slug.com slug.com
1
1 Like Show

Born in West Orange, New Jersey, 1958.
1 oldest sister
2 older brothers
2 younger brothers

My first experience with data that did not fit the Official Narrative (propaganda) was a book I read in School for a book report. The book described data concerning the sinking of the Ocean Liner (false flag) that was the casus belli (excuse: false flag) for Americans to be deceived into fighting the Central Banker War called World War One. The ship that was sunk (murdering people aboard) to move power to the criminals running the Central Bank Cabal was the Lusitania.

The next big event which caused me to fully reject the Official Narrative (propaganda) was the massacre at Waco misreported on National Television (Corporate Propaganda Organ of the Nation-State Aristocracy).

Full Bio

Comments

Millie and Tore Share More! Tore Says: Shadowgate Updates Millie and I used a lap top - sat on ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 25, 2020:
Time 55:00 or so... The 2 speakers are parroting "accountability" and "protest" and "something" needed to be done. By who? Rights of Man Page 52. "A government on the principles on which constitutional governments arising out of society are established, cannot have the right of altering itself. If it had, it would be arbitrary. It might make itself what it pleased; and wherever such a right is set up, it shows there is no constitution." Thomas Paine was fooled too, but he eventually figured things out, after the fact. The criminals set up a system of "accountability" where they enforce their power to decide if they need to be subjected to "accountability." That is not news. The law of the land in England was preventing the criminals in England from reaching the goal of World Government (Empire), so they (on the official record, I have the quotes) put in place Admiralty Courts and Equity Courts to entice The People to accept a counterfeit version of a Court of Law (common law), which is easily proven by the fact that the names of the courts remained separate and distinct until recent times, and now no one knows if it is a Court of Law or not, not even most black robe, on the take, criminals claiming to be judges. At one time (while I was doing my time as State Coordinator in National Liberty Alliance) a guy called me and offered to send me 500 pages of documentation proving (beyond doubt, actual red handed smoking gun, official records) that all the judges in California were in office illegally, as one of the judges had turned. I digress to prove a point. A Court of Law proceeds according to the common law, which is the unwritten law, the law that remains in force because human beings have moral conscience, the power of reason, and are able to confirm, over and over and over, again and again, since Ancient times, some basic principles. Such as: attempt to solve a controversy verbally or once written language is invented, attempt to solve controversy in writing, before moving on to DEFENSIVE violence. Already, in the above, common law, moral, principle, is the assumption that aggressive violence (do onto others what you would defend against having other do to you) is outside the law. Example: "Ancient Law Right of resistance. "That this right of resistance was recognized as a common law right, when the ancient and genuine trial by jury was in force, is not only proved by nature of the trial itself, but is acknowledged by history.* *Hallam says, “The relation established between a lord and his vassal by the feudal tenure, far from containing principles of any servile and implicit obedience, permitted the compact to be dissolved in case of its violation by either party. This extended as much ...
Millie and Tore Share More! Tore Says: Shadowgate Updates Millie and I used a lap top - sat on ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 25, 2020:
Time: 53:00 or so... Tore wants to know why we are paying for the U.N. The Federal government was funded by States, there was no "we" paying for it, other than those States that decided to pay for it. A State could stop paying for it, some did just after the Revolutionary War which causes so much loss of life, liberty, and property, as the British Criminal Empire Builders Enslaving Everyone and making everyone PAY for their own enslavement, were rioting on the blood of the innocent in America, in the attempt to create and enforce a One World British Government Power Monopoly. So Americans in States said no, we don't want to pay for One World Government enforced by criminals in Black Robes and fancy wigs: slave traders, slave consumers, and they probably eat babies, so..."we" don't want to pay for that, no thanks. People in States said no. British criminals had many States to take-over. Many autonomous States, over vast areas of land, occupied by freedom loving people, with the real common law, not the British fake common law with Black Robe summary JustUS baby eating judges, were defended, so the British would land in Boston, while people in Pennsylvania were still free to fund their own defensive forces. The Criminal British One British World Government Monopoly Troops would then land in New York, and then the defenders in Massachusetts could lick their wounds, regain defensive power, while the British were spending all they had in New York. Meanwhile, down south, some of the people had the bright idea of giving the Slaves their freedom to help in the fight, but those geniuses just happened to be the ones who DID NOT CONSUME SLAVES. June 17, 1788 George Mason: "Mr. Chairman, this is a fatal section, which has created more dangers than any other. The first clause allows the importation of slaves for twenty years. Under the royal government, this evil was looked upon as a great oppression, and many attempts were made to prevent it; but the interest of the African merchants prevented its prohibition. No sooner did the revolution take place, than it was thought of. It was one of the great causes of our separation from Great Britain. Its exclusion has been a principal object of this state, and most of the states in the Union. The augmentation of slaves weakens the states; and such a trade is diabolical in itself, and disgraceful to mankind; yet, by this Constitution, it is continued for twenty years. As much as I value a union of all the states, I would not admit the Southern States into the Union unless they agree to the discontinuance of this disgraceful trade, because it would bring weakness, and not strength, to the Union." So... Don't want to pay for One World Government? Prefer to have the option to opt out in the World...
Millie and Tore Share More! Tore Says: Shadowgate Updates Millie and I used a lap top - sat on ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 25, 2020:
At Time 50:12 or so... "Are you for America or are you for The Deep State?" That (whether those two know it or not) is the Con Game in a sentence. That is the false choice: Evil, or lesser Evil. 1. America (Nation-State Empire Building Tool, Central Bank Counterfeit System, Summary JustUS Courts) 2. The Deep State (Global-State Empire Building Tool, Central Bank Counterfeit System, Summary JustUS Courts) Where is the peaceful choice? Where in that list is the common law, the law of the land, the sanctuary from the Con Game Evil or Lesser Evil False Choice? People think I'm nuts, but to put this in perspective you fence sitters ought to consider listening the facts that matter in the case. The freedom choice, the liberty choice, defended with peaceful means FIRST (common law Courts to settle any controversy) and only DEFENSIVE violence after peaceful means are truly exhausted (The Enemy is well past the gate and rioting in the blood of the innocent), is FREE MARKETS of governments. The "utopia" preferred by the so-called Anarchists, Ancaps, even the Anarchist Socialists (Stephen Pearl Andrews for example), is exemplified with the common law, trial by jury, the law of the land, and those organizations defended thusly. Example: Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy by William Watkins "Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right. "Experimentation in policymaking also encourages a healthy competition among units of government and allows the people to vote with their feet should they find a law of policy detrimental to their interests. Using again the state-run health system as an example, if a citizen of Tennessee was unhappy with Tennessee's meddling with the provisions of health care, the citizen could move to a neighboring state. Reallocation to a state like North Carolina, with a similar culture and climate, would not be a dramatic shift and would be a viable option. Moreover, if enough citizens ...
Millie and Tore Share More! Tore Says: Shadowgate Updates Millie and I used a lap top - sat on ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 25, 2020:
Time 44:51 or so... Millie claims that Trump is not controlled, if he was then "they" would already "...throw everything they could at him..." Who exactly is "they?" Here is one of "they": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFHU68FLTTc&t=78s Time 8:00 or so... Brendon O'Connell explains the TOOL used for the intended purpose. Now, I post that to answer the claim made by Millie about "they." "They" are not listed by Millie, so who does she mean, exactly, when she refers to "they?" Brendon O'Connell names names. They are, for example, Sheldon Adelson. Sheldon Adelson is part of a contending group of people who are busy doing what they can to gain more power and profit, so as to use that power gained to gain more power and profit, and their TOOLS include weapons of mass destruction, and weapons of mass deception. They are not Legal Fictions: 1. Zionists 2. Democrats 3. Republicans They are human beings who wear clothes when in public, and are naked when taking a shower or bath. They cooperate with each other, and to do so they must utilize a PROGRAM that is tailor made to facilitate cooperation. In the PROGRAM tailor made to facilitate cooperation "they" must speak the same ERROR FREE language (currency) because errors lead to powerlessness, so the CURRENCY used empowers them to ever greater levels of power and profit. An example of currency: "The United States of America is the only Nation on the Planet...that on paper...is free." That is full of errors.
Millie and Tore Share More! Tore Says: Shadowgate Updates Millie and I used a lap top - sat on ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 25, 2020:
Time 43:00 or so... Tore claims "The United States of America is the only Nation on the Planet...that on paper...is free." Just before that Tore described weaponized deception used by people upon targeted enemies “to avoid war,” or some other claimed justification to deploy weaponized mind-control, brainwashing, freedom stealing, backdoor, Trojan horse, virus formed, liberty killing, people killing, torturous, horrible, destructive, ORDERS to be following without question, because the targets don’t even know they are FOOLED. Who is the fool? Who is being fooled? Who are the deceivers? Why are they deceiving people? "The United States of America is the only Nation on the Planet...that on paper...is free." That is a clear example of deception working in time and place: a fact that matters. People in America who still think for themselves, who are not fooled, who are not following criminal orders without question, are free because they still think for themselves, and if their thoughts are filtered through something called MORAL CONSCIENCE, their actions may be lawful, legal, justifiable, just, reasonable, productive, adaptive, sustainable, right, good, beneficial, helpful, cooperative, competitive, nice, honorable, truthful, honest, loving, kind, and therefore free from evil, crime, destruction, torture, horror, rape, robbery, cruel and unusual punishment, judgment of guilt before affording defensive POWER to the presumed to be innocent accused, and free from actions that are unjust, criminal, harmful, destructive, unsustainable, parasitic, false, deceptive, extortive, fraudulent, libelous, slanderous, fake, dumb, moronic, stupid, servile, powerless, defenseless, or providing aid, comfort, finances, support, and power to empower single criminals or criminals in gangs, cabals, cartels, fake governments, or other organized crime organizations. "The United States of America is the only Nation on the Planet...that on paper...is free." The United States of America (plural) is a Federation of Independent States under the common law, as exemplified between 1774 and 1789. The United States of America (singular) is a Con Game, a Legal Fiction, a method of Subsidizing Slavery through Central Banking Fraud, Mind-control, and Summary JustUS, where the criminals enforce their orders which much be obeyed without question or else. The Bill of Rights attached to the Constitution of 1789 were set aside immediately upon the first steps taken toward Empire Building (Subsidized Slavery as a goal, Aggressive War for Profit as a means) as each successive National regime from the 1 Party President to the current one took up the same goals with the same means with IMPUNITY. If I missed a case, a treason case, ...
