slug.com slug.com
1
1 Like Show

Born in West Orange, New Jersey, 1958.
1 oldest sister
2 older brothers
2 younger brothers

My first experience with data that did not fit the Official Narrative (propaganda) was a book I read in School for a book report. The book described data concerning the sinking of the Ocean Liner (false flag) that was the casus belli (excuse: false flag) for Americans to be deceived into fighting the Central Banker War called World War One. The ship that was sunk (murdering people aboard) to move power to the criminals running the Central Bank Cabal was the Lusitania.

The next big event which caused me to fully reject the Official Narrative (propaganda) was the massacre at Waco misreported on National Television (Corporate Propaganda Organ of the Nation-State Aristocracy).

Full Bio

Comments

[youtu.be] “This is a fear driven response”: Government mask mandates & lockdowns are failing
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 16, 2020:
Asking known criminals for advice is what exactly? 1. Wise 2. Unwise 3. Give them more rope 4. Entertainment
Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud as told by those who investigated it. [youtube.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 16, 2020:
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich Crimes Against Humanity Some videos are removed, so the titles and authors ought to be published for those who may want to see whose messages are killed.
Leader of Colorado human trafficking ring gets 304 years in prison Chauncey Price has received one ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 15, 2020:
I looked for trial transcripts and so far found none. Does anyone know where to get the data?
I think we have satisfactorily established that truth as distinct from facts is a necessary social ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 14, 2020:
Perception exists. If you attempt to dispute that fact/truth, you prove it in the process of the attempt. If you attempt to transfer that fact/truth to someone else through any form of communication whatsoever, you prove the fact/truth existing again, even if you fail (as I often do) to convey that fact/truth as one.
Davos ‘Great Reset’ plan has more holes than Swiss cheese Jennifer Oriel Money grows on ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 11, 2020:
"They believe COVID-19 is an opportunity to make a new economic order designed by globalists, regulated by unelected officials and funded by workers whose taxes will pay the price for social justice activism and mass decarbonisation." "The West was heavily in debt before the pandemic." "They have adopted the slogan Build Back Better to embed their objectives in nation-states’ government policy." "Most of us still think that COVID-19 is a virus and a vaccine is the solution." Lies at that level are treasonous frauds. When people are not paying for their own enslavement, sending a piece of the action (or the whole enchilada) to the treasonous criminals, there has been, is, and will be a revolutionary reset from Subsidized Slavery to Sustainable Development as proven in the extremely shunted American Revolutionary Experiment. Criminal Group A (Globalist, Communist, Lunatics) constitute a Cabal of Criminals seeking Global Monopoly of Power and Profit. Those psychopaths, sociopaths, and their dwindling army of dumbed down sycophants have lost their collective Power to deceive everyone, leaving Criminal Group B with greater power than ever before. Criminal Group B (Nationalists, Socialists, Nihilists) constitute many competitive Cabals of Criminals seeking Local Monopoly of Power and Profit. These Nihilists, assorted psychopaths, sociopaths, and their growing armies of dumbed down sycophants have gained collective Powers because Criminal Group A have lost their Monopoly of Deception, a result of World Wide Interconnectivity: no longer can these criminals selectively tell lies to target population A and a different (opposite) set of lies to target population B. Some people can now see the opportunity to return to the Revolutionary Experiment as was done in America between 1774 and 1789, where The People govern The People with effective, voluntary, truth telling, due process of law, such as is the common law in Courts of Law, where The People are represented by The People, not by Criminal Groups fraudulently claiming to be Authorities of Law. The Great Reset is an example of something known as Controlled Opposition, whereby those in Power have expended their stolen loot in the effort to know better how their Power is returned to the People, The criminal powers know very well that the truth sets their victims free, and so they use that knowledge (that truth) to keep their victims from knowing the truth. The criminals in power often construct carbon copy version of the Revolutionary Idea, whereby the carbon copy version is but half true, and the carbon copy version of the truth is thereby effectively misleading, controlling, the targets of deception, making the targets of deception pay for the enslavement of the targets of ...
On a YT post I made recently about the Covid where I commented that The Dems were at fault for ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 10, 2020:
Those who follow orders without question do so... "The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto “Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.” “The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.” “How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.” My example parody: Authority "Here is your script, these are the words you will parrot, do not entertain any other possible narratives, this is the one you will parrot; any questions?" Subject "Certainly not."
"For while racial equality, minority rights and women’s rights are among the best products of ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 10, 2020:
"The pain that comes from being expected to remain silent on some important matters and perform impossible leaps on others is tremendous, not least because the problems (including the internal contradictions) are so evident. As anyone who has lived under totalitarianism can attest, there is something demeaning and eventually soul-destroying about being expected to go along with claims you do not believe to be true and cannot hold to be true. If the belief is that all people should be regarded as having equal value and be accorded equal dignity, then that may be all well and good. If you are asked to believe that there are no differences between homosexuality and heterosexuality, men and women, racism and anti-racism, then this will in time drive you to distraction. That distraction – or crowd madness – is something we are in the middle of and something we need to try to find our way out from." At some point some people find evidence proving the fact that the goal of some people (in power, and therefore able to finance and take expensive steps to reach their goal) is destabilization, demoralization, deceiving (fraud), and enslaving (extorting), the crowd. To make the crowd pay for the costs of enslaving the crowd - it stands to reason - requires that the crowd fails to be reasonable, by some power exerted to reach that goal. "The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto “Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.” “The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.” “How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.” Who pays for "Public School" and why do they pay for it? https://usdebtclock.org/
Why do Democrats still believe that Trump didn't denounce "White Supremacy"?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 10, 2020:
At the level of the lies being told in this matter the lies constitute the prosecutable crime known as treason, calling these lies anything other than a cause to bring the treasonous before the people in a Court of Law (common law, not Admiralty, Equity, Family, etc.) is a failure of moral duty in my opinion.
yes they can
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 9, 2020:
"On the 21st of March, Congress recommended to the several provincial assemblies to exert their utmost endeavors to promote the culture of hemp, flax, and cotton, and the growth of wool, in the United Colonies; to take the earliest measures for erecting and establishing, in each colony, a society for the improvement of agriculture, arts, manufactures, and commerce; and forthwith to consider of the ways and means of introducing and improving the manufactures of duck, sail-cloth, and steel."
Parrhesia and isegoria - two concepts of free speech [theatlantic.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 9, 2020:
I read it, and it is full of bullshit. "As I witnessed at an event at Kenyon College in September, when confronted with such arguments the response from gray-bearded free-speech fundamentalists like myself is to continue to preach to the converted about the First Amendment, but with an undercurrent of solidaristic despair about “kids these days” and their failure to understand the fundamentals of liberal democracy." Perhaps some of the bullshit spewed by this particular bullshit artist adversely affected (deceived) kids. The freedom to speak is never secure, so claiming that a document secured freedom to speak (or breath) is probably the most fundamental form of bullshit spewed by idiots like this one. "The 1689 English Bill of Rights secured “the freedom of speech and debates in Parliament,” and so applied to members of Parliament only, and only when they were present in the chamber." The freedom to speak is opposite both the capacity for criminals to censor and the capacity for criminals to deceive. If the following words were censored the following words would not be available for quoting, and if the following words were read by someone who has been deceived, then the following words would not be acknowledge as true words, which is a factual message, an accurate report of the facts that matter in the case: (MAGNA CARTA.) Care, Henry, ed. English Liberties, Or The Free-Born Subject’s Inheritance: Containing Magna Charta . . . The Habeas Corpus Act, And Several Other Statutes Boston: Printed by J. Franklin, for N. Buttolph, B. Eliot, and D. Henchman, 1721 Notes on Magna Carta "Farther, though it be said here, that the king hath given and granted these liberties, yet it must not be understood that they were meer emanations of Royal favour, or new bounties granted, which the people could not justly challenge, or had not a right unto before; for as lord Coke in divers places asserts, and as is well known to every gentleman professing the law, this charter is, for the most part, only declaratory of the principal grounds of the fundamental laws and liberties of England. Not any new freedom is hereby granted, but a restitution of such as the subject lawfully had before, and to free them from the usurpations and incroachments of every power whatever. It is worthy observation, that this charter often mentions sua jura, their rights, and libertates suas, their liberties, which shews they were before intitled to and possessed them, and that those rights and liberties were by this charter not granted as before unknown, but confirmed, and that in the stile of liberties and privileges long before well known.” If it is true that the natural right to speak (to report the facts that matter in any case) is above ...
This one begins to step past the surface into the deep do do.... [youtube.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 7, 2020:
See also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzKe0vMvH7g
This one begins to step past the surface into the deep do do.... [youtube.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 7, 2020:
I posted the following response on that YouTube "Channel": At time 14 or so I see an opportunity to respond with an observation concerning false choices. In any given situation there are many choices leading up to an observed moment in time (time never stops so it is a fiction to "stop time" in a moment for observation: photo for example) and then "Monday Quarterback" the event from that fixed moment in time. That can be useful, and it can be abused, as the example offered in the effort to communicate a foundational principle might be an effort to suggest that there are only 2 choices: 1. Evil, 2. Lesser Evil. At each moment leading up to the scene at the funeral many people made many choices and most people choose the best of the many good choices. Why do people allow any evil in their lives? Is it an obvious deception?
What lessons will be learned by the two major coalitions in America if Trump loses?
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 7, 2020:
That was a thought provoking read, but I may have read too much into it. What does the following mean? "not chastised by the people." Do you mean that the majority polarize into a cause to act as the people who chastise those criminals who perpetrated so many crimes, including crimes against humanity, in their effort to hold onto their power to control the polarization of the majority?
Just government things....
