision not to import East India tea from any part of the world. In the article respecting non-exportations, the sending of rice to Europe was excepted." On the 1st of April, 1775 "On this occasion, the importation of slaves was expressly prohibited." "On the 21st of March, Congress recommended to the several provincial assemblies to exert their utmost endeavors to promote the culture of hemp, flax, and cotton, and the growth of wool, in the United Colonies; to take the earliest measures for erecting and establishing, in each colony, a society for the improvement of agriculture, arts, manufactures, and commerce; and forthwith to consider of the ways and means of introducing and improving the manufactures of duck, sail-cloth, and steel." http://teachingamericanhistory.org/ratification/elliot/vol1/approaches/ ______________________________ In the Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. I. p. 10 "The clause, too, reprobating the enslaving the inhabitants of Africa, was struck out in complaisance to South Carolina and Georgia, who had never attempted to restrain the importation of slaves, and who, on the contrary, still wished to continue it. Our northern brethren also, I believe felt a little tender under those censures; for, though their people had very few slaves themselves, yet they had been pretty considerable carriers of them to others." http://teachingamericanhistory.org/ratification/elliot/vol1/approaches/ Thomas Jefferson Declaration of Independence "he has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating it's most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. this piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the CHRISTIAN king of Great Britain. determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce: and that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase ...
[youtu.be] Round Table with Doug Force and Company join the discussion
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 8, 2020:
The title is either stupid and servile, or a mistake (which can lead to stupidity and servility). Does the so-called "government" posses "their people?" Is that a confession?
[britishconstitutiongroup.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 8, 2020:
"The British Constitution Group campaigns for the restoration of Britain's ancient Divine secular Constitution, which, for several decades has been systematically denied and undermined by successive corporate governments of all political parties. The BCG is non-political and does not endorse or support any political party. We know that for over 1200 years, successive generations of British inhabitants have reasserted the principles that Alfred the Great and others had helped to restore. Specifically, these principles include that of Trial and Annulment by Jury and the supremacy of the people over their government by being in judicial authority at all times." Seems legit to me. "Pilate was not innocent because he washed his hands, and said, He would have nothing to do with the blood of that just one. There are faults of omission as well as commission. When you are legally called to try such a cause, if you shall shuffle out yourself, and thereby persons perhaps less conscientious happen to be made use of, and so a villain escapes justice, or an innocent man is ruined, by a prepossessed or negligent verdict; can you think yourself in such a case wholly blameless? Qui non prohibet cum potest, jubet: That man abets an evil, who prevents it not, when it is in his power. Nec caret scrupulo sosietatis occultae qui evidenter facinori definit obviare: nor can he escape the suspicion of being a secret accomplice, who evidently declines the prevention of an atrocious crime." Englishman’s Right: A Dialogue between a Barrister at Law and a Juryman, John Hawles, 1763 "FOR more than six hundred years - that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 - there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws. "Unless such be the right and duty of jurors, it is plain that, instead of juries being a "palladium of liberty "- a barrier against the tyranny and oppression of the government - they are really mere tools in its hands, for carrying into execution any injustice and oppression it may desire to have executed. "But for their right to judge of the law, and the justice of the law, juries would be no protection to an accused person, even as to matters of fact; for, if the government can dictate to a jury any law whatever, in a criminal case, it can certainly dictate to them the laws of evidence. That is, it ...
A little-known atrocity: [en.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 8, 2020:
“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.” Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956 Seems legit to me.
i did not have sexual relations
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 8, 2020:
_______________________________________ Q. Let me ask you finally -- this has been a long road -- how you regard -- what is your explanation for the fact that there has been such little national media coverage of these -- of this trial and this evidence and this event here in this Memphis courtroom, which is the first trial ever to be able to produce evidence on this assassination -- what has happened here that Mighty Wurlitzer is not sounding but is in fact totally silent -- almost totally silent? A. Oh, but -- as we know, silence can be deafening. Disinformation is not only getting certain things to appear in print, it's also getting certain things not to appear in print. I mean, the first -- the first thing I would say as a way of explanation is the incredibly powerful effect of disinformation over a long period of time that I mentioned before. For 30 years the official line has been that James Earl Ray killed Martin Luther King and he did it all by himself. That's 30 years, not -- nothing like the short period when the line was that the Cubans raped the Angolan women. But for 30 years it's James Earl Ray killed Dr. King, did it all by himself. And when that is imprinted in the minds of the general public for 30 years, if somebody stood up and confessed and said: I did it. Ray didn't do it, I did it. Here's a movie. Here's a video showing me do it. 99 percent of the people wouldn't believe him because it just -- it just wouldn't click in the mind. It would just go right to -- it couldn't be. It's just a powerful psychological effect over 30 years of disinformation that's been imprinted on the brains of the -- the public. Something to the country couldn't -- couldn't be. _____________________________ https://thekingcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/King_Family_Trial_Transcript.pdf
Covid World Order : DOMO .
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 7, 2020:
Gaslighting? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuSSuuUkrNI
Absolute Truth!!
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 7, 2020:
Another great one, downloaded, uploaded, thanks.
Rural Kentucky residents take a stand. [theandersonnews.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 7, 2020:
"Please sir, can I have some more?" It is patently absurd to follow the current narratives parroted by all sides (save for a few non-sides) in the current conflict of interests. A. BLM, Antiffa, Globalists, Democrats (Marxist/Communists), Left (left side of a single coin) B. Targets of the above, which include Republicans (Fascist/Capitalists), and supporters of Trump ("Republicans" are against Trump), and all those who are not on the Left/Right Single Coin Both groups in conflict parrot the same narrative in which the people as a whole (meaning everyone with no exceptions) must plead their case before the all mighty officers who officiate the official government in POWER. Please, please, please, stop harming people. Please, stop harming me, please. Please allow me to speak before your grand omnipotence, and give me a chance to defend myself against the harm being done to me by you. Really? Please stop taking from me everything of value I am able to produce on my own initiative, I can't survive long if you take even more, so please stop? Really? What is it about the fact that criminals (in or out of offices of government) don't obey laws that fails to ring true enough to dispel the current narratives that place the victims before the criminals and the victims plead for mercy before their tormentors, as if this time, for the first time, those who willfully torment are going to show mercy if enough people alone, as individuals, get their day in a Kangaroo Court?
