Fact is, the British Foreign Service and the United States Department of State had a role to play in getting Lenin into St. Petersburg in 1917. It wasn't only the Kaiser who pushed the disruption of the Russian Empire. The White Russian Revolution that deposed the Tzar in 1918 was not considered to be a strong enough government to further the aims of the other powers, the bankers and the actual powers that ran them, demons. Because of these things, more Christians were martyred in the 70 years from 1918 to 1988 than all the centuries from Christ till then combined.

On the whole, especially the ending, was very good in my view.

No one is perfect.

That is very well done, however this particular narrative - to me - is self-confessing self-contradictory in its treatment of the principles behind characters like Hamilton, Lincoln, and (if I remember right) Roosevelt.

The contradiction involves the use of POWER to impose Dictatorial Investment Monopoly (so-called Debt, from Central Bank Fraud Spending), as exemplified in the documented actions of Hamilton, as a Credit to Hamilton.

In other words the guy speaking in that video above places Hamilton on the good side, while the same guy exposes the evil of Central Banking Fraud.

How can that possibly be anything other than a clear contradiction?

From a source:

"But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program.

"To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter."
Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and their Legacy
by William Watkins

Hamilton was on the side that used false propaganda to assume power that consolidated (monopolized power and profit) the 13 (moving to 14 with Vermont) Nation States into one Legal Fiction Nation State with a Central Bank Fraud operating to fund whatever it wanted to fund and send the cost of whatever they decide to purchase (typically Empire by Annexation, such as The Indian Nations) to be paid for by their captured slave population, all done under Roman Civil Rules, with Summary Justice Debt Collection Courts.

If this guy, having is expert opinion of history, misses this Coup in 1787 through 1789 in America, he is clearly ignorant as to which side Hamilton is on.

Then there is Lincoln.

Sure, adding technological advances to improve exchanges of data affords rapid growth of the power to produce higher quality and lower cost (rising tide lifting all boats) of life on Earth, with an obvious other side to that sword, which is the rapid growth of falsehood through the same conduit: Rail Roading Across America. Thanks Lincoln, Fearless Leader of the Legal Fiction Nation State created in 1789, "spreading democracy" from coast to coast, at the expense of who? Who paid for it? How was it paid for, as the rush was on to capitalize on the increase in velocity as currency floods through existing societies, bringing good things along with very evil things?

The means to the end - Rail Road - was falsehood and aggressive violence, not equitable exchanges among free traders, free from falsehood and aggressive violence, in free markets of ideas, and free markets of high value products and services, so what was the actual END in view for those who willfully, and malevolently, chose those means to their END in view?

Lincoln is portrayed as was Hamilton, as Fearless Leader leading the cult into a future made better by their exemplary leadership?

Really?

Good find, thanks.