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 4, 2020:
The semantic trick (fraud) here is to replace organized criminal cabals labeled accurately as Organzied Criminal Cartels (cabal, monopoly, The Mob, etc.) with "government." Those deceived - as a rule - can't see it.
Just government things....
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 4, 2020:
Excellent, thanks.
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 4, 2020:
This belongs here too: A child may cover innocent eyes to make unwanted things disappear. A compromised adult may have suffered brainwashing as a child in fraudulent Criminal Government Indoctrination Centers. See the work of John Taylor Gatto, and the 6 Purposes of “Public School,” with the first purpose listed: "The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto “Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.” “The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.” “How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.” The adjustive function brings to adulthood the innocent ability to make unwanted things disappear. The 3 Monkey Censorship Meme, covering eyes, ears, and mouth – meme – dates back before memes became a semantic discovery. This is not NEWS: Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775: "Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation?” The President of the Corporation U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) publicly accuses “Democrats” as crooks, and even names names. Cambridge Dictionary: Crook: a very dishonest person, especially a criminal or a cheat: What is a semantic trick? As a rule (natural law) those who are deceived are not aware that they are deceived. How does one get away with non-feasance, misfeasance, malfeasance, misprision of justice, or misprision of treason, routinely? It isn’t just you neighbor that can’t see that the Emperor is naked. Alexandr Solzhenitsyn Nobel Lecture, 1970 “But let us not forget that violence does not live alone and is not capable of living alone: it is necessarily interwoven with falsehood. Between them lies the most intimate, the deepest of natural bonds. Violence finds its only refuge in falsehood, falsehood its only support in violence. Any man who has once acclaimed violence as his METHOD must inexorably choose falsehood as his PRINCIPLE. At its birth violence acts openly and even with pride. But no sooner ...
“Stalin goes to visit one of the collectives outside of Moscow,” began Kolya in his ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 3, 2020:
"Socialism is a political, economic and social theory that promotes collective ownership of wealth and good and collective rights over individual profit and ownership and individual rights." That is a view of history. Here is another one: “In what great feature are Protestantism, Democracy, and Socialism identical? I will answer this interrogatory first, and demonstrate afterward. Protestantism, Democracy, and Socialism are identical in the assertion of the Supremacy of the Individual, - a dogma essentially contumacious, reovlutionary, and antagonistic to the basis principles of all the older institutions of society, which make the Individual subordinate ans subject to the Church, to the State, and to Society respectively. Not only is this supremacy or SOVEREIGNTY OF THE INDIVIDUAL a common element of all three of these great movements, but I will make the still more sweeping assertion that it is substantially the whole of those movements. It is not merely a feature, as I have just denominated it, but the living soul itself, the vital energy, the integral essence or the being of them all.” Steven Pearl Andrews, The Science of Society, 1888 The subject matter is non-debatable. I've tried. Capitalists (so-called) are typically favoring a strong military force, in the National Interest. Is there any better example of so-called "socialism" (modern meaning) than a conscripted military? There is a contender. Capitalists (so-called) are typically favoring a National Tax to pay for such things as a strong military force. So "Capitalists" (so-called) are socialists, if the modern meanings of words are used to label people who share common ideals and common goals such as "Capitalism" and "Socialism," The same phenomenon of duplicitous meanings of words makes democracy non-debatable, as well as the meaning of a republic and a federation. The same duplicitous meanings of words tends to make Rule of Law non-debatable. Rule of Law is what The Majority (each individual?) says it is, or else. Thanks for the joke.
Never trust anyone who calls himself a libertarian socialist.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 3, 2020:
Authorized pretension?
[wnd.com] Poll: Half of America is prepping for 'civil war'
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 2, 2020:
Look at actual history: "No. 3 - New Constitution Creates A National Government; Will Not Abate Foreign Influence; Dangers Of Civil War And Despotism ___________________________________ Like the nome de plume "Publius" used by pro Constitution writers in the Federalist Papers, several Anti-Federalists signed their writings "A FARMER. " While the occupation of the writers may not have coincided with the name given, the arguments against consolidating power in the hands of a central government were widely read. The following was published in the Maryland Gazette and Baltimore Advertiser, March 7, 1788. The true identity of the author is unknown. _____________________________________ There are but two modes by which men are connected in society, the one which operates on individuals, this always has been, and ought still to be called, national government; the other which binds States and governments together (not corporations, for there is no considerable nation on earth, despotic, monarchical, or republican, that does not contain many subordinate corporations with various constitutions) this last has heretofore been denominated a league or confederacy. The term federalists is therefore improperly applied to themselves, by the friends and supporters of the proposed constitution. This abuse of language does not help the cause; every degree of imposition serves only to irritate, but can never convince. They are national men, and their opponents, or at least a great majority of them, are federal, in the only true and strict sense of the word. Whether any form of national government is preferable for the Americans, to a league or confederacy, is a previous question we must first make up our minds upon. . . . That a national government will add to the dignity and increase the splendor of the United States abroad, can admit of no doubt: it is essentially requisite for both. That it will render government, and officers of government, more dignified at home is equally certain. That these objects are more suited to the manners, if not [the] genius and disposition of our people is, I fear, also true. That it is requisite in order to keep us at peace among ourselves, is doubtful. That it is necessary, to prevent foreigners from dividing us, or interfering in our government, I deny positively; and, after all, I have strong doubts whether all its advantages are not more specious than solid. We are vain, like other nations. We wish to make a noise in the world; and feel hurt that Europeans are not so attentive to America in peace, as they were to America in war. We are also, no doubt, desirous of cutting a figure in history. Should we not reflect, that quiet is happiness? That content and pomp are incompatible? I have either read or heard this ...
The following link is a lecture on Covert-19, but don't let that put you off.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 2, 2020:
In the Dolores Cahill video presentation above at Tme: 45:00 or so, mention is made of competitive banking by local people and a name was mentioned: Professor Richard Werner Also mentioned: The German Sparcaster (Close Caption Spelling) Model So... https://professorwerner.org/ ‘Quantity Theory of Credit' https://www.postkeynesian.net/downloads/Werner/RW301012PPT.pdf I looked briefly into that data, which appears on the surface to be an effort to expose the falsehoods that prop up Monopoly Central Banking Fraud. This is not that hard to know. Everything Monopolized tends toward lower quality and higher cost over time in the absence of competition. Competition forces quality up to a practical limit (a limit imposed by nature) and competition forces costs down to a practical limit. Monopoly = no force of competition = decline in quality/increase in price Competition = no monopoly = increase in quality/decrease i price That is not subject to argument, or if it is subject to argument (competition of ideas) what is the result of that argument other than: higher quality and lower cost? Do you see?
[wnd.com] Poll: Half of America is prepping for 'civil war'
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 2, 2020:
In Civil War the aggressors hide behind falsehoods such as the falsehood contained in the name Civil War. In order to see this clearly someone - as a rule - must crawl out from under the pile of deception that causes people to agree to be deceived by such word magic. There is nothing CIVIL about WAR. There is always a group who finance war, invest in it, doing so because their plan is to profit from it. To see this clearly someone might attempt to put this phenomenon on a personal level. Would you set about to reach the goal of making a killing (a lot of future profits) on convincing the neighbors across the street to attack (with intent to kill, or enslave) the neighbors on your left and right? What could you do to accomplish that gaol of convincing your neighbors across the street to attack your neighbors on your left and right? An obvious tactic is to lie, to deceive, to make up fictional stories about your neighbors on your left and right, and then do whatever it takes to make your neighbor across the street to believe your lies, to entice your neighbor across the street to become so angry as to fill your neighbor across the street with hatred aimed at your neighbors on your left and right. Now, with that in mind, look at actual history: Thomas Jefferson Declaration of Independence "he has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating it's most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. this piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the CHRISTIAN king of Great Britain. determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce: and that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, & murdering the people upon whom he also obtruded them; thus paying off former crimes committed against the liberties of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another." https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/declara/ruffdrft.html
Can't wait to see what comes of that (if anything meaningful at all).
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 1, 2020:
I think that this case involving Kyle Rittenhouse, as it is defended by Lin Wood, is the most important current event, second only to the pending exposure of the Billion Dollar Subsidized Slavery Cabal potentially exposed in a trail by jury where Maxwell is the defendant. Lin Wood, and Trial by Jury (perhaps by common law: not delayed), places the facts before The People in a Public Trial, where The People (represented by a jury by common law) Publish Trial Transcripts. No need for CBS, NBC, ABC, FOX, CNN, Reason Magazine, L.A. Times, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Alex Jones, or anyone to ACT as middle man between the information relevant to the case and The Public, to be filtered, twisted, altered, falsified, confused, deranged, commingled, adjusted, opinionated, and otherwise censored. RAW facts that matter in the case are directly connected to The Public. The tactic of publishing a defamation (libel) case is possibly (in my opinion) an example of the genius (inventive, adaptive, creative) credited to the defense team. DO NOT SLANDER. There are consequences. Do unto others what you would yourself defend against having someone do to you IS a deep, encompassing, erudite, fits all, human message empowering humans with knowledge of natural law. DETERRENCE If I were on a fence and by my choosing I could fall into crime would I not want someone to deter me? If I were on a fence and by my choosing I push someone into crime would I then be asking my victim to push back?
