slug.com slug.com
1
1 Like Show

Born in West Orange, New Jersey, 1958.
1 oldest sister
2 older brothers
2 younger brothers

My first experience with data that did not fit the Official Narrative (propaganda) was a book I read in School for a book report. The book described data concerning the sinking of the Ocean Liner (false flag) that was the casus belli (excuse: false flag) for Americans to be deceived into fighting the Central Banker War called World War One. The ship that was sunk (murdering people aboard) to move power to the criminals running the Central Bank Cabal was the Lusitania.

The next big event which caused me to fully reject the Official Narrative (propaganda) was the massacre at Waco misreported on National Television (Corporate Propaganda Organ of the Nation-State Aristocracy).

Full Bio

Comments

D’you think you know who you’re voting for? Research “Scorecard” and “Hammer”
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 3, 2020:
How about the following? Steve Bannon: “We’re going to pull the plug on Hammer and Scorecard” November 2, 2020 by IWB https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/steve-bannon-were-going-to-pull-the-plug-on-hammer-and-scorecard/
There's nothing political about this video, but the information is interesting. [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 3, 2020:
That is the storyline claimed to be derived from science when the predetermined conclusion is employed from The Germ Theory Dogma. In the Germ Theory Dogma the "cause" of the set of symptoms is a microorganism or "germ" or "virus." The science used to determine the cause of the sickness is "majority rules," or "science by consensus." Competitive diagnosis other than The Germ Theory with The Germ Theory Dogma include the identification of things called exozomes. I decided to stop watching The Germ Theory Dogma (political false propaganda) when the "Germ" reproduces itself by instructing the human body to crreate copies of the "Germ." The competitive diagnosis, as far as I have read so far, is such that poisons invading the body (non-living toxic substances, heavy metals, including radioactive heavy metals, chemicals such as pesticides, etc.) trigger processes in the body to defend against the invasion by toxin. An analogy of the two competitive diagnosis is: Germ Theory Dogma: One lie invades the system, once in the system the lie convinces a healthy cell in the system to start lying, then the two liars move to two more healthy cells in the system, soon the whole system if a big pile of lies. Alternative Theories: Actual identification of the actual cause of any specific set of symptoms, tested for consistent reproducing of the same exact results as the same isolated suspected cause of the specific set of symptoms causes the same set of symptoms each time the same suspected cause of the same specific set of symptoms is injected into a healthy body, instead of assuming, and the confirming by consensus an assumption, that happens to make a few people very rich, that the "cause" of the specific set of symptoms is also the "cure" of the poverty on the horizon for those who confirm by consensus.
Sh... Just let her be happy.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 3, 2020:
My wife appreciates CONSTRUCTIVE criticism, so long as it is rare. Choose your battles.
Organized crime.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 2, 2020:
Top 10?
If you had a mail-in ballot, absentee ballot, or early voting, make sure to verify that your ballot ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 2, 2020:
Your African Prince has received your e-mail reply, and as soon as you open the account with 5,000 dollars your million dollar facilitator fee will be sent in the mail.
For those who hadn't heard yet.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 2, 2020:
Here is a confession: "Under Illinois law, no bail was allowed." Under the common law, which predates the English Language, and predates Magna Carta, and known as The Law of the Land, and adopted by moral people in America since 1774, does not agree with the quote above, and that is why I call it a confession. Here: 14th of October, 1774 "On the same day, Congress unanimously resolved, “that the respective colonies are entitled to the common law of England, and more especially to the great and inestimable privilege of being tried by their peers of the vicinage according to the course of that law.” They further resolved, “that they were entitled to the benefit of such of the English statutes as existed at the time of their colonization, and which they have, by experience, respectively found to be applicable to their several and local circumstances.” They also resolved, that their ancestors, at the time of their immigration, were “entitled to all the rights, liberties, and immunities, of free and natural-born subjects within the realms of England.” Here: VIII - Excessive bail, cruel punishment "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." Those who gain power and profit by deception cannot admit that NO BAIL is excessive bail. So, it may be useful to translate the confession into something more obviously a confession. "Under Illinois law, no bail was allowed." That is what that says, but it is obviously false, because the law of the land (common law) includes the common law process eluded to in the Eighth Amendment of the Bill of Rights, which is claimed to be The Law of The Land in any Independent State that is allowed to join the Federation of Independent States. The idea is that any criminal take-over of one State is then a cause of action in defense of all the formerly free people in that State, a duty bound to all the people in all the other States. Criminal take-over in one State (confession): "Under Illinois law, no bail was allowed." So rewritten as: "Under the rules enforced by the criminals who took-over Illinois, slaves have no rights." I hope that helps clear things up.
For those who hadn't heard yet.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 2, 2020:
So... The local criminal gang extorting "protection money" hires murderous pedo criminals to riot in the blood of the innocent, so as to scare the slaves into blind obedience as some of the victims grow restless and dare to defend themselves. An example is made of just what happens to disobedient slaves ordered to die at the hands of the mercenaries - felons at war with society. When those slaves do not obey, and those slaves instead defend themselves, they must be beat back into submission, and a tried and true method is to kidnap one of the guilty disobedient slaves, punish them cruelly in the local dungeon, ship them far away into a foreign dungeon, torture them more, extract a confession if possible, make a deal for "leniency" if possible, torture some more, attempt to make the charge of guilty official in a kangaroo, summary justice, debt collection court, and avoid by any means any further disobedience involving the angry mob known as a jury trial in a Court of Law. Offer an option to pacify the rest of the slaves foolish enough to credit the criminals with lawful authority, in which the kidnapped, tortured, morally and financially bankrupt example of just what happens to disobedient slaves another kangaroo court which pays off the still living (somehow) victim "civil damages" paid out of the "Public Fund" or pile of plunder: loot. The victim is already morally tortured, as per the schedule. He went to what he thought were the "authorities" to seek "protection" from the mercenary army of hired rioters. The mercenary army of hired "police" were ordered to "stand down" and allow the hired rioters to riot in the blood of the innocent, errrr, that is to say riot in the blood of those who are guilty of failing to obey the order to die. The rioters were hired to riot. What does that mean? If you were a Private Prosecutor, or an Independent member of an Independent Grand Jury, looking at the evidence in this case, would you fail to see an obvious example of treason? No, you can't, your orders are very specific concerning what is or is not treason, what is or is not a riot, what is or is not a peaceful protest, and what is or is not lawful authority. Obey or else. If Kyle is already being tortured, a little for now, or a lot, mentally, and physically, then added to the kidnapping charge is assault. Kidnapping is a felony. The felons guilty of kidnapping Kyle, which may now be additional felons guilty of assaulting Kyle, are doing so while occupying a government office, so add a list of charges to kidnapping (a felony) and assault (a felony) such as nonfeasance (they didn't do their job, they should be defending the innocent, not "standing down"), misfeasance (their warrant is bogus, the grand jury is controlled by the ...
This has been the worst Election in American history- [thefederalist.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 2, 2020:
All the steps toward absolute despotism up to today were steps launched at the first fraudulent "election" which anointed Generalissimo Washington to the throne of a purely fictitious corporate entity of nebulous limited liability. Before that arguably worse "Election" the office of President of the United States of America was determined by the Assembled Congress. The President was the President of the Federation when The United States were Independent people in Independent counties, in Independent States, formed into a voluntary mutual defense association kept voluntary with common laws binding common people within clearly defined boundaries of legality, lawfulness, morality, and a common interest: defense. Failing to learn from history can lead to repeated misdiagnoses and mistreatment. A. "Damn the criminals took over again. B. "I know! Find another criminal to take the place of the last one." "In June of 1775, George Washington was appointed Major General and elected by Congress to be commander in chief of the American revolutionary forces. Although he took up his tasks energetically, Washington accomplished nothing militarily for the remainder of the year and more, nor did he try. His only campaign in 1775 was internal rather than external; it was directed against the American army as he found it, and was designed to extirpate the spirit of liberty pervading this unusually individualistic and democratic army of militiamen. In short, Washington set out to transform a people's army, uniquely suited for a libertarian revolution, into another orthodox and despotically ruled statist force after the familiar European model. "His primary aim was to crush the individualistic and democratic spirit of the American forces. For one thing, the officers of the militia were elected by their own men, and the discipline of repeated elections kept the officers from forming an aristocratic ruling caste typical of European armies of the period. The officers often drew little more pay than their men, and there were no hierarchical distinctions of rank imposed between officers and men. As a consequence, officers could not enforce their wills coercively on the soldiery. This New England equality horrified Washington's conservative and highly aristocratic soul. "To introduce a hierarchy of ruling caste, Washington insisted on distinctive decorations of dress in accordance with minute gradations of rank. As one observer phrased it: "New lords, new laws. … The strictest government is taking place, and great distinction is made between officers and soldier. Everyone is made to know his place and keep it." Despite the great expense involved, he also tried to stamp out individuality in the army by forcing uniforms upon them; but the scarcity of...
Where is AG Barr?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 2, 2020:
Third one from the left.
[youtu.be] Paul Weston - Do You Trust The Government?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 1, 2020:
Ah, no, those who currently occupy the government are crooks, have been since 1789.
Guilty! 🐶 😆
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 1, 2020:
Yup, not the go to jail part, but we talk FOR the cats all the time. One cat is Leroy (badest cat in the whole damn yard) and he often goes to the kitchen window from outside and says: "Give me my five chickens." But stretches, yup, "OHHHHHH, that was a BIIIIIGGGGGG STTTTTTTTTTREEEEEEETCH."
