Legal Fiction II
by Joe Kelley
3-21-2022

Richard Henry Lee (VA)
6th President of the United States
in Congress Assembled
November 30, 1784 to June 3, 1785
[theforgottenfounders.com]

"A federal, or rather a national city,...”

The cat was let out of the bag above. Those witnessing the events that turned America off of the Natural Law equal footing at law path, were those witnessing the turning back onto the unequal footing under criminal rules path. The war was fought and won to get off the criminal path and then those witnessing witnessed the fraudulent turn back under Totalitarian Rule where criminal orders must be followed without question. 

Fuck you, pay me. 

From doing unto others that which deters crime, moving from giving others every opportunity to return under lawful order, turning from holding each offender to account precisely for those offenses in all cases of controversy before the next victim falls, abandoned, but not without a fight. 

From the Golden Rule method of operation, the events between 1787 and 1789 constituted a New World Order in America, to Build Back Better the Orders that must be followed without question, orders issued by the parasites that always infest mankind, those rats I call Treasonous Frauds. 

Those who were defenders, confessed by their words and their actions as defenders, had organically formed, from grass-roots, adaptive, creative, defensive republics, and then those defensive republics were then federated into defensive voluntary association, so as to defeat British Criminals persecuting War of Aggression, where those British Treasonous Frauds were given every opportunity to answer to the criminal charges published against their criminal acts, published in many forms including a common law defiance, a Public Notice called a Declaration of Independence. 

Solemn Notice of Mixed War based upon Military and Commercial Lien Rights. 

No, fuck you, I'm not paying you, thanks, but no thanks. 

Richard Henry Lee was front and center as one of the most important leaders leading the refusal to follow criminal orders without question. Richard Henry Lee was an exemplary example of a defender creatively adapting to an effective, efficient, and expedient defense against criminal attackers wearing their Red Coats and rioting in the blood of the innocent in America for fun and profits, dividends, and free stuff.

Examples exemplifying republics federated are individuals whose actions match their words during crucial battles with words and when words fail to resolve conflicts, then defensive actions match the Publicly announced words that forewarn those on both sides, defenders and offenders, as to those justified actions that were justifiable according to those facts found, those facts validated, and those facts prosecuted in written form, on Public Notices, in Public Media, according to common laws of free people defending liberty. 

Individual kings, and queens, are lords of their own selves, each a republic unto oneself, on an equal footing with all other kings and queens, all documented as never having been adjudicated guilty of outlawry, never found guilty in a Court of Law, and therefore presumed to be innocent of all charges.  

Google says:

outlawry, act of putting a person beyond the protection of the law for his refusal to become amenable to the court having legal jurisdiction.

Never having ever refused the just remedy of peers adjudicating criminal charges against each king and each queen, where each are under the collective protection of the common laws of free people. Each is born innocent until each is proven guilty before their peers in a Court of Law in county jurisdiction, and in federated republics following common laws of free people in Liberty. 

Federated republics federated for mutual defense against criminal aggressors found guilty by their criminal actions as they were found guilty as they moved from each victim to each next victim during their riots as they rioted and are rioting in the blood of the innocent, undefended against, as proven by the growing piles of tortured and murdered victims. 

“If the provision in question holds out allurements to attempt to withdraw, the people of a state must ever be subject to state as well as federal taxes; but the federal city and places will be subject only to the latter, and to them by no fixed proportion. Nor of the taxes raised in them, can the separate states demand any account of congress. These doors opened for withdrawing from the state governments entirely, may, on other accounts, be very alluring and pleasing to those anti-republican men who prefer a place under the wings of courts.”

Witch Courts Dick? 

They were expressly NOT “federal” taxes, you Dick, were guilty of changing the meanings of words while you confessed that the meanings of words were being changed. This was also figured out by many other witnesses witnessing the move from Courts of Law in county jurisdictions in federated republics, moved instead to Courts NOT of Law, Top-Down from Central Command at the New Nation-State Legal Fiction to Build Back Better National Tax Farming on The Plantation. 

June 8,9, and 10th, 1776
It was argued by Wilson, Robert R. Livingston, E. Rutledge, Dickinson and others:
"That the question was not whether, by a declaration of independence, we should make ourselves what we are not; but whether we should declare a fact which already exists:
That, as to the people or Parliament of England, we had always been independent of them, their restraints on our trade deriving efficacy from our acquiescence only, and not from any rights they possessed of imposing them; and that, so far, our connection had been federal only, and was now dissolved by the commencement of hostilities:
That, as to the king, we had been bound to him by allegiance, but that this bond was now dissolved by his assent to the late act of Parliament, by which he declares us out of his protection, and by his levying war on us a fact which had long ago proved us out of his protection, it being a certain position in law, that allegiance and protection are reciprocal, the one ceasing when the other is withdrawn:"

Federal association is expressly not blind obedience to criminal orders, Dick. 

Abigail Adams to John Adams Braintree, Mass., March 31, 1776
"I have sometimes been ready to think that the passion for liberty cannot be equally strong in the breasts of those who have been accustomed to deprive their fellow creatures of theirs. Of this I am certain that it is not founded upon that generous and Christian principle of doing to others as we would that others should do unto us. . . . "

Dick, see Dick, Nationalism doesn't even pass the laugh test of moral laws. 

Kidnap victim frees oneself in 1781: 
“A jury of twelve local farmers, all men and all white according to Levinson, rule in favor of Freeman in 1781, giving her freedom and awarding her 30 shillings in damages.”

Dick, see Jane run, see Jane run from Nationalism, Dick. 

Dr. James McHenry at the National Convention of 1787.
"Mr. E. Gerry. Does not rise to speak to the merits of the question before the Committee but to the mode.
“A distinction has been made between a federal and national government. We ought not to determine that there is this distinction for if we do, it is questionable not only whether this convention can propose an government totally different or whether Congress itself would have a right to pass such a resolution as that before the house. The commission from Massachusets empowers the deputies to proceed agreeably to the recommendation of Congress. This the foundation of the convention. If we have a right to pass this resolution we have a right to annihilate the confederation."

Dick! What have you guys allowed to be done to the rest of mankind? 

June 14, 1788
Patrick Henry:
“Mr. Chairman, it is now confessed that this is a national government. There is not a single federal feature in it. It has been alleged, within these walls, during the debates, to be national and federal, as it suited the arguments of gentlemen.
“But now, when we have heard the definition of it, it is purely national.”

Oh Dick, Dick, Dick, were you put under a spell? 

June 20, 1788
Melancton Smith
“He was pleased that, thus early in debate, the honorable gentleman had himself shown that the intent of the Constitution was not a confederacy, but a reduction of all the states into a consolidated government. He hoped the gentleman would be complaisant enough to exchange names with those who disliked the Constitution, as it appeared from his own concessions, that they were federalists, and those who advocated it were anti-federalists.”

Dicky boy, how can you let these Treasonous Frauds get away with their con game? 

"There is no question of the general doctrine that fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments" (United States v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61(1878). 
 
The move from common law county jurisdiction and equal footing doctrine, each free individual at liberty has the same access to rule of law as to each other or it is not law and it, witch court, does not pass the laugh test of common sense. The move went to National Debt Collection Courts. 

There was nothing federal about it. 

Why are you parroting the lies told to you? 

Is that a valid question and does that lead to a form of adjudication? 

Jus ad bellum, jus in bello, jus post bellum. 

Caveat Emptor