The fact that Covid-19 has more of your attention than a global elite pedophile ring blows my mind.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 7, 2020:
Every single individual on earth is in some way (from very minor to extremely major) guilty of failing to protect the innocent (children) from the guilty (so-called Human Trafficking Pedophiles) as much as those in Germany who failed to stop the Nazi's, often claiming "We didn't know," when asked why they did nothing. The least guilty of failing to protect mountains of innocent lives consumed by organized groups of criminal "Human Trafficking Pedophiles" are those who have worked diligently against the powers that protect these criminals, and those "least guilty of failure" individuals include government authorities in such cases as The Franklin Case documented here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsHs3eOL0mM From (at least) 1994 to 2020 there has been a continued flow of innocent lives moving from all over the world through (at least) Washington D.C., the Capital of Pedophilia, and worse. Worse that Pedophilia, or a subset thereof, was very well researched and publicized by Ted Gunderson. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqjNa-Jpsf0 His work that did work to expose (but failed to indict) the Organized Crime Perpetrators (each one is still free to this day to continue consuming innocent children) began in 1980. 1980 to 2020 is 40 years of children flowing through a meat grinder and no one on earth can stop it. "Pilate was not innocent because he washed his hands, and said, He would have nothing to do with the blood of that just one. There are faults of omission as well as commission. When you are legally called to try such a cause, if you shall shuffle out yourself, and thereby persons perhaps less conscientious happen to be made use of, and so a villain escapes justice, or an innocent man is ruined, by a prepossessed or negligent verdict; can you think yourself in such a case wholly blameless? Qui non prohibet cum potest, jubet: That man abets an evil, who prevents it not, when it is in his power. Nec caret scrupulo sosietatis occultae qui evidenter facinori definit obviare: nor can he escape the suspicion of being a secret accomplice, who evidently declines the prevention of an atrocious crime." Englishman’s Right: A Dialogue between a Barrister at Law and a Juryman, John Hawles, 1763 The Law Power starts in the mirror. They knew damn well what was going on, from those chopping up the kids, to those who turned a blind eye.
We Have SEVERAL PROBLEMS with CHINA/the C.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 6, 2020:
"I’ve been saying for YEARS that..." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3LvZAZ-HV4
The first slave ship came to Jamestown in 1619.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 6, 2020:
The idea that criminals who consume human lives for profit are authorities of law is like the idea that a computer virus manufacturer is a Global Authority on Human Health. The law of the land is the common law, has been in America since at least 1774: 14th of October, 1774 "On the same day, Congress unanimously resolved, “that the respective colonies are entitled to the common law of England, and more especially to the great and inestimable privilege of being tried by their peers of the vicinage according to the course of that law.” They further resolved, “that they were entitled to the benefit of such of the English statutes as existed at the time of their colonization, and which they have, by experience, respectively found to be applicable to their several and local circumstances.” They also resolved, that their ancestors, at the time of their immigration, were “entitled to all the rights, liberties, and immunities, of free and natural-born subjects within the realms of England.” Example: https://www.history.com/news/elizabeth-freeman-slavery-case-dred-scott-freedom “A jury of twelve local farmers, all men and all white according to Levinson, rule in favor of Freeman in 1781, giving her freedom and awarding her 30 shillings in damages.” Jefferson and many other Americans worked to expose the crime as one, and this ought to suggest that "owning" slaves to help them in a world run by criminals is not precisely the same thing as consuming slaves because you are one of the criminals. Buy a Human Trafficked Victim now, go ahead the market is thriving, then set that victim "free." Will that victim be free from their history of abuse? How much are you willing to do to set the slave victims free NOW? How about volunteering for jury duty? The Law of the Land was taken over by criminal slave traders in 1789. African Slavery, Irish Slavery, Indian Slavery, were all on the way out, because good people abiding by rule of law offered runaway slaves a place where slavery was not tolerated and criminals were processed with rule of law. All that was turned up-side-down in 1789.
What books do you guys recommend to learn about American history?
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 6, 2020:
Conceived in Liberty https://mises.org/library/conceived-liberty-2 A History Lesson by John Taylor Gatto (not a book) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdnTll1yETk An Essay on The Trial by Jury (history of the common law) https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/spooner-an-essay-on-the-trial-by-jury-1852 A People's History of the United States https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0030MR076/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8=1
My Thoughts on These Places Experiencing Riots and Violent or Illegal Protests and Unrest.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 6, 2020:
Rule of Law works better than rule by criminal means, depending upon the goals of the user of course.
Assuming BLM and Antifa terrorists escalate their arson and murder, what would be your reaction to a...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 6, 2020:
False question, therefore there is no reasonable answer listed in the false answers to the false question. A criminal take-over of America (so-called Napoleon-like-figure) would be called despotism, tyranny, or more recently a "Failed State." That already happened in 1789. The United States of America became a Corporate State in 1789, and it has been run by criminals ever since. If an individual somehow managed to occupy the President of the United States of America Corporate Office, Trump for example, and said person wanted to dissolve "congress" (not "drain the swamp," but instead to dissolve it), and said "Leader" wanted to dissolve (not drain) the swamp Courts, then said immoral means to said immoral ends would be by definition outside the law: OUTLAW. So the question is obviously couched in such a way as to fail to mention that a despot, or tyrant, is a criminal, and therefore the question is couched in such a way as to suggest that there is no such thing as law and order; sometimes "we" need a Bad Boy to take over, because "we" are so, so, so, bad! The question is couched on such a way as to suggest that it takes a Napoleon-like-figure, an exceptional Strong-Man, to Rule the people, since the people are so unruly. This is not a new thing, it is a con game played often in human history, see "Lord" Coke or "The Prince" Machiavelli for 2 examples. Why not simply return to rule of law? Why is the current president apparently incapable of bringing one criminal (Killary Clinton for example) before The People in a trial by jury case that proceeds according to the law of the land, which is the common law, see: The Bill of Rights? A Court of Law is a common law court, and The People, through their juries decide fact from fiction, guilt from innocence, lawful from unlawful, and the people adjudicate judgment of remedy, restitution, redemption, or punishment. If people continue to blame things for the actions of individual people, then these types of misleading questions (polls) will help (aid and abet) the criminals who have taken over the government; where criminals over-rule their victims with fake government and fake (Admiralty) courts. I will therefore rephrase the question to suit actual reality: Assuming Marxist/Communist Treasonous Criminal Rioters escalate their current crime spree, what would be your reaction to a strong leader returning to rule of law with a speedy trial of any one of the worst treasonous criminals behind this latest Marxist/Communist Treasonous Crime Spree (which includes the Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud)? Answers: 1. I didn't know anything about that actual law process, so I thought that the most powerful man (or potentially woman) takes everything, assumes absolute power, ...
Pissing on bonfires
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 5, 2020:
Things were relatively independent between 1774 and 1789, then it went back to Subsidized Slavery.
know that viewing some of pedophile sites are hard to look at, but we must harden ourselves and ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 4, 2020:
I think that any of these demonic perpetrators are due for a court date before a common law jury (meaning the jury decides fact, law, restitution, redemption , remedy, or punishment), and NOT a trial in the media. Those who want to see what the jury saw can look at the PUBLIC publicized trial transcripts, those who just want to know the verdict and the judgment can skip past the unthinkable unspeakable criminal acts.
is there a reason they can't find it....
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 4, 2020:
Not here either.
Unfortunately, people who have already sustained educational brain-damage cannot tell the difference...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 4, 2020:
Good find, thanks. "“Some historians argue that the massive success of the brand was due in large part to the ready-mix products promoted very intentionally by Aunt Jemima, if they couldn't have slaves at least they could have a “slave-in-a-box." "That is not history. There is no factual basis to support that statement. There has been no poll establishing any such motive for purchasing flour or anything else. It is made up. An invention of the supposed “historians,” who more accurately should be called “brain-damaged liars” for attempting to pass such drivel off as history. "That is not history. It is propaganda."