Trump's (64-Day) Post-Election Endgame (Or, Can A Criminal Be Inaugurated President?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 31, 2020:
“Already these allegations have provided much further de-legitimacy of the Biden campaign beyond the candidate himself. The virtual black-out of all four stories and the excuses offered by the news directors of many censors have not blinded the public. Instead, this obvious censorship has rocketed this developing story to a massive new viewership. Questions about the related FBI cover-up in burying the laptop allegations have further increased calls for an investigation. The outrage of America’s awakening public is rising daily, with at least sixty-four plus days to go.” See: “The Streisand effect is a social phenomenon that occurs when an attempt to hide, remove, or censor information has the unintended consequence of further publicizing that information, often via the Internet. It is named after American entertainer Barbra Streisand, whose attempt to suppress the California Coastal Records Project's photograph of her residence in Malibu, California, taken to document California coastal erosion, inadvertently drew further attention to it in 2003.” Wikipedo Then: “Post-election day, should these allegations bear scrutiny there are three possible investigative bodies available to Trump.” I may read the rest of this article, but my view is such that the fools who are stupified by all this deception (electoral politics = election cycle = election psycho) can pause, use their own brains – rare these days – and consider the contradictions contained in the above message. The law is only the law when it is unbiased, and does not favor the continued injury of innocent people, such as would be any deception crafted and perpetrated, any extorting threat perpetrated, or any aggressive violence perpetrated, with the aim thereby of injuring innocent people. In other words: the law is the law when innocent people are effectively defended because guilty people can no longer extract value from their victims. In other words: the law is the law when crime no longer pays, and the law is no longer the law when the law is the device used to make crime pay more than having no law at all. The message just offered in the last paragraph may not be as entertaining as the messages offered from ZeroHedge quoted again: “Post-election day, should these allegations bear scrutiny there are three possible investigative bodies available to Trump.” The law, when it is the law, is a device that prevents, deters, defunds, disincentivizes, discredits, does not aid, does not abet, does not protect, does not defend, the willful injury of innocent victims so as to make crime pay very well, which then leads inexorably to more, and more, and more, crime, because failing to pull the plug creates a very attractive opportunity for people to ...
Take that global warming!
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 30, 2020:
Early Polling on this one is: "It hits way too close to home: self-censored!"
Woman behind Trump at rally hilariously rips pics of Pelosi, Schumer and Schiff in half- ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 30, 2020:
"This redstate.com page can’t be found"
Take that global warming!
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 30, 2020:
I'm using this one, thanks.
Thoughts on this one?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 30, 2020:
"The new normal is right in front of us, right now: populist right versus populist left." That articles is pure fiction. Voting is like buying Shark Bite insurance for someone who lives in a desert and never goes to a beach, let alone traveling in a boat. The odds of winning with Shark Bite insurance are higher than winning with voting. The odds of winning in a lottery are higher than winning with voting: at least there is evidence of a winner who bought into the scam. The use of the word "populist" is evidence proving the fact that it is fraudulent, in my opinion.
These are the two most powerful men in the world.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 29, 2020:
Defensive
Other great white men have already predicted what we are now witnessing.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 28, 2020:
That is extensive. I found: "Fying blind is always a risky endeavor." I think that is why it is a good idea to look at things from as many views as is humanly possible, so as not to fly blind, or worse. Thomas Jefferson also wrote on the subject in his Notes on the State of Virginia.
Did you know this?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 28, 2020:
Thanks but... "The report was eye-opening, to say the least: over 500,000 children have tested positive for the novel coronavirus in America." I stopped reading there, since "testing positive" is a known fraud. The inventor of the PCR test does not support, and warns against, using a PCR test for diagnosis: testing for viruses. It is unscientific at best, and obviously fraudulent for many people, including doctors, lawyers, scientists, and people now working to defend against this fraud. If there are breaking discoveries having to do with how people fight these specific symptoms, on a molecular level, or deeper (micro), such as the identification of "Researchers identified a cytokine, IL-17A, which appears to protect children from the ravages of COVID-19" or on a more general level (macro), such as immune system strength in children is generally higher than in people past their "prime," then precisely what is the usefulness of that information just now discovered? "Researchers identified a cytokine, IL-17A, which appears to protect children from the ravages of COVID-19" A vaccine is an attempt to inject the suspected cause of the set of symptoms targeted for defense, and that inoculation (injecting someone with the suspected cause of the sickness) is designed to stimulate (and not overstimulate) the natural immune system of the patient or many patients. One thing I've read so far in this dive down this rabbit hole is the often repeated warning that every single individual is individually more or less capable of fighting and wining the battle against toxins, poisons, invasions of harmful substances, and it is therefore categorically wrong to suggest that there is a ONE FIX for everyone on such things as these very wide ranging sets of symptoms, that typically attack people with existing health problems, and lowered immune systems for whatever reason their immune system is lowered. "This is really a call to say rather than waiting to see if we have an effective vaccine for adults, let's begin that work of at least evaluating the vaccines in adolescents and ever-decreasing ages, so that we get a good lead on the dosing, the dose schedule, and the potential effectiveness of that kind of a vaccine." Inoculation is the process by which the target is injected with the suspected cause of a set of symptoms: vaccination. A bait and switch routine, a fraud, is to claim something is one thing, and then inject something else into the target.
Headlines the Facebook Police Can't Censor! Give us 3 minutes and we will get you caught up on ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 28, 2020:
I looked into that and found references to The Federalist Papers, and a link that actually loads those specific works. Those works were clearly shown to be specifically not written by people supporting Federalism, rather those people writing The Federalist Papers were supporting Consolidation of the Independent States into a Nation-State: Nationalism. I also looked into the link the UndergroundUSA site has for so-called "Anti" Federalist Papers, but the link goes to a different site, apparently requiring a membership, and there was no direct link to the works published by the actual Federalists who supported Federalism, such as George Mason, Patrick Henry, Robert Yates, Richard Henry Lee, etc. June 14, 1788 Patrick Henry: "Mr. Chairman, it is now confessed that this is a national government. There is not a single federal feature in it. It has been alleged, within these walls, during the debates, to be national and federal, as it suited the arguments of gentlemen. "But now, when we have heard the definition of it, it is purely national." Papers of Dr. James McHenry on the Federal Convention of 1787. ""Mr. E. Gerry. Does not rise to speak to the merits of the question before the Committee but to the mode. A distinction has been made between a federal and national government. We ought not to determine that there is this distinction for if we do, it is questionable not only whether this convention can propose an government totally different or whether Congress itself would have a right to pass such a resolution as that before the house. The commission from Massachusets empowers the deputies to proceed agreeably to the recommendation of Congress. This the foundation of the convention. If we have a right to pass this resolution we have a right to annihilate the confederation." FRIDAY, June 20, 1788 Melancton Smith "He was pleased that, thus early in debate, the honorable gentleman had himself shown that the intent of the Constitution was not a confederacy, but a reduction of all the states into a consolidated government. He hoped the gentleman would be complaisant enough to exchange names with those who disliked the Constitution, as it appeared from his own concessions, that they were federalists, and those who advocated it were anti-federalists." Somethings never change. RINO, DINO, FINO, Fascists and Marxists fraudulently (treason at that level) claiming to be Republicans and Democrats.
[thefreedomarticles.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 28, 2020:
Great find! "In a previous article, I talked about how SARS-CoV-2 is a stitched-together, Frankenstein virus, because it is a computer-generated, digital, abstract creation, not a real living virus. It has never been properly purified and isolated so that it could be sequenced from end-to-end once derived from living tissue; instead, it’s just digitally assembled from a computer viral database. The CDC scientists state they took just 37 base pairs from a genome of 30,000 base pairs! That means that about 0.001% of the viral sequence is derived from actual living samples or real bodily tissue. Here is the quote:"
Mask
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
"This site can’t be reached" I believe that an order (to be obeyed without question) such as "pay or die" is effective. The same despotic control works Globally when the criminals are running The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud. Masks are effective for making sure that the victims do not know WHO is enslaving them or killing them one calorie at a time or all at once.
Are you a White Supreme Pedophobe?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
That is an obvious false choice, none of the above. Those who I talk to about Subsidized Slavery (we pay to make criminals rich) fall into two general categories with few (few that I know of) exceptions to the rule: A. Those who ignore what I say, and do not respond for fear of giving legs to defensive actions against their con game. B. Those who agree with the facts that matter in the case, and then stop responding.
[theepochtimes.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
Allegiance to a flag is not allegiance to your fellow human being. Allegiance to a Nation-State-Legal-Fiction is also not allegiance to your fellow human being. Allegiance to a Corporate Subsidized Slavery "Constitution" is also not allegiance to your fellow human being. Often those who are fooled into aligning themselves with deceivers intent upon consuming mankind are misled. I suppose that there are exceptions to that rule.