An alternative history to today's narrative of slavery being the foundation of America.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 1, 2020:
"At base, such people do not believe in the democratic process." More word magic. The "democratic process," referred to is likely to be synonymous with Electoral Politics, and if so then that process is not democratic, it is oligarchical, which is the opposite of democratic: counter-feit. At the time of 1774 the Nations that formed the Voluntary Association for Mutual Defense (confederation of nations: federation) in response to British Aggression (attempting to enslave Americans and make Americans pay for their own slavery: Subsidized Slavery) and those people governing themselves voluntarily defeated British Aggression by Military Means. During the peace, while Americans (including Indian Nations, and including Irish and African Slaves) were recovering from a long costly war, British Aggression continued covertly. The result of that situation where Americans were weak, defenseless, powerless, against Covert Aggression, the Liberty they won was lost by Legal Fiction (word magic). The common law counties that formed into common law Nations that were united into a Defensive Federation were then Consolidated into one Corporate Nation-State Monopoly of Power and Profit in 1789. It has been Subsidized Slavery ever since for those who know it as well as those who are fooled by it.
An alternative history to today's narrative of slavery being the foundation of America.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 1, 2020:
Off to a bad start: "What’s true at the personal level is true at the national. What well-meaning liberals do not seem to realise these days is that democracies thrive or fail on the basis of national stories. This is doubly so in republics like the US, where there is no apolitical figurehead to unite people in place of a monarch." Peaceful co-existence with the Indians (first people, whatever) and the end of both Irish and African Slavery was inevitable under the Federal peaceful co-existence and common law BEFORE the Slave Traders, Warmongers, Central Banking Frauds, and assorted other Loyalists for Empire took over in 1789, removing the federal agreement and replacing it with a National Corporate Legal Fiction above the common law, and above the people, ensuring free reign of the genocidal, homicidal, reign of horror and terror of criminals counterfeiting governments. It (American government) was not a democracy, it was many competitive forms of government ranging from absolute dictatorships (Puritan Massachusetts) to anarchy in all but common law (Quaker Pennsylvania), and everything in between in many counties and 13 States at the time of the revolutionary period (1774 to 1789). A few counties, but growing numbers of counties, were moving toward common law principles, where the people govern themselves (democratic, but not "democracies") in republican (of, by, and for The People, Res-publica, the public thing) governments. States where cabals (religious, commercial, criminal, English loyalist) controlled the government (Massachusetts) by criminal means (see: Shays's Rebellion) were not by definition republics (they were for the cabal, not for the people) nor were they democratic (again, not government of, by, or for the people). If Massachusetts Tyranny was deserving of a name other than a Criminal Government it would be a Nation-State Corporate Government, of, by, and for the members of the Incorporated Nation-State. The word magic works on a subconscious level until individuals regain control of their moral conscience and look deep into the workings of meanings of words in context.
I knew it!!
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 30, 2020:
Got it, thanks.
How is it decided if posts show up in trending?
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 30, 2020:
That question could be answered, in theory.
L. Lin Wood preparing lawsuit against Joe Biden. [thegatewaypundit.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 30, 2020:
A return to rule of law one step at a time? "Formal demand for public retraction is being prepared for Biden/Harris Campaign on behalf of Kyle Rittenhouse." Hope is elusive, not extinct.
“Books can be immensely powerful.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 30, 2020:
Common to all Political Criminals is Central Banking Fraud and the Extortion required to create the demand for the counterfeit money. That fact matters. Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution: https://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_the_bolshevik_revolution-5.pdf Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler: http://aaargh.vho.org/fran/livres5/suttonhitler.pdf Wall Street and FDR: https://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_FDR-3.pdf The tactic (Hegelian Dialectic) is explained well in the Novel 1984 by George Orwell.
F-35 pilots think it's the best fighter in the sky [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 29, 2020:
Things are going autonomous, so the age of human operated Fighter Planes is going. If anyone has any interest in Fighter Combat, then consider reading BOYD: https://www.amazon.com/Boyd-Fighter-Pilot-Who-Changed/dp/0316796883 If you get the book, read it, and are unsatisfied, I would like to know how that can happen, presuming that you are interested in Fighter Combat. One additional book, on the subject of Fighter Combat, is here: https://www.amazon.com/Fighter-Combat-Maneuvering-Robert-Shaw/dp/0870210599
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 28, 2020:
"Allow me to explain the impact of a false positive rate of 0.8% on Pillar 2. We return to our 10,000 people who’ve volunteered to get tested, and the expected ten with virus (0.1% prevalence or 1:1000) have been identified by the PCR test. But now we’ve to calculate how many false positives are to accompanying them. The shocking answer is 80. 80 is 0.8% of 10,000. That’s how many false positives you’d get every time you were to use a Pillar 2 test on a group of that size. "The effect of this is, in this example, where 10,000 people have been tested in Pillar 2, could be summarised in a headline like this: “90 new cases were identified today” (10 real positive cases and 80 false positives). But we know this is wildly incorrect. Unknown to the poor technician, there were in this example, only 10 real cases. 80 did not even have a piece of viral RNA in their sample. They are really false positives. "I’m going to explain how bad this is another way, back to diagnostics. If you’d submitted to a test and it was positive, you’d expect the doctor to tell you that you had a disease, whatever it was testing for. Usually, though, they’ll answer a slightly different question: “If the patient is positive in this test, what is the probability they have the disease?” Typically, for a good diagnostic test, the doctor will be able to say something like 95% and you and they can live with that. You might take a different, confirmatory test, if the result was very serious, like cancer. But in our Pillar 2 example, what is the probability a person testing positive in Pillar 2 actually has COVID-19? The awful answer is 11% (10 divided by 80 + 10). The test exaggerates the number of covid-19 cases by almost ten-fold (90 divided by 10). Scared yet? That daily picture they show you, with the ‘cases’ climbing up on the right-hand side? Its horribly exaggerated. Its not a mistake, as I shall show." Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives 20 September 2020 by Dr Michael Yeadon
What is currently happening in Our Country?? Our Elites push this and what do we call it?
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 24, 2020:
When pedos groom their victims so as to convince their victims that slavery is good, being used by the pedo is acceptable, that being consumed by a criminal is desired, that anyone daring to question the order to accept domination by criminals is wrong, that it is right to force other people to join the cult of victimization, the process is called grooming. When pedos with badges do it, it is called Public School. "The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto “Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.” “The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.” “How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.” "What is currently happening in Our Country?" Without law it is not "our Country". Without law it is a place where the criminals dominate and consume victims. "Our Elites push this and what do we call it?" You have Elites? Why do you automatically force your "Elites" upon me with your half-truths, outright lies, distortions, and falsehoods? Criminals who groom the public through indoctrination centers paid for by the victims are not my "Elites," even if you repeat it a thousand times, and even if a lot of people also repeat the same falsehoods: (so-called Majority Rules). "What would we call this Antifa/BLM rioting everytime they dont get a court case their way"? When a criminal injures an innocent victim (brainwashing, controlling, enslaving, deceiving, threatening, etc.) it is called a CAUSE to act in defense of the victim. A cause to act at law involves some steps that have been perfected over thousands of years in a form known as The Ancient Law, also known as the common law, also known as the law of the land, and this form derived from a CAUSE to act in defense of victims remains to be the law of the land in America as I type this response. When a criminal in a government office perpetrates a crime there are formal names for those crimes such as: Non-feasance (failure to do the job according to the job description, such as "defend the innocent from the guilty")...
Actually, this technology has been around for many years.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 23, 2020:
Robots and Drones Agenda 2030? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_htkFok_0cs
The history of US Service Rifles- [ammoland.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 22, 2020:
Please consider the following book: Unintended Consequences by John Ross (Wow, and I loaned out my copy!) https://www.thriftbooks.com/w/unintended-consequences_john--ross/248969/?mkwid=heYWuUrg|dc=77240706869719=thriftbooks=bb====1235851098199146=dat-77240712317549:loc-190=bing=cpc=Search%20%7C%20Dynamic%20Search%20Ad%20Test=thriftbooks=heYWuUrg|dc|pcrid|77240706869719|pkw|thriftbooks|pmt|bb|product||slid||pgrid|1235851098199146|ptaid|dat-77240712317549:loc-190|#isbn=1888118040=1277836
Let me Let me know what you think of the website. [keksarmy.]
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 22, 2020:
Looks good, good luck with it.
[djhjmedia.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 22, 2020:
My mind goes in gear to search for trial transcripts having to do with at least one of the high level industry leaders busted for what I know to be Subsidized Slavery. How does one go about searching for such a case? Just the FACT that one has to search confesses the FACT that those in POWER are behind it. I'll go through the motions to search for that which does not exist, so as to put yet another stamp on the letter of indictment: where is the law? I typed in my search: Human Trafficking Trial Transcripts Nothing is published on the first page that indicates any high level Human Trafficking Industry Leader prosecuted by law (actual law, not kangaroo court law "pleadings"). I found this: Human trafficking crime https://www.britannica.com/topic/human-trafficking "Human trafficking, also called trafficking in persons, form of modern-day slavery involving the illegal transport of individuals by force or deception for the purpose of labour, sexual exploitation, or activities in which others benefit financially. Human trafficking is a global problem affecting people of all ages. It is estimated that approximately 1,000,000 people are trafficked each year globally and that between 20,000 and 50,000 are trafficked into the United States, which is one of the largest destinations for victims of the sex-trafficking trade." AND "Recognizing the inadequacy of then-existing laws, the U.S. Congress passed the first comprehensive federal legislation specifically addressing human trafficking, the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA). The primary goal of the TVPA is to provide protection and assistance to trafficking victims, to encourage international response, and to provide assistance to foreign countries in drafting antitrafficking programs and legislation. The TVPA seeks to successfully combat human trafficking by employing a three-pronged strategy: prosecution, protection, and prevention. Many federal agencies are given the oversight of human trafficking, including the Departments of Justice, Homeland Security, Health and Human Services, and Labor and the U.S. Agency for International Development. The primary U.S. agency charged with monitoring human trafficking is the State Department’s Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons (also called the trafficking office)." One victim at law would have at least one private prosecutor before one independent grand jury member. That would then lead to a formation of an independent grand jury. No one involves the government as yet. The independent grand jury then hires people, such as a constable, to issue a subpoena if information is not voluntarily transferred to the formed grand jury which is a common law power, a common law jurisdictional power both ...
