Achilles Heel V
by Joe Kelley
2-21-2022

The Pacifist Final Solution to the Treasonous Fraud Totalitarian Dictatorship problem is to never, ever, join forces with aggressively violent gangs and in that ORDER, to be obeyed without question, Treasonous Fraud Totalitarian Dictatorship cannot mislead anyone following that ORDER imposed by pacifists enforcing their Pacifist Final Solution.

This is, again, the Achilles Heel problem that always returns back to the required efforts to factually determine friends defending and foes offending by whatever means facilitates that ORDER from CHAOS.

"Even when modified, Quaker principles were radical enough to be unique in the colonies. Nowhere was this uniqueness more outstanding than in military affairs and in their treatment of the Indians. William Penn had from the beginning set the pattern of peace and justice to the Indians, and scrupulously purchased Indian land claims even when the claims themselves were dubious. Pursuing a policy of peace, incomprehensible to most of the other colonists, who were generally conscienceless in slaughtering the Indians, the Quakers of Pennsylvania built no forts, established no militia, and hired no scouts and Indian fighters. And by pursuing a policy of peace and no armaments, they found mirabile dictu, that they had nothing to fear. They had earned and gained the lasting respect of the Indians, and fair play met with fair play in its turn. As in New Jersey, where Quakers were influential in shaping Indian policy, there was no Indian war in the history of the colony so long as the Quakers ruled."
Pennsylvania: Quakers and Indians
Page 558
Conceived in Liberty, Murray Rothbard, 1979

Rule by Pacifist Principles is not an idea hatched out of a modern slave mind propagandized into total, or abject servility, under Treasonous Fraud Totalitarian Dictatorship, where people are killing themselves as ordered, wearing masks, injecting poisons, and consuming all savings to pay for all the costs of current Global Genocide, since productivity has been ordered to stop, and the only people ordered to keep working are those deemed essential to reach the goal of Global Genocide.

The gift from Murray Rothbard provides forensic evidence as to legal self-defense by common law. We the people do not have to give up our common sense, our moral conscience, the fruits of our labors to forensically expose the worst Treasonous Frauds among us, and then let the chips fall as they may from a position of absolute accurate accountability power.

We must not be aggressively violent ever, so as to avoid being misled ever. That defeats the Achilles Heel that so easily turns the defenders into offenders, and at the same time that Mode of Operation cuts the Achilles Heel of Treasonous Fraud. Not following criminal orders, in military terms, is the same as the Pacifist Final Solution. We must not let criminals make slaves of us all, but we don’t forget precisely how we have had our defensive power stolen from us, and used against us. 

The Military Forces must be defensively more powerful than the offensive Military Forces, failing to recognized and deal with that simple fact is not a charge charged to Pacifists, it is a charge charged to victims of Treasonous Fraud. In real terms, in real history, in reality, factually, pacifism (do no harm), does not equate to a willful choice to do nothing in defense of the innocent from the guilty. The minimum is to know fact from fiction, to know accurately who is a friend and who is a foe, and then choose, no matter how costly, fact over fiction and defending friends over following criminal orders. The words needed, since pacifism is not free from misleading misinterpretation, are voluntary association for mutual defense. Fight and win against Treasonous Fraud first, then have the power to defend against all the misled troops all around the world after the criminally insane psychopaths are no longer issuing orders that will be followed without question, to anyone.  

To blame a very powerful criminal aggressive force on pacifists refusing to fight against them would require one to totally ignore the first aggressor attempting to enslave the first pacifist and all the other aggressors that follow the first one on that aggressive path, by choice, by bribery, by fraud, or by aggressive force. Ignore the evidence proving beyond doubt who is guilty, doing so to blame the innocent instead, is evidence of victimization by Treasonous Fraud. The actual aggression by the aggressor is always a trail of forensic evidence connecting the innocent victim to the guilty criminal.

That ought to clue someone in as someone jerks their knee and blames Totalitarian Despotic Top-Down Order on pacifists, if that is what you do, blame the victim, then perhaps you now have evidence of Treasonous Fraud, and what good does it do you to blame yourself at that point, just following orders without question? You, as the victim of blaming victims for crimes perpetrated by criminals, and you follow the path of that servile stupid order back to where misdirection of defensive forces was turned away from the guilty criminal, where you were led to believe it was a good idea to blame the victim instead, follow, follow, follow, that path of stupid servility back to the source of it, and then praise your tormentor for the gift? If you find the culprit who planted that stupid and servile idea in YOUR head, then you find a Treasonous Fraud, a candidate for a lawful investigation at the county level, a name on a True Bill, with a date to face the evidence in a Criminal Trial by Jury, a case brought before independent trial jurors, in a county, common law, Court of Law.

But why work on those who are just following orders themselves, at the lower levels, when there is a forensically validated need to begin at the Top, and by triage work down to drain the swamp. While someone is placing band-aids on gunshot wounds in the chest, the most dangerous threat is freely reaching for the box of ammo to reload weapons of mass destruction used to criminally attack, with malice aforethought, more victims all lined up, and they have paid their life savings to get in the line.

Take Huge Thomson for example.

Investigation of the My Lai Incident
[loc.gov]

Mr. Reddan. “Well, was there something about the bodies that made you feel that they were not Viet Cong, had not been shot there while they were firing at troops or something of that sort? What did you see?

Lieutenant Thomson. “Can I talk with my counsel?

Mr. Herbert. “You can talk with him.”

Lieutenant Thomson. “Just the age of some of them, sir.”

Mr. Reddan. “Yes.”

Lieutenant Thomson. “You know, their parents, they could have been Viet Cong. I am not saying they were or they weren’t, because I don’t know. But say if they all were Viet Cong, the parents, well, you know, eventually the kids will grow up to be Viet Cong, too. But some of them were as small as that, they couldn’t be Viet Cong then.”

A whole misled Defensive Army caught Red-Handed killing babies for fun and profit isn’t something a Psyop Peacenik claims speciously. To blame all for the crimes of a few is a tactic. The facts in that case mattered, the facts were found out, and Lieutenant Thomson was cleared of all charges for turning his guns on baby killers on his “side.” Not “boys with toys” or other slogans. This goes precisely toward the pacifism of moral military forces built up and used effectively, efficiently, for the defense of the innocent against the guilty in time and place in American History, forensically documented on the Public Record. Misunderstanding pacifism, the purpose of it, calls for understanding the principles of accurate accountability instead of blindly accepting defenselessness in the face of overwhelming stupid servility. 

There is no Top-Down Totalitarian Dictatorial Military Force that can withstand moral scrutiny. Totalitarian Treasonous Fraud requires full-spectrum domination by Legal Fiction, and a whole lot of deceived victims just following orders without question.

Full Spectrum Dominance by Accurate Accountability:

1. Nonfeasance

Mike Scrutiny. “Did you see those babies?”

Nutjob Feasance. “No sir, I did not see those 12 and a half babies in the 20 foot long, 6 foot wide, and 6 foot deep ditch where those boys with their toys were playing around spreading democracy, no sir.”

2. Misfeasance.

Mike Scrutiny. “Did you know about the no-bid contract winner padding your bank account before you voted to send our defensive military forces into the area to ensure the continued flow of heroin from that area?”

Mary Greedy. “Yes sir, we were spreading democracy, it is our job according to Marxist literature.”

3. Malfeasance.

Mike Scrutiny. “Did you intend to weaken the people of America with your Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud and gain the presidency with a National Treasonous Election Fraud, so as to soften us up for a coup d'é·tat run by the Chinese Communist Party?”

Mr. Pedo. “Do I get free and unrestricted access to innocent children if I say yes?”

Caveat Emptor