Funny how folks react to this entire issue. Some facts that are either actual science or very well documented:

1. This virus SARS-CoV-2 (various subgroups) has a less than 0.1% deathrate,; with current data putting it below 0.06%. Both the 2017-2018 flu season and the H1N1 pnademic have larger percentage death rates and overall larger death totals.

2. IF you read the pamphlets (if you can get one), the manufacturers openly admit this is not approved for treatment by any governmental body and that it is not a vaccine in the truest sense. It is CRSPR tech that was primarily used for cancer treatment and extremely rare genetic disorders. that and CRSPR technology is also used in germ warfare creation. which is why it was banned from being done in the US.

3. None of the current producers of this treatment protocol will state were exactly they acquired the mRNA from or what splicing has been done to it. mRNA is designed to cause the creation of proteins inside both the cytoplasm of a cell as well within the nucleus. CRSPR therapy always has to be very closely monitored when done for normal controlled treatments due to the many variables that can happened with it. Up to three years later.

4. This treatment is supposed to aid in immunity yet there is an equal chance of contracting the disease (which has lees than a 0.1% deathrate remember) and they are not secure in what reaction it will have with the virus.

5. The percentages that are being used for the 95% effective rate is from a extremely small percentage of those who were part of the test group and it excludes a 20% section of the test group that showed varying levels of side effects. Death, Bell's palsy, and two very rare blood diseases being among the known reactions.

6. Multiple research groups have shown that the deathrate may even be lower to admitted linking of Covid to deaths were there is no evidence. Combined with a test that is over sensitive and not specific (PCR) and using that test outside it's parameters. As amplification beyond 25 times render the test functionally useless. Yet in many countries they are amplifying it over 35 times, which creates a even greater chance of error.

There is much more that can be gone into that bring into question the entire issue. The problem is it requires functional knowledge of microbiology and immunology. It also requires a working knowledge of psychological warfare, sociological conditioning, and a few other areas of manipulation that fall under NLP (Neuro Linguistic Programming).

Each person has the right to choose. Just remember that you pay the price and take your chances.

Tech oligopoly always have reasons why they can do things but you can’t.

If I was his age I don't know if I would get it. If I were a high profile person like him I would. It's just another example of how the "elites" no longer have any connection to the general population, no sense of responsibility for leadership. Zuckerberg, the android, is a perfect example of the petite nobility thinking of themselves as a separate species almost from the common folk.

I'm sure if he gets sick he will get the best medical care in the world. Most of us can't count on that. Plus I can't afford for both me and the wife to be sick at the same time. So I'm going to get it and she is not. It's kind of the way I have lived most of my life now, if it is dangerous I do it not the wife.

Everything is a cost benefit decision and everyone has different values or circumstances.