What if we focused on what we have in common. What unites us? Would some of the hate go away
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 4, 2020:
That is a factor in the power struggle. The "we" who belong in the group of people who focus on what "we" have in common are what is known as law abiding, but in order for "us" to understand this "we" have to understand the actual law as it is, and "we" can't fall for the counterfeit versions which are examples of RULE by CRIMINAL MEANS, also knowable as Subsidized Slavery. "We" can be those who share the common goal of deterring any crime by any criminal upon any victim, even if the criminal in question is holding and wielding an office of government, or especially so: enemies of liberty domestic. "We" can be those who share the lawful means to the above stated lawful ends: deter crime. "We" can be those who quickly realize that the lawful means to the lawful ends begins and must maintain a demand for and the supply of the facts that matter in any case, since falsehood empowers the criminals among "us."
Just going to drop this right here.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 3, 2020:
It fits on many levels with my own study, not all levels.
Came across this one on Minds.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 3, 2020:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1888118059/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8=1 Unintended Consequences is particularly useful when attempting to make sense of the current situation where people can't seem to read plain English, such as "Shall not..." or "No" .
A 28-Year-Old With No Degree Becomes a Must-Read on the Economy [bloomberg.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 2, 2020:
“He has really good knowledge of the plumbing of the monetary system,” says David Beckworth, a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center of George Mason University." I'll bet. "First in the importance of its evil influence they considered the money monopoly, which consists of the privilege given by the government to certain individuals, or to individuals holding certain kinds of property, of issuing the circulating medium, a privilege which is now enforced in this country by a national tax of ten per cent., upon all other persons who attempt to furnish a circulating medium, and by State laws making it a criminal offense to issue notes as currency. "It is claimed that the holders of this privilege control the rate of interest, the rate of rent of houses and buildings, and the prices of goods, – the first directly, and the second and third indirectly. For, say Proudhon and Warren, if the business of banking were made free to all, more and more persons would enter into it until the competition should become sharp enough to reduce the price of lending money to the labor cost, which statistics show to be less than three-fourths of once per cent. In that case the thousands of people who are now deterred from going into business by the ruinously high rates which they must pay for capital with which to start and carry on business will find their difficulties removed. If they have property which they do not desire to convert into money by sale, a bank will take it as collateral for a loan of a certain proportion of its market value at less than one per cent. discount. "If they have no property, but are industrious, honest, and capable, they will generally be able to get their individual notes endorsed by a sufficient number of known and solvent parties; and on such business paper they will be able to get a loan at a bank on similarly favorable terms. Thus interest will fall at a blow. The banks will really not be lending capital at all, but will be doing business on the capital of their customers, the business consisting in an exchange of the known and widely available credits of the banks for the unknown and unavailable, but equality good, credits of the customers and a charge therefor of less than one per cent., not as interest for the use of capital, but as pay for the labor of running the banks. "This facility of acquiring capital will give an unheard of impetus to business, and consequently create an unprecedented demand for labor, – a demand which will always be in excess of the supply, directly to the contrary of the present condition of the labor market. Then will be seen an exemplification of the words of Richard Cobden that, when two laborers are after one employer, wages fall, but when two employers are after one ...
The Revolutionary Elite Eats Their Own - The American Mind
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 2, 2020:
The source of those words "Jim Banks is a U.S. Congressman representing Indiana's 3rd district" indicates that time has passed since Ron Paul was the only voice for sanity. Not everyone can see the problem or the solution from the same angle, and that is the good thing, because the thing viewed has an infinite number of angles from which to be viewed, and a few angles of view are better than one MONOPOLY view, because there is the slightest chance that the addition of another view will improve (rather than falsify on purpose) the view that is potentially shared by the viewers who have an interest in quantifying and qualifying the thing in view: government or the alternatives which include FAKE government.
The Revolutionary Elite Eats Their Own - The American Mind
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 2, 2020:
"They don’t care about producing real change—they just want to be last one in line for the guillotine." A clear and present danger to those in line for the guillotine is the arrest of one of the "Elite" whose crimes may soon become Public Knowledge from Public Trial Transcripts, or that one may RAT on the other RATS in a "plea bargain," or that one may find a guillotine in her cell made out of suicide rope.
The Revolutionary Elite Eats Their Own - The American Mind
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 2, 2020:
"Well, the children have internalized their parents’ messages." How many cases out of the total number of cases involve parents nurturing their children to be criminals who will perpetrate the crime known as rioting? Is that quote above an off hand way to say that a nebulous Legal Fiction (The Nanny State) is the actual parent while the people who bore these children are absent during the formative years of these children? Out went the traditional family and in place is placed a legal fiction nanny state where trained propagandists pose as teachers? Why does that sound familiar? Oh, well there are people who confess: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wi5R9WI6_w0
The Revolutionary Elite Eats Their Own - The American Mind
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 2, 2020:
"Take a closer look at the mob. A new study by Pew research says only 1/6 of the protesters are Black. Four out of five are Democrats. This is not the poor working class fighting for a livable wage. It’s an act of performance art staged and underwritten by our nation’s elite, in the tradition of Woodstock or Occupy Wall Street. A viral video was shared recently of a white woman clad in $300 worth of Lululemon designer yoga apparel yelling at a Black male police officer and an Asian female police officer that they are “part of the problem.” She’s not fighting for justice. She’s fighting to quiet her own conscience." That is a good article, and I am incited into action by it. I read it and I comment. My actions are affected by those words. I want to add to the quoted words above, and my addition is to say that many of these fake protesters (inciting race war) are paid to do so, so they are merely employees who are merely following orders: just, just, just, following orders, and nothing more, nothing personal.
The Revolutionary Elite Eats Their Own - The American Mind
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 2, 2020:
"This isn’t a proletarian revolution. This is a generational fight within our ruling elite class." That conclusion was made also by Murray Rothbard in reference to the Revolutionary War. It was not a fight against which dictators rules (Dictators from Britain or Dictators here in America), it was a fight between the ruling elite class (home grown versus British) and the revolution was the opportunity to shed all Dictators foreign and domestic. That, unfortunately, lasted until 1789 in America.
Food for thought, not for arguments where the goal is to defeat the enemy at all cost.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 2, 2020:
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Maxwell-Indictment.pdf
Fox news: Charges against Ghislaine Maxwell announced! Ghislaine Maxwell, former girlfriend and ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 2, 2020:
No mask.
Getting In Front Of This One
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 2, 2020:
Downloaded, uploaded, thanks.