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
"...right to trial by jury..." "The judiciary of the United States is so constructed and extended, as to absorb and destroy the judiciaries of the several states; thereby rendering laws as tedious, intricate, and expensive, and justice as unattainable by a great part of the community, as in England; and enabling the rich to oppress and ruin the poor." George Mason, 1787 George Mason Debate in Virginia Ratifying Convention June 6, 1788: "Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions should arise under this government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of those powers; could not Congress, under the idea of providing for the general welfare, and under their own construction, say that this was destroying the general peace, encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people? And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury?" To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine November 15, 1802 "But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property. It is, therefore, no wonder that the "Rights of Man" was attacked by that faction, and its author continually abused. But let them go on; give them rope enough and they will put an end to their own insignificance. There is too much common sense and independence in America to be long the dupe of any faction, foreign or domestic." "As many thousands who were minors are grown up to manhood since the name of Federalist began, it became necessary, for their information, to go back and show the origin of the name, which is now no longer what it originally was; but it was the more necessary to do this, in order to bring forward, in the open face of day, the apostasy of those who first called themselves Federalists. "To them it served as a cloak for treason, a mask for tyranny. Scarcely were they placed in the seat of power and office, than federalism was to be destroyed, and the representative system of government, the pride and glory of America, and the palladium of her liberties, was to be over- thrown and abolished. The next generation was not to be free. The son was to bend his neck beneath ...
Are we in for a Covid-19 "Dark Winter"?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
I know someone who works in the Medical field and some of my reporting here is personal information transferred via that source, for example: 1. Orders Top Down to Nurses "Hand over your masks, don't wear them." Nurses refuse Top Down order for cause: we know better. 2. People die from specific symptoms, standardized treatments of specific treatments are still not Top Down orders, whereby Top Down initial orders (intubation) was MISTREATMENT, based upon obvious MISDIAGNOSIS, and at least locally the "better" treatments are not - again - standardized Top Down. 3. There was no first wave of pandemic proportion, it was much less than reported, and specific symptoms that threaten life were rare when compared to the "pandemic" predictions. Here it is important to note the "call for intubating machines" to MISTREAT a MISDIAGNOSIS was, and apparently is endemic. The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud is one thing. A set of symptoms which had lead to deaths is factual, and worldwide. False and misleading diagnosis is factual, and worldwide. False and misleading treatment is factual, and worldwide. The claimed Authorities (people associated with corporations known as WHO, CDC, NIH, etc.) have not reported that they have identified the cause of the "set of symptoms that lead to death" other than to call the set of symptoms that lead to death by the names Covid-19, Pandemic, and to then issue reports suggesting treatment, based upon an obvious, admitted, NONDIAGNOSIS. Other claimed Authorities (people no longer associated with the opposing authorities listed as Who, CDC, NIH, etc.) have identified the cause of a specific set of symptoms leading to death as a Bioweapon of very specific design, and there is a Patent on the design, as far as I know, so far. Group A, which I will call those who have accurately identified the cause of the set of symptoms that cause death, which is a Patented Bioweapon include people who treat the cause of this set of symptoms with advice that includes methods by which people strengthen their natural, internal, immune systems, such as detox, nutrition, sunlight, clean air, clean water, exercise, human contact, etc. Group B, which I will call those who have NOT accurately identified the cause of the set of symptoms that cause death, and I know this because they claim that the way to accurately identify the cause of the set of symptoms that cause death is The Gold Standard, which is to isolate the suspected "virus" (microorganism) using Standard Procedures (see: Koch's Postulates) known to identify suspected microorganisms, and then match the introduction of that specific microorganism to the specific set of symptoms Scientifically. That group apparently does not want to have the connections ...
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
"...I found that Ideas were weapons..." This is a Neocon before the Modern Manifestation of the Psychotic Cabal.
How much do we know about slavery in the United States?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2020:
Time 3: "...white people with a political agenda..." How about CRIMINALS with a political agenda? Whose pro-bono job is it to turn an obvious crime into racial polarization for political gain: power and profit? How about 12 white guys: “A jury of twelve local farmers, all men and all white according to Levinson, rule in favor of Freeman in 1781, giving her freedom and awarding her 30 shillings in damages.” As far as I know (but I do not have original trial transcripts at my disposal) that above is verified history. That is 1781 (...before the "Civil" War...") How about the ORIGINAL Federal Political Position on Slavery during the Revolutionary War (all men are equal under the law: common law): First Federal (not National) Congress United States of America: On the 20th day of October 1774 “This agreement contained a clause to discontinue the slave trade, and a provision not to import East India tea from any part of the world. In the article respecting non-exportations, the sending of rice to Europe was excepted." On the 1st of April, 1775 "On this occasion, the importation of slaves was expressly prohibited." Now, to put in perspective this issue of "Slavery in American History," one may consider why prices are so low as people in America send money to profitable corporations being run in China, or other places on earth where people are enslaved by government force. Are you setting those slaves free, doing what you can as a moral citizen to end Slavery in American History NOW? Who, and what army, in American History, were enforcing Slavery of people on The People as a whole? Was it a racial political issue? If so was is a racial political issue against Indians, Irish, and Africans, or in your mind, only against Africans? June 17, 1788 George Mason: “Mr. Chairman, this is a fatal section, which has created more dangers than any other. The first clause allows the importation of slaves for twenty years. Under the royal government, this evil was looked upon as a great oppression, and many attempts were made to prevent it; but the interest of the African merchants prevented its prohibition. No sooner did the revolution take place, than it was thought of. It was one of the great causes of our separation from Great Britain. Its exclusion has been a principal object of this state, and most of the states in the Union. The augmentation of slaves weakens the states; and such a trade is diabolical in itself, and disgraceful to mankind; yet, by this Constitution, it is continued for twenty years. As much as I value a union of all the states, I would not admit the Southern States into the Union unless they agree to the discontinuance of this disgraceful trade, because it would bring weakness, and not ...
Paglia: The Dumbing Down of America Began in Public Schools [intellectualtakeout.org]
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
"John Adams would likely agree." Really? My guess is that whoever believes that is a parrot subjected to Public School. Adams was accountable for The Alien and Sedition Acts once he extorted, distorted, his way to the Top of the Pyramid Scheme.
How is it decided if posts show up in trending?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
Bump for new members of the glorious SENATE! And where is...The Batman?
I didn't get a welcome!!! ;) Both newer additions are great additions to the discussions we ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
So... light it up!
Pathetic Queen of the Shrill; Hillary Clinton still fuming: 'I was born' to be president; it makes ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
That can't be true, seriously, why give so much? Why be so generous? If poetic justice or pathos or irony or whatever is wanted, demanded, why volunteer to fill that vacancy? I mean, considering it is Killary and all.
A wrong potion, a wrong spell...ing.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
Fraud-ian slip?
I didn't get a welcome!!! ;) Both newer additions are great additions to the discussions we ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
The "Senate" is dead, so...
Did every body watch manbaby Trump on 60 minutes?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
How does one accurately identify a troll?
Why Does Barr Let Wray Lie and Flout the Law?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 26, 2020:
331 Million people and one man is the only one with the power to indict a known criminal? I think that is proof positive that the criminals have taken-over the government. There is no law in America, hasn't been since 1789.
News Break. War Room: Pandemic Ep 456 - The CCP and Election 2020 Pt.2 [youtube.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 25, 2020:
Note: The Authorities behind The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud have not gone through the standard procedures by which a so-called "virus" (microorganism) is isolated, identified as the cause of specific symptoms, so as to thereby test and confirm THE cause of THE symptoms that can lead to death (cause of death). Why? or If you have evidence confirming THE cause (the microorganism) of THE symptoms, then show that evidence. No, I did not say that there is no evidence, I said that the individuals causing The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud have not gone through the standard procedures to scientifically identify the microorganism responsible for the deaths of anyone, let alone anyone being claimed as a result of a SPECIFIED virus (Covid-19). Evidence is claimed and offered in the video above, as someone claiming to prove that Civid-19 is a bio-weapon does so (according to her claims) by identifying the construction of the virus as an unnatural construction. She claims to know precisely what is the cause of these deaths, and it is a bio-weapon. If The Authorities (criminals) responsible and accountable for The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud are to admit that the cause of the symptoms is precisely identified as the SPECIFIED microorganism, they would then admit the evidence that could then lead to precisely what the cause of death of all these people is in fact. The term here is Plausible Deniability. The Global Treasonous Pandemic Frauds require falsehood, lies, deceit, false statements, contradictory statements, confusion, misdirection, ambiguity, uncertainty, etc., only so long as their monopoly of power and profit is insecure. Once secure, the monopolists can simply do as they please with impunity, such as issue orders to inject everyone with a known poison, a poison known to case death. Cause of death: murderers who are pleased when they can murder with impunity anyone who may dare to threaten their absolute power to do whatever pleases them. That is the warning offered in history, from anyone who has been subjected to absolute despotism, dictatorship, or whatever word you want to use, the word is not the thing, the thing is murderous: cause of death.
Is Government Reaction to Covid-19 a Threat to Civil Liberties?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 25, 2020:
2 critical comments. 1. The Media representative (mass media) claimed that Sweden failed to follow the script (lock-down, etc.) and that was a mistake, which caused greater loss of life. His words I could quote, but the point here is to ask if his claim is true. The point worth pointing out, to anyone who makes these claims of "cause of death," in any place, at any time, anywhere, is by what authority is such a claim made in any individual case, let alone all across one country or the next, or the whole world? The cause (covid 19) is admittedly not been isolated (scientific Gold Standard: see Koch's Postulates), the tests to see if someone has what they haven't identified (PCR), does not - admittedly - test to find something they having identified, and therefore there is no science behind claiming anyone has died from something no one admits to have been found scientifically, with standard procedures used to find those causes? 2. The moderator asks WHO is behind all this, if it is nefarious (as these people obviously point out), and even the name Bill Gates is plopped on the table like a wet tar baby. NO ONE ANSWERS, they all dodge the question. THE DODGE was the claim by the representative from Mass Media who claimed that "no one wants to be wrong" and he then offers up Sweden as the exception, as if what Sweden did was wrong. Again, by what measure? They admit that they feed garbage in, so how can they claim to get a rose smelling pile of shit?