Millie and Tore Share More! Tore Says: Shadowgate Updates Millie and I used a lap top - sat on ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 25, 2020:
Time 42:00 or so... Now Tore offers the same false (ignorant of the facts or deception on her part) narrative about the law process, as she is shocked that no one is calling for arrests. If as Tore says, the information available constitutes a cause of action (the British invading America intent on subjecting Americans to British Full Spectrum Dominance was a cause of action), then a name goes on a presentment after an independent grand jury writes one up. So why is Tore not shocked that no one is assembling a common law, independent, grand jury, in any county in America, so as then to have on a presentment a name of the accused and a court date for the accused to be given an opportunity to DEFEND against any possible false accusations whatsoever? If that step isn't taken then throw the law out the window, throw due process under the bus, ignore due process of law, ignore the Bill of Rights, forget it, leave it behind, and move on with whatever unjustified, unlawful, illegal, bullshit you want to do with all the people you can convince to go along on the same train wreck, the same boat you make with all the holes drilled into the hull. Why do you think the criminals began enforcing the Judiciary Act of 1789 before publishing the Bill of Rights? The criminals set-up a counterfeit Court System OVER the law of the land: the common law. Gone are your rights thereby.
Millie and Tore Share More! Tore Says: Shadowgate Updates Millie and I used a lap top - sat on ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 25, 2020:
Time 40:00 or so... A statement was made earlier along the lines of "...innocent until proven guilty..." and then mention is made concerning "...pressure congress...congressional investigations...lead to the arrest..." That exemplifies the problem. The problem is that there is no law in America (hasn't been any since 1789). The Law (Law of the Land, due process of law, do onto other's as you would have others do to you) is gone and in place is a counterfeit form of law: do onto other's that which you yourself would defend against others doing to you. The process of law involves a cause of action initiated by a guilty criminal causing injury to an innocent victim, the discovery of that fact that matters, and then a communication to the suspect offering the suspect an opportunity to state their case before the people (a trial jury) in a Court of Law (not a court of Admiralty, Equity, or other Summary JustUS "Court"). Why are people suffering at the hands of criminals who don't know the law parroting the same ignorant statements that drive criminals to cause such suffering? An individual (Millie) is kidnapped, suffers cruel and unusual punishment, is thereby extorted into "just following orders," as the victim is brought before another criminal in a black robe, and that criminals summons up counterfeit lawful authority to decide the facts that matter in this case of kidnapping, cruel and unusual punishment, extortion, and subsidized slavery (just following orders), as the "Judge" (having no authority whatsoever as to the law: presumption of innocence for example) issues orders to be followed without question to whomever is summarily extorted into such blind obedience to falsehood without question. So...Millie dares to question the authority of people who fail the basic test of lawful authority (presumption of innocence) and then parrots that same ignorant order following? You are hereby told to pressure criminals in a counterfeit congress to presume these other people to be guilty and they kidnap them. What next Millie? Have the kidnapped presumed to be guilty accused perpetrators tortured for false confessions or tortured to extort other desired behavior desired by the criminals who allow such torture, even demand such torture upon as yet to be found guilty people? The invite to a court date (a criminal trial such as treason) is a test of the law power offered to the accused, presumed to be innocent accused, and IF the accused does not agree to show up for the trial, then the accused DEMONSTRATES a fact of crime factually in fact, in time, and in place, caught red handed, on the official record: contempt of court. There is president. THE REVOLUTIONARY AMERICAN JURY: A CASE STUDY OF THE 1778-1779 ...
She’ll do anything for your vote!
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 23, 2020:
That one went on my facebook page, thanks.
Indeed who is Jeff?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 23, 2020:
OK, it is me. I promise not to extort people with threats of nuclear war today.
Four seconds of this video has been making the rounds on social media, the four seconds where he ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 23, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKWpuCpPczs
(admin) I see this as a shakeout.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 22, 2020:
Weaponized A.A.I.?
(admin) I see this as a shakeout.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 22, 2020:
Silver before making it to gold.
For over a century we have been sorting and weighing data to determine every individual's score on ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 22, 2020:
A measure of value that is important is first the individuals own measure. I now more that a few people who would not measure up on a I.Q. test as "valuable," but they teach me how to live well like no others can. If people can learn from other people better than the previous best, would that type of ELITE STATUS be worthy of study and emulation?
I’d be putting it on Kijji ..... no reasonable offer refused
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 22, 2020:
Fearless or just plain stupid, the picture is evidence.
on my way to a BLM protest
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 22, 2020:
No, I don't go to Subsidized Treasonous Riots. I hear the pay is good, but there are no benefits otherwise.
If this is not a Deep Fake, well, I'm speechless [twitter.]
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 22, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDhhXIfIDUs
A State Trooper pulled an 87-year-old woman over for speeding.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 22, 2020:
Equalizer?
What say you?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 22, 2020:
When reality sets in, and actual concerns replace false propagandized fears, people dust off their own moral conscience, their own power of logic and reason, and they take steps to deal with potential confrontations with unreasonable people. "We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth -- and listen to the song of that siren, till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those, who having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it." Modernized: They are apt to attempt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, such as the fact that they are the criminals, and they are running the government ever closer toward absolute dictatorship, and they manufacture a narrative that is based upon the "song of the siren" mythology, as they will transform many people into carbon copy beasts such as the criminals running fake government DEMONstrate that they are, but the victims they target include some who hold their own power of moral conscience dear enough to defend. Therefore we arm ourselves with the facts that matter in the case, and if peaceful means (actual law power) fails, we have more than rocks and sticks to defend ourselves when the criminals become even more violent, such as would be an order to poison each one of us with a Snake Oil Poison falsely called a Vaccine.
On Edge Software Browser I get: "You must be a member of this group before commenting.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 21, 2020:
Update: The following link loads (just tested) in both Edge and Brave browser software, but it does not load from my Group Page here at IDW: The following is cut and pasted from clipboard the same paste from the same save to both Edge and Brave and it loads: https://www.youtube.com/embed/6NOV86r1uDk My Topic with the same link cut and pasted twice more than the original post, and it does not load. https://idw.community/group/VoluntaryMutualDefense/discussion/124181/the-best-people-are-those-who-dont-know-were-using-them-https-www-youtube-com-embed-6nov8 Instead: "An error occurred. Please try again later. (Playback ID: Mej915SlKfsiAGYb)" Also, the message: "You must be a member of this group before commenting." That message continues to load despite my settings at IDW: 1. Show Group Access & Use Options 2. Who can post? 3. Anyone 4. Update
Smart alec 🤣
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 21, 2020:
I still can't find a conspiracy theorist.
Thoughts on this one?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 21, 2020:
"“Joe Biden will be a president we will all be proud to salute,” Powell said." I didn't get past that in the article. The pathological liar who conspired to murder millions of people in an aggressive war for profit, making false claims at a Marxist/Communist/Satanist Forum (U.N.) says that "we" are going to do something? Who is "we?" Is "we" the pathological liars, and assorted treasonous devil worshipers?
Woo hoo! level 7!!
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 21, 2020:
Cool.
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 21, 2020:
Time: 25:20 or so... My ears don't work very well, and I can't hear much in this video as the music makes it even more difficult for me to hear the spoken words. I caught the mention of an effort to find previous competitive governing methods and then I caught the mention of picking government office holders randomly. That is exemplified in the following quote: The Athenian Constitution: Government by Jury and Referendum by Roderick T. Long "The practice of selecting government officials randomly (and the Athenians developed some fairly sophisticated mechanical gadgets to ensure that the selection really was random, and to make cheating extremely difficult) is one of the most distinctive features of the Athenian constitution. We think of electoral politics as the hallmark of democracy; but elections were almost unknown at Athens, because they were considered paradigmatically anti-democratic. Proposals to replace sortition with election were always condemned as moves in the direction of oligarchy. "Why? Well, as the Athenians saw it, under an electoral system no one can obtain political office unless he is already famous: this gives prominent politicians an unfair advantage over the average person. Elections, they thought, favor those wealthy enough to bribe the voters, powerful enough to intimidate the voters, flashy enough to impress the voters, or clever enough to deceive the voters. The most influential political leaders were usually Horsemen anyway, thanks to their social prominence and the political following they could obtain by dispensing largesse among the masses. (One politician, Kimon, won the loyalty of the poor by leaving his fields and orchards unfenced, inviting anyone who was hungry to take whatever he needed.) If seats on the Council had been filled by popular vote, the Horsemen would have disproportionately dominated it — just as, today, Congress is dominated by those who can afford expensive campaigns, either through their own resources or through wealthy cronies. Or, to take a similar example, in the United States women have had the vote for over half a century, and yet, despite being a majority of the population, they represent only a tiny minority of elected officials. Obviously, the persistence of male dominance in the economic and social sphere has translated into women mostly voting for male candidates. The Athenians guessed, probably rightly, that the analogous prestige of the upper classes would lead to commoners mostly voting for aristocrats. "That is why the Athenians saw elections as an oligarchical rather than a democratic phenomenon. Above all, the Athenians feared the prospect of government officials forming a privileged class with separate interests of their own. Through reliance on sortition, ...
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 21, 2020:
In English the word democracy means government run by all the people (no exceptions, the government is all the people, no factions), and the difficulty with the democratic form of government is that democracy is not possible when dealing with a number of people exceeding a limit of too many people. The limit can be raised with technology, but if people are left out (minority, majority, faction, division of the whole), then it is no longer democracy. When some people exploit other people (enslave them) it is no longer a democracy by definition. Democracy is a form of government in which all the people govern: the people directly govern themselves as one, which means that democracy is specifically not such that the Majority Rules over a Minority, or a more Powerful Faction makes a less powerful faction obey without question the orders enforced by the more Powerful Faction. If the government in force is a more Powerful Faction enforcing obedience from a less powerful faction, then the word for that form of government is Organized Crime, and that is because, given the natural laws that government mankind, that type of absolute power empowers criminals to the top of it: as an indisputable rule proven time and again. Absolute power naturally corrupts people, turning natural born people into criminals. Don't give people absolute power and they won't turn into criminals in that way: a lesson worth knowing, an error worth the effort to avoid repeating. If the government is of, by, and for The People as a whole, but not necessarily a democracy, then the government is said to be a republic, which comes from Latin, whereby the word respublica means The Public Thing. In a republic (which is not a form of government) all the people benefit, because it (the government) is The Public Thing, it is for all the people: no exception except those who choose to reject it, go against it, criminalize it. An example could be the laws governing the free flow of sunlight, the free flow of oxygen, the free flow of palatable water, the free flow of nutritious food, the free flow of land to stand on, also known as natural laws, would be a republic. The free flow of air is governed by nature and that government is a naturally occurring republic: The Public Thing. The free flow of oxygen is a republican government, people can live by it, or people can choose to choke other people to death, or choke other people until other people are extorted into blind obedience. A criminal government is one where a number of criminals stop the flow of the free flow of oxygen so as to extort people who are thereby having their lives choked off by those criminals, and the victims are made to work harder and harder to make the criminals more and more powerful, because the victims no...