I'm okay with this, how bout you?
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 22, 2020:
Excellent, thanks!
[articles.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 22, 2020:
"Governments have given pharmaceutical companies a liability shield from lawsuits when COVID-19 vaccines injure or kill people. The hard sell is on, but a lot of people are NOT buying it. Every poll taken this year has revealed that between 40% and 70% of people living in the U.S. and Europe do not plan to get a COVID-19 vaccine when it is licensed." The crime scene known fraudulently as a Global Pandemic is a step toward full compliance, or absolute dictatorship, whereby the percentage of disobedient to obedient is as small as is inhumanly possible. It is not a Conspiracy Theory to report on the nature of immorality embodied in a rapidly growing number of inhuman beings infecting this species, and turning this species into a self-exterminating lifeless form. The law goes one way, crime goes the opposite way. The law is for each to do unto each other as each would have others do to self. Self-promoting, self-adapting, self-educating, self-defending, self-producing, self-governing, but not selfish: the law applies to all equally or the alternative is chosen by individual SELVES. Crime is for each to do unto each other that which each would defend against having others do to self. One glue binding people together (the law) goes toward prosperity, higher quality life, at lower cost, adaptively, so it is self-sustaining on a species level, with no boundaries to future prosperity on other planets. The other glue binding people together (crime) goes rapidly toward lower quality of life at higher cost as power moves from each individual fighting to make ends meet has their power stolen and used to steal more, until no one is left able to produce anything of value, and the ship in this state sinks on a predictable schedule. Facts like those above matter, and if the facts just reported above are useful for those glued into either side of that power struggle between liberty and absolute despotism (everyone is eventually made into a criminal), then what will those facts do for either individuals on either side? The despotic (criminal) side will not allow, cannot allow, the victims to know these facts, for if the victims do know these facts, the power struggle swings in favor of the liberators, the defenders, the producers, the individuals on the moral side, the side bound by the law. A case in point is the Notice of Liability, which is based upon the same concept that drove the writing of a Declaration of Independence, which is a Notice of Mixed War, which is a Commercial Lien and Military Lien Right. History shows: "That the question was not whether, by a declaration of independence, we should make ourselves what we are not; but whether we should declare a fact which already exists: That, as to the people or ...
“Like the Critical Theory of the Frankfurt School, postmodernism seeks to institutionalize ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 21, 2020:
"When asked what can change this: Rebellion! Rebellion by the grad students. This is what I'm trying to foment. We absolutely need someone to stand up and start criticizing authority figures. But no; this generation of young people have been trained throughout middle school and high school and college to be subservient to authority." A familiar bit of inculpatory evidence.
Loneliness can be a deadly mental health injury. Schedule yourself to be with good people everyday.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 20, 2020:
If you sell your soul for profit, what do you think will be your company in bed?
I gotta say Tim is right.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 20, 2020:
I tell Private Prosecutors to Consider Charging Serial Infringers of Natural Rights With Treason. All the Unemployed then have a Job that Drains the Swamp and Stimulates the Economy.
Garbage in, garbage out.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 19, 2020:
"But woe to that nation whose literature is disturbed by the intervention of power. Because that is not just a violation against “freedom of print”, it is the closing down of the heart of the nation, a slashing to pieces of its memory. The nation ceases to be mindful of itself, it is deprived of its spiritual unity, and despite a supposedly common language, compatriots suddenly cease to understand one another. Silent generations grow old and die without ever having talked about themselves, either to each other or to their descendants. When writers such as Achmatova and Zamjatin – interred alive throughout their lives – are condemned to create in silence until they die, never hearing the echo of their written words, then that is not only their personal tragedy, but a sorrow to the whole nation, a danger to the whole nation." Alexandr I Solzhenitsyn I'd like to point out that an abundance of accurate information is one thing, and another thing is an abundance of inaccurate information. “But this wealth of information produced little or no insight.” ― Stephen King, The Gunslinger Who decides what is information and instead what is misinformation, and how does one get the information necessary to then gain the power to know how to discriminate, segregate, divorce, nullify, remove, censor, extract, set aside, avoid, ignore, defend against, insure against loss associated with the risks of contacting and being subjected to, falsehood that infects GOOD information? And in the naked light I saw Ten thousand people, maybe more. People talking without speaking, People hearing without listening, People writing songs that voices never share And no one dared Disturb the sound of silence. Simon Paul
“I prefer the company of peasants because they have not been educated sufficiently to reason ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 19, 2020:
Excellent, thanks.
Multiculturalism in Australia (and the rest of the world) Same criticism and same problems the ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 18, 2020:
"I advocate multiculturalism as a way of combating racism and prejudice, therefore, if you criticise multiculturalism you are guilty of racism and/or harbouring prejudice." If that is one way of defining multiculturalism, then it looks like deception, or fraud, or treason, depending up on the source and situation in which the defining of multiculturalism is so defined. As to what the author thinks a republic is, or a federation, I'm curious, so I'll ask. How do you define the terms you use in the piece above? What is a Federal association? What is a republic?
yes they are!
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 18, 2020:
The funny thing includes the fact that comedians don't have to make this shit up, it is...
[summit.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 18, 2020:
In America is it routine for those in power to execute those deemed by them as disobedient, or merely troublesome. What does Law have to do with it?
We diverged from the topic of philosophies relationship to psychology to discuss maturity and ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 18, 2020:
"Who feeds the Buddha?" Perhaps there is a problem associated with false information being allowed to infect individual minds, as in the saying "garbage in: garbage out." Who fed the Buddha all that bullshit?
When a word has more than one meaning. 😂
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 17, 2020:
You are on a roll, or I'm just now caught in the stream.
A Constitution Day primer on the Second Amendment- [bearingarms.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 17, 2020:
The first thing one ought to know is that the "federalists" were not "federalists," they were nationalists. The reason why this is the first thing one ought to know is the fact that this false flag of "federalism' flown by the nationalists constitutes an obvious fraud, a use of deception by willful deceivers, and fraud at this level is treason. George Mason (credited with the Bill of Rights amendments, although it was not his writing) refused to sign the National (corporate) Constitution of 1787, and he was very specific about his opposition to that (criminal) document. Madison was one of the treasonous Nationalists (falsely claiming to be federalists) up until Nationalism led to The Alien and Sedition Acts under the Adams (criminal) regime, then Madison turns his coat from Nationalists (not federalist) to Democratic Republican (still not anti-federalist, but the group opposing nationalism which was then called Consolidation by way of Construction) along with Jefferson, as documented with the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. So Madison may have been one of the useful idiots at the time if the usurpation in 1787 through 1789, but when the true nature of the nationalists (Marxists/Communists by todays terminology) agenda came to light, Madison had to face reality. I've studied this some, certainly not exhaustively, and if anyone has any doubts at all as to what is reported above, then I can point to sources and quotes for confirmation. A true test for any of these controversial topics is the Golden Rule, if is claimed to be good for the goose, then why is it no longer good for the gander?
My holiday plan rapidly shrinking in my head. 😂
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 17, 2020:
Keeper!
COVID-19 is a serious disease just as the flu is a serious disease.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 17, 2020:
I think you are right about that. https://ise.media/video/plandemic-ii-indoctornation-23.html
In another thread [slug.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 17, 2020:
I'm going to pick out one sentence that will then launch my reply. "The only area it has not penetrated is theology but religion is in sharp decline. Consciously or unconsciously the cause and effect paradigm of determinism has undermined traditional ideas of individual responsibility." I think that art, gambling, sports, and most certainly economy prove otherwise. The use of "only" to me is part of the dogma that leads to demoralization. To explain what I mean I have to build from a solid foundation first: 1. The only irrefutable fact, an absolute fact, is that perception exists a. Every effort to disprove the only, absolute, irrefutable fact, proves it, in fact. b. No known alternative can be perceived without perceiving it. c. etc. 2. Life is good or life is not good 3. If life is not good, life does not exist for long 4. In order to perceive a way in which life (which is good) can continue to exist, life must adapt to every need required in order for life to continue to exist, which leads to the idea of POWER 5. If POWER exists (a perception) and it either does exist continually or it eventually no longer exists, including the POWER to perceive that life is good, then it can be perceived that there is a POWER STRUGGLE, and it can be worded in many ways so as to inform life forms other than ONE perceptive life form perceiving the POWER STRUGGLE. So, with that in mind, the POWER STRUGGLE can be worded as Entropy vs Ectropy, explained as: Entropy is the POWER that returns all perceptive matter to the simplest form (which would eventually be only perception, and then nothing at all anywhere anytime anyplace) and opposing Entropy is the POWER that forces perception into greater things, more things, other than perception, such as, for example, a Big Bang, or less complicated forms, such as a Hydrogen Atom. Somehow the ectropic force (POWER) forces additional things into being, making things more complicated, more organized, and more livable, lovable, better, eventually reaching to a point at which a perceiver (or the only perceiver which is you) can perceive a Song, which is beautiful, and which inspires the perceiver not only to live, but to reproduce, to adapt, to make life more complex, more organized, better, and worth living, sustaining, etc. So, with that in mind, as far as one, single, monopoly, perceiver of one individual living being is concerned, you if you are the only one in a dream where everyone else is pure imagination, or you as one of many perceivers - as far as you are concerned - life will either go from less to more organized, less to more complex, or life will go the other direction and if you can't do anything about it (free will) then test your POWER to do so. Stop ...
“Judge a man by his questions rather than by his answers” Voltaire
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 17, 2020:
Was there a question asked?