Is Government Reaction to Covid-19 a Threat to Civil Liberties?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 25, 2020:
Thanks for the link, it is a very good discussion in my opinion.
Is Government Reaction to Covid-19 a Threat to Civil Liberties?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 25, 2020:
Time: 25:00 or so... Statements were made about the propaganda campaign (from a few people in a small group) to cause fear and control the minds of the target population, to make them submit to the despotic orders that cause so much suffering upon so many innocent people. And the monopoly viewpoint (fear and blind obedience) was enforced as the monopolists did not allow alternative viewpoints, such as questioning the validity of the tests, (PCR), which had "...no known accuracy..." because they were not run through the rigors of scientific verification (gold standard, Koch's postulates, isolating the suspected "germ," verifying the cause as the cause of the symptoms, and then proving that the test used to test to find the isolated "germ" does in fact do so, repeatedly, but the PCR test - according to the inventor of it - is not a diagnosis test, and therefore why are people claiming it is?) so, why is this small group (of criminals) gaining so much power by deception and fear-mongering? Could it be that there is no law in England as it is proven that there is no law in America? Criminals get away with Crimes against Humanity and the so-called "government" hides under the desk?
Is Government Reaction to Covid-19 a Threat to Civil Liberties?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 25, 2020:
Time: 6:00 or so... There is a report that "...coded for "not for resuscitation...through diktat..." and "...no longer something negotiated with the doctor and nurse..." meaning the criminals claiming to be the government order the death sentence without consent from their lived ones. As in... When should a loved one no longer get health care, and who will be authorized to make that decision in time and place? A. The individual needing health care lets it be known (authorizes) that they refuse further health care: "let me die, do not resuscitate me, under these types of conditions, particularly when there is no hope for my continued living, according to someone able to know, such as MY doctor or MY nurse, these people here, the ones I trust to make that decision, and if I am no longer able to negotiate the facts that matter in the case - due to incapacity from sickness at the time - then these people here (my loved one's named here) negotiate that decision to allow me to die or to attempt to revive. B. A criminal who is part of a criminal gang claiming to be the government, because they can, because their lies are deceiving people well enough to allow them to get away with such crimes against humanity as The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3Vc33-QWHI
biden the supporter of chaos
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 24, 2020:
Maneuver Warfare, straight out of Boyd's artwork.
First Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 24, 2020:
Failure to learn from history... https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/alsedact.asp
Are Netflix and Amazon approaching Nazi-level propaganda?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 24, 2020:
Immoral is not the same as unfair. Criminal is not the same as unfair. Fraud is not the same as unfair. Treason is not the same as unfair. When are people going to call a spade a spade? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuEBBwJdjhQ=emb_logo=IwAR0sg-V1yRqsoDBbFxn0IC6SXKVvOP01eXiolpo8pvwOZHTGEpNIBC7K5G8
This man was the best proponent of free of thought and rational investigation! If I can be a ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 23, 2020:
I looked into this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0Z7KeNCi7g It says: Homeopathy, quackery and fraud If someone is going to investigate this POWER STRUGGLE between Monopolists and Competitors in Free Markets, they can find information that is as their discovery. Good luck. I've done some homework, over decades, and this troll is trolling for the Monopoly.
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 23, 2020:
Very good, thanks.
Do facts matter in elections anymore?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 23, 2020:
"How do you make sense of the world?" I put the available pieces of the puzzle together and sense becomes obvious eventually. One puzzle piece is offered to those who choose to look in the past for puzzle pieces: 1. “Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it.” ― Edmund Burke. 2. “Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it” ― Sara Shepard, Wanted. 3. "Those unable to catalog the past are doomed to repeat it.” ― Lemony Snicket, The End. 4. “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." (George Santayana) 5. “We're doomed to repeat the past no matter what. That's what it is to be alive. It's pretty dense kids who haven't figured that out by the time they're ten.... Most kids can't afford to go to Harvard and be misinformed.” ― Kurt Vonnegut, Bluebeard Some messages (signs on the previously traveled road) are lies, but how can one know this if history is replaced with falsehood? 6. "The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto “Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.” “The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.” “How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.” If someone can be intentionally, and successfully, demoralized, and stripped of their internal power of judgment, during their early years traveling down the road called life, then they can also be told not to look in the past, not to look for puzzle pieces at all, and told to scorn (or worse) anyone who dares to question the orders being issued from the authorities. If you are no longer an authority over right and wrong, then who is? I believe that solid evidence can be used to create a world view that works to make life better and less costly. "Have you recalibrated how much evidence you need to see before you believe something?" Evidence that fits reasonably into a logical order (my eyes hurt when staring at the sun, each time I try to stare at the sun), doing so without contradiction (never have I ever not suffered pain when staring at ...
The Constitution doesn't mean whatever you want it to- [bearingarms] For the past couple of ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 22, 2020:
I'm going to fact check that... "The Constitution doesn't mean whatever you want it to-" Debate in Virginia Ratifying Convention 1788 Elliot 3:89, 430--36, 439--42 [6 June] George Mason: "Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions should arise under this government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of those powers; could not Congress, under the idea of providing for the general welfare, and under their own construction, say that this was destroying the general peace, encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people? And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury?" I guess it depends upon what is is... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4XT-l-_3y0 Judiciary Act 1789 (treason) Enumeration Act 1790 (treason) First Bank of the United States 1791 (treason) later reconstituted as The Federal Reserve Excise Tax on Whiskey 1791 (treason) later reconstituted as The IRS Whiskey Rebellion Proclamation 1794 (treason) Alien and Sedition Acts 1798 (treason) The secret, gag order, meetings in 1787 to usurp the common law and the original voluntary federation, turning lawful government into Subsidized Slavery (tyranny, empire, despotism, whatever) was TREASON.
'Social distancing' is just a politically correct way of saying 'isolation'- [redstate]
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 22, 2020:
"Politically Correct" is just a treasonously fradulent way of saying treasonous fraud.
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 22, 2020:
Martin from Chicago?
[youtu.be] Steve Bannon: The Rest of Hunter Biden's Emails
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 22, 2020:
Key points in that video as far as I am concerned are: 1. Bannon is back after daring to go after Kissinger 2. Pelosi may be President of the Corporate United States Monopoly of Power and Profit if things go her way 3. The FBI had the soon to be exposed evidence of Biden Treason (and other crimes) before the Impeachment of Trump, evidence that would likely have caused Warren or Sanders as Marxist Candidate, and prevented the Impeachment, which could have focused more preventative or defensive actions against The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud. 4. The Fake Debate Tonight (10-22-02020) may actually be even more entertaining than the last one.
[youtu.be] Steve Bannon: The Rest of Hunter Biden's Emails
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 22, 2020:
Very good, thanks. I linked it on Brendon O'Connell's YouTube Channel.
YES! I firmly believe that schools should be free from political interference.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 21, 2020:
"While critical race theory exists as a broad school of thought that originated from left wing legal activism, central tenets of the philosophy include accepting the existence of systemic racism, as well as the prevalence of white supremacy and privilege over other racial groups." Facts about the difference between white and black colors are accurately measurable. Deceptions that cause injury are accurately accounted for as such through due process of law, such as the common law, which is the Ancient Law. A criminal WILL use deception to escape accountability for the injuries done to the victim by the criminal, or to the victims by the criminals, in cases were criminals organize into cooperative criminal groups as criminal groups are groups because they share the same goal of causing injury to victims. That is my lead-in to the following from Thomas Jefferson's Notes on the State of Virginia, which was written in America in 1781, which is 8 years before the criminals took over America and Subsidized Slavery. "To emancipate all slaves born after passing the act. The bill reported by the revisors does not itself contain this proposition; but an amendment containing it was prepared, to be offered to the legislature whenever the bill should be taken up, and further directing, that they should continue with their parents to a certain age, then be brought up, at the public expence, to tillage, arts or sciences, according to their geniusses, till the females should be eighteen, and the males twenty-one years of age, when they should be colonized to such place as the circumstances of the time should render most proper, sending them out with arms, implements of houshold and of the handicraft arts, feeds, pairs of the useful domestic animals, &c. to declare them a free and independant people, and extend to them our alliance and protection, till they shall have acquired strength; and to send vessels at the same time to other parts of the world for an equal number of white inhabitants; to induce whom to migrate hither, proper encouragements were to be proposed. It will probably be asked, Why not retain and incorporate the blacks into the state, and thus save the expence of supplying, by importation of white settlers, the vacancies they will leave? Deep rooted prejudices entertained by the whites; ten thousand recollections, by the blacks, of the injuries they have sustained; new provocations; the real distinctions which nature has made; and many other circumstances, will divide us into parties, and produce convulsions which will probably never end but in the extermination of the one or the other race. -- To these objections, which are political, may be added others, which are physical and moral. The first difference which strikes us is that of...
