slug.com slug.com

1 1

To try or not to try:

"Biskupic writes that the constitutional text is, "When the President of the United States is impeached, the Chief Justice shall preside," which obscures the argument Roberts-excluders must make. The actual text is "When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside." The argument must be that Trump is no longer the President of the United States, therefore there's no role for the Chief Justice. That also provides a foundation for an argument that there is now no occasion for a trial of impeachment — impeachment is a procedure for removing the President — and it is an abuse of power for the Senate to try the former President, deprived of the safeguard of the Chief Justice as a neutral arbiter."


There was a comment in the article that referenced the above:

"If the Chief Justice is required, then what Leahy is about to do is not a duty. Taking on a role that is not yours under the Constitution is an abuse of power."
Will Leahy be costumed in his horned animal skin shaman outfit?

tracycoyle 8 Jan 26
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

That gets right at the heart of the issue. It is a crying shame that Democrats could apparently not care less about the U.S. Constitution.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:178280
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.