Public Republics Private Empires I
by Joe Kelley
8-18-2022

Celente and the Judge Podcast - August 17, 2022
To access our premium content, subscribe to the Trends Journal:
[facebook.com]

“Former President Donald Trump will soon be indicted by a Federal Grand Jury. He is the victim of a Federal Government that knows no bounds, and has assumed powers nowhere granted in the Constitution by the shear force of its own will.”

F.U.C.
Federal Union Counterfeiters

None of them are Federal.

Here is an original American precedent preserving the original meaning of a Federal association:

"That the question was not whether, by a declaration of independence, we should make ourselves what we are not; but whether we should declare a fact which already exists:
That, as to the people or Parliament of England, we had always been independent of them, their restraints on our trade deriving efficacy from our acquiescence only, and not from any rights they possessed of imposing them; and that, so far, our connection had been federal only, and was now dissolved by the commencement of hostilities:
That, as to the king, we had been bound to him by allegiance, but that this bond was now dissolved by his assent to the late act of Parliament, by which he declares us out of his protection, and by his levying war on us a fact which had long ago proved us out of his protection, it being a certain position in law, that allegiance and protection are reciprocal, the one ceasing when the other is withdrawn:"

Even if the precedent was not set on hemp paper or stone tablets, the moral principle remains the same as the power of gravity stays the same naturally.

“... declares us out of his protection, and by his levying war on us a fact which had long ago proved us out of his protection, it being a certain position in law, that allegiance and protection are reciprocal, the one ceasing when the other is withdrawn...”

Even if the precedent was not set in human DNA, the principles would remain in force like the force of gravity does not go either LEFT or RIGHT dependent upon the political wind by executive fiat.

“Hallam says, "The relation established between a lord and his vassal by the feudal tenure, far from containing principles of any servile and implicit obedience, permitted the compact to be dissolved in case of its violation by either party. This extended as much to the sovereign as to inferior lords. If a, vassal was aggrieved, and if justice was denied him, he sent a defiance, that is, a renunciation of fealty to the king, and was entitled to enforce redress at the point of his sword. It then became a contest of strength as between two independent potentates, and was terminated by treaty, advantageous or otherwise, according to the fortune of war. There remained the original principle, that allegiance depended conditionally upon good treatment, and that an appeal might be lawfully made to arms against an oppressive government. Nor was this, we may be sure, left for extreme necessity, or thought to require a long-enduring forbearance. In modern times, a king, compelled by his subjects' swords to abandon any pretension, would be supposed to have ceased to reign; and the express recognition of such a right as that of insurrection has been justly deemed inconsistent with the majesty of law. But ruder ages had ruder sentiments. Force was necessary to repel force; and men accustomed to see the king's authority defied by a private riot, were not much shocked when it was resisted in defence of public freedom." - 3 Middle Age, 240-2.”
Essay on The Trial by Jury
Lysander Spooner, 1852

The force forcing people to abandon morality and replace morality with immorality works the same way every single time, just like gravity, forces force by natural laws.

“...the compact to be dissolved in case of its violation by either party...”

The force forcing people to abandon morality and replace morality with immorality works the same way by logic, reason, principle, and natural law. Immoral people, also known as criminals, force innocent victims by aggressive force and hide behind the liberal use of fraud. Criminals force innocent people to give up their own, individual, independent, power to conscientiously object to “just following” criminal “dictates” without question.

What Ever Happened to the Constitution? Andrew Napolitano

Nappy is guilty of FRAUD.

Nappy claims, fraudulently, that the National Government is Federal.

And that too, is a lie.

Dr. James McHenry at the Federal Convention of 1787:
"Mr. E. Gerry. Does not rise to speak to the merits of the question before the Committee but to the mode.
A distinction has been made between a federal and national government. We ought not to determine that there is this distinction for if we do, it is questionable not only whether this convention can propose an government totally different or whether Congress itself would have a right to pass such a resolution as that before the house. The commission from Massachusets empowers the deputies to proceed agreeably to the recommendation of Congress. This the foundation of the convention. If we have a right to pass this resolution we have a right to annihilate the confederation."

It is not merely “questionable.”

"There is no question of the general doctrine that fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments" (United States v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61(1878).”

Even if the precedent was not set in stone or set on hemp paper by human beings documenting natural laws governing human beings, those who do not question morally objectionable forces forced by deception are causing injury because they can get away with causing injury, as they choose to cause injury to innocent people. As they choose to use deception to cause injury to innocent people, they pick on weakened targets destabilized, demoralized, and rendered defenseless with the liberal use of Treasonous Fraud Parasitic Predation.

Criminals, as a rule, do not get away with causing injury to targeted victims when targeted victims are more powerful than the criminals targeting victims.

Criminals, as a rule, know not to question the rule that criminals cannot get away with injuring innocent people when innocent people are more powerful than criminals.

What is the whole truth about the power of Treasonous Fraud used liberally by Parasitic Predators when no one is LEFT with the power to conscientiously object to giving away the power to conscientiously object?

When all The People become “True Believers” in the Treasonous Fraud that began in 1787 in America, in secret meetings, where Kidnappers made deals with Money Launderers and Criminally Insane Psychopaths, also known as Warmongers, or War Pigs, the end result of The Dirty Compromise was to turn off the power of The People to conscientiously object to having their consciences Lobotomized with nothing LEFT but JUST FOLLOWING CRIMINAL ORDER.

Please master, can I have some more criminal orders?

Secret proceedings and debates of the convention assembled at Philadelphia, in the year 1787, Page 13 Luther Martin
“One party, whose object and wish it was to abolish and annihilate all State governments, and to bring forward one general government, over this extensive continent, of monarchical nature, under certain restrictions and limitations. Those who openly avowed this sentiment were, it is true, but few; yet it is equally true, Sir, that there were a considerable number, who did not openly avow it, who were by myself, and many others of the convention, considered as being in reality favorers of that sentiment; and, acting upon those principles, covertly endeavoring to carry into effect what they well knew openly and avowedly could not be accomplished.”
[archive.org]

The word Federal has an original meaning placed into the word by defenders defending their power to say NO to criminals, even while those criminals continue to insist that NO means YES when criminals want NO to mean YES, and by executive fiat Yes can mean Yes if the slaves beg for the mercy that no longer exists.

Caveat Emptor