On a scale of 1-9.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 21, 2020:
3
OK, problems already, with the quote about "getting rid of our form of government," which is what ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 21, 2020:
Note for Brandon O'Connell video above: Time 48:00 or so... The missing part of the Trilogy from Anthony Sutton is described by Kay Griggs. Sutton offered 1. Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, 2. Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, and Wall Street and FDR, but missing from Sutton's Trilogy is the funding of the Rise of China. That is hereby reported by Kay Griggs. Thanks. So... 1. Wall Street (Global Monopoly of Power and Profit) Hitler https://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_Hitler.pdf 2. Wall Street and Communist Russia https://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_the_bolshevik_revolution-5.pdf 3. Wall Street and Socialist/Communist/Fascist U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) https://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_FDR-3.pdf 4. Wall Street and the Rise of Communist China https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zgVgdZGZ08
OK, problems already, with the quote about "getting rid of our form of government," which is what ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 21, 2020:
More INFO "Great Reset": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6HQFMqxEwc=emb_logo
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 21, 2020:
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance—that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
ok so i figure this is probably the beat place to ask this and get a real answer.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 21, 2020:
"Anyway, can someone who likes Jorgenson break down why she would be worth voting for if Trump’s demeanor is what is holding someone back. Where does she line up with what he has been doing and how does she differ?" I do not know anyone, anywhere, personally, who knows - personally - any of these people who are seeking POWER and PROFIT at the level of President of the Corporation U.S.A. Inc. (LLC). Where any of these people "line up" is a judgment call based upon distant data thereby. Do you believe the information you receive from second hand sources, also known as hearsay? noun unverified, unofficial information gained or acquired from another and not part of one's direct knowledge: I pay no attention to hearsay. an item of idle or unverified information or gossip; rumor: a malicious hearsay. adjective of, relating to, or characterized by hearsay: hearsay knowledge; a hearsay report. My point being pointed out here has to do with leadership as a function of individual judgment based upon available data. If the data available is often false (campaign promises routinely broken without consequence), then those people in a position to make a leadership judgment call (voting for someone seeking POWER and PROFIT in an election) are disarmed, and thereby incapable of making a judgment. Flipping a coin is potentially more likely to choose the better choice over the worse choice. Tossing up Cross and Pile? "The state is divided into counties. In every county are appointed magistrates, called justices of the peace, usually from eight to thirty or forty in number, in proportion to the size of the county, of the most discreet and honest inhabitants. They are nominated by their fellows, but commissioned by the governor, and act without reward. These magistrates have jurisdiction both criminal and civil. If the question before them be a question of law only, they decide on it themselves: but if it be of fact, or of fact and law combined, it must be referred to a jury. In the latter case, of a combination of law and fact, it is usual for the jurors to decide the fact, and to refer the law arising on it to the decision of the judges. But this division of the subject lies with their discretion only. And if the question relate to any point of public liberty, or if it be one of those in which the judges may be suspected of bias, the jury undertake to decide both law and fact. If they be mistaken, a decision against right, which is casual only, is less dangerous to the state, and less afflicting to the loser, than one which makes part of a regular and uniform system. In truth, it is better to toss up cross and pile in a cause, than to refer it to a judge whose mind is warped by any motive whatever, in that particular case. But ...
The USSA... The United Socialist States of America.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 20, 2020:
"What the Democrats have become are now largely Utopian Socialists..." That is based upon what data? I ask because my study shows that the words quoted above are clearly wrong. I want to know how someone can get so wrong with their messages. How about letting someone else know what you mean by "Utopian Socialists?" How about an example of a "Utopian Socialist"? If you can show an example of a "Utopian Socialist" when the term became a term (original meaning of the term), and then you can show someone now who exemplifies a modern version of a Democrat Utopian Socialist, someone could then see why you wrote such nonsense, or I can learn something about my errors in study. EDIT: I read the rest of the message offered. To me you are clearly a false propagandist, so I'm wondering of you are paid to do so, or if you are merely just another parrot.
Call them by the name they self-identify as, or else you're a bigot, lol...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 20, 2020:
Thanks.
Guess there aren't too many Libertarian Free Thinkers on IDW.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 20, 2020:
Communication is useful in two directions: 1. To share accurate information, helping everyone. 2. To deceive, harming everyone. I may have missed the message you intend to make here, but I can attempt to find out if the message intended is what I think it is, and I can ask questions. Why did you post this on this IDW forum?
the switch from "share holder capitalism" to "stake holder capitalism" it's tie directly to ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 19, 2020:
When the criminals take-over the government, what can the victims expect? 1. You will be told to obey, and do not question the order. Are there any other messages required? "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned." As the criminals steal power with impunity (you cannot take them to court, just ask them) they grow exponentially stronger while their victims grown exponentially weaker. The words that cover up the facts that matter in the case are legion. Add to the pile: "stake holder."
From We Are Change and Luke Rudkowski is a news report concerning current activities involving the ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 19, 2020:
As to the message at Time: 8:00 or so... The JAB (giving people THE VIRUS to protect people from THE VIRUS: vaccine/inoculation) from TRUMP is now being discredited by the opposition (Marxist/Communist/Satanist/Globalist/Criminal Cartel) and why is that one might wonder. Please remember that TRUMP et al. had taken steps to destroy the Global Monopoly Power over The JAB MARKET. So... "Vaccine" producers A (Marxist/Communist/Satanist/Globalist/Criminal Cartel)) are now ANTI - NOT OUR MONOPOLY - VAXXERS!
At Time: 30:00 or so Dr.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 19, 2020:
See also: Fuellmich.com https://www.fuellmich.com/ What is the name of the Journalist, and where can his video be found, whereby the "script" is spelled out clearly?
German and American Lawyer Dr Reiner Fuellmich says Lockdowns are a Crime Against Humanity.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 19, 2020:
At time 17:00 or so... Fuellmich points out how Germans were trained (since mid 19th Century) to OBEY. Where do you think the American OBEDIENCE (drones) phenomenon was adopted? "The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto “Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.” “The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.” “How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.” Gatto also points out that the American brain-washers ("Public Education") used the techniques pioneered by the Prussians (Germans).
Will Covid disappear after Nov 11 ?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 19, 2020:
The drones (order followers) are no longer assaulting shoppers in my experience, perhaps it will be a gradual loosening of the effects that forced people to do such foolish things.
The dollar will collapse unless we have a major war.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 19, 2020:
"But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program. "To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter." Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and their Legacy by William Watkins https://usdebtclock.org/ And yet, people still manage to make more things worth stealing, even while the stolen loot for over 200 years in America, has been used to steal even more, talk about paradoxes.
[theepochtimes.com] (admin) Here its is... BIG TECH CENSORSHIP. They are not on the peoples side!
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 19, 2020:
Very good find, thanks.
Be honest, you want Trump to win out of spite, right?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 18, 2020:
The feeling is real, but so is the idea that one may jump off a cliff if one goes to close to the edge.
Athens, Sparta, and the Roman Republic had great ideas for a constitution, such as: Roman offices...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 18, 2020:
"There was no federal Greek government." The word FEDERAL today means ARBITRARY as in DESPOTIC, or ALL POWERFUL. That is not the original meaning of the word: "That the question was not whether, by a declaration of independence, we should make ourselves what we are not; but whether we should declare a fact which already exists: That, as to the people or Parliament of England, we had always been independent of them, their restraints on our trade deriving efficacy from our acquiescence only, and not from any rights they possessed of imposing them; and that, so far, our connection had been federal only, and was now dissolved by the commencement of hostilities: That, as to the king, we had been bound to him by allegiance, but that this bond was now dissolved by his assent to the late act of Parliament, by which he declares us out of his protection, and by his levying war on us a fact which had long ago proved us out of his protection, it being a certain position in law, that allegiance and protection are reciprocal, the one ceasing when the other is withdrawn:" First Congress United States of America as Federated under the common law and The Articles of Confederation. You have been had.
Athens, Sparta, and the Roman Republic had great ideas for a constitution, such as: Roman offices...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 18, 2020:
"Democratically elected..." That is false. From then (ancient history) to now many words have been corrupted, counterfeited, made to mean the opposite meaning, for reasons obvious to some, not obvious to those who are deceived. The Athenian Constitution: Government by Jury and Referendum by Roderick T. Long "The practice of selecting government officials randomly (and the Athenians developed some fairly sophisticated mechanical gadgets to ensure that the selection really was random, and to make cheating extremely difficult) is one of the most distinctive features of the Athenian constitution. We think of electoral politics as the hallmark of democracy; but elections were almost unknown at Athens, because they were considered paradigmatically anti-democratic. Proposals to replace sortition with election were always condemned as moves in the direction of oligarchy. "Why? Well, as the Athenians saw it, under an electoral system no one can obtain political office unless he is already famous: this gives prominent politicians an unfair advantage over the average person. Elections, they thought, favor those wealthy enough to bribe the voters, powerful enough to intimidate the voters, flashy enough to impress the voters, or clever enough to deceive the voters. The most influential political leaders were usually Horsemen anyway, thanks to their social prominence and the political following they could obtain by dispensing largesse among the masses. (One politician, Kimon, won the loyalty of the poor by leaving his fields and orchards unfenced, inviting anyone who was hungry to take whatever he needed.) If seats on the Council had been filled by popular vote, the Horsemen would have disproportionately dominated it — just as, today, Congress is dominated by those who can afford expensive campaigns, either through their own resources or through wealthy cronies. Or, to take a similar example, in the United States women have had the vote for over half a century, and yet, despite being a majority of the population, they represent only a tiny minority of elected officials. Obviously, the persistence of male dominance in the economic and social sphere has translated into women mostly voting for male candidates. The Athenians guessed, probably rightly, that the analogous prestige of the upper classes would lead to commoners mostly voting for aristocrats. "That is why the Athenians saw elections as an oligarchical rather than a democratic phenomenon. Above all, the Athenians feared the prospect of government officials forming a privileged class with separate interests of their own. Through reliance on sortition, random selection by lot, the Council could be guaranteed to represent a fair cross-section of the Athenian people — a kind of ...
