Environmentalists don't seem to care about golden eagles when it comes to wind power-
[hotair.com]
5
Be part of the movement!
Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.Create your free account
3 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.I once had the awesome experience of watching a golden eagle stoop on a cat and take it. What a magnificent bird. Note: the eagle on the Marine Corps Emblem is a golden eagle.
FuzzyMarineVet
Level 8
Aug 18, 2022
3
Both Republicans and Democrats whiff on the science here.
For small birds, cats take more birds than wind turbines by 3 orders of magnitude.
That being said, for golden eagles, it doesn't happen that cats kill eagles. It's the other way around. For golden eagles, wind turbines are a concern.
jaymaron
Level 8
Aug 18, 2022
3
“North America more deadly to birds than wind turbines: climate change, unregulated harvesting and habitat loss, which have caused a decline of 3 billion birds.” I could be wrong, but putting up thousands of wind turbines in a prime habitat for golden eagles seems like habit loss. But the reality is that environmentalists are not actually pro-nature as much as they are anti-human.
Mechanic
Level 8
Aug 18, 2022
4
But the reality is that environmentalists are not actually pro-nature as much as they are anti-human.
I think you may be right about that.
Loss of habitat is NOT the problem:
The Continental U.S. (i.e. lower 48) has about 1.9 Billion acres and the vast majority is undeveloped as only 69.4 million acres, or about 3.6% is urban.
Be part of the movement!
Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.