Quanon.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 2, 2020:
If people learn from half truths, they learn to believe falsehoods. Freedom and Liberty are incompatible with beliefs in falsehoods designed to transfer power from the victims to the criminals, as the end result is subsidized slavery where the people are made to believe that their chains are as lovely as the Naked Emperor's New Clothes. "...it was once like in the United States where men were free." When was that? During Reagan's term the battle was against foreign powers attempting to continue the march toward a Global Monopoly of Power and Profit (where the people are considered hereditary property). Reagan was a Nationalists. If the "Nation" subsidizes "government" business through coerced payments extorted from the hereditary property, then the "Nation" is Fascist, which is a subset of Socialism, as is Communism also a subset of Socialism. If it turns full Globalism it will be a hybrid mix of both Fascism and Communism with no local distinctions separating one from the other. That would require absolute control, which is then the reason why there is no longer any need to divide the world into either Fascist or Communist localities that are constantly made to fight each other so as to maintain the illusion of "freedom" from each other. "...it was once like in the United States where men were free." The last time men were free, so were women. If men were enslaving women, and other men of different colors, different religions, different political ideologies, then men were half free, by a convenient refusal to see the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Abigail Adams to John Adams Braintree, Mass., March 31, 1776 "I have sometimes been ready to think that the passion for liberty cannot be equally strong in the breasts of those who have been accustomed to deprive their fellow creatures of theirs. Of this I am certain that it is not founded upon that generous and Christian principle of doing to others as we would that others should do unto us. . . . " To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine November 15, 1802 "But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property. It is, therefore, no wonder that the "Rights of Man" was attacked by that faction, and its author continually abused. But let them go on; give them rope enough and they will put an end to their own insignificance. There is too much common sense and independence in America to be long the dupe of any faction, foreign or domestic. "But, in the midst of the freedom we enjoy, the licentiousness of the papers called Federal (and I know not why they are called so, for they are in their ...
Is this a fair assement of the situation ? [scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.net]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 1, 2020:
Hamilton is winning when racing a Formula 1 race car, and sometimes competition is intense, worth watching for many millions of paying customers. Politicizing Formula 1, as far as I've seen, takes away from the competition, so why is it allowed, and who is allowing it? The mere fact that Formula 1 was shut down proves my point: political control of a business that has been surviving for many years. When did that happen in the past? What is going to happen when the American (NLF) Football Season starts? My point is to point out who controls which businesses, or what power such as $$$$ has the power to shut a powerful business down, stop it in its tracks?
Makes you think are they brainless [facebook.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 1, 2020:
"Sorry, this content isn't available right now"
[westernjournal.com] CHAZ has been Liberated. The Summer of Love has come to an end.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 1, 2020:
<Error> <Code>AccessDenied</Code>
[facebook.com] BREAKING, Hillary Clinton S.hocks Nation - It's On.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 1, 2020:
Voting in Electoral Politics is Oligarchic, it leads to Oligarchy, it leads to Aristocracy, it is not democratic. It is democratic if the word democratic means the opposite of the original meaning. Original meaning: the people rule themselves New, modern, opposite meaning A: Mob Rule New, modern, opposite meaning B: Marxist Communism hidden under a false flag of Mob Rule Actual Democracy: The Athenian Constitution: Government by Jury and Referendum by Roderick T. Long "The practice of selecting government officials randomly (and the Athenians developed some fairly sophisticated mechanical gadgets to ensure that the selection really was random, and to make cheating extremely difficult) is one of the most distinctive features of the Athenian constitution. We think of electoral politics as the hallmark of democracy; but elections were almost unknown at Athens, because they were considered paradigmatically anti-democratic. Proposals to replace sortition with election were always condemned as moves in the direction of oligarchy. "Why? Well, as the Athenians saw it, under an electoral system no one can obtain political office unless he is already famous: this gives prominent politicians an unfair advantage over the average person. Elections, they thought, favor those wealthy enough to bribe the voters, powerful enough to intimidate the voters, flashy enough to impress the voters, or clever enough to deceive the voters. The most influential political leaders were usually Horsemen anyway, thanks to their social prominence and the political following they could obtain by dispensing largesse among the masses. (One politician, Kimon, won the loyalty of the poor by leaving his fields and orchards unfenced, inviting anyone who was hungry to take whatever he needed.) If seats on the Council had been filled by popular vote, the Horsemen would have disproportionately dominated it — just as, today, Congress is dominated by those who can afford expensive campaigns, either through their own resources or through wealthy cronies. Or, to take a similar example, in the United States women have had the vote for over half a century, and yet, despite being a majority of the population, they represent only a tiny minority of elected officials. Obviously, the persistence of male dominance in the economic and social sphere has translated into women mostly voting for male candidates. The Athenians guessed, probably rightly, that the analogous prestige of the upper classes would lead to commoners mostly voting for aristocrats. "That is why the Athenians saw elections as an oligarchical rather than a democratic phenomenon. Above all, the Athenians feared the prospect of government officials forming a privileged class with separate interests of their ...
[facebook.com] BREAKING, Hillary Clinton S.hocks Nation - It's On.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 1, 2020:
Deleted? Is there a mirror?
Gang violence
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 1, 2020:
That is the infamous angry mob. The higher up in the pecking order you go with angry mobs you may find first Organized Crime, and then Organized Crime pretending to be The Government, then Organized Crime pretending to be the Government of the World. Next, if things go the same way, the "higher" power would be Organized Crime (The Angry Mob) pretending to be the government of ALL.
Mmm...chocolate! 🐴🐴🐴
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 29, 2020:
Feed bags! We went to a local Chillies restaurant for food and someone boldly claimed that we had to submit to a tyrannical order to wear a mask in order to enter the Marxist/Communist propaganda organ pretending to be a restaurant. We did not go in, and I had this question on our way to our vehicle: "Do we get feed bags issued at the door?"
[youtube.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 28, 2020:
There is no law, so no lawsuits. If there was law, then any one of the many law abiding members of The People could afford to gain access to the law and be defended by the law. One of the governors who are causing death in the current crime known as The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud could be named on an affidavit as a criminal and that lawful accusation could then be moved to a local magistrate or justice of the peace. Magistrates or justices of the peace are not government employees, if they have a bias it is not for their income, and they constitute the pool from which an independent, common law, grand jury is formed. "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury..." Part of the move from Rule of Law to Rule by these criminals, is the move away from independent, common law, grand juries. Once the justice of the peace receives notice of a clear and present danger to life, liberty, and property, in the form of a Marxist/Communist Criminal occupying the seat of Governor, that warrants the formation of an independent, common law, grand jury, due to the probable cause of yet more injuries perpetrated by that criminal in office. The independent grand jury commands all jurisdiction civil and criminal, so certainly a crime of this magnitude falls into the jurisdiction of any independent grand jury in any county in any State where any of these criminals in the office of Governor are perpetrating these heinous crimes, including the inciting of riot, inciting of violent criminal usurpation, which is also treasonous. The same charge applies to those running Corporate Media. The independent grand jury members can hire (create or employ existing) court officers to serve subpoenas, or arrest those who refuse to state their case to the members of the common law grand jury. Note: "It is a matter well known, and well understood, that by the laws of our country, every question which affects a man's life, reputation, or property, must be tried by twelve of his peers; and that their unanimous verdict is, alone, competent to determine the fact in issue. If then, you undertake to enquire, not only upon what foundation the charge is made, but, likewise, upon what foundation it is denied, you will, in effect, usurp the jurisdiction of the Petty Jury, you will supercede the legal authority of the court, in judging of the competency and admissibility of witnesses, and, having thus undertaken to try the question, that question may be determined by a bare majority, or by a much greater number of your body, than the twelve peers prescribed by the law of the land. This point has, I believe, excited some doubts upon former occasions but those doubts have...
