Vid 2:58 mins.
So, it's a divine claim, stated in a different way than another divine claim, which somehow means that it is not a divine claim? I can see that Ehrman really did well in his logic studies.
He is a brilliant guy. However, a reasonable atheist will not be going around bashing something "not true" that is not a threat to anybody. That's why it's reasonable to conclude that he has an ax to grind. OR... he's just trying to sell his books by doing this harmful thing that he's doing.