Tony Heller: We Are Democrats! The party of the people. [youtube.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 21, 2020:
If they (each one) is in fact (and knowingly) Marxist/Communist/Satanist, and they know (each one) that Marxist/Communist/Satanism will turn the stomachs of moral people (productive people: targets) who comes in contact with it, including such things as spirit cooking, cannibalism, pedophilia, etc., then they (Marxist/Communist/Satanists) are perpetrating Treasonous Fraud when they fraudulently claim to be Democrats when they are in fact Marxist/Communist/Satanists. What about all the people who believe the fraud? What about all the people who can't see the Marxist/Communist/Satanist Crimes perpetrated by the Marxist/Communist/Satanist Cabal members? They are still guilty of aiding and abetting Marxist/Communist/Satanists Cabal members as Marxist/Communist/Satanist Cabal members perpetrate crimes, such as fraud, such as Subsidized Riots, and such as the Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud. Guilt can be willful or simply factual as discriminated with the terms following: Mens rea (guilty of mind) Actus reas (guilty act) How do the Marxits/Communist/Satanist Cabal members (Cult members) accomplish their treasonous fraud as they turn the minds of people into supporters of Marxist/Communist/Satanism? One step toward the accomplishment of the treasonous fraud is to convince people that everyone is guilty. Everyone is guilty, just ask them. Except themselves of course. Everyone but themselves is guilty. Thereby no one is innocent, when everyone is guilty. When no one is innocent, then no one can be guilty. They are not guilty, thereby. They can eat babies, drink their blood, sell their little body parts, and they are not guilty. Everyone else is guilty. If you don't wear a mask, you will be punished to the full extent of the law that does not exist, because it is no longer invested in: defunded. Which law? Rather: witch law? "When the constitutional procedures of the common law were applied, there could be few convictions for smuggling by juries of ordinary people, who shared in the common interest as sufferers from taxes and monopoly, and hence in the common enthusiasm for smuggling. To circumvent the constitutional 6 courts of common law, the prerogative High Court of Admiralty was established to absorb the jurisdictions of the maritime courts of the seaports, which had administered the traditional sea law and law merchant." Page 10 Conceived in Liberty, Murray Rothbard, 1979 "Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the ...
Are you ready for the next shoe to drop?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 21, 2020:
Central Banking Fraud is not a new thing. "But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program. "To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter." Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and their Legacy by William Watkins It does not need a new name, but a new name can help divert attention away from anyone who may stand in its way, and divert attention away from any information that clearly exposes it for what it is precisely. I call it Blind Obedience to Falsehood Without Question. Above is a guy deceiving people as his Central Banking Fraud Cabal attempts to implement it. It cannot continue to exist unless it destroys powerful competition, which simply means that higher quality and lower cost Banking Services WILL replace it for the simple reason that people prefer higher quality and lower cost over and above lower quality and higher cost....
Wow, what an idea!
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 20, 2020:
"There are at least 5,000 federal criminal laws, with 10,000-300,000 regulations that can be enforced criminally. In fact, our entire criminal code has become a leviathan unto itself. In 2003, there were only 4,000 offences that carried criminal penalties. By 2013, that number had grown by 21 percent to 4,850. The code has become so big, that the Congressional Research Service and the American Bar Association simply do not have enough staff to adequately categorize every law we have on the books." https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2015/06/06/how-many-federal-laws-are-there-again-n2009184 So...
Why Canadians are polite...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 20, 2020:
Got it, thanks.
"The best people are those who don't know we're using them." [youtube.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 20, 2020:
Time 28:00 or so... The term "Talent Spotting" is offered. Examples of Talent Spotting: 1. CIA/NSA/FBI/HS, etc. look for and find employees fit for their "very particular set of skills." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZOywn1qArI 2. Is it a good idea to put on a jury 12 pathological lying psychopaths in a trial by jury case involving a high level government official involving a false flag that starts a war that lasts decades for no good reason whatsoever, other than to line the pockets of the pathological lying psychopaths infecting government? Yes, I'm one of the best people that doesn't know I am being used by pathological lying psychopaths who have amassed almost unlimited power by lying and infecting governments including corporate governments. No, the costs born by decades of perpetual wars that line the pockets of pathological lying psychopaths inevitably lead to a steady decline in standards of living and inevitable increases in the cost of living for all future generations leading to human extinction. 3. Check out a good Science Fiction Series called The Ender Series by Orson Scott Card 4. Is it a good idea to vote for ONLY pathological lying psychopaths when choosing the people who have control over weapons of mass destruction that can wipe out all life on Earth, and this is a trick question because ONLY pathological lying psychopaths would build such things as weapons of mass destruction, let alone use them for extortion or extermination.
Oh dear, Biden in Wonderland.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 19, 2020:
Can we be realistic for awhile? If Trump can't help give Clinton her day in a Court of Law (not Admiralty or Equity) to answer for many alleged crimes (a campaign promise by the way), then the Office of President of The United States is an obvious fraud. The power to hold criminals to account for their crimes against innocent people (a steady flow of children into the meat grinder for example) is The Law if it is what it is advertised so as to get people to invest in it. Where are the Court Transcripts? I found these: THE COURT: Let me ask you, do all of you agree with this verdict? THE JURY: Yes (In unison). THE COURT: In answer to the question did Loyd Jowers participate in a conspiracy to do harm to Dr. Martin Luther King, your answer is yes. Do you also find that others, including governmental agencies, were parties to this conspiracy as alleged by the defendant? Your answer to that one is also yes. And the total amount of damages you find for the plaintiffs entitled to is one hundred dollars. Is that your verdict? THE JURY: Yes (In unison). The "government" is found guilty of conspiracy murder, which amounts to execution of someone guilty of speaking the truth about the criminal Vietnam War. "Our" government will execute you if you speak the truth (or worse), a fact that matters, a fact determined in something resembling a Court of Law (not speedy trail, therefore not according to the common law), therefore outside the law (outlaw) if the Bill of Rights means anything to the criminals in offices of "government." 2. "Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Anheuser-Bush Brewing co. V. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318. The Jury found there was no lawful consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing." STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF SCOTT First National Bank of Montgomery, Plaintiff vs Jerome Daly, Defendant. December 9, 1968 That one is a little more complicated compared to murder, or even compared to conspiracy murder often claimed to be ...
Vernon Coleman: Is This Fraud Ever Going to End?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 19, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1wbgrhr2Bw=emb_logo The COVID-19 Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee www.ACU2020.org Corona-Ausschuss Englisch
During Barry Soetoroes first election, anything American, white, Christian, heterosexual, male, etc ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 19, 2020:
He was not alone, the army of sycophants along with the army of fellow sociopaths have grown in America for over 200 years, because "they can." There is no law in America, how about using the law now, it isn't too late. The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots Page 40 Private Prosecutors "For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action. Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, however, private prosecutors were prohibited from withdrawing the action pursuant to private agreement with the defendant. Court intervention was occasionally required to compel injured crime victims to appear against offenders in court and "not to make bargains to allow [defendants] to escape conviction, if they...repair the injury." Page 42 Law Enforcement as a Universal Duty "Law enforcement in the Founders' time was a duty of every citizen. Citizens were expected to be armed and equipped to chase suspects on foot, on horse, or with wagon whenever summoned. And when called upon to enforce the laws of the state, citizens were to respond "not faintly and with lagging steps, but honestly and bravely and with whatever implements and facilities [were] convenient and at hand. Any person could act in the capacity of a constable without being one, and when summoned by a law enforcement ...
i have been doing some research into the fall of civilisations and one thing crops up time and time ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 19, 2020:
Natural complexity is naturally met with competitive use of thought and actions by living beings capable of solving natural complexities. How about an example? If these living beings that can natural solve all kinds of natural complexities are fooled into believe one lie, then will those living beings be able to solve that one lie and move on, or will those living beings suffer the exponential growth rate associated with the natural expansion of complexity as one lie requires another lie to cover up the first one, and then there are 2 lies needing 2 more lies to cover up each one of those, then 4, then 16, then 256. Can you add? Addition isn't good enough. How about some algebra? "But let us not forget that violence does not live alone and is not capable of living alone: it is necessarily interwoven with falsehood. Between them lies the most intimate, the deepest of natural bonds. Violence finds its only refuge in falsehood, falsehood its only support in violence. Any man who has once acclaimed violence as his METHOD must inexorably choose falsehood as his PRINCIPLE. At its birth violence acts openly and even with pride. But no sooner does it become strong, firmly established, than it senses the rarefaction of the air around it and it cannot continue to exist without descending into a fog of lies, clothing them in sweet talk. It does not always, not necessarily, openly throttle the throat, more often it demands from its subjects only an oath of allegiance to falsehood, only complicity in falsehood." Alexander I Solzhenitsyn, Nobel Lecture, 1970 In America the lies have grown rather complex since 1789. From here: "But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt,...
Awhile ago I started a Topic on my own Forum titled The Chinese Void.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 19, 2020:
Time 36:40 or so... The reporter claims that the Iranians have suggested that the Cornholio Sickness targets the leadership in Iran. Don't blame me for that Conspiracy Theory. My point here is to point out that the Cornholio Sickness can't be both a Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud and a Bio-weapon targeting specific people in specific places. 1. Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud 2. World War III and the use of tactical Bio-weapons by criminal regimes (actual people in actual groups of criminals) The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud is obviously a False Advertisement Campaign whereby the False Propagandists have fooled people into thinking that they are all going to die unless they wear masks, "social distance," and shut down small businesses such as restaurants, disrupting economies, destabilizing populations, and generally making people sick physically and psychologically through deception, false propaganda, brain-washing, mind-control, I.I.A. Military Grade Weaponized Networking, and the additional Sub-Crime of National Subsidized Riots where agent provocateurs are paid (out of the Public Fund) to rop, rape, kidnap, extort, assault, torture, murder, and mass murder for fun and profit, with impunity, as "Police" are coincidentally "defunded" in the local area where the "Rioters" are being unleashed upon the innocent population (perhaps only the children are innocent). That is one thing, with a sub-category, but that is not also World War III and the use of tactical Bio-weapons used by criminal gangs to cause injury to competitor criminal gangs, where the weapons target specific people within the boundaries of the capacity of the specific Bio-weapon. To see this in a better light (perhaps) look here: The COVID-19 Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee www.ACU2020.org Corona-Ausschuss Englisch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1wbgrhr2Bw=emb_logo That is from here: “We Have A Lot of Evidence That It’s A Fake Story All Over The World” – German Doctors on COVID-19 By Arjun Walia https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/08/no_author/we-have-a-lot-of-evidence-that-its-a-fake-story-all-over-the-world-german-doctors-on-covid-19/ In some places (not targeted by the Bio-weapon, but targeted by the Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud) the data collected by some people (not proven in my opinion) suggests that the Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud is only real in that it is a well played Con Game, a use of I.I.A. Military Grade Weaponized Propaganda Techniques, and that only works on gullible, brain-washed, mind-controlled, people only is some places, not all places. A Bio-weapon made from Military Grade Weaponized biological poisons (think Mustard Gas used in World War 1, or Military Grade Anthrax) targets specific people as ...