The propaganda is strong with this one.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 28, 2020:
Nationalism is one step down from Globalism. The American federation began as a federation (voluntary mutual defense association) under the common law, then in 1789 it was Nationalized by the fake news (federalist papers) fake federalist party (nationalist party) as discovered by Thomas Paine. To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine November 15, 1802 "But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property. It is, therefore, no wonder that the "Rights of Man" was attacked by that faction, and its author continually abused. But let them go on; give them rope enough and they will put an end to their own insignificance. There is too much common sense and independence in America to be long the dupe of any faction, foreign or domestic. "But, in the midst of the freedom we enjoy, the licentiousness of the papers called Federal (and I know not why they are called so, for they are in their principles anti-federal and despotic), is a dishonor to the character of the country, and an injury to its reputation and importance abroad. They represent the whole people of America as destitute of public principle and private manners. "As to any injury they can do at home to those whom they abuse, or service they can render to those who employ them, it is to be set down to the account of noisy nothingness. It is on themselves the disgrace recoils, for the reflection easily presents itself to every thinking mind, that those who abuse liberty when they possess it would abuse power could they obtain it; and, therefore, they may as well take as a general motto, for all such papers, we and our patrons are not fit to be trusted with power. "There is in America, more than in any other country, a large body of people who attend quietly to their farms, or follow their several occupations; who pay no regard to the clamors of anonymous scribblers, who think for themselves, and judge of government, not by the fury of newspaper writers, but by the prudent frugality of its measures, and the encouragement it gives to the improvement and prosperity of the country; and who, acting on their own judgment, never come forward in an election but on some important occasion. "When this body moves, all the little barkings of scribbling and witless curs pass for nothing. To say to this independent description of men, "You must turn out such and such persons at the next election, for they have taken off a great many taxes, and lessened the expenses of government, they have dismissed my son, or my brother, or myself, from a lucrative office, in which there was nothing to do"-is to show the cloven foot of ...
On Happy Homelands, Styx recommended reading about the Salem Witch Trials- does anyone have good ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 28, 2020:
The Salem Witch Trials is covered briefly in the book Conceived in Liberty by Murray Rothbard. Example: 59 Aftermath of the 1690s: The Salem Witch-Hunt and Stoughton’s Rise to Power Page 442 "If the Mather-Phips coalition had been allowed to continue in control, Massachusetts might have found a tolerable and even welcome path into the eighteenth century: the steady easing of Puritan restrictions combined with a decided drift back to the effective Massachusetts independence from royal depredatoins. In short, Massachusetts might have been able to advance toward a synthesis of the best of the two contending sides of the recent past: the self-governing and freedom of trad of the Puritans (without the theocratic persecutions), and the religious freedom and mercantile cosmopolitanism of the pro-royal opportunists (without the royal despotism). But such a synthesis for liberal independence was not to be. For at the heart of the new regime was a sinister canker: Lieutenant Governor William Stoughton. Stoughton was determined to overthrow this moderate liberalism in order that he and his friends – including the formerly discredited Joseph Dudley – might return to power, and that he might renew his plundering of Massachusetts. "Stoughton and Dudley were determined to regain power and to reimpose a royal absolutism that they would lead, at the head of a newly plundering oligarchy. To do this they would have to discredit and eliminate Governor Phips. With great luck, William Stoughton found his opportunity at hand; opportunity to split the ordinarily antiroyalist masses and to rally the body of Puritan theocrats behind him. In short, Stoughton found a way to rally the two extremes, to swing the Puritan masses behind his Tory opportunists in order to crush the moderate center. This opportunity was the notorious Salem witch-hunt of 1692." Page 443
"Groups once hostile to each other, populist militias and public law enforcement, are forming a ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 27, 2020:
"Groups once hostile to each other, populist militias and public law enforcement, are forming a new alliance whose common goal is to return the US to its pro peace, pro prosperity, anti war, constitutional republic origins." That is at best half-true. The following is a meeting attended by public law enforcement and "populist militias" (actually Oath Keepers, who know better than to accept false labels that are intended to discredit people who volunteer for our mutual defense against all enemies foreign or domestic): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARPJJSPcFhM Hostility is willfully initiated by people alone or people in groups, those are known as criminals.
Trump vs Biden 2020, who will win?
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 26, 2020:
"In democracy it's your vote that counts; In feudalism it's your count that votes." —Mogens Jallberg These days the truth does not count for those who won't count it.
Time to show the radical leftists & anarchists our teeth. Enough is enough.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 25, 2020:
Is there a process by which those deserving "our teeth" are discovered and processed?
New video of high value.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 25, 2020:
Time 5:30 or so... Only private attorney seems to have any predictive ability? The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots Page 40 Private Prosecutors "For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action. Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, however, private prosecutors were prohibited from withdrawing the action pursuant to private agreement with the defendant. Court intervention was occasionally required to compel injured crime victims to appear against offenders in court and "not to make bargains to allow [defendants] to escape conviction, if they...repair the injury." Page 42 Law Enforcement as a Universal Duty "Law enforcement in the Founders' time was a duty of every citizen. Citizens were expected to be armed and equipped to chase suspects on foot, on horse, or with wagon whenever summoned. And when called upon to enforce the laws of the state, citizens were to respond "not faintly and with lagging steps, but honestly and bravely and with whatever implements and facilities [were] convenient and at hand. Any person could act in the capacity of a constable without being one, and when summoned by a law enforcement officer, a private person became a temporary member of the police department. The law also presumed that any person acting in his public capacity as...
New video of high value.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 25, 2020:
On this topic the following may be helpful: The Black Swan by Nassim Nicholas Taleb https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00139XTG4/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8=1
Never was a truer word said in jest, listen up YanksπŸ˜‚[youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 25, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKUaqFzZLxU
How has the world gotten so crazy and corrupt?
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 25, 2020:
How far back do you want to look? King John sells out to Pope Innocent III who "annuls" Magna Carta? 1798 was a U turn into crazy and corrupt. George Mason, 1788: "Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions should arise under this government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of those powers; could not Congress, under the idea of providing for the general welfare, and under their own construction, say that this was destroying the general peace, encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people? And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury?" George Mason, 1788: "Mr. Chairman, this is a fatal section, which has created more dangers than any other. The first clause allows the importation of slaves for twenty years. Under the royal government, this evil was looked upon as a great oppression, and many attempts were made to prevent it; but the interest of the African merchants prevented its prohibition. No sooner did the revolution take place, than it was thought of. It was one of the great causes of our separation from Great Britain. Its exclusion has been a principal object of this state, and most of the states in the Union. The augmentation of slaves weakens the states; and such a trade is diabolical in itself, and disgraceful to mankind; yet, by this Constitution, it is continued for twenty years. As much as I value a union of all the states, I would not admit the Southern States into the Union unless they agree to the discontinuance of this disgraceful trade, because it would bring weakness, and not strength, to the Union." George Mason, 1787 "The judiciary of the United States is so constructed and extended, as to absorb and destroy the judiciaries of the several states; thereby rendering laws as tedious, intricate, and expensive, and justice as unattainable by a great part of the community, as in England; and enabling the rich to oppress and ruin the poor." Thomas Jefferson, A Summary View of the Rights of British America, August 1745 "For the most trifling reasons, and sometimes for no conceivable reason at all, his majesty has rejected laws of the most salutary tendency. The abolition of domestic slavery is the great object of desire in those colonies, where it was...
