Special Privileged Prerogatives and National Interests
by Joe Kelley
12-21-2021

Returning to:

More Than You Ever Wanted to Know About Posse Comitatus
E. P. Visco
George Mason University
Arlington, Virginia, U.S.A

[ismor.com]

Basic Law ought to be employed during any effort to unpack an onerous Giant Wall of Text.

They, meaning Treasonous Frauds, all of which have names as individuals, and are responsible, and accountable, to each other, and to The People as a whole, those they, will OWN you by making it onerous to read their Giant Walls of Texts, whereby they assume Special Privileged Prerogatives and National Interests. They can rob, rape, torture, murder, and mass murder whomever they please, and you MUST NOT do anything to get in their damned way.

No or-else.

Just Obey.

Are the words offered and unpacked capable of passing the basic Laugh Test, Litmus Test, of lawful founding?

Did you already forget what is that basic lawful founding?

Mathew 7:12, or The Golden Rule, affords humanity that basic lawful founding to test to see if someone is outside the law, or inside the law, doing to others that which they would defend against themselves, or doing to others NOT which they themselves would defend against.

If it passes the laugh test, then it is serious business. If it fails the laugh test, then fools go there, where angles fear to tread, and knowing, beyond reasonable doubt, why no one in their right mind would go down that path, knowing what awaits those choosing that path, whereby events along that criminal path grow worse, more torturous, more horrifying, more terrifying, with each step along that path, each step that is so laughably apparent to anyone with a modicum of human powers of reason, before they take that first step, and then each additional step causes more ignorance as to the futility of raping yourself back to innocence, knowing that is worth the effort not to forget it.

Forgetaboutit!

If only there was a better way!

Where is my sign?

From the text of the Posse Comitatus offering, now unpacking, is found the following useful data.

“The execution of warrants for the return of escaped slaves was resisted in Pennsylvania. A posse was summoned to aid the commissioners but the posse refused to act.”

That is useful in the context of the aforementioned laugh test.

Need I remind you again:

“A jury of twelve local farmers, all men and all white according to Levinson, rule in favor of Freeman in 1781, giving her freedom and awarding her 30 shillings in damages.”

What happened to the laugh test between 1781, when kidnappers had to pay the fine to restore their victim after the fact of that crime, and then 1801, giving license to kidnappers to extort money from The General Population to support kidnappers seeking to recover their fraudulent property claims?

Whose bright idea was it to turn the sheriff into a criminal?

Change the lead, change the story, change the lead, change the story, change the lead, change the story.

Stop!

Don’t!

Stop!

Don’t!

Stop!

If it is right for the Sheriff to assemble a posse to right wrongs, all in agreement as to what is right and what is wrong, except of course for those who make claims of Special Privileged Prerogatives and National Interests, those confessing their malevolence in the act of kidnapping and forcing the kidnap victim to pay for all the costs of kidnapping them, and forced with torture to pay even more while kidnapped, and forced to make valuable things that will then be stolen by the kidnappers, and then to top that laundry list of crimes in a book sized legal presentment thrown at those criminals, those Treasonous Frauds have the audacity to claim that The Public has to pay for the cost of returning the kidnap victim to the kidnapper, and get up in arms to do so.

Brawndo Pronto.

Let us go BRANDO BRAWNDO!

Fuck Rediculous Speed, let's go Full Retard!

No, the posse says in unison, that is laughably stupid and servile, go fuck yourself.

Those ORDERS are as absurd, and as self-defeating, as is the Central Banker Treasonous Fraud Confidence Scheme, and the Prince from Africa Investment Opportunity.

Yet, some people, confessing in their own way, in their own time, in their own places, actually aided and abetted those Treasonous Frauds, doing so in yet more criminal acts defying lawful accountability, so where are the sheriffs?

Essay on The Trial by Jury
Lysander Spooner, 1852
[files.libertyfund.org]

“The great court for civil business was the county court; held once every four weeks. Here the sheriff presided; but the suitors of the court, as they were called, that is, the freemen or landholders of the county, were the judges; and the sheriff was to execute the judgment.”

Yea, those guys. So...running amok in the playground, rioting in the blood of the innocent, are these preposterously arrogant Treasonous Frauds, and no one at all, anywhere, takes it upon themselves to actually read the law, know it, and use it to bring those self-evident, caught Red-Handed, Treasonous Frauds to justice, because…

Too Big Too Fail.

Why is that?

Sheriffs may be dividing their loyalties in some cases, or even worse, some may be Treasonous Frauds themselves.

This is not news.

