Courts Not Of Law I
by Joe Kelley
4-10-2022

Jan 6th Defendant NOT GUILTY, Judge Says Video PROVED Cops Let Them In, Young Turks Completely WRONG
262,588 views, Apr 7, 2022

“...there has been a jury trial, and another bench trial…”

Clues for the clueless in matters of fact and law begin with the map that maps the terrain, which is said to be the golden rule, and easily read to navigate the waters muddied by sewer rats.

Presume innocence until proven guilty by a process that works for all on an equal footing or the process does not pass the laugh test.

Given the time at the moment, expediently, protecting the next victim from injury, no time to waste while victims are dropping like flies.

Haste makes waste, but don't go off half-cocked, responsibility is accurately accountable.

Worse than failing to stop someone guilty from proceeding from one crime scene to the next with impunity is the guilty one proceeding from one crime scene to the next as the aggressor causes the demand for a validated defensive action at law.

Facts speak for themselves self-evidently, Treasonous Frauds commit treason and fraud.

Marginally less evil than the criminal rioting in the blood of the innocent are those who have the power to stop those criminals, yet they willfully do nothing, or worse, they aid and abet.

If someone is actually, factually, causing injury to someone innocent in time and place and someone who could prevent any injury to anyone does not act in defense, for cause, then there are two crime scenes. The initial initiation of aggression by the criminal willfully acting out aggression proven to be a crime by the fact that the criminal causes injury to the victim who is then injured, constitutes one crime in one place one time where the evidence of the crime is the injury to the victim traced back to the criminal causing that injury to that victim in fact, then the criminal act of nonfeasance for failing to take up the cause at law to prevent injury to that innocent victim, or the next, or the next, when it was and is in the power of the one choosing to do nothing and thereby choosing to be guilty of nonfeasance.

If I knew better I would not have ruined my life by turning to crime and causing injury to the innocent victim, and if I knew better I would not have refused to take up the cause to prevent the crime when it was possible to prevent the crime on my watch with my dime, saving the injury I did or will do to the victim or victims I choose to injure.

The same individual decides to commit both crimes alone in a fictional suicide case, acting out all the necessary parts in the play-acting version, the map, while the real thing happens with other people playing the same parts all over the world and everyone stands idle just watching as humanity moves to inhumanity and inevitably to omnicide.

“When you are legally called to try such a cause, if you shall shuffle out yourself, and thereby persons perhaps less conscientious happen to be made use of, and so a villain escapes justice, or an innocent man is ruined, by a prepossessed or negligent verdict; can you think yourself in such a case wholly blameless? Qui non prohibet cum potest, jubet: That man abets an evil, who prevents it not, when it is in his power. Nec caret scrupulo sosietatis occultae qui evidenter facinori definit obviare: nor can he escape the suspicion of being a secret accomplice, who evidently declines the prevention of an atrocious crime.”
Englishman’s Right
by John Hawles
1762

If someone is falsely claiming to be preventing a crime, someone who is NOT factually preventing a crime, because there is no actual crime happening, while that actor acts out a defensive act intending to stop a crime NOT in progress, fooled into believing that there is a crime and the action done by the fool is to attempt to stop a crime that is NOT happening, the fool finds out that the fool was fooled, with or without help, as there are no victims injured by anyone, unless the actions that were done to prevent a crime that was NOT in progress caused injury to someone NOT guilty of any crime. If there is injury done by the fool foolish enough to attempt to prevent a crime NOT in progress, then the fool is guilty of actus reus, a guilty act of false accusation, false validation, and false prosecution. If the fool is shown the evidence of the false crime that is NOT a crime in progress and the fool is then willfully proceeding to persecute someone, the fool is guilty of mind, mens rea, a malevolent criminal act in fact.

False accusations are crime scenes. I was fooled into believing I was terminally bad so I killed myself. Society was fooled into believing that all men are bad so society killed itself.

A common law criminal case demands from an accuser that the accuser moves the accusation from the accuser, with the accusation in hand, moving that accusation to an independent grand jury for validation.

Waste not, want not, time is running, be careful, be precise, but don't be late.

For cause.

Cause the criminal may strike again. Cause the criminal caused a need for effective defensive action. Just cause’ humans need to survive. Just because there is a demand on many levels, NOT merely instinctual, duty if you will, a duty to survive despite being fooled.

That is an American precedent at common law, which is The Ancient Law, which is the unwritten law, which is, therefore, the law that does not need codification to be a law, which is the law also written in so many Public Notices such as Trial Transcripts from County Jurisdictions in Courts of Law, moving prosecutions to be validated by independent County Grand Juries and eventually to any of over 3,000 County Criminal Courts of Law at this moment on so many dimes.

Duty-bound to prosecute the fools fooled into inaction by Treasonous Frauds.

Then what chicken butts?