This man brings Elegance to economics
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 17, 2020:
That quote spells out the essence of the Power Struggle between Organized Crime hidden behind every possible false front AND free, independent, creative, adaptive, productive, sustainable, reproductive, peaceful, competitive, people in the Liberty they maintain. Group A (the original life sustaining, reproducing, adapting, productive, expanding) is born naturally free to remain in Group A, or be somehow inspired to move into Group B. Group B (the group formed to reach the goal of eating Group A alive) is the criminal group that works as does every other virus in nature: parasitically. This is not news, but it is no longer common knowledge, because Group B in America since 1789 has grown from a relatively small Group of criminals to a very large Group of criminal parasites, and the parasites have learned very well how to grow exponentially. The criminal parasitic group, for example, must take-over and control the flow of information, such as the information offered by Thomas Sowell above, and that information (which is factually true, and leads to wisdom and right action) must be replaced with false information from birth. Example: "A Parasite City. "Suppose 5,000 men to own $30,000 each; suppose these men to move, with their families, to some desolate place in the state, where there is no opportunity for the profitable pursuit of the occupations either of commerce, agriculture, or manufacturing! The united capital of these 5,000 men would be $150,000,000. Suppose, now, this capital to be safely invested in different parts of the state; suppose these men to be, each of them, heads of families, comprising, on an average, five persons each this would give us, in all, 25,000 individuals. A servant to each family would give us 5,000 persons more, and these added to the above number would give us 30,000 in all. Suppose, now, that 5,000 mechanics—shoemakers, bakers, butchers, etc.—should settle with their families in the neighborhood of these capitalists, in order to avail themselves of their custom. Allowing five to a family, as before, we have 25,000 to add to the above number. We have, therefore, in all, a city of 55,000 individuals, established in the most desolate part of the state. The people in the rest of the state would have to pay to the capitalists of this city six per cent on $150,000,000 every year; for these capitalists have, by the supposition, this amount out at interest on bond and mortgage, or other wise. The yearly interest on $150,000,000, at six per cent, is- $9,000,000. These wealthy individuals may do no useful work whatever, and, nevertheless, they levy a tax of $9,000,000 per annum on the industry of the state. The tax would be paid in this way. Some money would be brought to the new city, and much...
The bureaucracy isn’t interested in successful treatments.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 17, 2020:
"The bureaucracy isn’t interested in successful treatments." Specific criminals enforce criminal solutions to the problems the criminals create. A criminal (organized) Monopoly cannot exist under competitive (free) markets, including government of every kind, military, economic, medical, science, entertainment, etc. Look up The War on Quackery, see the pattern clearly.
I have now been unable to edit or delete posts for two weeks.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 17, 2020:
I've had a problem with the edit part of the [=] window being cut-off on new posts, but I can get that window opened if I start a reply to my own post that won't allow the edit part to show in the window. Lower left corner of a comment is Reply with a left arrow, then [=] or "ediit?" and then Like "thumbs up," and I can't edit when the "edit" window is cut-off, not fully shown, unless I start a reply and then reopen the [=] "Edit" window. I have not yet had to deal with a can't comment (unless exiled from the group) problem. I am not editing, so that works for me. What about starting a new Group, such as Web Problems, and start off with a description of the 2 week (so far) problem, and I'll join and put in my own additional problem? You can update as needed I assume, with new posts, since you can't comment.
Blues travelers' song hook is the most brilliant song in pop music history...Fight me! [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 16, 2020:
"Hook" It doesn't matter what I say So long as I sing with inflection That makes you feel I'll convey Some inner truth or vast reflection But I've said nothing so far And I can keep it up for as long as it takes And it don't matter who you are If I'm doing my job then it's your resolve that breaks Because the Hook brings you back I ain't tellin' you no lie The Hook brings you back On that you can rely There is something amiss I am being insincere In fact I don't mean any of this Still my confession draws you near To confuse the issue I refer To familiar heroes from long ago No matter how much Peter loved her What made the Pan refuse to grow Was that the Hook brings you back I ain't tellin' you no lie The Hook brings you back On that you can rely Suck it in suck it in suck it in If you're Rin Tin Tin or Anne Boleyn Make a desperate move or else you'll win And then begin To see What you're doing to me this MTV is not for free It's so PC it's killing me So desperately I sing to thee Of love Sure but also of rage and hate and pain and fear of self And I can't keep these feelings on the shelf I've tried well no in fact I lied Could be financial suicide but I've got too much pride inside To hide or slide I'll do as I'll decide and let it ride until I've died And only then shall I abide this tide Of catchy little tunes Of hip three minute ditties I wanna bust all your balloons I wanna burn all your cities to the ground I've found I will not mess around Unless I play then hey I will go on all day. Hear what I say I have a prayer to pray That's really all this was And when I'm feeling stuck and need a buck I don't rely on luck because The Hook brings you back I ain't tellin' you no lie The Hook... On that you can rely
His first dad joke. 🤣
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 16, 2020:
Thanks.
NYPost: Sudden end to Lancaster riots.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 16, 2020:
This is the magic force of free markets. If all people in all places were made to act all the same way in all situations, as if being controlled by a HIVE mind, or Dictatorial Monopoly Power, or Single Nation-State Authority, then there would be no differences to account for as some people are obviously causing the problems they claim to be fixing, while other people are at least attempting to fix some of the symptoms, and yet other people are actually finding the causes of the problems so as then to find how best to fix those specific causes of those specific problems. Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy by William Watkins "Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right. "Experimentation in policymaking also encourages a healthy competition among units of government and allows the people to vote with their feet should they find a law of policy detrimental to their interests. Using again the state-run health system as an example, if a citizen of Tennessee was unhappy with Tennessee's meddling with the provisions of health care, the citizen could move to a neighboring state. Reallocation to a state like North Carolina, with a similar culture and climate, would not be a dramatic shift and would be a viable option. Moreover, if enough citizens exercised this option, Tennessee would be pressured to abandon its foray into socialized medicine, or else lose much of its tax base. To escape a national health system, a citizen would have to emigrate to a foreign country, an option far less appealing and less likely to be exercised than moving to a neighboring state. Without competition from other units of government, the national government would have much less incentive than Tennessee would to modify the objectionable policy. Clearly, the absence of experimentation and competition hampers the creation of effective programs and makes the modification of failed national programs less likely." That was an obvious (to some people) example ...
Monopoly of Power and Profit is diametrically opposed to freedom (to compete) in liberty (free ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 15, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9z87viDmOo Hello darkness, my old friend, I've come to talk with you again, Because a vision softly creeping, Left its seeds while I was sleeping, And the vision that was planted in my brain Still remains Within the sound of silence. In restless dreams I walked alone Narrow streets of cobblestone, 'Neath the halo of a street lamp, I turned my collar to the cold and damp When my eyes were stabbed by the flash of a neon light That split the night And touched the sound of silence. And in the naked light I saw Ten thousand people, maybe more. People talking without speaking, People hearing without listening, People writing songs that voices never share And no one dared Disturb the sound of silence. "Fools," said I, "You do not know. Silence like a cancer grows. Hear my words that I might teach you. Take my arms that I might reach you." But my words like silent raindrops fell And echoed in the wells of silence And the people bowed and prayed To the neon god they made. And the sign flashed out its warning In the words that it was forming. And the sign said, "The words of the prophets are written on the subway walls And tenement halls And whispered in the sounds of silence.
Get some perspective...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 15, 2020:
Cat responds: "I can get food from 5 other families nearby, how about you?"
Just thought I'd post this here for the edification of those in need. Are you confused yet?
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 15, 2020:
"It must be noted that the first question must be answered or the socialists may not even know they are socialists." Marx was working the criminal trade of deception at about the time Americans were going in the other direction. Cases in point: "Protestants and Protestant churches may differ in relation to every other article of their creed, and do so differ, without ceasing to be Protestants, so long as they assert the paramount right of private or individual judgment in matters of conscience. It is that, and that only, which makes them Protestants, and distinguishes them from the Catholic world, which asserts, on the contrary, the supreme authority of the church, of the priesthood, or of some dignitary or institution other than the Individual whose judgment and whose conscience is in question. In like manner, Democrats and Democratic governments and institutions may differ from each other, and may very infinitely at different periods of time, and still remain Democratic, so long as they maintain the one essential principle and condition of Democracy, - namely, that all governmental powers reside in, are only delegated by, and can be, at any moment, resumed by the people, - that is, by the individuals, who are first Individuals, and who then, by virtue only of the act of delegating such powers, become a people, - that is, a combined mass of Individulas. It is this dogma, and this alone, which makes the Democrat, and which distinguishes him from Despotist, or defender of the divine right of kings. “Again, Socialism assumes every shade and variety of opinion respecting the modes of realizing its own aspirations, and, indeed, upon every other point, except one, which, when investigated, will be found to be the paramount rights of the Individual over the social institutions, and the consequent demand that all existing social institutions shall be so modified that the Individual shall be in no manner subjected to them. This, then, is the identical principle of Protestantism and Democracy carried into its application in another sphere. The celebrated formula of Fourier that “destinies are proportioned to attractions,” means, when translated into less technical phraseology, that society must be so reorganized that every man may be a law unto himself, paramount to all other human laws, and the sole judge for himself of the divine law and of the requisitions of his own Individual nature and organization. This is equally the fundamental principle of all the social theories, except in the case of the Shakers, the Rappites, etc., which are based upon religious whims, demanding submission, as a matter of duty, to a despotic rule, and which embody, in another form the readoption of the pops or conservative principle. They, therefore, while ...
