Trial Transcripts Rinse and Repeat V
5-24-2022
by Joe Kelley

IN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Cause No. 17-6553
Ron Glick, Petitioner
V.
Angela J Townsend, Et Al.
On Writ of Certiorari
To the United States Supreme Court
[supremecourt.gov]

"There is no question of the general doctrine that fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments" United States v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61 - 1878.

All original writs from Ancient Law used or abused by individual tyrants or collectivist Angry Mob Bosses are duties responsibly accounted for accurately by each individual on an equal footing at law.

If not you, then WHO?

Morally, legally, lawfully, rightfully, efficiently, expediently, defensively, voluntarily, responding to clear and present dangers clearly presented to humanity by inhumanity as immoral inhumanity riots in the blood of the innocent warranting by probable cause a number of Treasonous Frauds appearing on affidavits named as defendants given their opportunity to explain to their peers JUST how their actions are JUST despite all the evidence against them in their County Criminal Trial by Jury Cases validated by independent grand jurors and adjudicated by independent trial jurors.

Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, Pedo Joe, and Son, Killary, etc., invited to appear before representatives of the people in their County Criminal Court of Law as defendants.

The list is not as long as the number of Political Prisoners suffering cruel and unusual punishments in The American Gulag since 1789.

Google says:
Writs of Certiorari
"The primary means to petition the court for review is to ask it to grant a writ of certiorari. This is a request that the Supreme Court order a lower court to send up the record of the case for review."

Those are pleadings before The State. As kidnapped people are forced to labor for Treasonous Frauds, and as those victims ask for permission to take Treasonous Frauds to Treasonous Fraud Courts NOT of Law, those guilty Treasonous Frauds slow walk the kidnapped victims through torturous injustice because they can, because the victims believe in the false authority of Treasonous Frauds.

One of the most, if not THE most important writ from Ancient Law is a defiance.

“Hallam says, "The relation established between a lord and his vassal by the feudal tenure, far from containing principles of any servile and implicit obedience, permitted the compact to be dissolved in case of its violation by either party. This extended as much to the sovereign as to inferior lords. If a, vassal was aggrieved, and if justice was denied him, he sent a defiance, that is, a renunciation of fealty to the king, and was entitled to enforce redress at the point of his sword. It then became a contest of strength as between two independent potentates, and was terminated by treaty, advantageous or otherwise, according to the fortune of war. There remained the original principle, that allegiance depended conditionally upon good treatment, and that an appeal might be lawfully made to arms against an oppressive government. Nor was this, we may be sure, left for extreme necessity, or thought to require a long-enduring forbearance. In modern times, a king, compelled by his subjects' swords to abandon any pretension, would be supposed to have ceased to reign; and the express recognition of such a right as that of insurrection has been justly deemed inconsistent with the majesty of law. But ruder ages had ruder sentiments. Force was necessary to repel force; and men accustomed to see the king's authority defied by a private riot, were not much shocked when it was resisted in defence of public freedom." - 3 Middle Age, 240-2.”
Essay on The Trial by Jury
Lysander Spooner, 1852

Free at last!

Treasonous Frauds kidnap the population, force the population to work for the profits of Treasonous Frauds, and then those Treasonous Frauds use that stolen property to steal more from the kidnapped population of “slaves” enslaved within a blind belief in falsehood without question. Meanwhile, each individual “slave” is duty-bound to employ peaceful, moral, lawful, and legal methods clearly and presently documented in legal precedent, to expose those Treasonous Frauds and prosecute them in any of over 3,000 County Criminal Courts of Law, despite those Treasonous Frauds obstructing due process of law moving expediently to a JUST cause in defense of the people from every single danger that warrants defensive actions, from worst to least.

The Statute of Quo Warranto, made Anno 18 Edw. I Stat. 2 and Anno Dom. 1290.
"These statutes are codifications of existing common law practices, albeit practices that had been used little if at all for a long time."
"This was essentially a move to put all feudal lords on the defense, so that the King could remove any that opposed him or his policies, and confirm the obeisance of the rest."
"Once established as a tool that could be used by a monarch, it also establishes it as a tool for use by the people when they become the sovereign, as happened upon adoption of the U.S. Declaration of Independence."
"It should also be noted that the original common law writs of quo warranto were demands on the party claiming authority, the respondent, who had the burden of proof, not petitions for relief from the court, other than declaratory., with the burden of proof on the petitioner."
[constitution.org]

Pleading a case of a Treasonous Fraud getting away with Treasonous Fraud in a Court NOT of Law compares favorably for Treasonous Frauds in their Courts, and those pleadings compare to a County Criminal Case before a jury in a County Court of Law unfavorably for Treasonous Frauds and favorable FOR THE PEOPLE in their County Courts of Law.

Witch Court?

The State does not exist in reality and therefore The State does not exist in a County Criminal Case before a jury because The State is a Legal Fiction Entity at best, and at worst it is a trap set by Treasonous Frauds to lure victims in with bait that looks like justice but is JUST for Treasonous Frauds to give themselves immunity from prosecution.

The People, not The State, versus the named defendant.

The blank is LEFT blank because the people are stupid and servile from too much collectivist cool-aid abuse.

Representing The People, by law, by precedent, dating back into Ancient Times, is the accuser, the one standing on moral grounds, bringing the evidence against the accused to the jurors. First the grand jurors for validation, then the trial jurors for adjudication.

Private prosecutors, independent and individual, are given the name Attorney General in criminal cases, because individual, independent, and private prosecutors represent the people as a whole when the charge is a criminal charge because the people are all threatened by the immorality of the damages done to the victim or victims by the criminal known, suspected, or unknown and then discovered, validated, and currently prosecuted by the Attorney General private prosecutor independent individual representing the people, NOT the collective State.

Where is The State? Why is anyone representing The State?

If you are caught in The State, a legal fiction, then consider that you are caught in an Infantile State, and it may be a good time to grow the fuck up.

Caveat Emptor