We no longer live in a free country.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 25, 2020:
Freedom (Liberty) starts in the mirror. If you are speaking about the power exerted at a National Level, then "we" were not "free" when the criminals took over in 1789. "They" are free to do whatever they want with impunity since 1789. Hell, wake the fuck up, they made slavery legal for them to perpetrate, and that means, in no uncertain terms, that they excused themselves from any prosecution of any kind from that day forward. Qui s'excuse, s'accuse. He who excuses himself accuses himself. If "they" can get away with the fraud of turning the Federation of Independent States into a Legal Fiction Nation State, AND subsidize their slave trades, AND create and enforce a National Central Bank Fraud Scam, complete with a fraudulent National Tax scam: which includes an extortion payment force, and a National Debt Scam, where "they" enforce a Monopoly of Power and Profit, and "they" consider The People (black, white, orange) as hereditary property, then they can get away with eating babies and selling baby parts to the highest bidders. This was stupid, and it is getting even more stupid. "It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Spooner, Trial by Jury
What happened to the Intellectual Dark Web's influence?
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 24, 2020:
"What beliefs do the IDW promote that seem controversial?" IDW (or any group of people) promote might making right as a standard rule, as if the software loaded into each individual is loaded with this virus. The controversy is nearly absent, but that does not mean that there is no controversy. Might does not make right, the opposite is true, so those (in any group) who promote the false narrative don't "seem controversial" among themselves. The controversy is only visible to those who have identified the virus and have killed it, so as to then allow the true software to emerge from the dark web of deceit. 1. Ubiquitous parroting of the Might Makes Right non-principle as if it were the governing law of human beings. 2. Almost completely absent Golden Rule principle failing to inspire controversy because the false narrative is so ubiquitous and internally defended by it's promoters. "Do you think they uphold these principles for all of their beliefs or are they still limiting the clarity of their statements so as to not be canceled? If so, which beliefs are they hiding?" "They" (those who promote Might Makes Right: a non-principle dependent upon deception and other criminal means) will be canceled as so often is demonstrated for any failure to promote that narrative. If "they" are hiding any beliefs I suppose they could be hiding the belief that they are promoting deception: self-deception. What would they need to hide from those who know about the nature of their non-principle? If they admit that they are promoting deception internally, yet they still promote deception externally, it looks the same from outside the deceiver. If they admit externally (stop hiding the fact that they know they are in the business of promoting a deception), then they stop hiding the "secret." "How can the IDW convert an intellectual discussion into activists who are willing to engage with those who peddle false narratives?" Those in or out of the group called IDW are obviously going to have a hard time "converting" or convincing other people to disengage a false narrative if they themselves promote (peddle) a false narrative. People who are infected with the Might Makes Right non-principle virus share the same devious methods required to maintain the deception internally as well as externally. Honor among thieves is a strict set of rules, and no one is allowed to defect. A fellow deceiver attempting to convince another fellow deceiver to "engage with those who peddle false narratives" is to put it mildly: insincere. To put it bluntly "they" first ignore facts that unmask their dogma, "they" then resort to changing the subject from the data that unmasks their dogma when ignoring it does not work, and routinely the subject matter introduced into ...
The end result of the post Obama era [dailyfriend.co.za]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 24, 2020:
"Any organism infested with parasites slowly succumbs to their voracious presence and eventually that organism becomes so sick that it dies a miserable, lingering death." To that I add: "A Parasite City. Suppose 5,000 men to own $30,000 each; suppose these men to move, with their families, to some desolate place in the state, where there is no opportunity for the profitable pursuit of the occupations either of commerce, agriculture, or manufacturing! The united capital of these 5,000 men would be $150,000,000. Suppose, now, this capital to be safely invested in different parts of the state; suppose these men to be, each of them, heads of families, comprising, on an average, five persons each this would give us, in all, 25,000 individuals. A servant to each family would give us 5,000 persons more, and these added to the above number would give us 30,000 in all. Suppose, now, that 5,000 mechanics—shoemakers, bakers, butchers, etc.—should settle with their families in the neighborhood of these capitalists, in order to avail themselves of their custom. Allowing five to a family, as before, we have 25,000 to add to the above number. We have, therefore, in all, a city of 55,000 individuals, established in the most desolate part of the state. The people in the rest of the state would have to pay to the capitalists of this city six per cent on $150,000,000 every year; for these capitalists have, by the supposition, this amount out at interest on bond and mortgage, or other wise. The yearly interest on $150,000,000, at six per cent, is- $9,000,000. These wealthy individuals may do no useful work whatever, and, nevertheless, they levy a tax of $9,000,000 per annum on the industry of the state. The tax would be paid in this way. Some money would be brought to the new city, and much produce; the produce would be sold for money to the capitalists, and with the money thus obtained, added to the other, the debtors would pay the interest due the capitalists would have their choice of the best the state produces, and the mechanics of the city, who receive money from the capitalists, the next choice. Now, how would all this be looked upon by the people of the commonwealth? There would be a general rejoicing over the excellent market for produce which had grown up in so unexpected a place, and the people would suppose the existence of this city of financial horse-leeches to be one of the main pillars of the prosperity of the state. "Each of these capitalists would receive yearly $1,800, the interest on $ 30,000, on which to live. Suppose he lives on $900, the half of his income, and lays the other half by to portion off his children as they come to marriageable age, that they may start also with $30,000 capital, even as he did. This $900 which he lays by ...
This means that COVID-19 is highly infectious and very mild.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 24, 2020:
1. You can claim this is just the beginning and more deaths are imminent. Use this as an excuse to quarantine everyone and then claim the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead. 2. You can tell people that ‘minimizing’ the dangers is irresponsible and bully them into not talking about numbers. 3. You can talk crap about made up numbers hoping to blind people with pseudoscience. 4. You can start testing well people (who, of course, will also likely have shreds of coronavirus DNA in them) and thus inflate your ‘case figures’ with ‘asymptomatic carriers’ (you will of course have to spin that to sound deadly even though any virologist knows the more symptom-less cases you have the less deadly is your pathogen. That is cut and pasted from this: https://www.thebernician.net/uk-healthcare-worker-says-covid-19-testing-kits-do-not-work/ The essence of falsehood is such that eventually the liars have to claim that two opposites are valid at the same time: up and down are the same direction at once.