I am very concerned that if Durham indicts a bunch of the people we have been hoping get indicted, ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 15, 2020:
Kangaroo Courts are what they are, but if the idea is to return to Rule of Law instead, then what The People do to Police their Government isn't accountable as something done BY THE GOVERNMENT. This line of thinking (blame Trump for holding criminals to account) is BASSAKWARDS. So...who would have thought that life could become so very close to the 1984 Novel Virus? "The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto “Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.” “The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.” “How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.” It may be time to question such "authority."
“Caution in handling generally accepted opinions that claim to explain whole trends of history is ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 15, 2020:
"Few ideologies have won enough prominence to survive the hard competitive struggle of persuasion, and only two have come out on top and essentially defeated all others: the ideology which interprets history as an economic struggle of classes, and the other that interprets history as a natural fight of races." I see no reason to go any further than that dubious claim. Why would someone make such a dubious claim, let alone repeat it? Is there something in the rest of the message that is worth the cost of reading it?
I wonder what the next global crisis will be, to serve as yet another distraction from what is ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 13, 2020:
Round 2 Cornholio Sickness? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCjMIKHwWas
"Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko said last month via Belarusian Telegraph Agency, BelTA.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 13, 2020:
Criminals extort, that is their business. Economic Hitman Makes a Confession About America’s Biggest Threat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLc3ehhPIKA
If only there were more people in academia who thought like TS.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 12, 2020:
"Responsibility must be individual, or there is no responsibility at all." Equitable Commerce by Josiah Warren, 1852
“The taxpayers are sending congressmen on expensive trips abroad.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 12, 2020:
Free Money!
Regarding Mr. Floyd.... discuss.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 10, 2020:
Amazing.
You need to keep what you know now and refuse to change no matter what the deep state puts out as ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 10, 2020:
No time to view it yet, but thanks for the news item. Edit: Started perusing the video and immediately I am inspired to relink Shadow Gate (even Alex Jones is censoring it): https://cetv.one/programs/shadowgate-documentary-millie-weaver-released-just-before-being-arrestedmp4-37efc5
Oregon Democratic House Speaker's legislative director arrested over Portland riots- ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 10, 2020:
My guess is that there are very good reasons (and very evil ones) for not allowing a Court of Law to process these "arrested" people who are what? Presumed to be guilty? The trial is supposed to determine guilt, not pay the presumed to be guilty people some sort of "deal" to then allow them, and whoever hires them, to continue running amok in the playground.
Wanting to get as many tales as possible I am posting this in multiple categories, hope you don't ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 10, 2020:
I have not been refused service and I would opt out if I knew in advance that there would be an assault upon me for failing to obey the order to pay without cash (Federal Reserve Counterfeit Money, or debased coins, or actual coins that are a worth a lot more than the debased rate). Choose your battles?
What arguments may help progressives moderate or change their views?
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 10, 2020:
I've been moderating (discussing possible truths with those who want to know better from worse) with progressives since at least 1980 or so... That is 40 years of experience. "One example is that progressives think that Conservatives don't care about the poor while the fact is they donate more to charity than liberals. Can you think of other examples?" Progressives include individuals who belong in the following categories: 1. False propagandists (who intend to deceive so as to harm: frauds) a. Paid false propagandists b. Pro-bono false propagandists 2. Brainwashed (Indoctrinated purposefully in Public Schools by Group 1a) a. They are taught to spread false propaganda and they are taught not to question false propaganda and they are strictly obedient (see: Gulag Archipelago by Alexander I. Solzhenitsyn) b. They still question their brainwashing, they are not strictly obedient 3. Curious people having connected to false propaganda and are as yet not connected to alternative narratives that are not intentionally false a. They are eager to spread false propaganda because that is all they know so far b. They already question the false propaganda naturally, internally, as too much of it is self-evidently self-contradictory. All of the above applies equally to "Conservatives," so an example worthy pointing out to those whose minds are not turned off internally by brainwashing is the process known by many words such as The Hegelian Dialectic, or Divide and Conquer. When people see that there are many other people other than the 2 sides of the 2 Party Politics Con Game, they are then sometimes willing to investigate why people are not party to the 2 Party Political Con Game.
I've seen posts in various places about how people have tried to wake their friends and/or family up...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 9, 2020:
Things worth consideration on this topic include: "The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto “Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.” “The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.” “How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.” Combine that (brainwashing, mind-control, false propaganda, criminal dumbing down of a population) with the following words of wisdom: "There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance—that principle is contempt prior to investigation." Individuals from birth are targeted and their internal authority is purposefully turned off, and an analogy here is a VIRUS or a Trojan Horse. The aggressive attacker slips past the gate (internal bullshit detector) and turns off the hosts defenses, then the host is filled with falsehood. Blind Belief in Falsehood Without Question. The only hope for the infected is an internal spark that asks the first question relevant to the infliction: Who is THE authority over my own thoughts? The WRONG answer is supplied by the VIRUS. "Who is in control of my thoughts?" "I am." If the answer is the RIGHT answer (internal bullshit detector turned back on), then the following scenario begins to play out once again: "Who is really in control of my thoughts right now?" "Am I?"
How are you doing under Covid lockdown?
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 9, 2020:
From a link below: _______________________________________ The report in question has the bland title, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.” It was published in May 2010 in cooperation with the Global Business Network of futurologist Peter Schwartz. The report contains various futurist scenarios developed by Schwartz and company. One scenario carries the intriguing title, “LOCK STEP: A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.” Here it gets interesting as in what some term predictive programming. The Schwartz scenario states, “In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months…” He continues, “The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.” This sounds eerily familiar. Then the scenario gets very interesting: “During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.” ___________________________________ https://behind-the-news.com/operation-lock-step-the-sinister-agenda-behind-covid-19/
What is the best soundtrack to the clip that has been going around recently of the antifa dancing ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 8, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZD8YPY8RBQc
Biden will NOT debate Trump.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 8, 2020:
Biden can NOT speak intelligibly on his own, so...
"Stand your ground" is legalized murder?
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 8, 2020:
"Of course, we all know that to be complete nonsense." Voir dire? It may be worth pointing out that criminals are among us, and they may sometimes make their way into positions in government AND positions in law: private prosecutors, independent grand jurors, and independent trial jurors. Keeping the criminals out of government can't (obviously) be a job trusted to the government, so...
How are you doing under Covid lockdown?
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 8, 2020:
"It" is a well documented treasonous crime in progress, complete with confessions. "It" will last as long as the victims of "it" allow "it" to continue at will, without a proper, lawful, legal, constitutional, moral, defense against those who are perpetrating "it." I'm not locked down, never was, so...
CNN strikes again.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 7, 2020:
Conspiracy Theory
Obviously having no police is insane.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 6, 2020:
An enforced monopoly on "protection" is called extortion. "Qui non prohibet cum potest, jubet: That man abets an evil, who prevents it not, when it is in his power. Nec caret scrupulo sosietatis occultae qui evidenter facinori definit obviare: nor can he escape the suspicion of being a secret accomplice, who evidently declines the prevention of an atrocious crime." Englishman’s Right: A Dialogue between a Barrister at Law and a Juryman, John Hawles, 1763 The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots Page 40 Private Prosecutors "For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action. Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, however, private prosecutors were prohibited from withdrawing the action pursuant to private agreement with the defendant. Court intervention was occasionally required to compel injured crime victims to appear against offenders in court and "not to make bargains to allow [defendants] to escape conviction, if they...repair the injury." Page 42 Law Enforcement as a Universal Duty "Law enforcement in the Founders' time was a duty of every citizen. Citizens were expected to be armed and equipped to chase suspects on foot, on horse, or with wagon whenever summoned. And when called upon to enforce the laws of the state, citizens were to respond "not faintly ...
Are you concerned that there will be a coup if Trump wins?
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 6, 2020:
Not all coup d'état attempts are successful. In some cases the criminals have already overplayed their Con Game and each new deception, threat, or aggressive attack is a plainly, self-evident, confession of guilt traceable to the perpetrators in fact. They dig their own graves, they jump in, after a long pull on a bottle of cool-aid, and the ship they built sinks, dragging all their cult members down with them. Bon voyage!
I think this is a good, drastic move.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 6, 2020:
Statism is a Secular Religion complete with the required cult membership.
Our efforts seem to be misplaced.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 6, 2020:
Criminal Governments (those individuals who invest in them) kill the most by a long margin.
For all the conspiracy theorists.....
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 6, 2020:
If an answer is offered, will the demand for an answer be supplied? Exhibit A: "There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance—that principle is contempt prior to investigation." Exhibit B: "The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto “Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.” “The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.” “How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.” Exhibit C: WE ARE BEING PLAYED. PLEASE READ. https://www.gracevanberkum.com/post/we-are-being-played-please-read?fbclid=IwAR20lvlx8xq2QRtQ4SlgagTS5VuMgk1Y8NYyTjbuPWO33pqCbT0wOkEw4bo No, ONE MONOPOLY DICTATOR at ONE MONOPOLY TABLE during ONE MONOPOLY MEETING did not set in motion every single action by every single human being on Earth, if that is the STUPID and SERVILE question being asked. Criminals, as a rule, do not obey rules. Criminals, as a rule, harm innocent people using deception, threat of aggressive violence, and aggressive violence. Criminals MUST do all that to be Criminals. Criminals don't have to all sit at the same table each day to cooperate when criminals organize. When criminals organize they make victims as their business. When criminals organize they often fight other criminal gangs over their EXCLUSIVE MONOPOLY access to their targeted criminal populations. When criminals make deals, it is called cartelization, as many criminal organizations will form a Cabal, which is a MONOPOLY of POWER and PROFIT. Example: To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine November 15, 1802 "But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property." Example 2: "It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The ...
Common sense for the most
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 5, 2020:
Additional info
Common sense for the most
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 5, 2020:
Thanks.