TRUMP ASKED IF HE SUPPORTS ‘CONSPIRACY THEORY’ THAT HE’S ‘SAVING WORLD FROM SATANIC ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 19, 2020:
"2,000 Facebook groups pushing the baseless conspiracy theory" And the Earth is Flat is now a Scientific fact I suppose. Conspiracy of Silence (Banned Documentary on Pedophilia) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsHs3eOL0mM Ted Gunderson - Former FBI Chief Exposes 'Illuminati' (disturbing content) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqjNa-Jpsf0 Marxist/Communist/Satanist Dictionary: baseless information unfit for public consumption due to the fact that it is inculpatory evidence proving a crime
Let’s be specific...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 19, 2020:
People paid to vote (think and act) a certain way (not that votes are actually counted mind you) include people known as Corporations. If these privileges are going to be spelled out clearly, then amounts of money paid for services rendered (privileges with strings attached) are warranted. The most privileged is The Federal Reserve Gang (or Cabal), and the tally isn't hard to find. https://www.usdebtclock.org/ Who is owed all that privilege? Who will actually pay all that privilege?
The National Debt is almost 27 trillion. [usdebtclock.org]
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 19, 2020:
Guess which one is $388,011.00? The Con is not new. "But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program. "To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter." Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and their Legacy by William Watkins "Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United ...
Some people are on that imaginary fence, a fence placed for them to sit on by people who profit from...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 19, 2020:
Time 1:21 or so... 2 subjects on the table: 1. If China has perpetrated War of Aggression for Profit against the rest of the world with The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud, then what is the response? 2. Which business model is economic (good, productive, sustainable, long-term, reasonable, moral, just, increases standards of living while reducing costs of living, prosperous, competitive, adaptive, open-source, free market, reproductive, and constantly improving) and which business model is merely criminal? Is that a trick question? You take the deal or die, and I wonder if that is the right business model? The right business model is the one kept right with the right defense model such as the common law, also known as rule of law, where those using the wrong business model (organized crime, extortion, conspiracy murder, etc.) are held to account for their crimes in an economical manner: speedy, based on the facts, true, just, right, moral, etc. That answer also answers the first question. If "China" did it then people in China did it, and an actual investigation into the facts could discover the names of the people who did it, and then those people with those names are offered a court date in a Court of Law to then have them state their case before the jury who represent the people as a whole. I'm on crack? What do you think was the Declaration of Independence? The document clearly spells out the facts that matter in a case where a named individual was currently perpetrating War of Aggression for profit. A so-called King (claiming divine right no less) was currently caught red handed doing this, that, and the other thing to innocent people in America. Did the accused show up for a Court Date to clear his name and explain the justified reasons for his actions? No. The aggressor charged in the document doubled down on the War of Aggression, pouring more economic wealth into the risky venture of Empire Building, where America was going to be enslaved into Subsidized Slavery, which is a condition of living in living hell where the slaves are made to pay for their own enslavement, and that turns out to be non-economical, because the Empire builders have to add more enforcers on the dole to keep the business model going which thereby reduces the number of productive slaves that can be wrung out like a wet rag, and eventually the number of drones enforcing the business model outnumber the number of slaves that can somehow continue producing anything worth stealing, which is clearly not sustainable. Would any of that information be discovered during the trial in a Court of Law? Why not? Because there is no law. Not Globally, not Nationally, not at the State level, not at the County level, not ...
Some people are on that imaginary fence, a fence placed for them to sit on by people who profit from...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 19, 2020:
Time 1:14 or so... The reporter lays it out very well to John Perkins, along the lines of qui bono (who benefits) as Perkins claimed that U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) with 5% of world population had 25% of the world deaths of Cornholio Virus (Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud): China did it, by the who-benefits-most reasoning, and then John Perkins appears to be realizing something, but John Perkins is sticking to the "belief" in the unproven Germ Theory that is essential for The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud. If the Germ Theory is a well worn hoax, and instead many (not all) "pandemics" are being proven to be caused by poisons dumped into the environment by careless or criminal members of Corporations, then the whole Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud evaporates and in place is an obvious use of I.I.A. Weapons in a Cyber Attack during the ongoing World War III. Is U.S.A. destabilizing? Does destabilization of a target country make the target population more or less capable of defending itself against further attacks WHEN the people in that country can't even admit that they are under attack, let alone identify the attackers who are perpetrating the aggressive attack in an aggressive war for profit, which by the way is the crime perpetrated by the infamous Nazi Party, the same crime that earned a few of those Nazi's a date with a hangman's noose.
Some people are on that imaginary fence, a fence placed for them to sit on by people who profit from...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 19, 2020:
Time 1:10 or so... A very good question was asked by the reporter concerning the possibility that China responded to Trump Trade BALANCE moves (China was leveraging U.S.A. heavily with sanctions: imbalance) with an Economic Hitman move which I call The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud. So... Previous to that question John Perkins admitted that China was a rising dragon with technological advances in Cyber Warfare, but now John Perkins answers with no, China (as far as he knows) did not cause The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud in response to Trump attempting to balance trade. No? John Perkins claims (as part of his reason for saying no, that China didn't cause The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud) that Bill Gates predicted a virus, so... John Perkins thinks that Bill Gates is an authority on "natural" biological viruses? Bill Gates is an authority on how to criminally employ networking to gain a lot of power, by creating both virus and anti-virus software and making a killing selling both to an unaware, and well propagandized, target market. Bill Gates criminally employs networking to gain a lot of power creating biological weapons claimed to be natural viruses, then sell biological weapons as a cure, a patented criminal-made "virus," and a patented criminal-made "anti-virus" (vaccine), where both products are injected into the target market, and that crime just so happens to consume the targets while power just so happens to flow to the criminal who makes these "products," and that is the guy who is referenced by the Economic Hitman (conspiracy murderer) as evidence that proves that China didn't cause The Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud as an Economic Hit on their competitors, like U.S.A. Inc, now run by Trump et al.? In the recent report titled Shadow Gate the weapon known as I.I.A. (Interactive Internet Activity) was confessed as a part of current Economic Hitman type moves made by criminals running Private (so-called) Corporations (Organized Crime) and I.I.A. weapons are confessed as being used by Public (so-called) Nation-States (Corporations) for Economic Hitman type moves internal and external to their own "turf." None of that seems familiar to you? An army of fake people on the internet spread fear about a bug (germ theory is not a proven theory) that will kill you if you don't wear a mask, and suddenly the whole world is wearing masks? The same army of fake people on the internet spread fear about a bug that will kill you if you don't stay at home, and suddenly people are staying at home? The same army of fake people on the internet spread fear about a bug that will kill you if you don't close your "non-essential" business (actual producers of wealth), and suddenly around the whole world small...
The real enemy within [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 19, 2020:
Injustice to Dou E "As Dou E is led to her execution, she prophesies that there will be snow in midsummer at the outrage of her death. She is beheaded, and snow falls."
Bunnings ad for Karens.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 19, 2020:
Excellent, thanks.
[youtu.be] every 30 years they try
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 19, 2020:
People who have a use for words fall into at least 2 categories: 1. Words mean something specific to everyone using the same word: one useful meaning like using the words ONE METER LENGTH. If the words mean anything, it becomes very difficult to get anything produced: I need 100 wooden boards ONE METER LENGTH. 2. Words mean something specific to the targets of deception, while the exploiters of deception use an OPPOSITE meaning for the same word. Case studies include the morphing of language to turn the right of travel into a privilege awarded to the obedient. The word "driver" becomes someone authorized to have a license to travel instead of someone merely driving a vehicle that accelerates the natural act of traveling. Other case studies include the morphing of the words on a long list: 1. Socialism 2. Nationalism 3. Oligarchy 4. Monarchy 5. Republicanism 6. Conservatism 7. Liberalism 8. Communism 9. Fascism 10. Freedom 11. Good 12. Bad A few names stand out as having not yet undergone the transformation from original meaning (driver) to "official" legalese, enforced, meaning, which is often opposite the original meaning, such as: 1. Liberty 2. Evil Perhaps the second one on that last list is currently morphing.
Some people are on that imaginary fence, a fence placed for them to sit on by people who profit from...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 18, 2020:
The discussion in the above video turns to a claim of balance between democracy and marketing at about time: 38:00. What is not said (and why?) during that discussion of that pendulum swinging balance between democracy and marketing was the previously CONFESSED threat of DEATH to those who do not TAKE THE DEAL. So...once again it is a False Narrative (democracy and marketing) when the true (not half true) factual accounting (not story telling) has to do with Free Markets (free from crime) and Criminals running Counterfeit Governments where Criminals Rule with Criminal Rules that involve Blind Obedience to Falsehood Without Question (a.k.a. TAKE THE DEAL an offer that can't be refused), which is the END of competition. So...they also speak about competition. As in: government providers A tax too much, cost too much, quality of service is lower and plummeting, while taxes are accelerating to ever higher rates (take a look at the so-called National Debt Clock Real Time) while across the street there is a better deal: competition. I'll end this comment with a relevant quote: by William Watkins "Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right. "Experimentation in policymaking also encourages a healthy competition among units of government and allows the people to vote with their feet should they find a law of policy detrimental to their interests. Using again the state-run health system as an example, if a citizen of Tennessee was unhappy with Tennessee's meddling with the provisions of health care, the citizen could move to a neighboring state. Reallocation to a state like North Carolina, with a similar culture and climate, would not be a dramatic shift and would be a viable option. Moreover, if enough citizens exercised this option, Tennessee would be pressured to abandon its foray into socialized medicine, or else lose much of its tax base. To escape a national health system, a citizen would have to emigrate to a foreign country, an option far less appealing and less likely ...
To whom it may concern: I recently started using the Browser Software called Brave.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 18, 2020:
Further testing: If I am not signed into IDW on Edge I cannot see the posts I publish, nor can I find the Group I created, at least not without learning all the hoops I would need to jump (other than signing in) to see my Group or my posts from my Group. Is that an IDW feature? If so, why is it a feature? We (IDW) don't want the Public to know what we publish to the Public? Someone might want to discuss the topic we publish to the Public, and so we don't want that, and so we discourage that from ever happing?
