Adverse Possession V
by Joe Kelley
10-11-2022

Will Trump Out Kissinger? The Elites Who Want Power Back

Time 33:33
“...land reform...”
Stephen Kinzer

Kinzer spills the beans on THE ORDER of THE CORPSE maintaining their exclusive rights over their exclusive property. If it was merely land, then the Legal Fiction Being, being inhuman, would have no need for humans being human.

The corpse would be doing all the work on the Tax Farm, making fictional beings being inhuman forevermore.

Without the land, there is nowhere for people to stand, let alone produce anything worth stealing, such as children.

No seeds growing into trees that create apples and more seeds, more trees, more apples, and abundance to a point in time and place as to reduce the scarcity value of necessities, so-called deflation, ending the fictional need to act like rats on a sinking ship of The Infantile State.

The Law of The Land is Natural Law applied to humans being human in place and time immemorial and beyond.

Temporal Salvation instead of Omnicide on the Fast and Furious Fast Track.

Not Calvin’s prescription.

The Cambridge History of Law in America
Volume 1 Early America (1580-1815)
Edited by Michael Grossberg, Christopher Tomlins

"In exchange for these acts of civility, the conqueror acquired some measure of sovereignty over the conquered peoples and, by way of compensation for the trouble to which he had been put in conquering them, was also entitled to a substantial share of the infidels' goods. Empire was always conceived to be a matter of reciprocity at some level, and as Edward Winslow nicely phrased it in 1624, America was clearly a place where "religion and profit jump together." For the more extreme Calvinists, such as Sir Edward Coke who seems to have believed that all infidels, together presumably with all Catholics, lay so far from God's grace that no amount of civilizing would be sufficient to save them, such peoples might legitimately be conquered; in Coke's dramatic phrasing, because "A perpetual enemy (though there be no wars by fire and sword between them) cannot maintain any action or get any thing within this Realm. All infidels are in law perpetui inimici, perpetual enemies, (for the law presumes not that they will be converted, that being remota potential, a remote possibility) for between them, as with devils, whose subjects they be, and the Christians, there is perpetual hostility and can be no peace."

"Like all Calvinists, Coke adhered to the view that as infidels the Native Americans could have no share in God's grace, and because authority and rights derived from grace, not nature, they could have no standing under the law. Their properties and even their persons were therefore forfeit to the first "godly" person with the capacity to subdue them. "If a Christian King," he wrote, "should conquer a kingdom of an infidel, and bring them [sic] under his subjection, there ipso facto the laws of the infidel are abrogated, for that they be not only against Christianity, but against the law of God and nature contained in the Decalogue." Grounded as this idea was not only in the writings of Calvin himself but also in those of the fourteenth-century English theologian John Wycliffe, it enjoyed considerable support among the early colonists. As the dissenting dean of Gloucester, Josiah Tucker, wrote indignantly to Edmund Burke in 1775, "Our Emigrants to North-America, were mostly Enthusiasts of a particular Stamp. They were that set of Republicans, who believed, or pretended to believe, that Dominion was founded in Grace. Hence they conceived, that they had the best Right in the World, both to tax and to persecute the Ungoldy. And they did both, a soon as they got power in their Hands, in the most open and atrocious Manner."

But that is an antiquated labor theory of value liberal equal footing word salad, Joe, Mr. Smarty Pants.

We are The Brotherhood of The Falling Down Pants.

We the people do not condone a mad rush to happily produce abundance for all those other persons!

What on Earth could be trickling down from a few choice Empires that are not made to Rise on schedule? What would inspire the trodden down to beg US for more Empire scarcity value, if we the people do not fund the requisite unfavored Empires falling?

Conceived in Liberty
Murray Rothbard, 1979

“By Liberty, I understand the power which every man has over his own actions, and his right to enjoy the fruit of his labour, art, and industry, as far as by it he hurts not the society, or any member of it, by taking from any member, or by hindering him from enjoying what he himself enjoys. The fruits of a man’s honest industry are the just rewards of it, ascertained to him by natural and eternal equity, as is his title to use them in the manner which he thinks fit. And thus, with the above limitations, every man is sole lord and arbiter of his own private actions and property….”