Bench trials are by right factually NOT judiciously adjudicated in a Court of Law, and this was common knowledge not too long ago, but the Treasonous Frauds have been busy spiriting away the knowledge that sets mankind free from Treasonous Fraud.

“The third step, the following year, was the creation by the Privy Council of the network of vice admiralty courts for the colonies, authorized in the Navigation Act. These courts were specially created for the trial and punishment of violators of the Navigation Acts. Prior to 1697, accused violators were tried at the regular common-law colonial courts. This meant that the judges were colonists who probably disapproved of the restrictive laws, and that the trials were by juries almost invariably sympathetic to the violators. To surmount this problem, the Privy Council now commissioned the royal colonial governors as vice admirals, each empowered to create a vice admiralty court under his jurisdiction. The vice admiralty court could now convict violators without the inconvenience of putting the case to a jury of the defendant’s peers, for here trial was conducted by the judge only. The judges, of course, were royal officials, in effect appointed by the governors, as were all of the vice admiralty court officials. In practice the judges had the full management of the vice admiralty courts; and to ensure diligence in convicting offenders, the judges were paid a percentage of the value of the violator’s goods that they condemned. Enhancing the power of each judge was the fact that each court had one judge only, although in some cases the judge appointed a deputy to try cases; for instance, the judge of the Massachusetts court, the jurisdiction of which covered New Hampshire, appointed a deputy for the latter colony.”
Conceived in Liberty
Aftermath in the 1690s: The Salem Witch-Hunt and
Stoughton’s Rise to Power
Page 452
Murray Rothbard, 1979

Put the vice back in court.

Witch Court.

Courts NOT of law, run by Treasonous Frauds, false accusations, no victims until the false accuser makes the false accusation while the false accuser claims authority over law, a false claim proven in the act of falsely accusing someone while the rules governing the government expressly codify false accusations as a criminal act, and while rules governing the government expressly codify that criminal acts by government officers constitute treason against their own rules on their own law books that codify the limits of their authority at law.

“The government called a grand jury for Middlesex County and Judge Samuel Nevill, one of the leading proprietors, charged the jury to indict twenty of the rioters for high treason. The jury, however, “would hardly indict them for a riot.”
Conceived in Liberty
Land Conflicts in New Jersey
Pages 547, 548
Murray Rothbard, 1979

The law constitutes County Grand Jury Jurisdiction of law in any criminal case in America.

V - Provisons concerning prosecution
“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury...”

For cause.

The law constitutes County Trial Jury Jurisdiction of law in any criminal case in America.

VI - Right to a speedy trial, witnesses, etc.
“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury...”

For cause.

A Court of Law in America from 1774 to this day is a County Jurisdiction common law process, with or without a building, run by volunteers who volunteer as private prosecutors, independent County Grand Jurors, and independent County Trial Jurors. Courts NOT of law, in America, bypass the people, because the people are considered the property of the government by Treasonous Frauds, and Courts NOT of law are run from benches by Summary Justice Treasonous Frauds.

For Treasonous Fruads.

“To overcome the protections afforded defendants in common-law trials, the punishment for violating New Laws was placed by the Privy Council into the hands of the prerogative courts, where prisoners could be tortured and were deprived of the benefits of trial by jury. The Court of Star Chamber also developed censorship to control the reading of the people, and the laws of seditious and slanderous libel to protect the government from criticism.”
Conceived in Liberty
Europe at the Dawn of the Modern Era
Page 25
Murray Rothbard, 1979

A County Court of Law run by the people and for the people remains in force when the people volunteer to keep the rats out of government. Nothing other than Treasonous Fraud imposed by Treasonous Frauds prevents the people from regaining the common law jurisdiction as it was regained in 1774 on the Public Notices as a legal precedent.

"On the same day, Congress unanimously resolved, “that the respective colonies are entitled to the common law of England, and more especially to the great and inestimable privilege of being tried by their peers of the vicinage according to the course of that law.” They further resolved, “that they were entitled to the benefit of such of the English statutes as existed at the time of their colonization, and which they have, by experience, respectively found to be applicable to their several and local circumstances.” They also resolved, that their ancestors, at the time of their immigration, were “entitled to all the rights, liberties, and immunities, of free and natural-born subjects within the realms of England.”
First Federal Congress of America
14th of October, 1774

Not National.

If people continue to ask Treasonous Frauds for mercy, in their Courts NOT of law, begging for a bone to chew on, those Treasonous Frauds will rip your arm from your body and throw you a bone after they eat all the flesh from the bone that was once yours, unless it pleases them to take your children first.

Qui Non Prohibet Cum Potest Jubet

Sua Jura Libertates Suas

Judicium Parium Suorum

Jus Ad Bellum, Jus In Bello, Jus Post Bellum

Caveat Emptor