The Truth About Vaccines: Episode 4 - Examining Influenza, the HIB and Pneumococcal Vaccines & Herd...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 17, 2020:
Thanks. Time 12:00 or so... As to test between "vaccinated" (assaulted) and saline placebo 100 each groups the assaulted group had a higher rate of "polio" type symptoms? From my reading the whole "Germ Theory" is bullshit, and "polio" was identified as a toxic pesticide use and reaction during the "pandemic." https://www.cochrane.org/
WATCH LIVE: Confirmed! Trump Has Footage Of Hunter Biden Raping And Torturing Little Girls — Set ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 17, 2020:
As if inculpatory evidence documented treason is not enough to set in motion due process of law... So what is going to be the result of yet more evidence of crime to be ignored by the fake law?
[youtu.be] “This is a fear driven response”: Government mask mandates & lockdowns are failing
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 17, 2020:
"Fuellmich goes on to cite data showing that in Bergamo, Italy, 94% of deaths were not the result of COVID-19 infection spreading wild but, rather, the consequence of the government's decision to transfer sick patients from hospitals to nursing homes, where they spread infection — colds, flu and SARS-CoV-2 — among the old and frail. "This was also done by New York Governor Andrew Cuomo,22 in direct violation of federal guidelines,23 as well as in Minnesota, Ohio,24 Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Michigan and California.25 Fuellmich also points out the routine malpractice that occurred in some New York hospitals, where all suspected COVID-19 patients were placed on mechanical ventilation, which turned out to be a death sentence." Coronavirus Fraud Scandal — The Biggest Fight Has Just Begun https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/10/17/coronavirus-fraud-biggest-crime-against-humanity.aspx?cid_source=dnl=email=art1HL=20201017Z1=DM679632=989538973
[articles.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 17, 2020:
Excellent find, thanks. ""I have been practicing law primarily as a trial lawyer against fraudulent corporations such as Deutsche bank, formerly one of the world's largest and most respected banks, today one of the most toxic criminal organizations in the world; VW, one of the world's largest and most respected car manufacturers, today notorious for its giant diesel fraud; and Cunard and Niagara the world's largest shipping company. We're suing them in a multi-million-dollar bribery case," Fuellmich says. "All the above-mentioned cases of corruption and fraud committed by the German corporations pale in comparison in view of the extent of the damage that the corona crisis has caused and continues to cause. This corona crisis, according to all we know today, must be renamed a corona scandal; and those responsible for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages."
The mainstream's attempt at whitewashing, summarized by Ben Shapiro:
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 17, 2020:
Is this like layers of an onion? Peel off the first symptom and call it the cure, then time passes and the other symptoms only get worse. The real story isn't manipulation of elections by monopolist criminals who extort near absolute control over information. The real story is the fraud where people are fooled into belief in the power of voting in elections, rather than the power of voting on lawful (common law) juries. If only there was a way to hold criminals in government to account for their crimes OTHER THAN voting them out of office. The layers of false cures start at the point when the criminals who take-over governments enforce their power to decide if what they do is a crime or not. Martin Luther King Jr. Conspiracy Murder Trial Transcripts (lawfully established fact that matters): Q. Let me ask you finally -- this has been a long road -- how you regard -- what is your explanation for the fact that there has been such little national media coverage of these -- of this trial and this evidence and this event here in this Memphis courtroom, which is the first trial ever to be able to produce evidence on this assassination -- what has happened here that Mighty Wurlitzer is not sounding but is in fact totally silent -- almost totally silent? A. Oh, but -- as we know, silence can be deafening. Disinformation is not only getting certain things to appear in print, it's also getting certain things not to appear in print. I mean, the first -- the first thing I would say as a way of explanation is the incredibly powerful effect of disinformation over a long period of time that I mentioned before. For 30 years the official line has been that James Earl Ray killed Martin Luther King and he did it all by himself. That's 30 years, not -- nothing like the short period when the line was that the Cubans raped the Angolan women. But for 30 years it's James Earl Ray killed Dr. King, did it all by himself. And when that is imprinted in the minds of the general public for 30 years, if somebody stood up and confessed and said: I did it. Ray didn't do it, I did it. Here's a movie. Here's a video showing me do it. 99 percent of the people wouldn't believe him because it just -- it just wouldn't click in the mind. It would just go right to -- it couldn't be. It's just a powerful psychological effect over 30 years of disinformation that's been imprinted on the brains of the -- the public. Something to the country couldn't -- couldn't be. The "government" (actual criminals in government office) conspired to murder and murdered a whistle blower blowing the whistle on the criminals in government. That, from another angle of view, is "The Government" executing someone found guilty of a capital crime in ...
[youtu.be] “This is a fear driven response”: Government mask mandates & lockdowns are failing
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 16, 2020:
Asking known criminals for advice is what exactly? 1. Wise 2. Unwise 3. Give them more rope 4. Entertainment
Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud as told by those who investigated it. [youtube.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 16, 2020:
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich Crimes Against Humanity Some videos are removed, so the titles and authors ought to be published for those who may want to see whose messages are killed.
Leader of Colorado human trafficking ring gets 304 years in prison Chauncey Price has received one ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 15, 2020:
I looked for trial transcripts and so far found none. Does anyone know where to get the data?
I think we have satisfactorily established that truth as distinct from facts is a necessary social ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 14, 2020:
Perception exists. If you attempt to dispute that fact/truth, you prove it in the process of the attempt. If you attempt to transfer that fact/truth to someone else through any form of communication whatsoever, you prove the fact/truth existing again, even if you fail (as I often do) to convey that fact/truth as one.
Davos ‘Great Reset’ plan has more holes than Swiss cheese Jennifer Oriel Money grows on ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 11, 2020:
"They believe COVID-19 is an opportunity to make a new economic order designed by globalists, regulated by unelected officials and funded by workers whose taxes will pay the price for social justice activism and mass decarbonisation." "The West was heavily in debt before the pandemic." "They have adopted the slogan Build Back Better to embed their objectives in nation-states’ government policy." "Most of us still think that COVID-19 is a virus and a vaccine is the solution." Lies at that level are treasonous frauds. When people are not paying for their own enslavement, sending a piece of the action (or the whole enchilada) to the treasonous criminals, there has been, is, and will be a revolutionary reset from Subsidized Slavery to Sustainable Development as proven in the extremely shunted American Revolutionary Experiment. Criminal Group A (Globalist, Communist, Lunatics) constitute a Cabal of Criminals seeking Global Monopoly of Power and Profit. Those psychopaths, sociopaths, and their dwindling army of dumbed down sycophants have lost their collective Power to deceive everyone, leaving Criminal Group B with greater power than ever before. Criminal Group B (Nationalists, Socialists, Nihilists) constitute many competitive Cabals of Criminals seeking Local Monopoly of Power and Profit. These Nihilists, assorted psychopaths, sociopaths, and their growing armies of dumbed down sycophants have gained collective Powers because Criminal Group A have lost their Monopoly of Deception, a result of World Wide Interconnectivity: no longer can these criminals selectively tell lies to target population A and a different (opposite) set of lies to target population B. Some people can now see the opportunity to return to the Revolutionary Experiment as was done in America between 1774 and 1789, where The People govern The People with effective, voluntary, truth telling, due process of law, such as is the common law in Courts of Law, where The People are represented by The People, not by Criminal Groups fraudulently claiming to be Authorities of Law. The Great Reset is an example of something known as Controlled Opposition, whereby those in Power have expended their stolen loot in the effort to know better how their Power is returned to the People, The criminal powers know very well that the truth sets their victims free, and so they use that knowledge (that truth) to keep their victims from knowing the truth. The criminals in power often construct carbon copy version of the Revolutionary Idea, whereby the carbon copy version is but half true, and the carbon copy version of the truth is thereby effectively misleading, controlling, the targets of deception, making the targets of deception pay for the enslavement of the targets of ...
On a YT post I made recently about the Covid where I commented that The Dems were at fault for ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 10, 2020:
Those who follow orders without question do so... "The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto “Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.” “The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.” “How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.” My example parody: Authority "Here is your script, these are the words you will parrot, do not entertain any other possible narratives, this is the one you will parrot; any questions?" Subject "Certainly not."
"For while racial equality, minority rights and women’s rights are among the best products of ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 10, 2020:
"The pain that comes from being expected to remain silent on some important matters and perform impossible leaps on others is tremendous, not least because the problems (including the internal contradictions) are so evident. As anyone who has lived under totalitarianism can attest, there is something demeaning and eventually soul-destroying about being expected to go along with claims you do not believe to be true and cannot hold to be true. If the belief is that all people should be regarded as having equal value and be accorded equal dignity, then that may be all well and good. If you are asked to believe that there are no differences between homosexuality and heterosexuality, men and women, racism and anti-racism, then this will in time drive you to distraction. That distraction – or crowd madness – is something we are in the middle of and something we need to try to find our way out from." At some point some people find evidence proving the fact that the goal of some people (in power, and therefore able to finance and take expensive steps to reach their goal) is destabilization, demoralization, deceiving (fraud), and enslaving (extorting), the crowd. To make the crowd pay for the costs of enslaving the crowd - it stands to reason - requires that the crowd fails to be reasonable, by some power exerted to reach that goal. "The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto “Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.” “The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.” “How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.” Who pays for "Public School" and why do they pay for it? https://usdebtclock.org/
Why do Democrats still believe that Trump didn't denounce "White Supremacy"?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 10, 2020:
At the level of the lies being told in this matter the lies constitute the prosecutable crime known as treason, calling these lies anything other than a cause to bring the treasonous before the people in a Court of Law (common law, not Admiralty, Equity, Family, etc.) is a failure of moral duty in my opinion.
yes they can
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 9, 2020:
"On the 21st of March, Congress recommended to the several provincial assemblies to exert their utmost endeavors to promote the culture of hemp, flax, and cotton, and the growth of wool, in the United Colonies; to take the earliest measures for erecting and establishing, in each colony, a society for the improvement of agriculture, arts, manufactures, and commerce; and forthwith to consider of the ways and means of introducing and improving the manufactures of duck, sail-cloth, and steel."
