No. They should not.
Lawyers think they are Western Civilization's "Aristocrats".
And... they're gradually establishing themselves as such, effectively, by dominating Legislative and other political offices.
This problem was supposed to have been prevented in America by our original 13th Amendment of 1819, of which you've probably never heard... even most Americans haven't, because public education.
That Amendment, according to David Dodge[1], would have disqualified anybody who held any "Title of Nobility"... which included "Esquire" (Lawyers), from holding public office; elucidating a clause in Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution, which reads:
"No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state."

The (original) 13th Amendment appears to have been ratified in 1819, followed by claims that Virginia never actually ratified it (even though it ended up on their books), and it was just generally ignored for a few decades... until eventually our Civil War broke out. After which, this important part of the U.S. Constitution was quietly displaced with the current 13th Amendment, by the very wanna-be Aristocrats that it de-legitimized... and then it was rather purposefully forgotten.

And now... we are experiencing exactly why this Amendment was so important in the first place; and why the purpose behind it is so important to a society of "equals" who seek to remain equal.
The established "normalcy" of needy egocentric judges demanding that you address them as Nobility, and even punishing non-compliance, is just one of the symptoms.
Just try to imagine how dramatically different the West would be, and more aligned with our ideals, if these wanna-be Aristocrats were never able to elevate themselves and seal themselves off from the rest of us with unnecessarily cryptic and obfuscated language, in Laws that they neither read before signing, nor do they even understand in the first place; subject to their own internal, mutual approval but never to ours...
Sure, we have elections, ostensibly anyway... but the more they seal themselves off as a de facto Aristocracy, the more disadvantageous and ineffective it is to send an "outsider" to represent your concerns.
You can't even represent yourself to your own Government, that exists on your behalf and by your consent... not effectively, anyway. You have to hire one of THEM to sponsor you and speak on your behalf.
...serf that you are.

[1]More info here about the American Amendment:
[let.rug.nl]

I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13 to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained them for the purpose of order. Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves and protect the weak and lawful.

Yeah what makes that idiot gaoled think he is above the law?
Never heard of "contempt" eh.