For the experts on American constitutional rights in this group, Does anyone know if this is still ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 18, 2020:
As to natural rights (constitutional or not): the concept of "free speech" is based upon the freedom to publish (or speak before written language) facts that expose powerful people and powerful groups who are factually criminals, especially when those criminals are counterfeiting governments. This goes way back, which I will show in a quote, but for now it may be useful to turn to the principles behind the law which is defensive as the law applies to injuries done by people who lie. The above quote claimed to be a quote made by Kamala Harris may be true, and if so, then it would be a confession of intent to harm innocent people by abusing the power of counterfeit government, an act of treason. A reasonable number of discrete and honest members of any lawful area, such as a County area, could form a common law grand jury, and investigate that confession for validity, and then if it proves to be factual, then those independent common law grand jurors could write up a presentment, hire a constable to deliver the presentment, and the accused is thereby afforded a court date in a Court of Law (common law) to defend the seditious, treasonous, words spoken by Kamala Harris (not simply yelling "fire" in a theater when there is no fire). The same independent grand jurors could use their lawful jurisdiction powers to investigate the source of the claim and find that someone wrote those words and falsely attributed those words to Kamala Harris, causing actual, measurable, damage to Kamala Harris in their independent estimation, and again they would be duty bound to write up a presentment to offer the LIBELOUS author of the LIBEL his or her or their day in court to state their case before an independent trial jury. Since there has been no law in America since 1789, and the Law Power has been counterfeiting instead, nothing will be done, and natural laws revert to laws of the jungle. Oh, and the quote from history: Ancient Law Right of resistance "That this right of resistance was recognized as a common law right, when the ancient and genuine trial by jury was in force, is not only proved by nature of the trial itself, but is acknowledged by history.* *Hallam says, “The relation established between a lord and his vassal by the feudal tenure, far from containing principles of any servile and implicit obedience, permitted the compact to be dissolved in case of its violation by either party. This extended as much to the sovereign as to inferior lords. If a vassal was aggrieved, and if justice was denied him, he sent a defiance, that is, a renunciation of fealty to the king, and was entitled to enforce redress at the point of his sword. It then became a contest of strength as between two independent potentates, and was terminated by ...
For the experts on American constitutional rights in this group, Does anyone know if this is still ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 18, 2020:
Can that be verified?
They could've cleaned the tyres.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 18, 2020:
"Tires not included."
Is this the new thing now?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 18, 2020:
If you just woke up to a blank memory then, yes, this is a new thing. Elections lead to Oligarchy, something well known since Ancient times. The Athenian Constitution: Government by Jury and Referendum by Roderick T. Long "The practice of selecting government officials randomly (and the Athenians developed some fairly sophisticated mechanical gadgets to ensure that the selection really was random, and to make cheating extremely difficult) is one of the most distinctive features of the Athenian constitution. We think of electoral politics as the hallmark of democracy; but elections were almost unknown at Athens, because they were considered paradigmatically anti-democratic. Proposals to replace sortition with election were always condemned as moves in the direction of oligarchy. "Why? Well, as the Athenians saw it, under an electoral system no one can obtain political office unless he is already famous: this gives prominent politicians an unfair advantage over the average person. Elections, they thought, favor those wealthy enough to bribe the voters, powerful enough to intimidate the voters, flashy enough to impress the voters, or clever enough to deceive the voters. The most influential political leaders were usually Horsemen anyway, thanks to their social prominence and the political following they could obtain by dispensing largesse among the masses. (One politician, Kimon, won the loyalty of the poor by leaving his fields and orchards unfenced, inviting anyone who was hungry to take whatever he needed.) If seats on the Council had been filled by popular vote, the Horsemen would have disproportionately dominated it — just as, today, Congress is dominated by those who can afford expensive campaigns, either through their own resources or through wealthy cronies. Or, to take a similar example, in the United States women have had the vote for over half a century, and yet, despite being a majority of the population, they represent only a tiny minority of elected officials. Obviously, the persistence of male dominance in the economic and social sphere has translated into women mostly voting for male candidates. The Athenians guessed, probably rightly, that the analogous prestige of the upper classes would lead to commoners mostly voting for aristocrats. "That is why the Athenians saw elections as an oligarchical rather than a democratic phenomenon. Above all, the Athenians feared the prospect of government officials forming a privileged class with separate interests of their own. Through reliance on sortition, random selection by lot, the Council could be guaranteed to represent a fair cross-section of the Athenian people — a kind of proportional representation, as it were. Random selection ensured that those selected would be ...
[youtu.be] every 30 years they try
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 18, 2020:
The Communists (read Communist Manifesto) rejected Socialism so...what gives with the shell game with the labels?
media is a world wide disgrace
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 18, 2020:
Best one yet, thanks. Download, upload.
[youtu.be] ShadowGate Whistleblower Calls Out Alex Jones & Roger Stone!
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 18, 2020:
Time 49:48 Steve Pieczenik is mentioned, and to me the fact that all these Nationalists (Trump, Alex Jones, Pieczenik) are Nationalists is not news, but to claim that these Nationalists have all sold out to the Zionists and Israel is missing the point. The point that I think is being missed in this video (so far) is that previous to Trump and the rise of the Nationalists, there was a long run (at least Bush 1 through to Obama) of Globalist Empowerment. So the point pointed out with Trump, to me anyway, is what I call a War in Heaven. I think it is important to point that out because that fact (if it is one) leaves both the Globaists and the Nationalists less powerful as they empower themselves at the expense of productive people (moral people, honest people, natural people, people not yet fully controlled into being consumers of productive people: drones). So now is as good a time as any for the productive people to shed both FACTIONS, and return to Rule of Law. So...the biggest story is still the fate of Maxwell as potentially the first domino. To restate: Sure, the Zionist Faction is very powerful and working to gain more power over productive people AND Competitor Factions like China, U.S.A. Inc. (Nationalists), and Globalists Inc. (those currently behind the Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud and the National Treasonous Subsidized Riots). Bad Actors: 1. Zionists 2. CCP 3. WHO, U.N., Globalist Inc. 4. Russia 5. Vatican (black and white Pope and Jesuits) 6. National and Global Central Banking Cartel The time now is the time to bring them all down, all that is needed is an event, such as a Trial by Jury Transcript where a Maxwell or other domino falls in front of God and everyone, naming names, showing videos, the works, much too much for innocent eyes, ears, minds, and souls, but those are the ones being eaten alive so...where are the good guys and gals, you know, the adults? All that is needed is an event like the following: "Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Anheuser-Bush Brewing ...
[youtu.be] ShadowGate Whistleblower Calls Out Alex Jones & Roger Stone!
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 18, 2020:
Time: 42:40 or so... PFC Bergy spoke: "You're destroying America's election integrity, literally the core of our democracy that so many died to protect!" Here is the the CORE thing. If it weren't a fraudulent government (but it is one) the name "democracy" could mean something worth supporting, such as The People governing the government through Trial by Jury, as reported here: "FOR more than six hundred years - that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 - there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws. "Unless such be the right and duty of jurors, it is plain that, instead of juries being a "palladium of liberty "- a barrier against the tyranny and oppression of the government - they are really mere tools in its hands, for carrying into execution any injustice and oppression it may desire to have executed. "But for their right to judge of the law, and the justice of the law, juries would be no protection to an accused person, even as to matters of fact; for, if the government can dictate to a jury any law whatever, in a criminal case, it can certainly dictate to them the laws of evidence. That is, it can dictate what evidence is admissible, and what inadmissible, and also what force or weight is to be given to the evidence admitted. And if the government can thus dictate to a jury the laws of evidence, it can not only make it necessary for them to convict on a partial exhibition of the evidence rightfully pertaining to the case, but it can even require them to convict on any evidence whatever that it pleases to offer them. "That the rights and duties of jurors must necessarily be such as are here claimed for them, will be evident when it is considered what the trial by jury is, and what is its object. "The trial by jury," then, is a "trial by the country" - that is, by the people - as distinguished from a trial by the government. "It was anciently called "trial per pais" - that is, "trial by the country." And now, in every criminal trial, the jury are told that the accused "has, for trial, put himself upon the country; which country you (the jury) are." The object of this trial "by the country," or by the people, in preference to a trial by the government, is to guard against every species of oppression by the government. In order to effect this end, it is indispensable that ...
[youtu.be] ShadowGate Whistleblower Calls Out Alex Jones & Roger Stone!
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 18, 2020:
Time: 5:30 PFC Bergy (tweet?) "You're destroying America's election integrity, literally the core of our democracy that so many died to protect!" That is clearly psyop propaganda. 1. There has never been any integrity associated with fraudulently driven "elections" which "elect" a new despot to sit on top of a despotic (criminal) government organization (organized crime counterfeiting government) as explained over and over again during each cycle from Liberty to Despotism back to Despotism and then back to Liberty, most recently during the Revolutionary period. 2. The core of our democracy is a very twisted statement assuming that everyone within "our" has the slightest clue as to what is or is not "democracy." So...the "core" is clearly misinforming the general population so as to drive the general population in a direction determined by the people who operate that "core" principle: deception. 3. Since the Revolutionary War (or further back including the French and Indian War) and each "War" afterward in American history there is a massive transfer of power that just so happens to flow from those who are driven to war (to spread or defend a false flag such as "our democracy") to those who do the driving. Did you know, or you, or you, that the Central Banking Fraud Whore who taught the trade to Alexander Hamilton (another Central Banking Fraud Whore) refused to pay the Revolutionary War veterans while they raise taxes to destabilize and render those Revolutionary War veterans bankrupt so as to then take possession of their farms? That is a lesson Hamilton learned very well. I want to keep watching to find out what "Calls Out Alex Jones..." means.
Pretty descent reasoning. [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 18, 2020:
That is a decent analogy. How about going a little deeper? Anyone game? Here is a pertinent find: Abigail Adams to John Adams Braintree, Mass., March 31, 1776 "I have sometimes been ready to think that the passion for liberty cannot be equally strong in the breasts of those who have been accustomed to deprive their fellow creatures of theirs. Of this I am certain that it is not founded upon that generous and Christian principle of doing to others as we would that others should do unto us. . . . " Since Susan B Anthony was charged with a crime for voting, when women were "not allowed" to vote in elections (a wasted vote) nor in juries where a vote actually counts. So women were like slaves in America until they gained an equal footing (Christian principle...) and once having an equal footing they then could defend themselves in matters at law: in Courts of Law. But that assumes that there are Courts of Law, which is a dangerously false assumption: boarding on criminal insanity. The Judges (not the people, including former or current slaves, and women) decide in Courts other than Courts of Law, while the people decide in Courts of Law, and if the jury is being stacked, that is a crime called jury tampering. Case in point: “A jury of twelve local farmers, all men and all white according to Levinson, rule in favor of Freeman in 1781, giving her freedom and awarding her 30 shillings in damages.” No women, no slaves, no black slaves, no white slaves (so-called indentured servants), just twelve local farmers, all men, all white, yet the Black Slave was set free in a Court of Law (suffering from jury tampering) and the criminal slave master was fined, apparently. No mention of a court date for the criminal slave master, along with another criminal case or two involving charges of jury tampering. I think that case was a "civil' case. So the analogy above in the video starts off with a Court of some kind, clearly not a Court of Law, as the criminals involved in the case are those who are guilty of infringing upon the natural right to publish facts: so-called free speech. A competitive analogy comparing with the Susan B Anthony analogy could be an analogy where victims of the Alien and Sedition Acts were tried in Kangaroo Courts for publishing facts about the criminals in the National government, such as the fact that the criminals in the National government were accused of infringing upon the natural rights to publish those facts: so-called free speech. The current Dictator on top of the Dictatorship (National government) Trump could pardon, for example, a historical figure in American history who was found guilty of "free speech." Example Link on that subject: ...