Joe takes a little time for reflection
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 4, 2020:
Thanks.
Just ancient things.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 3, 2020:
Plato?
(From March 2020) "Joe, why do you think this Virus is not the huge problem it's being promoted ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 3, 2020:
"It's my view that the panic is absolute stupidity." I think that compared to attacking Iran and Afghanistan when triggered to do so by an obvious false flag perpetrated by easy to find perpetrators (follow the money), where those triggered are told that the "highjackers" were "terrorists" from a list that lists people from Saudi Arabia, people found to be alive after the list was published: the current panic is just another example of Mass Marketing. Mass Marketing is the word that fits in the vernacular of those who are triggered, and those who are triggered will be triggered by words such as mind control, brainwashing, or false propaganda. Those who are triggered (with many possible exceptions) follow orders without question. They have been programmed from birth to follow orders without question, and the indoctrination has worked. To speak to them it may be possible to say to them that there is a Mass Marketing effort to sell Vaccines. The problem with that message is that the people who are brainwashed to follow orders have been brainwashed to take vaccines when ordered to do so, doing so without question, therefore there is nothing wrong with Mass Marketing to sell Vaccines. If those who are brainwashed hear words that may suggest to the brainwashed that vaccines harm people, those brainwashed people will be triggered, and you will become (in their eyes) an antivaxer conspiracy theorist, and nothing that you say from then on will be heard, and therefore nothing you say will be acted on by the brainwashed. Zombie movies since the Night of the Living Dead now have current significance. The movie They Live is also currently significant. The book 1984 is our condition of life now. The warnings of the Founding Fathers against the Constitution of 1789 were proven prophetic immediately after the dirty deal was signed, and their warnings continue to haunt those who are not brainwashed. For those not brainwashed, for those who have yet to learn the facts that matter in our current situation, the following is a very good start: "The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto “Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.” “The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.” “How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this ...
When does the freedom of speech go too far?
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 1, 2020:
First: Crowded Theater Phenomenon Data or fists, knives, bullets, bombs, poisons, and lies flowing from individual to individual is easily classified into 3 distinct, separate, and conflicting/opposing categories: 1. Offensive (I do to you what I won't allow you to do to me) = immoral 2. Defensive (I only do to you what I want you to do to me) = moral 3. Neutral (who cares, none of anyone's business, according to them) = amoral The first so-called amendment (a.k.a. free speech) is a right to publish facts that matter in a case where criminals have taken over the defensive government. That is 2 above. That is defensive. That is moral. That is supported by evidence such as: "Hallam says, “The relation established between a lord and his vassal by the feudal tenure, far from containing principles of any servile and implicit obedience, permitted the compact to be dissolved in case of its violation by either party. This extended as much to the sovereign as to inferior lords. If a vassal was aggrieved, and if justice was denied him, he sent a defiance, that is, a renunciation of fealty to the king, and was entitled to enforce redress at the point of his sword. It then became a contest of strength as between two independent potentates, and was terminated by treaty, advantageous or otherwise, according to the fortune of war. * * There remained the original principle, that allegiance depended conditionally upon good treatment, and that an appeal might be lawfully made to arms against an oppressive government. Nor was this, we may be sure, left for extreme necessity, or thought to require a long enduring forbearance. In modern times, a king, compelled by his subjects’ swords to abandon any pretension, would be supposed to have ceased to reign; and the express recognition of such a right as that of insurrection has been justly deemed inconsistent with the majesty of law. But ruder ages had ruder sentiments. Force was necessary to repel force; and men accustomed to see the king’s authority defied by a private riot, were not much shocked when it was resisted in defence of public freedom.” - 3 Middle Ages, 240-2." Lysander Spooner, Essay on The Trial by Jury, 1852 Exhibit A: "... if justice was denied him, he sent a defiance, that is, a renunciation of fealty to..." Next is taken from The First Congress of the United States of America during the deliberation (what jurors do) considering the publication of a Declaration of Independence: "That the question was not whether, by a declaration of independence, we should make ourselves what we are not; but whether we should declare a fact which already exists: That, as to the people or Parliament of England, we had always been independent of them, their restraints on our ...
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 1, 2020:
"Do you think America will be safe under Trump?" I did not watch the video. If people do not have their own bullshit detectors turned on, and they require external sources to "fact check," everything, then the word that seems appropriate to me is: obedient. Take one subject such as the Cornholio Sickness (A.K.A. Covid:19) as an example. How many people never look deeply into the subject matter? They wear masks when told, they fear other people close to them when told, they wait for more orders when uncertain. Here is a link to one of very many sources of information, often conflicting information, but one source of information that offers many links to support the effort to "fact check" the official narrative: https://www.gracevanberkum.com/post/we-are-being-played-please-read?fbclid=IwAR20lvlx8xq2QRtQ4SlgagTS5VuMgk1Y8NYyTjbuPWO33pqCbT0wOkEw4bo I've done my own research within my very limited boundaries, and to me the Cornholio Sickness is a Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud, not merely a hoax, and save yourself the effort if you are triggered into responding something along the lines of "you don't care for all those sick people," or whatever. Whatever is making people sick, with many different symptoms, ranging from an inability for the blood to carry oxygen, to a loss of the sense of smell, from mild cold symptoms, to death causing symptoms that baffle their care providers, that is separate from the campaign to use the emergence of novel symptoms to gain power and profit through destabilization, demoralization, deceit, threat, and aggressive violence upon the innocent, which are crimes, and from the levels the criminals are poised, it is treason. "Do you think America will be safe under Trump?" I could go on to much greater detail just on that one subject, to fact check, compare notes, with any other fact checker, including a host of information detailing the emergence of the "germ theory" (trade marked, limited liability) in direct competition with an alternative scientific conclusion based upon the same test results that spawned the "germ theory" see: http://www.medicinacomplementar.com.br/biblioteca/pdfs/Biomolecular/mb-0464.pdf Louis Pasteur Vs Antoine Béchamp and The Germ Theory of Disease Causation - 1 "Do you think America will be safe under Trump?" That is just one fact checkable subject on the road to either blind obedience to falsehood without question or the many adaptive, competitive, free market, prosperous, moral, loving, caring, peaceful, inventive, creative, useful, productive, sustainable, survivable, alternatives.
This is not humorous and the author would be suspended on Twitter for speaking out.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 1, 2020:
If you are polarized to a point of violence, are you afforded an opportunity to state your case before The Country (The People) in a Court of Law? If those who are polarizing people to a point of violence are also running the Courts, then what?
The Rupublican Party
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 31, 2020:
Those who do so belong in the group of those who do so, those who don't belong don't. Conflating, commingling, confusing, binding, bonding, everyone into one group has many names, but the goal is always the same: deception. A curious divide explained by example: "In June of 1775, George Washington was appointed Major General and elected by Congress to be commander in chief of the American revolutionary forces. Although he took up his tasks energetically, Washington accomplished nothing militarily for the remainder of the year and more, nor did he try. His only campaign in 1775 was internal rather than external; it was directed against the American army as he found it, and was designed to extirpate the spirit of liberty pervading this unusually individualistic and democratic army of militiamen. In short, Washington set out to transform a people's army, uniquely suited for a libertarian revolution, into another orthodox and despotically ruled statist force after the familiar European model. "His primary aim was to crush the individualistic and democratic spirit of the American forces. For one thing, the officers of the militia were elected by their own men, and the discipline of repeated elections kept the officers from forming an aristocratic ruling caste typical of European armies of the period. The officers often drew little more pay than their men, and there were no hierarchical distinctions of rank imposed between officers and men. As a consequence, officers could not enforce their wills coercively on the soldiery. This New England equality horrified Washington's conservative and highly aristocratic soul. "To introduce a hierarchy of ruling caste, Washington insisted on distinctive decorations of dress in accordance with minute gradations of rank. As one observer phrased it: "New lords, new laws. … The strictest government is taking place, and great distinction is made between officers and soldier. Everyone is made to know his place and keep it." Despite the great expense involved, he also tried to stamp out individuality in the army by forcing uniforms upon them; but the scarcity of cloth made this plan unfeasible. "At least as important as distinctions in decoration was the introduction of extensive inequality in pay. Led by Washington and the other aristocratic southern delegates, and over the objections of Massachusetts, the Congress insisted on fixing a pay scale for generals and other officers considerably higher than that of the rank and file. "In addition to imposing a web of hierarchy on the Continental Army, Washington crushed liberty within by replacing individual responsibility by iron despotism and coercion. Severe and brutal punishments were imposed upon those soldiers whose sense of altruism failed to override ...
[youtube.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 30, 2020:
I listened to the whole thing. Chris says something along the lines of the Media not going past a line that would question the Establishment. Juan says something along the lines of those in power delaying the persecution until after the American Presidential Election Psycho (a psychotic cycle, my words). Susie says something along the lines of the Democrats in America not liking Wikileaks because the election was handed to Trump when people found out that the Democrats were Spirit Cooking Devil Worshiping Baby Mass Murderers (my words). So...this group of Media personalities won't go past a line that would question the Establishment, and because they don't they lend those torturing mass murderers support thereby. They, by their ignorance, or by their willful failure to blow the whistle on the Establishment CORE (they are criminals, they are not the government) help in the torture of whistle-blowers like Julain Assange: in my opinon.
Pentagon Releases Terrifying Video Of Russian Su-27 Turning Directly In Front Of A B-52 ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 30, 2020:
Show off.
