21.06.30.1322W COLLECTIVIST IDEOLOGICAL THOUGHT DEFLECTION!

I came across this video that stands out (to me at least) as a prime example of how COLLECTIVISTS deflect by conflation conversations about IDEOLOGY thereby diverting the narrative to one more sustainable by themselves.

In this video the woman is opposing communism (an ideology) to which Justin Trudeau (an obvious collectivist) immediately CONFLATES it (communism) with racism FOR NO OTHER REASON THAN TO GAIN HIS IDEOLOGICAL ADVANTAGE. Could he have won the debate had he not changed the battlefield to one in his advantage – I guess we’ll never know until it’s too late.

Please keep in mind that I don’t have a dog in this Canadian race – it means nothing to me personally. This video I came across just presented such a perfect example of Socialist conflation to throw off their IDEOLOGICAL opponents by simply changing the battlefield to one that at least appears to advantage themselves.

Look around & you start to see it being done by all Marxist inspired groups & individuals – IT’S A SLIGHT OF HAND TACTIC THAT ABSOLUTELY NEEDS TO BE EXPOSED FOR THE SAKE OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION’S SAKE!

Subversion of a free people, I would submit, is accomplished in two steps [correct me if I’m wrong]. STEP ONE: is Socialism, the easiest to sell to honest good hearted well meaning people concerned for their fellow human beings. That’s not to say it’s not wrong, it’s just easier to convince people that the good out weighs the bad & that it’s just a temporary thing until everyone else has their eyes opened to the altruistic good they’ll be doing. This self sacrificing altruism can take on many many (if not infinite) forms such as ‘climate change’ hysteria being one happening as I write. Not being capable of understanding why their fellow humans can’t see the imminent danger facing humanity they move on to step two FOR THE GOOD OF HUMANITY OF COURSE. There must be something wrong with these people causing them not to see the imminent danger(s) as they see them. Why they must be Fascists or Racists or White Supremacists or if nothing else they must be harboring Unconscious Biases that prevents them from seeing the imminent danger to humanity they clearly see? So they move on to step two to protect humanity from itself. STEP TWO: Since they (the rest of the world) can’t see the imminent danger facing them, it becomes necessary to rig elections to install people that do see the same imminent danger they do. If that fails to open their eyes to the imminent danger, well the means of production of good & services must be place in the care of those previously installed people that do see the same imminent danger they do. Of course the children must be taught how to see the imminent danger to humanity their parents are unfortunately incapable of seeing – IT’S FOR THEIR OWN GOOD, YOU KNOW. And you can anticipate how the rest of the dance goes on.

CAN WE AT LEAST CALL IT THE COMMUNIST TWO STEP?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
con·fla·tion

noun

1. the merging of two or more sets of information, texts, ideas, etc.
   into one: "the forceful conflation of two traditions"
   Powered by Oxford Dictionaries
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Posted by: Kyle Seeback ~ May 28, 2021
“Being called racist for asking tough questions is unCanadian”

Yes, yes, I like many many others have used ‘conflation’ instead of the word ‘mistaken’ in the past – that doesn’t take away from the definition above. Try to look over our past indiscretions, as it seems to be a very common practice because it’s somewhat true.