I am trying to figure out why so many get stuck in the Republican/Democrat rut.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 24, 2020:
I think that the trend is going away from the FALSE choice of the greater or lesser of two evils DOGMA, and to explain why I think so I will remind people of the Ron Paul and Ross Perot phenomenon. Ron Paul ran for President in 1988: Excerpt from Wiki: "The Ron Paul presidential campaign of 1988 began in early 1987 when former Congressman Ron Paul of Texas announced his candidacy for the 1988 presidential nomination of the Libertarian Party. He joined the third party after leaving the Republican Party over the Reagan administration's handling of the federal budget. He ran on a platform that included non-interventionism in foreign conflicts, decriminalization of illegal drugs on a federal level, a return to the gold standard, the abolition of the Federal Reserve and a reduction in all government spending. On Election Day, he was on the ballot in 46 states and the District of Columbia, and finished in third place with approximately 0.47% of the vote, behind Democratic candidate Michael Dukakis and the winner Vice President George H.W. Bush. " Greater Evil George H.W.Bush Lesser Evil Michael Dukakis Not Evil (against government robbery through "National Debt" Central Banking Fraud) Ron Paul. Fast forward to 1992. At the time of the Ross Perot Phenomenon the "choices" were Bush or Clinton, both being deeply embedded, established, criminals running criminal organizations, sharing the same means (criminal means) to the same ends: Monopoly of Power and Profit, where The People are considered as hereditary property. Excerpt from Wiki on 1992 Election: "By May, Perot was leading presidential polls in both Texas and California. The Bush and Clinton campaigns became concerned about a candidacy, and publicly wondered if Perot could continue to "play by his own rules"." That was the shot (not) heard around the world, because the people of the world (as proven with the current Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud) are collectively (effectively) brainwashed. Greater Evil Clinton Lesser Evil Bush Not Evil (also against National Debt "abuse") Ross Perot Fast Forward to 1996 Greater Evil Clinton Lesser by far Evil Dole Not Evil (still against National debt "abuse") Ross Perot Then Ron Paul ran for president again in 2008. Excerpt from Wiki: "The 2008 presidential campaign of Ron Paul, Congressman of Texas, began in early 2007 when he announced his candidacy for the 2008 Republican nomination for President of the United States. Initial opinion polls during the first three quarters of 2007 showed Paul consistently receiving support from 3% or less of those polled. In 2008, Paul's support among Republican voters remained in the single digits, and well behind front-runner John McCain. "During the fourth quarter of ...
It was absolutely depressing to discover the fallowing.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 24, 2020:
“No thought is ever made to the notion of a cooperative system, where neither the individual or group is entitled to your labour.” That is not true, according to many sources, not the least of which is common law principles. In times and places were people exist within a well maintained “cooperative system” (rule of law), even criminals are afforded their capacity to make a living, as punishment for crimes was limited to that clearly demarcated minimum of individual sustainability within the system. Law was an offer of admittance, and those who choose not to join, by their own choice, were outlaws, subject to private justice with no penalty to the “vigilante.” Just because many (most) people (majority certainly) are unaware of cooperative systems that work to help everyone succeed in life (by effectively deterring crime), does not mean that “No thought is ever made to the notion of cooperative system, where neither the individual or group is entitled to your labour.” Also, you can use the edit feature to remove the repeated paragraphs above, or not.
Would organising real life town halls explaining concepts involving the enlightenment be a good ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 24, 2020:
In my study the idea of organizing public meetings was one of the obvious steps used by revolutionary people who took the steps that are necessary to move from subsidized slavery (tyranny, despotism, whatever words you want to use to call the process by which everything worth stealing is stolen by people fraudulently claiming to be the government), and to move to freedom, liberty, free markets, rule of law, or whatever words you want to use to describe a situation whereby fewer and fewer people are in government abusing their power to perpetrate crimes instead of protecting and serving the people. It the past a "real life town hall..." meeting was called a Committee for Safety or Committee of Safety. From such ideas are documents such as a Declaration of Independence.
Mike Pence 2024 question??
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 23, 2020:
I think that if Trump wins the next round, then the Globalist (Deep State, republicans and democrats) lose big, and basically end their reign of terror themselves, they play out their hand. So...that scenario leaves open a much different scenario for 2024, possibly the rise of actual competition in political parties, and candidates. In other words, the candidates for office once the Deep State have exhausted their criminal powers, could include a number of true Federalists, which could give the Nationalists a run for their money. If Trump does not win, on the other hand, then elections would probably return to the Rubber Stamp it was from the Bushes to Obama (republican and democrat "globalists") and I suppose that means Pedo-Joe would be propped up as "President" complete with the obvious strings attached to his masters, who somehow keep most of his brain farts off the Major Media Broadcasts.
Just wondering what people think about a true LOCAL Free Market Economy?
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 23, 2020:
If it is actually a free market, then government is one of the markets. I don't know why this is so hard for people to grasp, other than the fact that people are born into a big pile of lies, and a constant assault of lies from birth. 2 examples may suffice, and then another 2 examples may help bring home the conceptualization of actual free markets (or not): A. "It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States. "If the trial by jury were reëstablished, the Common Law principle of taxation would be reëstablished with it; for it is not to be supposed that juries would enforce a tax upon an individual which he had never agreed to pay. Taxation without consent is as plainly robbery, when enforced against one man, as when enforced against millions; and it is not to be imagined that juries could be blind to so self-evident a principle. Taking a man’s money without his consent, is also as much robbery, when it is done by millions of men, acting in concert, and calling themselves a government, as when it is done by a single individual, acting on his own responsibility, and calling himself a highwayman. Neither the numbers engaged in the act, nor the different characters they assume as a cover for the act, alter the nature of the act itself. "If the government can take a man’s money without his consent, there is no limit to the additional tyranny it may practise upon him; for, with his money, it can hire soldiers to stand over him, keep him in subjection, plunder him at discretion, and kill him if he resists. And governments always will do this, as they everywhere and always have done it, except where the Common Law principle has been established. It is therefore a first principle, a very sine qua non of political freedom, that a man can be taxed only by his personal consent. And the establishment of this principle, with trial by jury, insures freedom of course; because: "1. No man would pay his money unless he had first contracted for such a government as he was willing to support; and, "2. Unless the government then kept itself within the terms of its contract, juries would not enforce the payment of the tax. Besides, the ...
Official mascot
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 23, 2020:
Another one downloaded and uploaded, thanks.
Paul Harrell shoots 3 AR platforms and discusses barrel lengths.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 23, 2020:
Cool, thanks.
I didn't know that until now! πŸ˜‚
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 23, 2020:
Snap-on tool manufacturer adds a hex drive between the handle and the shank.