Spot on as always. [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 18, 2020:
I find often problems with either my thinking or the thinking I get from listening to Jordan Peterson. Examples: 1. He says responsibility in context in which I am immediately inspired to say no. There is the ability to respond, and there is accountability, one is not the other, and it sounds to me like Jordan Peterson conflates the two into one, which in his words muddies the waters (self-deception, or failure to be accountable). I really like how Jordan Peterson asks the audience to think about that, and how he supposes that this or that is worth the effort to consider, both of which, to me, is self-imposed accountability. To express why I think the waters are muddied when conflating both responsibility and accountability as if it were one thing, I can say that response-ability is what someone can do as the present turns into the future. Someone is presented with a situation in real time and they have an ability to respond in those dynamic situations whereby the past turns into the future they have the power to affect. Response-ability is present tense phenomenon, where people act based upon many factors including instinctual responses, thoughtful responses, thoughtless responses, moral responses, amoral responses, immoral responses, etc. Accountability, on the other hand, is present tense phenomenon (the past is dependent upon memory and the future is dependent upon imagination/creativity) that looks into memory to judge the responses acted out by the actor acting out responses, or failing to act out responses. Conflating the two phenomenon into one, to me, tends to relieve the individual from accountability for both the credit earned by moral responses ("being responsible") and the credit earned by immoral responses (not "being responsible"), which then sends the thinking on a path looking for causes outside the individuals power to respond (response-ability) which is to reject the individuals accountability and place accountability external to the individual. Case in point at the end of the above video at Time 8:30 or so... "...he is carried by societal pathology..." There it is, the gun did it. The individual is not accountable for that murder, the gun did it. There it is, the ideology did it. The individual is not accountable for that ideology, the ideology carried away the victim. It wasn't a responsible Fox outfoxing a victim, it was an ideology that did it, so blame the ideology. There it is, not a gang of criminals accountable for using their criminal means (deception, extortion, aggressive violence) to consume their victims, it was societal pathology that carried away the victim who is accountable for failing to respond morally when facing clearly accountable deceivers.
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 17, 2020:
This guy appears (to me) to be ignorant concerning the law, which is actually normal. At time "They do that typically to avoid embarrassment for the arrested person." That was in the context of arresting someone SUSPECTED of a crime. The problem with that is something called double jeopardy. Someone suspected of a crime, but not found guilty by a common law (independent) trial jury, is "innocent until proven guilty," which is an established common law principle. Supposing here that a counterfeit Grand Jury (not an independent common law grand jury, but rather a rubber stamp assembly hired by and directed by a counterfeit government persecutor) issued a summons for a court date for the accused, then, in that case, the next thing to be done is to contact the accused and invite them to State their case before a common law, independent, trial jury. Why did someone find the accused guilty of refusing the court date summons, which is a serious crime? Example: THE REVOLUTIONARY AMERICAN JURY: A CASE STUDY OF THE 1778-1779 PHILADELPHIA TREASON TRIALS Carlton F.W. Larson "The British occupation of Philadelphia was the seminal event of the War for Independence in Pennsylvania. Following Washington's defeat at Brandywine Creek, the British army entered Philadelphia on September 26, 1777. The Continental Congress and the Pennsylvania state government had already fled the city, and Washington would eventually withdraw his army to Valley Forge for the winter. Historians estimate that about one-third of Philadelphia's population, some 12,000 people, had fled the city in advance of the invasion. The state government, in exile in Lancaster, soon began hearing reports of Pennsylvanians who were actively aiding or joining the British army. In March 1778, the Assembly, with assistance from Chief Justice McKean, passed a law entitled "An Act for the attainder of divers traitors." The law named twelve prominent individuals who had sided with the British and required them to appear for trial by April 20, 1778. If they failed to appear, they would be deemed "convicted and attainted of high treason, to all intents and purposes whatsoever." The Act also authorized the Supreme Executive Council to issue additional proclamations naming persons who had joined the British army. Any such persons who failed to appear for trial would also be attainted of high treason. Although such conditional bills of attainder would soon be prohibited by the U.S. Constitution, Pennsylvania did not seek primarily to hang people without trials, but to seize promptly the abandoned estates of loyalists who had fled to the British. The law accordingly set forth various procedures for seizing the estates of those persons who failed to report for trial." The Law, which ...
RealClearInvestigations: the Wargames the US almost always loses.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 17, 2020:
"Given this capability, China, with its 2-million-strong military, might directly attack Taiwan, with a standing force of 220,000, hoping that the U.S. would stay out of the conflict. But the U.S. would have powerful reasons for not allowing that to happen. Aside from the destruction of a friendly democracy, a Chinese seizure of Taiwan would enormously expand China's power and position in Asia, especially if combined with its absorption of the entire South China Sea into its maritime territory. This would be a major step forward for China, now clearly a strategic revival and an enemy of democracy, in its goal of replacing the U.S. as the dominant power in all of Asia." Clearly the above is written by someone aiding and abetting false propaganda knowingly or not. The trigger word "democracy" fits precisely into place so as to inform the brainwashed that side A (spreading democracy) are the good guys, and side B (not side A) are the bad guys. Clue 2 (that the author is propagating a very specific false narrative): "Military analysts seem to agree that in the first day or two, there would likely be thousands of American deaths and the loss of billions of dollars’ worth of materiel." If people could take the time to study every war since the Revolutionary War (including that war, and even further back, such as the 7 Years War or French and Indian War), they could learn that some people profit from these wars, and those people finance (bet on) both sides losing. A way of seeing this is to look into the economic term "Selling Short." Since the event when M.A.D. became real the good guys versus bad guys narrative has been much harder to falsify (rationalize, or fraudulently justify) and "Wars" have become a more obvious profitable venture for those who cause it (finance it). Just look into the Korea War to see this, as neither side is "allowed" to win, and both sides are encouraged to prolong the very expensive destruction of lives and "materiel." Orders are issued to prevent a "winner," as exemplified in the order issued to disallow fighter pilots to engage enemy planes retreating into enemy airspace. If that is not clearly a "deal" made between those who profit from war (on both sides) so as to increase profits, then consider using your own brain to simulate what would actually happen if one side (armed with nukes) starts to lose the war. That moment of decision making never happened if you look into the actual facts when "U.S.A." decided to bomb Japan, which was one side "winning" and still "rationalizing" (justifying falsely) the employment of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Lies afforded the users of Weapons of Mass Destruction to do so, so that makes LIES weapons of mass destruction. Those who profit from wars (who ...
Monopoly - Big Goverment Edition.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 17, 2020:
Excellent. Monopoly Game 2.0 The New Normal
📰 GOOD NEWS: FAUCI’S OUT AND COMMON SENSE MIGHT BE RETURNING! [infowars.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 17, 2020:
Original: http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2020/august/17/good-news-fauci-s-out-and-common-sense-might-be-returning/ I like this: "South Dakota and Sweden did virtually nothing to lock down or restrict their populations and they actually fared better than lockdown states in the US. They had lower death rates, their hospitals were never over-run with Covid patients, and they have an economy to go back to." As good advice as this: Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy by William Watkins "Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right. "Experimentation in policymaking also encourages a healthy competition among units of government and allows the people to vote with their feet should they find a law of policy detrimental to their interests. Using again the state-run health system as an example, if a citizen of Tennessee was unhappy with Tennessee's meddling with the provisions of health care, the citizen could move to a neighboring state. Reallocation to a state like North Carolina, with a similar culture and climate, would not be a dramatic shift and would be a viable option. Moreover, if enough citizens exercised this option, Tennessee would be pressured to abandon its foray into socialized medicine, or else lose much of its tax base. To escape a national health system, a citizen would have to emigrate to a foreign country, an option far less appealing and less likely to be exercised than moving to a neighboring state. Without competition from other units of government, the national government would have much less incentive than Tennessee would to modify the objectionable policy. Clearly, the absence of experimentation and competition hampers the creation of effective programs and makes the modification of failed national programs less likely."
A short clip of Ronald Dworkin and Bryan Magee discussing liberalism back in 1978.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 16, 2020:
I'm not buying. The root cause of harm done to humans by humans is three fold: 1. Deception (to consume the target) 2. Threat of Aggressive Violence (to consume the target) 3. Aggressive Violence (to consume the target) Call that The list of means patented by criminals: Criminal Means (to arrive at criminal goals: consume targets) The words criminals use to hide behind are the stuff of legend, not seeing that is the stuff of deception. So... Each word is often made duplicitous by the use of the word used by criminals to achieve criminal goals: consume targets. Examples abound: Liberal (original meaning is A) Liberal (duplicitous additional meaning is opposite A) Works with many words such as: Republic Democracy Federation Law Legal Lawful Good Bad etc.
(admin) The Media is the Enemy
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 16, 2020:
Not "by media," if the Shadow Gate information is as true as it reasons out. https://banned.video/watch?id=5f37fcc2df77c4044ee2eb03 In other words: The "Media" includes every single individual who is brainwashed and triggered by those who now have the gun, and the gun is IIA (Time: 5:45 or so) Interactive Internet Activities: management. Time: 29:50 or so... "How to make them nod their head or..."
"There is no greater tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of the law and in the ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 16, 2020:
"An error occurred. Please try again later. (Playback ID: gZAklovJ4hQQxOL) I call it Counterfeit Law. Examples abound where original, grass-roots, organic, defensive, moral, law power emerges and is named, and then the counterfeiters counterfeit the name and that deception aids and abets their abuse of power.
Butt-load 😂 🤣
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 16, 2020:
Damn, talk about a Butt Load of Whiskey!
Guess this is going to become the norm now.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 16, 2020:
Two unprepared women...
Failed state?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 15, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1GT-BZvhrw
Millie Weaver's "Shadow Gate" which got her arrested.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 15, 2020:
Deep Digging in Doggie Do Do, Don't Do it, Danger, Danger, Danger
I have a question for Americans: do you think the reason the Democrats are so pro mail-in voting is ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 15, 2020:
The criminals claiming to be "Democrats" already prove (confess) their criminality because they hide behind a false front. They are Marxist/Communist/Satanists, a criminal organization, and as such they WILL VOTE the way all criminals VOTE, and their VOTES are always going to aid, abet, support, maintain, and sustain their criminal organization. With that in mind those criminals are in serious need of court dates where American Votes that count can be voted by each independent juror in each criminal case. To those who are still in the dark about this, all one has to do is read the natural laws (not statutes) referred to in the Bill of Rights. Any infringement of any natural right by anyone, including Marxist/Communist/Satanists members hiding behind the false front of "Spreading Democracy" as fake "Democrats" is a crime in progress, a crime scene, and the confession of the criminal is on their authorized paper work in fact. I know that few people have seriously questioned these things, fewer have any answers, but the above is simply factual, and if it can't be seen by someone, then that is clearly their problem. Perhaps they have been brainwashed. "The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto “Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.” “The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.” “How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.”
[youtu.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 13, 2020:
To lay it all out so as to leave no doubt is out of fashion, but some are yet unfashionable. Martin Luther King Jr. knew his time was up during his last speech before being executed for the crime of speaking the truth about the criminals in government. He too spoke with cryptic language.
Every living thing is doomed to endure what it is willing to accept.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 13, 2020:
I am going to save that one, thanks.