Parrhesia and isegoria - two concepts of free speech [theatlantic.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 9, 2020:
I read it, and it is full of bullshit. "As I witnessed at an event at Kenyon College in September, when confronted with such arguments the response from gray-bearded free-speech fundamentalists like myself is to continue to preach to the converted about the First Amendment, but with an undercurrent of solidaristic despair about “kids these days” and their failure to understand the fundamentals of liberal democracy." Perhaps some of the bullshit spewed by this particular bullshit artist adversely affected (deceived) kids. The freedom to speak is never secure, so claiming that a document secured freedom to speak (or breath) is probably the most fundamental form of bullshit spewed by idiots like this one. "The 1689 English Bill of Rights secured “the freedom of speech and debates in Parliament,” and so applied to members of Parliament only, and only when they were present in the chamber." The freedom to speak is opposite both the capacity for criminals to censor and the capacity for criminals to deceive. If the following words were censored the following words would not be available for quoting, and if the following words were read by someone who has been deceived, then the following words would not be acknowledge as true words, which is a factual message, an accurate report of the facts that matter in the case: (MAGNA CARTA.) Care, Henry, ed. English Liberties, Or The Free-Born Subject’s Inheritance: Containing Magna Charta . . . The Habeas Corpus Act, And Several Other Statutes Boston: Printed by J. Franklin, for N. Buttolph, B. Eliot, and D. Henchman, 1721 Notes on Magna Carta "Farther, though it be said here, that the king hath given and granted these liberties, yet it must not be understood that they were meer emanations of Royal favour, or new bounties granted, which the people could not justly challenge, or had not a right unto before; for as lord Coke in divers places asserts, and as is well known to every gentleman professing the law, this charter is, for the most part, only declaratory of the principal grounds of the fundamental laws and liberties of England. Not any new freedom is hereby granted, but a restitution of such as the subject lawfully had before, and to free them from the usurpations and incroachments of every power whatever. It is worthy observation, that this charter often mentions sua jura, their rights, and libertates suas, their liberties, which shews they were before intitled to and possessed them, and that those rights and liberties were by this charter not granted as before unknown, but confirmed, and that in the stile of liberties and privileges long before well known.” If it is true that the natural right to speak (to report the facts that matter in any case) is above ...
This one begins to step past the surface into the deep do do.... [youtube.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 7, 2020:
See also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzKe0vMvH7g
This one begins to step past the surface into the deep do do.... [youtube.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 7, 2020:
I posted the following response on that YouTube "Channel": At time 14 or so I see an opportunity to respond with an observation concerning false choices. In any given situation there are many choices leading up to an observed moment in time (time never stops so it is a fiction to "stop time" in a moment for observation: photo for example) and then "Monday Quarterback" the event from that fixed moment in time. That can be useful, and it can be abused, as the example offered in the effort to communicate a foundational principle might be an effort to suggest that there are only 2 choices: 1. Evil, 2. Lesser Evil. At each moment leading up to the scene at the funeral many people made many choices and most people choose the best of the many good choices. Why do people allow any evil in their lives? Is it an obvious deception?
What lessons will be learned by the two major coalitions in America if Trump loses?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 7, 2020:
That was a thought provoking read, but I may have read too much into it. What does the following mean? "not chastised by the people." Do you mean that the majority polarize into a cause to act as the people who chastise those criminals who perpetrated so many crimes, including crimes against humanity, in their effort to hold onto their power to control the polarization of the majority?
Just government things....
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 4, 2020:
The semantic trick (fraud) here is to replace organized criminal cabals labeled accurately as Organzied Criminal Cartels (cabal, monopoly, The Mob, etc.) with "government." Those deceived - as a rule - can't see it.
Just government things....
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 4, 2020:
Excellent, thanks.
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 4, 2020:
This belongs here too: A child may cover innocent eyes to make unwanted things disappear. A compromised adult may have suffered brainwashing as a child in fraudulent Criminal Government Indoctrination Centers. See the work of John Taylor Gatto, and the 6 Purposes of “Public School,” with the first purpose listed: "The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto “Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.” “The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.” “How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.” The adjustive function brings to adulthood the innocent ability to make unwanted things disappear. The 3 Monkey Censorship Meme, covering eyes, ears, and mouth – meme – dates back before memes became a semantic discovery. This is not NEWS: Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775: "Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation?” The President of the Corporation U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) publicly accuses “Democrats” as crooks, and even names names. Cambridge Dictionary: Crook: a very dishonest person, especially a criminal or a cheat: What is a semantic trick? As a rule (natural law) those who are deceived are not aware that they are deceived. How does one get away with non-feasance, misfeasance, malfeasance, misprision of justice, or misprision of treason, routinely? It isn’t just you neighbor that can’t see that the Emperor is naked. Alexandr Solzhenitsyn Nobel Lecture, 1970 “But let us not forget that violence does not live alone and is not capable of living alone: it is necessarily interwoven with falsehood. Between them lies the most intimate, the deepest of natural bonds. Violence finds its only refuge in falsehood, falsehood its only support in violence. Any man who has once acclaimed violence as his METHOD must inexorably choose falsehood as his PRINCIPLE. At its birth violence acts openly and even with pride. But no sooner ...
“Stalin goes to visit one of the collectives outside of Moscow,” began Kolya in his ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 3, 2020:
"Socialism is a political, economic and social theory that promotes collective ownership of wealth and good and collective rights over individual profit and ownership and individual rights." That is a view of history. Here is another one: “In what great feature are Protestantism, Democracy, and Socialism identical? I will answer this interrogatory first, and demonstrate afterward. Protestantism, Democracy, and Socialism are identical in the assertion of the Supremacy of the Individual, - a dogma essentially contumacious, reovlutionary, and antagonistic to the basis principles of all the older institutions of society, which make the Individual subordinate ans subject to the Church, to the State, and to Society respectively. Not only is this supremacy or SOVEREIGNTY OF THE INDIVIDUAL a common element of all three of these great movements, but I will make the still more sweeping assertion that it is substantially the whole of those movements. It is not merely a feature, as I have just denominated it, but the living soul itself, the vital energy, the integral essence or the being of them all.” Steven Pearl Andrews, The Science of Society, 1888 The subject matter is non-debatable. I've tried. Capitalists (so-called) are typically favoring a strong military force, in the National Interest. Is there any better example of so-called "socialism" (modern meaning) than a conscripted military? There is a contender. Capitalists (so-called) are typically favoring a National Tax to pay for such things as a strong military force. So "Capitalists" (so-called) are socialists, if the modern meanings of words are used to label people who share common ideals and common goals such as "Capitalism" and "Socialism," The same phenomenon of duplicitous meanings of words makes democracy non-debatable, as well as the meaning of a republic and a federation. The same duplicitous meanings of words tends to make Rule of Law non-debatable. Rule of Law is what The Majority (each individual?) says it is, or else. Thanks for the joke.
Never trust anyone who calls himself a libertarian socialist.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 3, 2020:
Authorized pretension?
[wnd.com] Poll: Half of America is prepping for 'civil war'
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 2, 2020:
Look at actual history: "No. 3 - New Constitution Creates A National Government; Will Not Abate Foreign Influence; Dangers Of Civil War And Despotism ___________________________________ Like the nome de plume "Publius" used by pro Constitution writers in the Federalist Papers, several Anti-Federalists signed their writings "A FARMER. " While the occupation of the writers may not have coincided with the name given, the arguments against consolidating power in the hands of a central government were widely read. The following was published in the Maryland Gazette and Baltimore Advertiser, March 7, 1788. The true identity of the author is unknown. _____________________________________ There are but two modes by which men are connected in society, the one which operates on individuals, this always has been, and ought still to be called, national government; the other which binds States and governments together (not corporations, for there is no considerable nation on earth, despotic, monarchical, or republican, that does not contain many subordinate corporations with various constitutions) this last has heretofore been denominated a league or confederacy. The term federalists is therefore improperly applied to themselves, by the friends and supporters of the proposed constitution. This abuse of language does not help the cause; every degree of imposition serves only to irritate, but can never convince. They are national men, and their opponents, or at least a great majority of them, are federal, in the only true and strict sense of the word. Whether any form of national government is preferable for the Americans, to a league or confederacy, is a previous question we must first make up our minds upon. . . . That a national government will add to the dignity and increase the splendor of the United States abroad, can admit of no doubt: it is essentially requisite for both. That it will render government, and officers of government, more dignified at home is equally certain. That these objects are more suited to the manners, if not [the] genius and disposition of our people is, I fear, also true. That it is requisite in order to keep us at peace among ourselves, is doubtful. That it is necessary, to prevent foreigners from dividing us, or interfering in our government, I deny positively; and, after all, I have strong doubts whether all its advantages are not more specious than solid. We are vain, like other nations. We wish to make a noise in the world; and feel hurt that Europeans are not so attentive to America in peace, as they were to America in war. We are also, no doubt, desirous of cutting a figure in history. Should we not reflect, that quiet is happiness? That content and pomp are incompatible? I have either read or heard this ...
