Treasonous Counterfeit Science Dogma
by Joe Kelley
1-20-2022

Science is a justifiable process when it works to accurately identify problems and improve successful solutions to the accurately identified problems, subject to improvement as better solutions over-rule worse solutions backed by all available evidence found regardless of any preconceived prejudice for existing solutions or existing problems.

Science applied to the problem known as crime, if it is scientific, accurately identifies false solutions made false on purpose: Treasonous Fraud.

Hypothesis A:

It is unreasonable to force healthy people to risk their lives for the greater good when sick people misdiagnose threats to humanity both on purpose and following misdiagnosis without question so as to destroy humanity on purpose or accidentally when following misdiagnosis without question.

Hypothesis B:

It is unreasonable to encourage, bribe, or extort people into voting in an election in the face of proof beyond reasonable doubt that elections are principally criminal when electors are voting for Totalitarian Dictators destroying humanity with Totalitarian Dictatorships, and those who count the votes are forensically exposed as having counted the votes fraudulently, removing votes that do not vote for the preselected candidate and adding votes that vote for the preselected candidate.

Hypothesis C:

It is unreasonable to claim that science is a process by which all evidence contrary to a scientifically published theory, such as germ theory, is not worthy as evidence scientifically. It is unreasonable to claim that science is a process by which subjective selection of evidence in support of a predetermined conclusion is the only evidence worthy of the title: The Science. It is therefore reasonable to claim that The Science is a subjective predetermined prejudice supporting Treasonous Fraud.

If the Chinese Communist Party, and other known criminal gangs, were to gather enough criminal powers, enslaving enough victims doing whatever the leaders of the Chinese Communist Party ordered them to do, or be tortured to death for disobedience, and they did, in fact, create a Bio-Weapon in a Lab in Wuhan China, with the help of a Treasonous Fraud named Fauci, and others, such as Bill Gates, then would it be reasonable to assume, with a predetermined prejudicial conclusion, or a hypothesis, or a Conspiracy Theory, that those criminals hell bent on destroying humanity, for their exclusive power to make slaves out of humanity, that they, the CCP, Fauci, Gates, et al, would lie about what they were really doing?

Is that too far fetched?

Criminals using weapons of mass destruction will tend to lie about their crimes.

No?

By what process, if there is any known to humanity, would the hypothesis stated be proven beyond reasonable doubt to a scientific mind, or even a mind less scientific, such as a common sense mind?

If self-evident facts that matter don’t matter to someone, are they confessing an unscientific mind, or are they confessing a criminal mind, depending upon damage done to people due to their actions based upon their refusal to credit facts as facts?

If they are actually not scientific, they are criminally insane instead, then can that diagnosis, done that way, lead to a possible prescription for a reasonable treatment to help such sick people with their sickness, for the greater good, as well as the good of the criminally insane?

Is it reasonable to hypothesize that criminally insane people will keep on voting for dictators running dictatorships even after past generations have been tortured and murdered by the millions for voting for dictators running dictatorships, including many of the dictators themselves?

If there is a process, known to mankind, that solves the dictatorship problem, would it be reasonable to conclude that dictators would use the loot they steal to ensure that people do not know about that process?

If the process that ends and then deters dictatorship is a social scientific fact, proven without contradiction, and that process is called the common law, with private prosecutors, independent grand juries, and independent trial juries, where everyone participating in collective defense of everyone else, and all such volunteers agree that everyone is on an equal footing, with equal access, according to the common laws common to all, then is it reasonable to assume that tyrants running totalitarian governments would be threatened by such a well established scientifically proven fact that matters to anyone in command of their own individual moral conscience and power of reason will, spirit, and soul?

If common law were true, and the process valid, would anyone, in any county, in any state, in any federation of states, employing the common law, on an equal footing, be duty bound to take an accusation of Treasonous Fraud, with the named accused on the accusation, to a member of a common law grand juror for validation of probable cause, to then offer the accused a trial by jury in a Court of Law?

If common law were a threat to criminals counterfeiting due process of law, would those criminals put in place obstacles that prevent someone from holding criminals counterfeiting due process of law to account for their crimes in a Court of Law, and if so, would a counterfeit court of law be dictatorial?

If there was an accurately identified problem, such as Global Treasonous Fraud, would anyone be aware of it, name it, and then begin to take lawful steps to end it, and deter it from ever happening again?

If so, what would be a valid first step, crickets?

Caveat Emptor