Nahhhhhhhhh that was communism

@RemiDallaire Atheism was the official “religion” of the communists. Just like it was for the French Revolutionists. Just saying.

@DanMartinovich Communist was the main religion of the communists as they could not stand that another form of authority could be arround (stating the obvious here). The french revolution was a backlash at the monarchy who was in bed with religion in this case the catholic church. Now... Let's talk about history the right way and with the right motives..

And when I talk about religions.... I talk about he whole HUMAN history... The beginning to the present day.

@RemiDallaire Yep, and your excluding atheism. If you attributing all kinds of evils as the effects of religion, but not including the effects of atheism. I’d say something is amiss. The facts are That Islam and Hinduism’s effects can be seen in nations. The non Bible possessing non Bible reading type of Christianity’s effects can be seen in nations. The Bible possessing Bible reading type of Christianity’s effects can be seen in nations and atheism’s effects can be seen in nations. Or rather than effects let’s just say when each of these are dominate in nations the effects can be seen.

@DanMartinovich You are just talking about human nature than..right ?? (I hope) Some of that nature is worse than ohers. And atheism is far from the worse of that nature. especially historicaly

@RemiDallaire well if you are talking numbers killed in the shortest amount of time. Then depraved human nature influenced by atheism comes out on top. If your talking over the long run. Islam. Followed by those centuries of monarchies that claimed Christianity but outlawed Bibles in the hands of the general public.

I don’t even count Bible possessing Bible reading populations which didn’t begin until 500 years ago in the same category since it was they that created the free world.

By the way. Do you think we Bible reading populations are against Islam, and we are for religious purposes? Or political ones? Yes to is politics and religion go hand in hand. Get my drift?

@DanMartinovich Nope... Your drift stinks LOL The same as any other .. To put communist as atheism and not even looking at the motive they had is like saying Henry the 8 was a feminist. I highly dissagree with that premisse. But hey lets just agree to disagree on this... I'll let you go with your disformed views and that 's it.

@RemiDallaire lol.
It’s all about the fruit my friend.
Atheism’s fruit was communism and fascism.
Islam’s and Christian monarchist who kept the Bible from the people’s fruit is totalitarianism.
The fruit of Bible possessing Bible reading Christianity was the free world.

You need to learn who your friends are in the fight against the left and their Muslim allies. Atheists have no more power over their radicals than Muslims do over their radicals. If you want to look at history as any kind of proof. It was only the people’s influenced by Very large Bible reading populations that overthrew all the radicals of every sort. That is where the power to be free resides. With them.
.

@RemiDallaire A historian your not. Nor much on philosophy either.

@DanMartinovich It's funny you are telling that to an actual archeologue. Diplomed from Laval University. But hey don't let that discourage you bud. You did try your best. And I salute that.

@DanMartinovich And... as far as phylosophy goes... I never said I was a phylosophe. Specialised in Greek and Roman studies though... I'm sure I know a bit more than... hmmmmm YOU . (And Euthyphron says,,,Panu ge to that translation in ancient greek I agree)

Cheers

@RemiDallaire Did you ever get ripped off.

@DanMartinovich LOL Whatever. You're reaching now. Come on.. I just disagree with you. Did I commit the ultimate sin regarding your own personnal cult ? (Do you have a statue of yourself in your own backyard ?) LOL
I don't try to discredit you in anyway. I just disagree with you and told you why. You just spating back trying to discredit me.

Let me see who is acting like that too. Yeah...Are you Muslim ?? That would make sense.

@MaskedRiderChris she's just more evidence of a two tiered justice system, maybe the DNC will sacrifice her to the election alter. And in listening closely to her repudiation, I do not hear where she is condeming FGM? It sounds like to me that she is repudiating the question itself, but maybe Im prejudicial or plain wrong? Would be interesting to hear another's perspective.