[youtube.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 30, 2020:
Time 12:53 or so… Assange “...it is up to a court to decide, clearly, whether something is in the end a crime...” No. A crime is defined by the criminal perpetrating the crime, the criminal creates the crime and executes the crime and the victim or victims of the criminal or criminals CONSTITUTE a cause to act in defense of those victims, because failure to do so enriches, empowers, aids, abets, lends support to, emboldens, allows, affords, encourages, and gives more opportunity for more crimes for all criminals, including moral people who are not yet deciding to take what can be taken because no one stops them. A Court of Law places a presumed to be innocent accused before The People for adjudication as to the facts that matter in the DISPUTED case, and The People through their juries can offer convicted criminals a means by which the convicted criminals can return under the umbrella of security maintained by THE PEOPLE through rule of law: deterrence. Turn this: “...it is up to a court to decide, clearly, whether something is in the end a crime...” Turn that back to this: “...it is up to the people as a whole, represented by private prosecutors, defendants, grand jurors, and trial jurors, who decide, clearly, whether something is in the end a crime...” The criminals clearly took over in 1789 in America, they confessed doing so, on the public record, and they have been perpetrating crimes, clearly, since then, and JUST because there are no Courts of Law to hold them to account, PROVES, does not disprove, that the criminals have, clearly, taken over, and they have clearly taken over in America in 1789. What are the Alien and Sedition Acts? What do the following words mean? To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine November 15, 1802 "But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property. It is, therefore, no wonder that the "Rights of Man" was attacked by that faction, and its author continually abused. But let them go on; give them rope enough and they will put an end to their own insignificance. There is too much common sense and independence in America to be long the dupe of any faction, foreign or domestic. "But, in the midst of the freedom we enjoy, the licentiousness of the papers called Federal (and I know not why they are called so, for they are in their principles anti-federal and despotic), is a dishonor to the character of the country, and an injury to its reputation and importance abroad. They represent the whole people of America as destitute of public principle and private manners. "As to any injury they ...
[youtube.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 30, 2020:
Time: 4:40 or so... Julian Assange claims: "...it’s all bankrupt, and the reason it’s all bankrupt, in all current political theories are bankrupt, in particular lines of political thought, is because actually we don’t know what the hell is going on, and until we know the basic structures of our institutions how they operate in practice, these titanic organizations, how they behave inside, not just through stories but through vast amounts of internal documentation, until we know that, how can we possibly make a diagnosis, how can we set the direction to go, until we know where we are, we don’t even have a map of where we are, so our first task is to build up the intellectual heritage that describes where we are, and once we know where we are, then we have a hope of setting a course for a different direction, until then I think all political theories to greater and lesser extents of course are bankrupt.” So...Assange is lost in the wilderness of bankrupt political theories. Is everyone? No. The non-bankrupt political theory is expressed in a Declaration of Independence. What intellectual heritage does a Declaration of Independence come from? It comes from the Ancient Law, the common law, which predates Magna Carta, and therefore it predates each American State Constitution, the common law predates the first and ONLY Federal Constitution called The Articles of Confederation, and the common law (the intellectual heritage that describes where we were) predates the National (it is not federal) Constitution of 1789. The common law PREDATES the Bill of Rights which FAILED to amend the Constitution of 1789. How about a short trip into “vast amounts of internal documentation,” to prove beyond any doubt to a thinking mind that our “intellectual heritage” from which we were is the common law? (MAGNA CARTA.) Care, Henry, ed. English Liberties, Or The Free-Born Subject’s Inheritance: Containing Magna Charta . . . The Habeas Corpus Act, And Several Other Statutes Boston: Printed by J. Franklin, for N. Buttolph, B. Eliot, and D. Henchman, 1721 Notes on Magna Carta "Farther, though it be said here, that the king hath given and granted these liberties, yet it must not be understood that they were meer emanations of Royal favour, or new bounties granted, which the people could not justly challenge, or had not a right unto before; for as lord Coke in divers places asserts, and as is well known to every gentleman professing the law, this charter is, for the most part, only declaratory of the principal grounds of the fundamental laws and liberties of England. Not any new freedom is hereby granted, but a restitution of such as the subject lawfully had before, and to free them from the usurpations and ...
[youtube.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 30, 2020:
I am going to attempt to encourage people to shed their bias on this subject (if they have bias) and upload instead a common law principle known as free speech. You are guilty of a crime if your willful actions harm someone. That is free speech. Who decides if you have stepped outside the law, and who decides if your speech is your weapon? When the criminals take-over, they seize the power to decide any question of any kind in any place any time: and they decide that they are the government: Government run by Criminals. What can clue people in on this fact that matters? How about a court case? Witch Court? Previous to 1789 the following observation concerning the facts that matter at Law were published: "It is a matter well known, and well understood, that by the laws of our country, every question which affects a man's life, reputation, or property, must be tried by twelve of his peers; and that their unanimous verdict is, alone, competent to determine the fact in issue." M'Kean, Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court RESPUBLICA v. SHAFFER, 1 U.S. 236, 1788 Person A yells Fire in a crowded Theater. People are injured. That is not Free Speech. Person A documents the crimes perpetrated by criminals in government, including a list of infringements of natural rights that clearly step outside the law as the law is clearly (or not clearly enough for some) documented in a Declaration of Independence, and in a (or many) Bills of rights. Person A then attempts to move the documents into the machine known as Due Process of Law. Person A is clearly murdered by people on the list of the accused perpetrators in the documents compiled and attempted to be delivered into the machine known as Due Process of law. Is that free speech? How about the current situation? Group A (Globalists) pay propagandists to abuse natural rights by propagating false information which is designed to destabilize a country of people whose core values began with the vital requirement of defending natural rights with a process known as the common law, which includes independent grand juries (of, by, and for the people, not of, by, and for the government, not of, by, and for a foreign government, not of, by, and for a church, not of, by, and for a corporation), and independent trial juries, in Courts of Law (not Courts of Admiralty, not Courts of Equity, Family, etc.), and Group A manages to turn the hearts and minds of the target population sufficiently away from their core values to cause the target population to adopt instead a counterfeit version of those core values. Example: "The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto “Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from ...
[youtube.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 30, 2020:
And...people can trace said Zionist control back to Russia and do so with a low budget. Trillions of UNITS of Power (Power to Purchase) flow into each Central Bank Fraud which FUNDS each Government from the largest most powerful one to the smallest least powerful one, and NO ONE can figure this Conspiracy Out and do something about it? Do you see a problem with that? "Qui non prohibet cum potest, jubet: That man abets an evil, who prevents it not, when it is in his power. Nec caret scrupulo sosietatis occultae qui evidenter facinori definit obviare: nor can he escape the suspicion of being a secret accomplice, who evidently declines the prevention of an atrocious crime." Englishman’s Right: A Dialogue between a Barrister at Law and a Juryman, John Hawles, 1763 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZNjUiP0p6I
Breaking Truth Educate Yourselves [lewrockwell.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 29, 2020:
Fantastic post, thanks. "Officially there is no treatment for COVID-19, and that is why they can get away with saying salvation hinges on a vaccine. If there are treatments that work, which there are, there is no need for a vaccine. What kind of people would deny treatments that would help millions?"

Give Love

Left to give: 0 Coins
Click here to get coins.

  • Level8 (71,312pts)
  • Posts603
  • Comments
      Replies
    1,772
    1,149
  • Followers 16
  • Fans 0
  • Referrals11
  • Joined Oct 29th, 2019
  • Last Visit 1+ month ago
Josf-Kelley's Groups
Q is for question
460 members, Host
Voluntary Mutual Defence
36 members, Host
End Game (formerly Ryan Faulk Fans)
14 members, Host
Controversial Charts
48217 members
Jordan Peterson Group
25268 members
Joe Rogan Group
16217 members
Just Jokes and Memes
14304 members
Tucker Carlson Fans
13425 members
Dinesh D'Souza Fans
10167 members
IDW Topic-of-the-Day
9713 members
News From All Views
7139 members
DaisyCousens
5903 members
Tim Pool Group
5823 members
Sydney Watson Fanspace
5450 members
Classical Liberalism
4790 members
Canadian Politics
3965 members
IDW Political Party
2768 members
Arielle Scarcella FanSpace!
2698 members
Politically Incorrect folks
2474 members
Anti-Socialism
2259 members
Learning from Christ
2167 members
President Donald J. Trump... Latest
2065 members
Saving Western Civilisation
2037 members
RamZPaul
1864 members
John Paul Watson Group
1613 members
Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder
1542 members
Alex Jones Fans
1280 members
Conspiracy Truth : Wolves And Sheeple
1212 members
Stefan Molyneux Fans
1053 members
Emergency Preparedness and Survival
952 members
Libertarian Freethinkers
895 members
COVID-19
765 members
The Great Reset
693 members
The Second Amendment Sanctuary
639 members
True Crime Discussion Group
590 members
Conspiracy Research
571 members
Words of Wisdom
477 members
Feminism = cancer
461 members
International News
383 members
Vaccine Education & Discussion Group
304 members
Comedy, Laughs and Humor.
300 members
Ideas of God
291 members
The Case Against Corona Panic
249 members
Dr. Steve Turley Group
171 members
United We Stand
153 members
The History Corner
138 members
Brain soup
129 members
IDW.Community Senate
125 members
ORIGINAL MEMES ( GREGORY ALAN ELLIOTT )
117 members
Red Pilled Hotties (Yes you can still flirt & remain politically engaged)
105 members
Liz Wheeler Fans Page.
98 members
Propaganda Clearing House
88 members
Anarcho-Capitalism / Voluntaryism
55 members
MGTOW: Exodus From The Plantation
50 members
Now You Are Talking With
46 members
IDW Liberty Alliance Culture War Room
43 members
Current Events
27 members
Rednecks Anonymous
26 members
50 Policies
24 members
Freemerica
19 members
UnCommon Sense 42020 PodCast
7 members