Good doggie ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 13, 2020:
Another one passed on, thanks.
As most on here are already aware, the Admin of this site had created other sites, and recently on ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 13, 2020:
Common on this site is the resort to person attacks by members with "high scores," so...
Yes, gun rights actually are human rights- [bearingarms.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 13, 2020:
The (natural) right of resistance goes back to Ancient times, it is not a new invention. From Trial by Jury by Lysander Spooner, 1852: "That this right of resistance was recognized as a common law right, when the ancient and genuine trial by jury was in force, is not only proved by nature of the trial itself, but is acknowledged by history.* *Hallam says, “The relation established between a lord and his vassal by the feudal tenure, far from containing principles of any servile and implicit obedience, permitted the compact to be dissolved in case of its violation by either party. This extended as much to the sovereign as to inferior lords. If a vassal was aggrieved, and if justice was denied him, he sent a defiance, that is, a renunciation of fealty to the king, and was entitled to enforce redress at the point of his sword. It then became a contest of strength as between two independent potentates, and was terminated by treaty, advantageous or otherwise, according to the fortune of war. * * There remained the original principle, that allegiance depended conditionally upon good treatment, and that an appeal might be lawfully made to arms against an oppressive government. Nor was this, we may be sure, left for extreme necessity, or thought to require a long enduring forbearance. In modern times, a king, compelled by his subjects’ swords to abandon any pretension, would be supposed to have ceased to reign; and the express recognition of such a right as that of insurrection has been justly deemed inconsistent with the majesty of law. But ruder ages had ruder sentiments. Force was necessary to repel force; and men accustomed to see the king’s authority defied by a private riot, were not much shocked when it was resisted in defence of public freedom.” - 3 Middle Ages, 240-2"
I feel like I'm sunk in a martini glass and I'm the olive!
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 13, 2020:
Saved and passed on, thanks.
VDH: Progressive want to erase the Constitution.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 13, 2020:
"The Founding Fathers saw a purpose in the Electoral College. It ensured that small, rural states would retain importance in national elections." That is roughly half true. The half false part is the part where a group of founders were against Consolidating the Federation of Independent States into one Monopoly of Power and Profit, whereby the other half of the "founders" considered the people as hereditary property. The false part is the part where the facts are sent down the memory hole such as the fact that a federation of independent states does not give absolute dictatorial powers to One Monopoly Executive Officer and his (or her) minions, over everyone in all the formerly independent States. Example: "Who can deny but the president general will be a king to all intents and purposes, and one of the most dangerous kind too; a king elected to command a standing army? Thus our laws are to be administered by this tyrant; for the whole, or at least the most important part of the executive department is put in his hands." Philadelphiensis IX February 06, 1788 Worse than handing absolute power over every single military capable human being in all the formerly independent States was the move by the Monopolistic "Founders" to give the Executive Monopoly Power the Power to steal anything from anyone who dares to produce anything worth stealing: the power to "tax" (at gunpoint, or sword point) at will, a power to "tax" - extort - each individual human being. Example: "No. 3 - New Constitution Creates A National Government; Will Not Abate Foreign Influence; Dangers Of Civil War And Despotism ___________________________________ Like the nome de plume "Publius" used by pro Constitution writers in the Federalist Papers, several Anti-Federalists signed their writings "A FARMER. " While the occupation of the writers may not have coincided with the name given, the arguments against consolidating power in the hands of a central government were widely read. The following was published in the Maryland Gazette and Baltimore Advertiser, March 7, 1788. The true identity of the author is unknown. _____________________________________ "There are but two modes by which men are connected in society, the one which operates on individuals, this always has been, and ought still to be called, national government; the other which binds States and governments together (not corporations, for there is no considerable nation on earth, despotic, monarchical, or republican, that does not contain many subordinate corporations with various constitutions) this last has heretofore been denominated a league or confederacy. The term federalists is therefore improperly applied to themselves, by the friends and supporters of the proposed constitution....
Why, come tragedy, come calamity, come suffering, does civilization consistently mistake the ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 13, 2020:
An instrument is Indoctrination, a fact that matters. What is the lesson in the following discovery of that fact that matters? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eP98ZKt709A
The American experiment cannot be left to languish.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 13, 2020:
The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots Page 40 Private Prosecutors "For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action. Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, however, private prosecutors were prohibited from withdrawing the action pursuant to private agreement with the defendant. Court intervention was occasionally required to compel injured crime victims to appear against offenders in court and "not to make bargains to allow [defendants] to escape conviction, if they...repair the injury." Page 42 Law Enforcement as a Universal Duty "Law enforcement in the Founders' time was a duty of every citizen. Citizens were expected to be armed and equipped to chase suspects on foot, on horse, or with wagon whenever summoned. And when called upon to enforce the laws of the state, citizens were to respond "not faintly and with lagging steps, but honestly and bravely and with whatever implements and facilities [were] convenient and at hand. Any person could act in the capacity of a constable without being one, and when summoned by a law enforcement officer, a private person became a temporary member of the police department. The law also presumed that any person acting in his public capacity as an officer was rightfully appointed."
QUESTION OF THE DAY Is free will an illusion?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 12, 2020:
I think that the fundamental difficulty with a paradox (free will or predetermined "free" will) is that the thing in view (a process) is viewed by an error prone (limited) perceiving entity. Language of some sort is used to perceive and often what is perceived (something external to the perceiver) is misperceived due to errors in the transfer of data, and then errors are compounded when one perceiving entity attempts to communicate with another perceiving entity concerning the error prone perception of an external process. One perceiving entity may step out of a specific previous misperception (seeing the error previously "believed") while that same "free" perceiver (free from a specific misperception) can perceive people who remain within that false box of misperception. Example: Henry: "I have the power to do whatever I want whenever I want according to my exclusive desires without any external powers that overpower my free will." Bill: "Can you decide to stop breathing for 10 minutes while running 100 yards in 10 seconds?" Henry: "I can decide to remove that question from my memory." Some people have a vested interest in creating false versions of reality so as to keep people in a box. I think that Plato with the Allegory of the Cave is an example.
The JUSSIE SMOLLET HATE HOAX WAS PRAISED BY OUR NEW VP CANDIDATE
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 11, 2020:
History must be rewritten if this is going to work!
The secret of how wine is really made has been leaked. 😂
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 11, 2020:
Passed on, thanks.
An extreme thought?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 11, 2020:
A step forward is better than many steps backward.
I recently learned a little about Native American slave holders.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 11, 2020:
“The Five Civilized Tribes were deeply committed to slavery, established their own racialized black codes, immediately reestablished slavery when they arrived in Indian territory, rebuilt their nations with slave labor, crushed slave rebellions, and enthusiastically sided with the Confederacy in the Civil War.” Why would someone see a need to label themselves as being "Civilized?" Is that like a liar claiming that they are not lying? Why does it have to be part of the communication at all? People are individuals. From Wiki: "The original Iroquois League (as the French knew them) or Five Nations (as the British knew them), occupied large areas of present-day New York State up to the St. Lawrence River, west of the Hudson River, and south into northwestern Pennsylvania. From east to west, the League was composed of the Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca nations." I post that to show another claim to fame concerning many people bound into many groups where the glue binding these groups together include many forces, such as survivability. Have you heard about Mourning Wars? Example: "Mourning wars had three primary purposes, each of which helped restore the spiritual vitality of the Iroquois nations. First, mourning wars were fought for vengeance. The raid gave warriors a chance to provide some sense of closure to those who had lost a loved one. In Iroquois cultures, this was a big part of personal psychological and emotional healing after a loss. "Second, mourning wars gave young men a chance to prove themselves as warriors. Since these were raids and not always full battles, these new warriors could distinguish themselves through acts of bravery, rising to replace the warriors who had been killed. This was an important form of social advancement for Iroquois men. "Finally, and most importantly, the fundamental purpose of mourning wars was to abduct members of an enemy tribe as compensation. Occasionally, the matriarch of the clan demanded that these captives be killed in vengeance. That was relatively rare, however. More frequently, the captives were actually adopted by the grieving family members. It was the literal replacement of a lost loved one." https://study.com/academy/lesson/why-did-the-iroquois-fight-mourning-wars.html By the way, who is claiming to be Civil, and therefore an authority on who is not civilized? One might find this: The Cambridge History of Law in America Volume 1 Early America (1580-1815) Edited by Michael Grossberg, Christopher Tomlins "In all previous cases, and in the protracted English attempts to seize parts of northern France, conquest had been justified on the grounds of dynastic inheritance: a claim, that is, based on civil law. In America, however, this ...
A warning to the west.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 10, 2020:
Who exactly financed the Rise of the Bolsheviks? https://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_the_bolshevik_revolution-5.pdf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpyaoNb1ZGo
Editorial: Eighteen (years) is enough: Limit the terms of Supreme Court justices [news.yahoo.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 9, 2020:
Limiting the time a despot rules as such may lessen the tendency toward evil, but why give them that much power in the first place? The people (if the Bill of Rights means anything) are the judges of fact and law, not someone wearing a black robe on a bench in a corporate office, so...
AirForceTechnology: Three finalists in the competition to build Canada's next generation of ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 8, 2020:
On this type of subject matter I think it is useful to read BOYD: The Fighter Pilot who changed the Art of War: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/38840.Boyd
My first introduction to Machiavelli.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 8, 2020:
Introduction in my copy of The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli "Machiavelli's outlook was darkly pessimistic; the one element of St Augustine's thought which he wholeheartedly endorsed was the idea of original sin. As he puts it starkly in the same chapter 18 of The Prince, men are bad. This means that to deal with them as if they were good, honourable or trustworthy is to court disaster. In the Discourses (I,3) the point is repeated: 'all men are bad and are ever ready to display their malignity'. This must be the initial premise of those who play to found a republic. The business of politics is to try and salvage something positive from this unpromising conglomerate, and the aim of the state is to check those anarchic drives which are a constant threat to the common good. This is where The Prince fits into the spectrum of his wider thought: while a republic may be his preferred form of social organization, the crucial business of founding or restoring a state can only be performed by one exceptional individual."
