I believe it is.

There is not biased attacks against Liberals, there is decidedly attacks against identitarians who hold fascist views. Morons like AOC who hold they should be allowed to bulldoze houses because gov't workers can remake them to a higher standard. Those people get mocked, those people that never had to fix a DMV mistake.

The article linked is not only false, but dramaticaly false. He states:

>>if it’s true that the IDW members, with the exception of Shapiro, align almost entirely with liberals on the main issues that divide liberals and conservatives, then we should reasonably expect them in practice to align politically with liberals and not conservatives.

Which basically misses the entire point of the IDW. The IDW is almost exclusively built by people who are:
a) Against censuring of political views.
b) Against demonizing political views.
c) In favor of long format, well thought out, political discussions.

The current left (ie progressives not conservatives) is against each of these things. So the actual formula is:

The IDW is (largely) against conservatives in their theory, but against progrssives in their actions. IOW the disconnect between these two is precisely the point of the IDW.
Take Jonathon Haidt as the premier example. He was raised progressive, but broke from the orthodoxy when he said, basically, "Hey, wait a minute, there are these five elements of morality and progressives can't even see three of them!"
That is an attack on progressivism... from someone who still believes progressive theory, but is against progressive action.
An IDW, for example, will be against conservatives shouting down a progressive speaker, and just as against progressives shouting down a conservative speaker. Not only does that give him far, far more work to do in the later category, it is a violation of a basic progressive principle: conservatives must be shouted down.

Wouldn't any of those steps risk media and campus tour sponsorships?

Can I have an example of a far-left spokesperson who demonstrates honesty, civility, reason and compassion and cite instances in which they have done so for each category? The leftists who have demonstrated these qualities have been attacked by the far left. My examples are Joe Rogan, Eric Weinstein, Brett Weinstein, Steven Pinker, Stephen Frye, Jordan Peterson, Sam Harris, Dave Rubin and Ricky Gervais.

Thisis as near to an unrestricted open forum as we can reasonably get, if you want to impose virtue signaling diversity on us , you're better off looking elsewhere,

I believe no one should be senored if the initiation of the person is not to harm, silence, threat, demean, belittle, hurt, degrade, sell or otherwise themselves or the other person or there for.
Freedom of speech in today's society is better then Gold or anything we know. Many are silenced by there government and need to opportunity to tell the truth no? As far as far right "conspiracy theories" many have been proven true and these people have a right to speak as well right? As far as far left people they have a right to speak as right as well no? As long as the guide line is set as absult no harm ever i see no problem with keeping the FREE SPEECH plate form was that not the intention? We all have free choice to avoid or respond self responsibility is a must as well no?