Roman Civil Rules Summary Justice Counterfeit Court of Law Judge

Over Rules Bill of Rights

He may have been one more stooge just following orders. He may have been knowledgeable about the law, which is the common law, which is the law of the land, in America, since at least 1774. If he was knowledgeable about the law he would know the following:

V - Provisons concerning prosecution
“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.”

The Counterfeit Judge, if not a stooge just following orders, knew he was infringing upon the Fifth Amendment to the 1789 Constitution of the Nation-State that Consolidated the formerly Independent United States of America, knowingly, and with malice aforethought, then he is guilty of Reckless Endangerment of All: Treason.

“Don’t get brazen with me!” Counterfeit Judge Persecution of Kyle Rittenhouse in a Roman Civil Summary Justice Court.

Why is a Grand Jury part and parcel to the common law, which is the Ancient Law, which is the unwritten law, which is the law of the land, in America, since at least 1774?

The Grand Jury is in place to keep the criminals out of the government.

“Don’t get brazen with me!”

Proof:

The People's Panel
The Grand Jury in the United States, 1634 - 1941
Richard D. Younger

Page 3

"They proved their effectiveness during the Colonial and Revolutionary periods in helping the colonists resist imperial interference. They provided a similar source of strength against outside pressure in the territories of the western United States, in the subject South following the Civil War, and in Mormon Utah. They frequently proved the only effective weapon against organized crime, malfeasance in office, and corruption in high places.

“But appreciation of the value of grand juries was always greater in times of crisis, and, during periods when threats to individual liberty were less obvious, legal reformers, efficiency experts, and a few who feared government by the people worked diligently to overthrow the institution. Proponents of the system, relying heavily on the democratic nature of the people's panel, on its role as a focal point for the expression of the public needs and the opportunity provided the individual citizen for direct participation in the enforcement of law, fought a losing battle. Opponents of the system leveled charges of inefficiency and tyranny against the panels of citizen investigators and pictured them as outmoded and expensive relics of the past. Charges of "star chamber" and "secret inquisition" helped discredit the institution in the eyes of the American people, and the crusade to abolish the grand jury, under the guise of bringing economy and efficiency to local government, succeeded in many states.”

Without a Grand Jury in place to keep the criminals out of Defensive, Moral, Efficient, Effective, Fact Based Government, the law turns into Offense, Immoral, Efficient, Effective, Fraud Based Government.

When the criminals take-over, they make it a RULE that you cannot even question their orders to obey obediently. When the criminals take-over, they make it a RULE that you cannot even question their orders to self-exterminate you and everyone else. If you are first ordered to kill or enslave other people, that order will not last long, soon enough you will be ordered to allow other people, paid to kill you by them, to let other people kill you. If the criminals RULING you ORDER you to KILL yourself, and everyone else, you must OBEY.

“Don’t get brazen with me!”

Conceived in Liberty, Murray Rothbard, 1979
“To overcome the protections afforded defendants in common-law trials, the punishment for violating New Laws was placed by the Privy Council into the hands of the prerogative courts, where prisoners could be tortured and were deprived of the benefits of trial by jury. The Court of Star Chamber also developed censorship to control the reading of the people, and the laws of seditious and slanderous libel to protect the government from criticism.” Page 25

The Star Chamber is a product of criminals who recklessly endanger life, liberty, property, the pursuit of happiness, and the means to defend all. The label “Star Chamber” was used by Treasonous Frauds to remove the common law documented requirement to maintain a Grand Jury in place of, by, and for the people against criminals in government.

“Don’t get brazen with me!”

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except when the criminals take away the Grand Jury, replacing the Grand Jury with Counterfeit Judges Counterfeiting the necessary work charged to the common law, independent, grand jurors.

Between The People and Criminals in Government, are members of The People charged with the following:

Supreme Court
Respublica v. Shaffer
Court of Oyer and Terminer, at Philadelphia
February Sessions, 1788.

“It is a matter well known, and well understood, that by the laws of our country, every question which affects a man's life, reputation, or property, must be tried by twelve of his peers; and that their unanimous verdict is, alone, competent to determine the fact in issue. If then, you undertake to enquire, not only upon what foundation the charge is made, but, likewise, upon what foundation it is denied, you will, in effect, usurp the jurisdiction of the Petty Jury, you will supercede the legal authority of the court, in judging of the competency and admissibility of witnesses, and, having thus undertaken to try the question, that question may be determined by a bare majority, or by a much greater number of your body, than the twelve peers prescribed by the law of the land. This point has, I believe, excited some doubts upon former occasions but those doubts have never arisen in the mind of any lawyer, and they may easily be removed by a proper consideration of the subject. For, the bills, or presentments, found by a grand Jury, amount to nothing more than an official accusation, in order to put the party accused upon his trial: 'till the bill is returned, there is, therefore, no charge from which he can be required to exculpate himself; and we know that many persons, against whom bills were returned, have been afterwards acquitted by a verdict of their country.”
M'Kean, Chief Justice.

Showing utter disregard to human life, mankind itself, these criminals have removed the natural rights of free people in liberty in America, and they either do not know it, as fellow stooges just following orders – actus reus - or they know it, and they are guilty of mind: mens rea.

Further proof:

Essay on The Trial by Jury, Lysander Spooner, 1852
“To show that this supposition is not an extravagant one, it may be mentioned that courts have repeatedly questioned jurors to ascertain whether they were prejudiced against the government- that is, whether they were in favor of, or opposed to, such laws of the government as were to be put in issue in the then pending trial. This was done (in 1851) in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, by Peleg Sprague, the United States district judge, in empanelling three several juries for the trials of Scott, Hayden, and Morris, charged with having aided in the rescue of a fugitive slave from the custody of the United States deputy marshal. This judge caused the following question to be propounded to all the jurors separately; and those who answered unfavorably for the purposes of the government, were excluded from the panel.
“Do you hold any opinions upon the subject of the Fugitive Slave Law, so called, which will induce you to refuse to convict a person indicted under it, if the facts set forth in the Indictment, and constituting the offence, are proved against him, and the court direct you that the law is constitutional"
The reason of this question was, that “the Fugitive Slave Law, so called,” was so obnoxious to a large portion of the people, as to render a conviction under it hopeless, if the jurors were taken indiscriminately from among the people.
A similar question was soon afterwards propounded to the persons drawn as jurors in the United States Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, by Benjamin R. Curtis, one of the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, in empanelling a jury for the trial of the aforesaid Morris on the charge before mentioned; and those who did not answer the question favorably for the government were again excluded from the panel.”

Those who take-over defensive government enslave mankind and kill mankind with malice aforethought.

To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine
November 15, 1802
“But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property.”