The following link is a lecture on Covert-19, but don't let that put you off.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 2, 2020:
In the Dolores Cahill video presentation above at Tme: 45:00 or so, mention is made of competitive banking by local people and a name was mentioned: Professor Richard Werner Also mentioned: The German Sparcaster (Close Caption Spelling) Model So... https://professorwerner.org/ ‘Quantity Theory of Credit' https://www.postkeynesian.net/downloads/Werner/RW301012PPT.pdf I looked briefly into that data, which appears on the surface to be an effort to expose the falsehoods that prop up Monopoly Central Banking Fraud. This is not that hard to know. Everything Monopolized tends toward lower quality and higher cost over time in the absence of competition. Competition forces quality up to a practical limit (a limit imposed by nature) and competition forces costs down to a practical limit. Monopoly = no force of competition = decline in quality/increase in price Competition = no monopoly = increase in quality/decrease i price That is not subject to argument, or if it is subject to argument (competition of ideas) what is the result of that argument other than: higher quality and lower cost? Do you see?
[wnd.com] Poll: Half of America is prepping for 'civil war'
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 2, 2020:
In Civil War the aggressors hide behind falsehoods such as the falsehood contained in the name Civil War. In order to see this clearly someone - as a rule - must crawl out from under the pile of deception that causes people to agree to be deceived by such word magic. There is nothing CIVIL about WAR. There is always a group who finance war, invest in it, doing so because their plan is to profit from it. To see this clearly someone might attempt to put this phenomenon on a personal level. Would you set about to reach the goal of making a killing (a lot of future profits) on convincing the neighbors across the street to attack (with intent to kill, or enslave) the neighbors on your left and right? What could you do to accomplish that gaol of convincing your neighbors across the street to attack your neighbors on your left and right? An obvious tactic is to lie, to deceive, to make up fictional stories about your neighbors on your left and right, and then do whatever it takes to make your neighbor across the street to believe your lies, to entice your neighbor across the street to become so angry as to fill your neighbor across the street with hatred aimed at your neighbors on your left and right. Now, with that in mind, look at actual history: Thomas Jefferson Declaration of Independence "he has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating it's most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. this piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the CHRISTIAN king of Great Britain. determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce: and that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, & murdering the people upon whom he also obtruded them; thus paying off former crimes committed against the liberties of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another." https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/declara/ruffdrft.html
Can't wait to see what comes of that (if anything meaningful at all).
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 1, 2020:
I think that this case involving Kyle Rittenhouse, as it is defended by Lin Wood, is the most important current event, second only to the pending exposure of the Billion Dollar Subsidized Slavery Cabal potentially exposed in a trail by jury where Maxwell is the defendant. Lin Wood, and Trial by Jury (perhaps by common law: not delayed), places the facts before The People in a Public Trial, where The People (represented by a jury by common law) Publish Trial Transcripts. No need for CBS, NBC, ABC, FOX, CNN, Reason Magazine, L.A. Times, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Alex Jones, or anyone to ACT as middle man between the information relevant to the case and The Public, to be filtered, twisted, altered, falsified, confused, deranged, commingled, adjusted, opinionated, and otherwise censored. RAW facts that matter in the case are directly connected to The Public. The tactic of publishing a defamation (libel) case is possibly (in my opinion) an example of the genius (inventive, adaptive, creative) credited to the defense team. DO NOT SLANDER. There are consequences. Do unto others what you would yourself defend against having someone do to you IS a deep, encompassing, erudite, fits all, human message empowering humans with knowledge of natural law. DETERRENCE If I were on a fence and by my choosing I could fall into crime would I not want someone to deter me? If I were on a fence and by my choosing I push someone into crime would I then be asking my victim to push back?
An alternative history to today's narrative of slavery being the foundation of America.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 1, 2020:
"At base, such people do not believe in the democratic process." More word magic. The "democratic process," referred to is likely to be synonymous with Electoral Politics, and if so then that process is not democratic, it is oligarchical, which is the opposite of democratic: counter-feit. At the time of 1774 the Nations that formed the Voluntary Association for Mutual Defense (confederation of nations: federation) in response to British Aggression (attempting to enslave Americans and make Americans pay for their own slavery: Subsidized Slavery) and those people governing themselves voluntarily defeated British Aggression by Military Means. During the peace, while Americans (including Indian Nations, and including Irish and African Slaves) were recovering from a long costly war, British Aggression continued covertly. The result of that situation where Americans were weak, defenseless, powerless, against Covert Aggression, the Liberty they won was lost by Legal Fiction (word magic). The common law counties that formed into common law Nations that were united into a Defensive Federation were then Consolidated into one Corporate Nation-State Monopoly of Power and Profit in 1789. It has been Subsidized Slavery ever since for those who know it as well as those who are fooled by it.
An alternative history to today's narrative of slavery being the foundation of America.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 1, 2020:
Off to a bad start: "What’s true at the personal level is true at the national. What well-meaning liberals do not seem to realise these days is that democracies thrive or fail on the basis of national stories. This is doubly so in republics like the US, where there is no apolitical figurehead to unite people in place of a monarch." Peaceful co-existence with the Indians (first people, whatever) and the end of both Irish and African Slavery was inevitable under the Federal peaceful co-existence and common law BEFORE the Slave Traders, Warmongers, Central Banking Frauds, and assorted other Loyalists for Empire took over in 1789, removing the federal agreement and replacing it with a National Corporate Legal Fiction above the common law, and above the people, ensuring free reign of the genocidal, homicidal, reign of horror and terror of criminals counterfeiting governments. It (American government) was not a democracy, it was many competitive forms of government ranging from absolute dictatorships (Puritan Massachusetts) to anarchy in all but common law (Quaker Pennsylvania), and everything in between in many counties and 13 States at the time of the revolutionary period (1774 to 1789). A few counties, but growing numbers of counties, were moving toward common law principles, where the people govern themselves (democratic, but not "democracies") in republican (of, by, and for The People, Res-publica, the public thing) governments. States where cabals (religious, commercial, criminal, English loyalist) controlled the government (Massachusetts) by criminal means (see: Shays's Rebellion) were not by definition republics (they were for the cabal, not for the people) nor were they democratic (again, not government of, by, or for the people). If Massachusetts Tyranny was deserving of a name other than a Criminal Government it would be a Nation-State Corporate Government, of, by, and for the members of the Incorporated Nation-State. The word magic works on a subconscious level until individuals regain control of their moral conscience and look deep into the workings of meanings of words in context.

Give Love

Left to give: 0 Coins
Click here to get coins.

  • Level8 (77,205pts)
  • Posts685
  • Comments
      Replies
    1,848
    1,196
  • Followers 17
  • Fans 0
  • Following 1
  • Referrals11
  • Joined Oct 29th, 2019
  • Last Visit 1+ month ago
Josf-Kelley's Groups
Q is for question
460 members, Host
Voluntary Mutual Defence
37 members, Host
End Game (formerly Ryan Faulk Fans)
14 members, Host
Controversial Charts
48211 members
Jordan Peterson Group
25342 members
Ben Shapiro Group
22932 members
Joe Rogan Group
16274 members
Just Jokes and Memes
14373 members
Tucker Carlson Fans
13472 members
Dinesh D'Souza Fans
10192 members
IDW Topic-of-the-Day
9767 members
News From All Views
7201 members
DaisyCousens
5904 members
Tim Pool Group
5841 members
Sydney Watson Fanspace
5476 members
Classical Liberalism
4809 members
Canadian Politics
3979 members
IDW Political Party
2781 members
Arielle Scarcella FanSpace!
2741 members
Politically Incorrect folks
2477 members
Anti-Socialism
2262 members
Learning from Christ
2183 members
President Donald J. Trump... Latest
2064 members
Saving Western Civilisation
2050 members
RamZPaul
1868 members
John Paul Watson Group
1610 members
Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder
1553 members
Alex Jones Fans
1288 members
Conspiracy Truth : Wolves And Sheeple
1216 members
Stefan Molyneux Fans
1049 members
Emergency Preparedness and Survival
951 members
Libertarian Freethinkers
893 members
COVID-19
765 members
The Great Reset
698 members
The Second Amendment Sanctuary
647 members
True Crime Discussion Group
594 members
Conspiracy Research
573 members
Words of Wisdom
480 members
Feminism = cancer
465 members
International News
390 members
Comedy, Laughs and Humor.
309 members
Vaccine Education & Discussion Group
306 members
Ideas of God
291 members
The Case Against Corona Panic
247 members
Dr. Steve Turley Group
176 members
Joe Biden Is Not My President
174 members
United We Stand
153 members
The History Corner
139 members
Brain soup
129 members
IDW.Community Senate
125 members
ORIGINAL MEMES ( GREGORY ALAN ELLIOTT )
117 members
Liz Wheeler Fans Page.
108 members
Red Pilled Hotties (Yes you can still flirt & remain politically engaged)
107 members
Propaganda Clearing House
89 members
Anarcho-Capitalism / Voluntaryism
54 members
MGTOW: Exodus From The Plantation
54 members
Now You Are Talking With
46 members
IDW Liberty Alliance Culture War Room
44 members
Current Events
28 members
Rednecks Anonymous
28 members
50 Policies
23 members
Freemerica
19 members
Children's Health Defense
13 members
UnCommon Sense 42020 PodCast
9 members