AndrewMcCarthy: Strange complications in the case of General Flynn, Judge Sullivan and the en banc ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 8, 2020:
"Anyone who listened to the oral argument could tell how reluctant the judges seemed about issuing a mandamus writ against Judge Sullivan, even if they were convinced that he was wrong on the law." I am going to attempt to show something at work here, something based upon an easy to see principle. At the time of the American revolution the counterfeit Law was exposed as such, and that counterfeit Law was exposed as counterfeit with words that trigger certain emotions. The Divine Right of Kings. The emotions that are being triggered with those words above are emotions born into each individual, transferred to each individual naturally, transferred through genetic instructions: memory. Before the age of The Divine Right of Kings was an age of individual sovereignty born into each individual as a natural right. We, as nature made us, are potentially all Kings with our Divine Rights. We can hold each other to account, as a Divine Right, with our natural laws, and our common laws, laws we share willingly with each other. We can demand to know by what authority someone acts authoritatively. We can reject that authority, based upon the facts that matter in the case. That is old school natural law stuff. Examples abound if you look for them: (MAGNA CARTA.) Care, Henry, ed. English Liberties, Or The Free-Born Subject’s Inheritance: Containing Magna Charta . . . The Habeas Corpus Act, And Several Other Statutes Boston: Printed by J. Franklin, for N. Buttolph, B. Eliot, and D. Henchman, 1721 Notes on Magna Carta "Farther, though it be said here, that the king hath given and granted these liberties, yet it must not be understood that they were meer emanations of Royal favour, or new bounties granted, which the people could not justly challenge, or had not a right unto before; for as lord Coke in divers places asserts, and as is well known to every gentleman professing the law, this charter is, for the most part, only declaratory of the principal grounds of the fundamental laws and liberties of England. Not any new freedom is hereby granted, but a restitution of such as the subject lawfully had before, and to free them from the usurpations and incroachments of every power whatever. It is worthy observation, that this charter often mentions sua jura, their rights, and libertates suas, their liberties, which shews they were before intitled to and possessed them, and that those rights and liberties were by this charter not granted as before unknown, but confirmed, and that in the stile of liberties and privileges long before well known.” We had our common laws before the English Monarchy stole them, counterfeited them, and abuse their criminal powers, which by the way is a LAW: Criminals Abuse Power As A RULE....
Is the banning of WeChat/TicTok a modern day act of war?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 7, 2020:
An act of war is a fancy way of rationalizing a whole lot of intended evil soon to be released on a whole lot of innocent people. Those who wish to dominate the dominant groups must destroy all competition, it is a principle upon which the rules of the process are governed. So...with that in mind, will the effort to block the free transfer of information from one dominant group result in more or less competition? "...people scramble to find alternatives..." If "alternatives" are only evil or slightly and temporarily less evil, then I smell a rat.
Check this one out and tell me what you think about it. [prageru.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 7, 2020:
Criminals (left or right) harm innocent people with weapons, such as fraudulent statements made by frauds in offices of fraudulent authority.
Is this racism or is it science?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 7, 2020:
Two subjects that are separate, segregated, and apart from each other can be commingled, confused, misrepresented, and used as leverage to overpower innocent people: enslave them, and make them pay the costs associated with enslaving them. Race, the study of, the testing, learning, knowing, race, is a subject having value to some people, so they study race. Subsidized Slavery, the study of, the testing, learning, knowing, Subsidized Slavery, is a subject having value to some people, so they study Subsidized Slavery. Combining the two subjects into one subject, by a process known as deception, whereby the one study is purposefully conflated with the other, separate, study, can be done so as to facilitate the overpowering of the people who are targeted for exploitation by this method of deception. Race A according to the deceivers are inferior, and therefore in need of salvation for their own good. That may be a difficult con job when the deceivers are members of Race A, so...a fictional person is needed to represent the people claiming to be Dominant. An old story line going back a long time as documented at least here: Volume 1 Early America (1580-1815) Edited by Michael Grossberg, Christopher Tomlins "In all previous cases, and in the protracted English attempts to seize parts of northern France, conquest had been justified on the grounds of dynastic inheritance: a claim, that is, based on civil law. In America, however, this claim obviously could not be used. There would seem, therefore, to be no prima facie justification for "conquering", the Indians since they had clearly not given the English grounds for waging war against them. Like the other European powers, therefore, the English turned to rights in natural law, or - more troubling - to justifications based on theology. The Indians were infidels, "barbarians," and English Protestants no less than Spanish Catholics had a duty before God to bring them into the fold and, in the process, to "civilize" them. The first Charter of the Virginia Company (1606) proclaimed that its purpose was to serve in "propagating of Christian religion to such people, [who] as yet live in darkness and miserable ignorance of the true knowledge and worship of God, and may in time bring the infidels and savages living in these parts to humane civility and to a settle and quiet government." In performing this valuable and godly service, the English colonists were replicating what their Roman ancestors had once done for the ancient Britons. The American settlers, argued William Strachey in 1612, were like Roman generals in that they, too, had "reduced the conquered parts of or barbarous Island into provinces and established in them colonies of old soldiers building castles and towns in every ...
So tell me as anti socialists are you for or against the public funding of the police force?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 7, 2020:
Since words can be duplicitous (having two meanings, often opposite meanings) the question being asked can have at least 2 answers. The following words are not mine, they are from someone who has published books on the subject of socialism, and so any discredit associated with the use of the word socialism in this context ought to be aimed at the author of the words, not at me personally. “In what great feature are Protestantism, Democracy, and Socialism identical? I will answer this interrogatory first, and demonstrate afterward. Protestantism, Democracy, and Socialism are identical in the assertion of the Supremacy of the Individual, - a dogma essentially contumacious, reovlutionary, and antagonistic to the basis principles of all the older institutions of society, which make the Individual subordinate ans subject to the Church, to the State, and to Society respectively. Not only is this supremacy or SOVEREIGNTY OF THE INDIVIDUAL a common element of all three of these great movements, but I will make the still more sweeping assertion that it is substantially the whole of those movements. It is not merely a feature, as I have just denominated it, but the living soul itself, the vital energy, the integral essence or the being of them all.” Steven Pearl Andrews, The Science of Society, 1888 So the question asked is likely to be asked from a different meaning for the word socialist. The question being asked: "So tell me as anti socialists are you for or against the public funding of the police force?" Rephrasing the question in both possible meanings: 1. So tell me as anti (sovereignty of the individual) socialists are you for or against the public funding of the police force? 2. So tell me as anti (modern, opposite, counterfeited, meaning for) socialists are you for or against the public funding of the police force? Funding of the POLICE, in a "sovereignty of the individual" (individuals are above, not below the STATE) is explained here: The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots Page 40 Private Prosecutors "For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at ...
Would things be better if the Third Party candidate won and Reagan lost?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 7, 2020:
Would things be better if people returned to rule of law instead of criminals counterfeiting governments? I think that the answer is self-evident.
Seems at least possible
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 6, 2020:
Pretty sure the Boss has a Strap-on.
Rereading Road to Serfdom. Who else has read it?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 6, 2020:
What is good about it? If I am not mistaken I read that in the 1990s.
Federalist: How Hollywood self censors to gain admittance to the Chinese market ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 6, 2020:
"“You consult with Chinese experts and media consultants, you think about whether something is going to be perceived as criticism,” another producer added. “You worry about inadvertently crossing some line.”" There are consequences involved in paying extortion fees. Some people in the past understood this simple truth. Keep paying each fee and the criminals grow more powerful while you grow less powerful. It seems simple enough to some people. To other people... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAHM9rXjdUo
What have we NOT been paying attention to in 2020 but should?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 6, 2020:
World Wide Central Bank Fraud Collapse Bitcoin et al. Then, of course, as shown below, Subsidized Slavery (now called "human trafficking"). Those accountable are not going to get a ticket for a traffic violation if the Moms and Dads wake the fuck up. https://vimeo.com/341849221 I saw the Gorilla, and the Elephant in the Room is shitting on everything, so the only ones claiming to not see it are those who have a reason to lie. NEWS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVegsDfXHK8
The new Pledge
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 6, 2020:
What is wrong with the old one?
Courtesy of ([twitter.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 6, 2020:
Overdone. "...prevent the world from ending..." Those pulling the strings don't pull those strings. Those strings are "reaction." Built into the system of control are triggers, to cause people to overdo things. WHO is responsible for what? Who is accountable?
If forced to take the possible covid vaccine, are there any supplements to help any negative effects...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 6, 2020:
I found this (too awhile): https://thetruthaboutvaccines.com/minimize-vaccine-damage/ "Dr. Yoshiaki Omura, MD, a New York-based general practitioner and cardiologist with more than 50 years of experience in his field, accidentally discovered (while treating his patients for eye infections) that cilantro (aka Chinese parsley), is a powerful natural chelator of metals and other neurotoxins."
Geller Report: Leftism is a toxic and despicable ideology.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 6, 2020:
"It threatens Mercedes with “cancel culture” invented by the Nazis." It is merely a fraud. Calling it something other than a fraud is proof that it works.

Give Love

Left to give: 0 Coins
Click here to get coins.

  • Level8 (61,769pts)
  • Posts460
  • Comments
      Replies
    1,645
    1,079
  • Followers 16
  • Fans 0
  • Referrals3
  • Joined Oct 29th, 2019
  • Last Visit Very recently
Josf-Kelley's Groups
Voluntary Mutual Defence
35 members, Host
End Game (formerly Ryan Faulk Fans)
14 members, Host
Controversial Charts
48225 members
Jordan Peterson Group
25094 members
Joe Rogan Group
16059 members
Just Jokes and Memes
14171 members
Tucker Carlson Fans
13317 members
IDW Topic-of-the-Day
9606 members
News From All Views
7026 members
DaisyCousens
5861 members
Tim Pool Group
5765 members
Sydney Watson Fanspace
5398 members
Classical Liberalism
4726 members
Canadian Politics
3914 members
IDW Political Party
2739 members
Arielle Scarcella FanSpace!
2609 members
Politically Incorrect folks
2472 members
Anti-Socialism
2254 members
Learning from Christ
2119 members
President Donald J. Trump... Latest
2061 members
Saving Western Civilisation
2036 members
RamZPaul
1847 members
John Paul Watson Group
1607 members
Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder
1526 members
Slug.com Senate
1268 members
Alex Jones Fans
1254 members
Conspiracy Truth : Wolves And Sheeple
1208 members
Stefan Molyneux Fans
1054 members
Emergency Preparedness and Survival
945 members
Libertarian Freethinkers
892 members
COVID-19
765 members
The Great Reset
678 members
The Second Amendment Sanctuary
636 members
True Crime Discussion Group
588 members
Conspiracy Research
569 members
Words of Wisdom
479 members
Q is for question
459 members
No Nonsense Philosophy
457 members
Feminism = cancer
457 members
International News
351 members
Vaccine Education & Discussion Group
304 members
Ideas of God
284 members
Comedy, Laughs and Humor.
267 members
The Case Against Corona Panic
243 members
Books
223 members
KEEP OUT
170 members
Dr. Steve Turley Group
160 members
United We Stand
153 members
The History Corner
136 members
Brain soup
129 members
IDW.Community Senate
123 members
ORIGINAL MEMES ( GREGORY ALAN ELLIOTT )
117 members
Red Pilled Hotties (Yes you can still flirt & remain politically engaged)
105 members
Propaganda Clearing House
80 members
Liz Wheeler Fans Page.
73 members
Anarcho-Capitalism / Voluntaryism
54 members
Topple the Globalists
52 members
Now You Are Talking With
47 members
MGTOW: Exodus From The Plantation
43 members
Hibiscus Hoplites
34 members
Current Events
27 members
50 Policies
23 members
Freemerica
16 members
Shadilay
14 members
Trusted Web
10 members