“Indeed, Liberty is the divine source of all human happiness. To possess, in security, the effects of our industry, is the most powerful and reasonable incitement to be industrious; And to be able to provide for our children, and to leave them all that we have, is the best motive to beget them. But were property is precarious, labour will languish. The privileges of thinking, saying, and doing what we please, and of growing as rich as we can, without any other restriction, than that by all this we hurt not the public, nor one another, are the glorious privileges of Liberty; and its effects, to life in freedom, plenty, and safety….”

“Alas! Power encroaches daily upon Liberty, with a success too evident, and the balance between them is almost lost. Tyranny has engrossed almost the whole earth, and striking at mankind root and branch, makes the world a slaughterhouse….”

But Joe, again, all that in the past is antiquated, we have modernized!

XIV - Citizen rights not to be abridged
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor to deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Our fearless leaders give us our freedom from moral duty, don’t you know, Joe?

The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots
Page 40
Private Prosecutors
"For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action.

"Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, however, private prosecutors were prohibited from withdrawing the action pursuant to private agreement with the defendant. Court intervention was occasionally required to compel injured crime victims to appear against offenders in court and "not to make bargains to allow [defendants] to escape conviction, if they...repair the injury."

Page 42
Law Enforcement as a Universal Duty
"Law enforcement in the Founders' time was a duty of every citizen. Citizens were expected to be armed and equipped to chase suspects on foot, on horse, or with wagon whenever summoned. And when called upon to enforce the laws of the state, citizens were to respond "not faintly and with lagging steps, but honestly and bravely and with whatever implements and facilities [were] convenient and at hand. Any person could act in the capacity of a constable without being one, and when summoned by a law enforcement officer, a private person became a temporary member of the police department. The law also presumed that any person acting in his public capacity as an officer was rightfully appointed."

I know, I know, I know, put your head down, vote when told to vote, push the lever, push the button, and wait for Fearless Leader to shine brighter than a Star!

The light trickles down, at least until we can FUND Dark Winter!

Temporal salvation is for saps. Get in line, get your used toilet paper, dig your hole, and jump in.

For The Greater Good!

Fearless Leader insists.

Do not learn the whole truth about the law of the land, it will inspire effective defensive action based upon actionable intelligence. If you do, you won’t have time to be happy about owning nothing.

And eating bugs.

The defender takes the demand notice to the suspected corrupt government office occupant with an expiration date and the full force of moral duty to validate and prosecute the answer to the demand notice.

No answer in time is nonfeasance, a crime.

The wrong answer in time is misfeasance, at best.

The fraudulent answer in time is malfeasance, as documented by the material evidence provided within the answer accountable to the individual being held responsible.

Obstruction with contempt is misprision of treason, and by Civil Rules, treason is a capital crime.

The Law of The Land, however, demands a criminal trial jury, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth warranting a justifiable verdict and remedy offered to anyone found guilty for any crime less than obstruction with contempt for the people in a working republic.

Contempt is confessed outlawry, a fact that matters to anyone in need of knowing.

Criminals, as a rule, obstruct justice with contempt for the people in a working republic, and therefore they confess that they are not worthy of occupying any government office in a republic.

Rule of law, due process of law on an equal footing, is of, by, and for the people in a republic. Rule of law on an equal footing is not adjudicated as possessing any tangible value, whatsoever, to Treasonous Fraud Parasitic Predators, other than a source of bait placed in a net to kidnap and to force into labor, the people formerly secure in their republic under their due process of law on an equal footing.

Legal Fiction places the people off the moral foundations of the law of the land and places the people onto that slippery slope where humanity slides inhumanly into Omnicide.

The arrest of the people down that slide will not even begin while the people are led by Fraudulent Leaders. One must discover, validate, and prosecute whatever facts one can find, and begin building a shelf on the cliff to stand on, build the shelf larger to accommodate another, then another, facts validated to make more foundations.

As the inhumans insist upon their chosen torturous end, let them fund their own torturous demise, it is their chosen fate, at least until they too regain their independent, individual power to conscientiously object to just following orders.

Caveat Emptor