“The nature of the common law courts existing prior to Magna Carta, such as the county courts, the hundred courts, the court-leet, and the court-baron, all prove, what has already been proved from Magna Carta, that, in jury trials, the juries fixed the sentence; because, in those courts, there was no one but the jury who could fix it, unless it were the sheriff, bailiff, or steward; and no one will pretend that it was fixed by them. The juries unquestionably gave the “judgment” in both civil and criminal
cases.” Spooner

The people, meaning the representatives of the people, meaning the jurors, issued executable orders to their sheriff.

Witch People? The people protect and serve each other. The Treasonous Fraud People Consume Posterity for the survival of their own cult membership, call it sacrifice, call it pagan ritual, but don’t call a Rat late for dinner. The dues for entry are irrevocably treasonous. Once you are in, you have to Rat on your fellow Rats to get out, and Rats don’t like Rats any more, or less, than anyone else.

“At the common law the sheriffs, bailiffs, and other officers were chosen by the people, instead of being appointed by the king. (4 Blackstone, 413. Introduction to Gilbert’s History of the Common Pleas, p. 2, note, and p. 4.)” Spooner

Original above, counterfeit below, change the lead, change the story.

“These officers, who appointed the sheriffs, were themselves appointed by the king, and held their offices during his pleasure.” Spooner again

People elect their sheriff, their sheriff is commanded by people representing the people, those jurors, grand and trial, and if the sheriff goes rogue, do those people OBEY that RAT, or hand them a presentment to appear before The People, the Trial Jurors, in a Court of Law?

What is the legacy of history, other than something in need of antiquation?

Antiquate rule by the people, or, the opposite, antiquate rule by RATS in the RANKS?

Rats will pretend that YOU can have it both ways, at a cost charged to YOU.

The State, or antiquated King’s Prerogatives, The Infantile State, representing The State, not representing The People, issue orders to the sheriff.

The State made be do it.

A. A Republic of, by, and for The People as a whole.
B. Not a Republic, rather, something of, by, and for Treasonous Frauds.

One is chosen by The People, the other is enforced by Treasonous Fraud so as to consume The People.

Choices, choices, and what? I choose blind obedience to falsehood without question.

Where is that cool-aid pitcher?

The Nation State, having National Interests, serves The Infantile State, paying to its representatives, those FUNDS stolen from The People, since The Infantile State makes nothing of value at all ever, it cannot, it is a Legal Fiction, it only exists in the MINDS of the vcitims.

Enemies of The Infantile State, The People’s representatives NOT-WITH-STANDING, dare not question orders to be obeyed as demanded by those investing in power and profits extorted from The People by cult members that constitute The Infantile State.

No? Again, your knee jerks?

“To show that this supposition is not an extravagant one, it may be mentioned that courts have repeatedly questioned jurors to ascertain whether they were prejudiced against the government - that is, whether they were in favor of, or opposed to, such laws of the government as were to be put in issue in the then pending trial. This was done (in 1851) in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, by Peleg Sprague, the United States district judge, in empanelling three several juries for the trials of Scott, Hayden, and Morris, charged with having aided in the rescue of a fugitive slave from the custody of the United States deputy marshal. This judge caused the following question to be propounded to all the jurors separately; and those who answered unfavorably for the purposes of the government, were excluded from the panel.”
"Do you hold any opinions upon the subject of the Fugitive Slave Law, so called, which will induce you to refuse to convict a person indicted under it, if the facts set forth, in the indictment, and constituting the offence, are proved against him, and the court direct you that the law is constitutional?"
The reason of this question was, that "the Fugitive Slave Law, so called," was so obnoxious to a large portion of the people, as to render a conviction under it hopeless, if the jurors were taken indiscriminately from among the people.” Spooner

The moral part of this story is that blind obedience will be questioned so long as one individual commands moral conscience. How many moral people does it take to organize a proper defense, and along the way will there be criminals infesting the rank and file defenders, and if that is a palpable possibility, then which path is better?

A. The People form the government themselves, in Committees for Safety, elected sheriffs with posse comitatus powers, elected by the people, and those accurately accounted for sheriffs are then directed by independent grand jurors, and independent trial jurors, setting precedents worthy of the meaning offered in the original message. The original meaning preceding the counterfeit meaning.

B. Obey Treasonous Frauds because it cost to much to disobey, since they stole the lions share of value produced by their victims, and that loot funds more stealing, more bribing, more extorting, more robbing, more raping, more torturing, more murdering, and more mass murdering to keep the RATS in POWER.

When is it too late?

Caveat Emptor