Defiance History II
by Joe Kelley
4-5-2022

14th of October, 1774
"On the same day, Congress unanimously resolved, “that the respective colonies are entitled to the common law of England, and more especially to the great and inestimable privilege of being tried by their peers of the vicinage according to the course of that law.” They further resolved, “that they were entitled to the benefit of such of the English statutes as existed at the time of their colonization, and which they have, by experience, respectively found to be applicable to their several and local circumstances.” They also resolved, that their ancestors, at the time of their immigration, were “entitled to all the rights, liberties, and immunities, of free and natural-born subjects within the realms of England.”

On the 20th day of October 1774
“This agreement contained a clause to discontinue the slave trade, and a provision not to import East India tea from any part of the world. In the article respecting non-exportations, the sending of rice to Europe was excepted."

On the 1st of April, 1775
"On this occasion, the importation of slaves was expressly prohibited."

Essay on The Trial by Jury, Lysander Spooner, 1852
“For more than six hundred years—that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215—there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.

“Unless such be the right and duty of jurors, it is plain that, instead of juries being a “palladium of liberty”—a barrier against the tyranny and oppression of the government—they are really mere tools in its hands, for carrying into execution any injustice and oppression it may desire to have executed.

“But for their right to judge of the law, and the justice of the law, juries would be no protection to an accused person, even as to matters of fact; for, if the government can dictate to a jury any law whatever, in a criminal case, it can certainly dictate to them the laws of evidence. That is, it can dictate what evidence is admissible, and what inadmissible, and also what force or weight is to be given to the evidence admitted. And if the government can thus dictate to a jury the laws of evidence, it can not only make it necessary for them to convict on a partial exhibition of the evidence rightfully pertaining to the case, but it can even require them [6] to convict on any evidence whatever that it pleases to offer them.

“That the rights and duties of jurors must necessarily be such as are here claimed for them, will be evident when it is considered what the trial by jury is, and what is its object.

“The trial by jury,” then, is a “trial by the country”—that is, by the people—as distinguished from a trial by the government.”

Criminal orders issued confess guilt in fact. Criminals issue orders that must be obeyed without question, a fact found by those who question criminal orders.

Deliberation on the question concerning a common law Notice of Mixed War, a defiance, a Declaration of Independence, June 8, 1776:
“That the question was not whether, by a declaration of independence, we should make ourselves what we are not; but whether we should declare a fact which already exists:
That, as to the people or Parliament of England, we had always been independent of them, their restraints on our trade deriving efficacy from our acquiescence only, and not from any rights they possessed of imposing them; and that, so far, our connection had been federal only, and was now dissolved by the commencement of hostilities:
That, as to the king, we had been bound to him by allegiance, but that this bond was now dissolved by his assent to the late act of Parliament, by which he declares us out of his protection, and by his levying war on us a fact which had long ago proved us out of his protection, it being a certain position in law, that allegiance and protection are reciprocal, the one ceasing when the other is withdrawn:”

Defy orders that constitute aiding and abetting criminals seeking to destroy human lives by taking from victims their liberty and their means of defense.

Defy Treasonous Fraud by duty, by law, legally, morally, rightfully, as a federated republic, or suffer at the hands of Treasonous Frauds or worse, become one.

June 6, 1788
George Mason:
“Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions should arise under this government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of those powers; could not Congress, under the idea of providing for the general welfare, and under their own construction, say that this was destroying the general peace, encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people? And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury?”

Treasonous Frauds replace trial by jury with Summary Justice (JUST-US) National Debt Collection Agencies copied from British Empire Exchequer, Chancery, Equity, Admiralty, and now Human Trafficking Courts. Treasonous Frauds are the worst criminals ever to have disgraced the human gene pool, so feeding them more victims, or joining their rat ranks on their hamster wheel Empire Rise with a Boom and Empire Fall with a Bust schedule, seeking your piece of the action, costs.

Is that a fact?

If so what is the true cost, and how can it be discovered, acknowledged, and prosecuted (defended against) if the means to that end is collecting dust and instead people are led to plead for mercy before the monsters who torment them?

June 17, 1788
George Mason:
“Mr. Chairman, this is a fatal section, which has created more dangers than any other. The first clause allows the importation of slaves for twenty years. Under the royal government, this evil was looked upon as a great oppression, and many attempts were made to prevent it; but the interest of the African merchants prevented its prohibition. No sooner did the revolution take place, than it was thought of. It was one of the great causes of our separation from Great Britain. Its exclusion has been a principal object of this state, and most of the states in the Union. The augmentation of slaves weakens the states; and such a trade is diabolical in itself, and disgraceful to mankind; yet, by this Constitution, it is continued for twenty years. As much as I value a union of all the states, I would not admit the Southern States into the Union unless they agree to the discontinuance of this disgraceful trade, because it would bring weakness, and not strength, to the Union.”

“A jury of twelve local farmers, all men and all white according to Levinson, rule in favor of Freeman in 1781, giving her freedom and awarding her 30 shillings in damages.”

"There is no question of the general doctrine that fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments" United States v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61, 1878.

The people defend themselves in defiance of criminal orders as duty-bound, lawful, legal, moral private prosecutors, independent county grand jurors, and trial jurors in County Criminal Courts of Law, not Infantile State National Empire District Legal Fiction Courts where Union Members represent their Legal Fiction STATE, and that STATE is blamed for all the injures “it” does to the people. When people dare to use District Court Orders to claim injury done to individuals by The State, those Summary Justice (JUST-US) Union Members may, at their exclusive pleasure, award damages to bribe those victims and the funds that FUND bribery payments are taken from the National Debt.

Who pays National Debt? Who writes purchase orders from the National Debt FUND? What is bought in the name of the Nation-State and in the interest of The Nation-State Union Monopoly of Power and Profit? What is purchased in the name of the people who are told that they must pay that National Debt without question?

Nation-State versus federated republics.

Union versus competition.

Stagnation versus adaptation.

Legal-Fiction enforced brutally versus accurate accounting to deter crime with Public Notices of Trial Transcripts.

XIV - Citizen rights not to be abridged
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868
“4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.”

Rebels, so-called, in American history, exhausted peaceful means by moral principle in defiance of criminal orders issued by Treasonous Frauds. Criminals, especially Treasonous Frauds, do not obey moral principles, it is a given, a maxim, a known fact that matters, that criminals must cause injury to innocent victims in order to be accepted into their Union as a member of their Angry Mob. Once joined as a member, each member is then polarized against moral principles that include the process that holds criminals to an accurate accounting of the facts that matter in each criminal case.

Jus Ad Bellum, Jus In Bello, Jus Post Bellum

Caveat Emptor