slug.com slug.com

1 0

Brainstorming😛olicies of Goverment

Fair negotiable pay gap act

removes minimum wage, resets it to zero

state by state, employers, businesses and entrepreneurs must file their base starting employable pay to the "local equal opportunity audit department" established state by state

allows potential employee to negotiate their starting pay, comparing merits (exprirence, certs etc...) within reason without creating a inherit gap in wages between other already employed persons.

all within a threshold of a "percentage value"

ex. base pay 13 and hour state registered base pay: state negotiable pay gap for base pay is to be no higher than 10%, the interwiewer would not be able to offer 15 an hour to the new employee, the highest base pay in the this instant would be 14.50 an hour. This may scale in that state by Proven Merit to allow for better negotiable pay at the states discretion

new potenial employee has, sum of years( once again upon proven merit and number of years in field) : access to a percentage higher than base pay to a cap set by the state to ensure the gap is not disparaging to already employed persons

Years of exprirence may qualify interveiw-ee to negotiate a higher base pay depending on proof of such merit up to a twenty year threshhold

if employer wants to update their wage stantards they must only do so after the last update,after a year. fiscal year can qualify upon review

Employee is also aloud waive benefits to compete for a position to that persons disgression upon signing a written contract

each state may regulate its own percentage standards

TheMadHatter 4 Jan 14
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Labor wages are suppressed by the criminal powers claiming to be the government, so appealing to those powers for a fix to a problem created by them is - to coin a phrase - pissing in the wind.

"First in the importance of its evil influence they considered the money monopoly, which consists of the privilege given by the government to certain individuals, or to individuals holding certain kinds of property, of issuing the circulating medium, a privilege which is now enforced in this country by a national tax of ten per cent., upon all other persons who attempt to furnish a circulating medium, and by State laws making it a criminal offense to issue notes as currency.

"It is claimed that the holders of this privilege control the rate of interest, the rate of rent of houses and buildings, and the prices of goods, – the first directly, and the second and third indirectly. For, say Proudhon and Warren, if the business of banking were made free to all, more and more persons would enter into it until the competition should become sharp enough to reduce the price of lending money to the labor cost, which statistics show to be less than three-fourths of once per cent. In that case the thousands of people who are now deterred from going into business by the ruinously high rates which they must pay for capital with which to start and carry on business will find their difficulties removed. If they have property which they do not desire to convert into money by sale, a bank will take it as collateral for a loan of a certain proportion of its market value at less than one per cent. discount.

"If they have no property, but are industrious, honest, and capable, they will generally be able to get their individual notes endorsed by a sufficient number of known and solvent parties; and on such business paper they will be able to get a loan at a bank on similarly favorable terms. Thus interest will fall at a blow. The banks will really not be lending capital at all, but will be doing business on the capital of their customers, the business consisting in an exchange of the known and widely available credits of the banks for the unknown and unavailable, but equality good, credits of the customers and a charge therefor of less than one per cent., not as interest for the use of capital, but as pay for the labor of running the banks.

"This facility of acquiring capital will give an unheard of impetus to business, and consequently create an unprecedented demand for labor, – a demand which will always be in excess of the supply, directly to the contrary of the present condition of the labor market. Then will be seen an exemplification of the words of Richard Cobden that, when two laborers are after one employer, wages fall, but when two employers are after one laborer, wages rise. Labor will then be in a position to dictate its wages, and will thus secure its natural wage, its entire product.

"Thus the same blow that strikes interest down will send wages up. But this is not all. Down will go profits also. For merchants, instead of buying at high prices on credit, will borrow money of the banks at less than one per cent., buy at low prices for cash, and correspondingly reduce the prices of their goods to their customers. And with the rest will go house-rent. For no one who can borrow capital at one per cent. with which to build a house of his own will consent to pay rent to a landlord at a higher rate than that. Such is the vast claim made by Proudhon and Warren as to the results of the simple abolition of the money monopoly.

Benjamin Tucker, State Socialism and Anarchism:
HOW FAR THEY AGREE, AND WHEREIN THEY DIFFER, 1888

Interesting article I would love to see no minimum wage in America merit-based employment only

@TheMadHatter

To me, it can be very frustrating to know obvious problems with obvious solutions to those problems except the obvious problems associated with conveying both problems and solutions to other people, doing so intact.

Example:
Problem: Distorted markets distorted by criminal governments conspiring with criminal banking fraud causing a reduction in the natural supply of employers causing an excess in the natural supply of employees causing a decrease in the exchange value of labor: low wages.

Solution: Undistort markets.

Problem: Distorted markets

Solution:

"Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Anheuser-Bush Brewing co. V. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318. The Jury found there was no lawful consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing."
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF SCOTT
First National Bank of Montgomery, Plaintiff
vs
Jerome Daly, Defendant.
December 9, 1968

It turns out that a return to rule of law actual (not counterfeit) solves a lot of problems, if there is a will, and some basic understandings of the actual law power commanded by the people as a power that governs the government.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:70044
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.