AWARE V WOKE II
by Joe Kelley
9-15-2022

Conspiracy Theorists
“They condition you to believe we are unhinged, harmful conspiracy theorists so you don’t listen to us, but once you go down the rabbit-hole and learn the truths we’ve learned, there’s no looking back. You’ll never trust them or their system again”
[retalk.com]

Beyond the materials that constitute fraud are the facts that matter in any case involving an innocent victim of a morally unjustifiable attack by a guilty criminal WHO is responsible for causing those injuries to that victim in time and place.

Beyond the material evidence of fraud produced by the guilty criminal responsible for causing the injuries to the victim targeted by the criminal, beyond each fraudulent statement traced back to the fraud responsible for the fraudulent statement, is the fraud producing the evidence that convicts the fraud by confessing fraud as the fraud produces the material evidence of fraud in the effort to keep the defenders of the innocent victim ignorant of the criminal responsible for causing injury to the victim targeted by the criminal.

The slogan, a.k.a talking point, a.k.a. false advertisement, a.k.a. false propaganda, a.k.a. evidence of attempted response conditioning, a.k.a. evidence of attempted mind control, a.k.a. evidence of attempted brainwashing, a.k.a. evidence of attempted re-education, a.k.a. evidence of grooming, a.k.a. evidence of fraud, is also treasonous fraud when deployed by occupants occupying morally defensible and justifiable government offices.

Defenders defending against criminals attacking innocent people, as a rule, have to discover the material evidence that constructs a forensically prosecutable step by step path that connects the injuries perpetrated upon the victim to the perpetrator found guilty beyond reasonable doubt responsible for causing those injuries to that victim.

During the process of forensically connecting the criminal to the victim in time and place a defender is bound by moral duty to assemble the whole truth while investigating each discovered piece of evidence along the way, as each piece of evidence begins to assemble into the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

It is reasonable to theorize that the first piece of evidence found by a defender does not automatically assemble into the whole truth complete with a verdict of guilt which then leads expediently into a morally justifiable remedy which is thereby defending all future victims endangered by the perpetrator responsible for causing the injuries to the victim currently being defended by the defender receiving the first piece of evidence discovered during the investigation.

It is reasonable to theorize that the capable defender must, as a rule, theorize the location of the second piece of evidence to be discovered if it exists based upon the theory constructed from the first piece of evidence discovered by the capable defender.

It is reasonable to theorize that anyone found on the path of discovery obstructing further discovery of material evidence produced by the criminal responsible for the crime, anyone other than the criminal suspected of the crime, is a second criminal added to the first criminal along on the path of discovery in defense of the people threatened by the first criminal.

It is reasonable to theorize that two criminals discovered during the process to connect all the material evidence used to construct the whole truth required to morally justify a verdict and remedy in defense of the people as a whole that the two criminals suspects discovered could be connected with each other and proven to be connected to each other by material evidence produced by the two criminals discovered during the process to establish a verdict and remedy beyond reasonable doubt.

The theory that the first suspect is responsible for the injuries caused to the victim, but not yet proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, is a beginning theory that is then added to an addition theory concerning the second victim discovered to be a victim of obstruction during the assembling of the whole truth, whereby the second theory is based upon the suspicion that the original suspect being aided by the second suspect discovered obstructing the assembling of the whole truth is not a coincidence, that instead of a coincidence, the first and second suspects are reasonably suspected of working together to aid each other in the effort to avoid accurate accountability for the crimes that the suspects are theorized as being responsible for, including the first crime that caused injury to the first victim and the second crime perpetrated by the suspect suspected of willfully obstructing the due process of law based principally on an equal moral footing.

Even in cases where the first suspect is discovered by the first defender adding the second knife wound to the victim that has already received but survived the first knife wound, the theory is that the jury alone can establish both a verdict and a remedy in defense of the public in a working republic.

“It is a matter well known, and well understood, that by the laws of our country, every question which affects a man's life, reputation, or property, must be tried by twelve of his peers; and that their unanimous verdict is, alone, competent to determine the fact in issue.”
RESPUBLICA v. SHAFFER
Court of Oyer and Terminer, at Philadelphia
February Sessions, 1788

The theory is that each potential victim would not be defenseless if each potential victim was taught well to defend against criminals bearing knives and the material evidence of fraud.

The theory is that anyone found guilty of disarming morally justified defenders in any way is guilty of a serious crime against the public in a working republic under the common laws of free people defending a perishable state of liberty.

It is not unreasonable to theorize that more than one individual caught red-handed and dead-to-rights infringing upon the moral duty of defending oneself and the public in a working republic is more than one individual conspiring to perpetrate treason as the obvious motive behind such a treasonous conspiracy is to organize a criminal force in order to prey upon the people as would any other species of parasite.

Caveat Emptor