slug.com slug.com

1 1
This video is a disturbing account by former military personnel, who's government ordered them to partake in highly radioactive experimentation, and where years later, have been denied vital health #benefits.

Our #government.

It goes to show the dastardly nature of our own elected officials such as Sen. Orrin Hatch, who made it their own personal mission to lie and deceive our #veterens into believing that they would receive vital new legislation to get vital help...

...which was coldly, never enacted.

Stay out of the military.

EAL_Flt1979 7 Mar 4
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Bad and worse treatment of all the people by criminals claiming to be the government in America is not news. Each individual who discovers each example of these facts that matter constitute an individual cause to act in defense against such treasonous harm. What could possibly happen once enough people combined their individual causes to act into a lawful cause of action?

18 U.S. Code § 2381.Treason
"Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."

Every infringement of specified natural rights constitute treason but only if words have common meanings. If criminals are allowed to take over government offices, then they can redefine the meanings of words to suit their individual needs each day.

George Mason, June 6, 1788:
"Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions should arise under this government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of those powers; could not Congress, under the idea of providing for the general welfare, and under their own construction, say that this was destroying the general peace, encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people? And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury?"

There was a revolt by the Revolutionary War Veterans as the Central Bankers in charge at the time decided not to pay them. This is part of the story, the part not told by the Monopoly Founder Cult.

So that is clearly a president.

Then there was this:
The Bonus Army Invades
Washington, D.C., 1932
"Having no other place to go, the majority of the Bonus Army remained encamped in the city, despite the fact that Congress had adjourned for the summer. Finally, President Hoover ordered the Army to forcibly remove the veterans. On July 28 a force of tanks and cavalry under the command of General Douglas MacArthur stormed the camps and drove the veterans out. Their makeshift houses were then set ablaze."

Experimental animals, cannon fodder. The founders were two groups, not one. One group was for independent people in independent states voluntarily associated for mutual defense. The other group was called out by none other than Thomas Paine (who wrote Crisis during the Revolution):

To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine
November 15, 1802

"But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property. It is, therefore, no wonder that the "Rights of Man" was attacked by that faction, and its author continually abused. But let them go on; give them rope enough and they will put an end to their own insignificance. There is too much common sense and independence in America to be long the dupe of any faction, foreign or domestic.
"But, in the midst of the freedom we enjoy, the licentiousness of the papers called Federal (and I know not why they are called so, for they are in their principles anti-federal and despotic), is a dishonor to the character of the country, and an injury to its reputation and importance abroad. They represent the whole people of America as destitute of public principle and private manners."

Group A: Patriots
Group B: Treasonous Criminals

Group A: Live and let live, but defend that natural right and that natural duty, and do so voluntarily under the common laws of free people in liberty.

Group B: Warmongers, Central Banking Frauds, Slavers, Despots, Tyrants, Liars, Thieves, Rapists, Psychopaths, Sociopaths, Sycophants, Monarchists, Aristocrats, Death Merchants, and other criminals who, as told by Thomas Paine, consider "government" as a tool, a "profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property": SLAVES.

I learned alot in here, from you. Keep teaching me, what ya know. Well done.

@EAL_Flt1979

You are welcome. I started a group, you may want to go through that data here:
[slug.com]

I was thinking about writing another response, but I had no cause to act that way, not until you responded with that welcome response.

When was the last time you have heard about an angry mob, such as an angry mob hanging a horse thief (clearly against the law)?

The last time I remember that happening was in Waco, Texas, and the angry ones had National Badges, National Licenses to Torture, and National Authority to Mass Murder, to burn people alive in a church, including women, pregnant women, children, and babies.

More recently was the Stand-Off at Bunkerville. Both sides remained (governed by morality) relatively calm, the National Authorities had perpetrated some aggressive violence upon some innocent victims, so that was the extent of that angry mob comprised of National Authorities Authorized to harm innocent people, for personal profit.

My point here is to point out how this fact ought to be celebrated, not bemoaned or discredited. We as a people are generally more peaceful today than yesterday and that trend appears to be unstoppable, save for either natural or man-made (criminal made) species ending catastrophe.

So, one might think that the peaceful mob, rather than the angry mob, might get a clue, and once that light bulb goes off in each individual in turn, use - we the people might use - the actual law to hold these criminals, these angry mobs, to account for their crimes, so as to make their crimes pay less, and less, and less, until there is no longer a very large incentive for these people to turn to crime this way: fake government.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:81302
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.