He is the President of the USA, not just Washington D.C.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 23, 2020:
Rule of Law versus Rule by Criminal Means? Are innocent people injured by aggressive people intent on causing injury to innocent people? Once upon a time someone “at war with society” was considered a Felon, and as such the Felon who was at war with society was considered an outlaw, which is someone who decides to begin causing injury to innocent people. Rule of Law returns when criminals are no longer allowed to injure innocent people with impunity. Rule by Criminal Means happens when Criminals overpower defensive forces constituted from moral people who will not stand idle while criminals run amok in the playground. An analogy I like to use is a fictional pack of Mad Dogs tearing through a playground full of children, where the pack of Mad Dogs rip children apart in the playground until there are no more children in that playground, and then the pack of Mad Dogs move to the next playground. Some people have enough of it, so some people do something about it, such as (at the very least) Publicly indict the pack of Mad Dogs, describing their crimes in detail, and acknowledging the fact that the pack of Mad Dogs are, in fact, criminals, even if the pack of Mad Dogs have not yet been found guilty in a Court of Law. I will show a non-fictional account of this very process by which some people reach a point at which they have had enough of the crimes perpetrated by the pack of Mad Dogs, and these people who have had enough of the crimes perpetrated by the pack of Mad Dogs join forces in defense against the aggressive, attacking, criminal, pack of Mad Dogs. You can ride along as a passenger as we travel through this example of a time and place where some people begin down the path of effective defense, and a return to rule of law, a return to rule of law clawing their way back as they find themselves deep in a despotic hole dug by the pack of Mad Dogs. The children’s bodies pile high in the deep despotic holes dug by the pack of Mad Dogs as they happily move from one playground to the next, destroying all good things as they go. “We hold these truths to be sacred & undeniable; that all men are created equal & independant, that from that equal creation they derive rights inherent & inalienable, among which are the preservation of life, & liberty, & the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these ends, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government shall become destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, & to institute new government, laying it's foundation on such principles & organising it's powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety & happiness. ...
Regarding, Alaska Chaga, are you aware that Nobel Laureate author, Aleksander Solzhenitsyn wrote a ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 23, 2020:
"One of the great allegorical masterpieces of world literature, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's Cancer Ward is both a deeply compassionate study of people facing terminal illness and a brilliant dissection of the cancerous Soviet police state." https://www.amazon.com/Cancer-Ward-Novel-FSG-Classics/dp/0374534713 The analogy (cancerous statism/marxism) is apt, even with "germ theory."
Shock Video Shows White Girl Being Beaten by Black Women, Forced to Kiss Feet – Summit News
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 23, 2020:
As bad as that is, may I attempt to inform people that those on top of the Pyramid Scheme are eating babies, drinking their blood, etc. When good people find evidence of such atrocities, there is hesitation in publicizing that evidence, for many reasons. When those on top of the Pyramid Scheme are inciting race war, the atrocities that work to reach that goal are going to be publicized. Please keep that in mind, and in any case that type of atrocious aggression, perpetrated in front of many moral people, would cause defensive action immediately, and some people are still armed for defense.
Important!!!! Considering the vaccine that the government is going to require that we all take it ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 21, 2020:
Thanks, reading now. "International studies have been performed to refute this link, focusing on Thimerosal (mercury) found in the vaccine’s buffer, and on the measles component of this vaccine. Studies that have been conducted have not found an association between mercury or the measles component and autism. The published conclusions, including a recent Washington Post story, have been that the MMR vaccine is therefore not linked to autism. And yet, parents remain fearful and unconvinced, and justifiably so. The only conclusions that can be drawn from the studies that have been done is that neither mercury nor the measles virus in the vaccine can be associated with autism. One cannot conclude from the studies that there is no link between this vaccine and autism. I find it fascinating, perplexing really, that such a broad conclusion ”MMR vaccine is not linked to autism” has nevertheless been spread to the public, to the scientific community and to public officials. No well designed studies, either retrospective or prospective, have been done to truly examine this potential link. No studies have been done to examine the link between vaccines containing human aborted fetal DNA and epidemic levels of diseases such as autism." I am not convinced that the "Germ Theory" is based on anything but assumption: junk science. https://www.thebernician.net/the-deception-of-virology-vaccines-why-coronavirus-is-not-contagious-2/?fbclid=IwAR2gJtpDdYQAbYW3Zqo2j2JZz39MH7GvvxE5rfi4MFApVgwgz0t_woIypZU "Firstly, viruses are not living organisms or living microbes." Whatever is causing whichever symptoms it appears obvious enough that the prescribed "treatment" is worse than the disease, but it does make a handful of people very powerful.
Vaughan writes: I'm happy to report that posting this vid earned me a warning from the Faceplant ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 20, 2020:
Preliminary report on surgical mask induced deoxygenation during major surgery http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/neuro/v19n2/3.pdf
More consequences
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 20, 2020:
I will download that one, thanks.
If The War of Northern Aggression was about ending slavery, why in 1864 did Congress fail to pass ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 20, 2020:
The Civil War was predicted in 1788. It is a well reasoned consequence of allowing criminals to run the government.
PC name change
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 19, 2020:
Downloading and uploading that one, thanks.

Give Love

Left to give: 0 Coins
Click here to get coins.

  • Level8 (53,837pts)
  • Posts338
  • Comments
      Replies
    1,501
    1,011
  • Followers 15
  • Fans 0
  • Referrals1
  • Joined Oct 29th, 2019
  • Last Visit 2+ weeks ago
Josf-Kelley's Groups
Voluntary Mutual Defence
33 members, Host
Controversial Charts
48233 members
Jordan Peterson Group
24738 members
Joe Rogan Group
15771 members
Just Jokes and Memes
13889 members
Tucker Carlson Fans
13021 members
IDW Topic-of-the-Day
9409 members
News From All Views
6810 members
DaisyCousens
5437 members
Classical Liberalism
4667 members
Canadian Politics
3837 members
IDW Political Party
2686 members
Politically Incorrect folks
2465 members
Arielle Scarcella FanSpace!
2433 members
Anti-Socialism
2242 members
President Donald J. Trump... Latest
2051 members
Saving Western Civilisation
2025 members
RamZPaul
1811 members
John Paul Watson Group
1603 members
Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder
1520 members
News, Politics & Wily
1274 members
Alex Jones Fans
1223 members
Conspiracy Truth : Wolves And Sheeple
1207 members
Stefan Molyneux Fans
1055 members
Emergency Preparedness and Survival
940 members
Libertarian Freethinkers
886 members
COVID-19
731 members
The Second Amendment Sanctuary
634 members
True Crime Discussion Group
581 members
Conspiracy Research
567 members
Words of Wisdom
474 members
Qanon
460 members
No Nonsense Philosophy
456 members
Feminism = cancer
452 members
Breaking Global News
344 members
Vaccine Education & Discussion Group
302 members
Comedy, Laughs and Humor.
236 members
Books
223 members
The Case Against Corona Panic
202 members
KEEP OUT
169 members
United We Stand
153 members
Brain soup
129 members
The History Corner
129 members
IDW.Community Senate
120 members
ORIGINAL MEMES ( GREGORY ALAN ELLIOTT )
117 members
Red Pilled Hotties (Yes you can still flirt & remain politically engaged)
105 members
Propaganda Clearing House
56 members
Anarcho-Capitalism / Voluntaryism
50 members
Topple the Globalists
48 members
Now You Are Talking With
47 members
Liz Wheeler Fans Page.
44 members
MGTOW: Exodus From The Plantation
36 members
Hibiscus Hoplites
34 members
Current Events
27 members
50 Policies
19 members
Shadilay
14 members
Ryan Faulk Fans
12 members
Freemerica
11 members
Trusted Web
10 members