There is no end to so called vaccinations. They will never end unless they are ended. Every few months you will get whatever , plus some don't use some of the the shots for health problems and other stuff , side effects is either unknown or kept quite. The biggest issue off course is bodily autonomy,y. Once they get that, you don't have access to your health, they do. And they will do so with your children, you DNA etc. So it must not be allowed under any circumstances.

@Krunoslav I've got bad news for you buddy. Big Brother already has all the information they need about us.

@angelo ..not on everyone, and many have information on Big Brother. A future conflict, armed conflict is assured. Not just battle for the supremacy of ideas but also battle for future survival.

Rest assure, even if Big Brother makes it in their plans they will collapse under their own weight, since its inherently self destructive system. And they will produce their worse nightmare. Religious counter revolutionaries. And that is something they should be very afraid off. Like Taliban and Communists revolutionaries, people who dedicate their lives to revolution or in this case counter revolution. That is something no big army has ever managed to eradicate, most were outlasted by these types and it costs a fortune to fight them. In the end Taliban win.

Speaking of Taliban. Arabs are moving in the fill in the vacuum left behind by castrated or converted Christians. You won't turn Islamists to gender theory and all that crap. Trust me.

"re-education" camps. Hmmm where have we heard that euphemism before. China and Uyghurs.

@Krunoslav Do they know how threatening/chilling that statement is? I think they do but I live in a bubble.

@Penrodster I know, I know. And I do think its the same mindset they have and use same less threatening sounding , typically for lefties, terminology. Its the legacy of French Revolution.

Lets not forget that the lefty proto communists , the Jacobins formed "committee for public safety" and for everyone else the period is known as Reign of Terror. That's where we got our terrorism word.

F. Fürstenberg wrote in 2007 in the New York Times [“Bush’s Dangerous Liaisons”], in connection with the French Revolution – upon the etymology of the word “terrorist”as well:

“… The word was an invention of the French Revolution, and it referred not to those who hate freedom, nor to non-state actors, nor, of course, to ‘Islamofascism’. A ‘terroriste’ was, in its original meaning, a Jacobin leader who ruled France during La Terreur. (Reign of Terror)”

La Terreur. (Reign of Terror) - refers to a period during the French Revolution after the First French Republic was established in which multiple massacres and public executions occurred in response to revolutionary fervor, anti-clerical sentiment, and frivolous accusations of treason by Maximilien Robespierre and his Committee of Public Safety.

Several historians consider the "reign of terror" to have begun in 1793, placing the starting date at either 5 September, June or March (birth of the Revolutionary Tribunal), while some consider it to have begun in September 1792 (September Massacres), or even July 1789 (when the first killing took place), but there is a consensus that it ended with the fall of Maximilien Robespierre in July 1794 as this led to the Thermidorian Reaction.

Between June 1793 and the end of July 1794, there were 16,594 official death sentences in France, of which 2,639 were in Paris.

"War on terror", "patriot act" etc, laying the groundwork for lose definitions so when they run out of terrorists in Middle East, it is the parents who don't want their children indoctrinated into communism that become domestic terrorists and patriot act is used to spy on patriots.

"Education and counseling". I mean they told Jews they were going to have to take the showers for the hygiene reasons too.

Academic Agent: "You are the virus."

"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." ― "War on Terror" speech by George W. Bush, 2004 Video

@Penrodster Melbourne Australia to exclude the unvaccinated from the economy

Australia plans for the pandemic to continue for many years to come. "There will be different directives on different schedules for which doses to take," Health Secretary Kerry Chant announced at a recent press conference. New quarantine facilities are being built for thousands of people, some of which will not be ready until the middle of next year. At the same time, Victoria's Prime Minister Dan Andrews says that they should "lock out" unvaccinated from the country's economy.

Published: September 18, 2021, 12:20 pm

The quarantine facility at Howard Springs in the state of Northern Territory is seen as a model for the country's new facilities. A reporter from the New York Times who traveled to Australia was put in this camp. Screenshot from ABC News

On September 3, the state of Victoria’s Prime Minister Dan Andrews announced during a press conference that the unvaccinated should be excluded from the economy. An additional one million doses of the Moderna vaccine will arrive in Australia as “family sized doses of hope”.

“There is going to be a vaccinated economy, and you get to participate in that if you are vaccinated. We’re going to move to a situation where, to protect the health system, we are going to lock out people who are not vaccinated and can be,” Andrews said.

He claims that residents still have a choice, but those who make “wrong” choices will be punished. “If you make the decision not to get vaccinated, you are making the wrong choice.” Andrews believes that Covid will be a pandemic of the unvaccinated when Australia opens up and that society will not be safe for them. “Yes, it will be a vaccinated economy, and you can participate in it if you are vaccinated.”

Victoria plans to introduce vaccine passes to give only the double-vaccinated access to restaurants, shops, cinemas and sports arenas. He said the Australian state “will have a situation where the economy is operating for the vaccinated” only.

Victoria’s government has previously announced that it would not ease the restrictions as more people become immune or the number of infections decreases, but set a requirement that 80 percent of the population should be vaccinated with at least two shots.

In the state of New South Wales, the head of health care, Kerry Chant, announced at a press conference on August 31: “We need to get used to taking vaccines against Covid for the foreseeable future.” She said that she could not say that Covid would be with us “forever”, but only a better vaccine could end the pandemic. It was not expected in the near future, she emphasized.

She assured her audience that the government had purchased a large number of doses and that these would be administered “well into 2022” and would be part of a “regular cycle of vaccinations and re-vaccinations”. The future for Australians is nightmarish: Booster doses, repeated doses will be part of this. There will be different directives on different schedules for which doses to take, according to Chant.

On the northern outskirts of Melbourne, Victoria’s capital, a new quarantine facility is now being built next to a federal quarantine facility for animals. It is being built with 1000 beds but can be expanded to 3000. Similar construction has begun in several states. In mid-August, the Prime Minister of Queensland, Annastacia Palaszczuk, announced the construction of a 1500-bed facility in the Toowoomba wilderness near a small airport to relocate international traffic. A New York Times reporter said the stay in the camp cost him €1400.

It will not be ready until sometime next summer, but 500 beds will be available before Christmas. Palaszczuk said in an interview with ABC News that appropriate quarantine facilities require fewer police officers and nurses than current hotel quarantine. Toowoomba will be the state’s second quarantine facility, the first to be housed in hangars in a military area.

Australia has become the laughing stock of the world with their draconian handling of the pandemic as a result of only a few isolated cases, and because in mid-July, a single person, a woman in her 90s, had died. The country imposed severe restrictions on millions of people, essentially instituting quarantine for the healthy, not the sick. However, more and more people point out that Dan Andrews’ “lock out” of the unvaccinated from the economy not only goes against human freedoms and rights, but also ignore obvious facts and the latest data about the virus and jabs.

The two top FDA officials in the US, responsible for vaccine research, resigned recently and this week they penned a letter to The Lancet to warn against vaccine boosters. This is a remarkable development and shows that the project of a government-managed virus mitigation plan is in its last stages before finally imploding.

Director and Deputy Director of the Office of Vaccines Research, Marion Gruber and Phillip Krause initially gave no reason for their departure but this week, a bombshell called Considerations in boosting COVID-19 vaccine immune responses appeared in the prestigious British medical journal. The two top officials are among the authors. The article strongly warns against the booster shot that the Biden administration, following Dr Anthony Fauci’s advice, is advocating. Fauci and his ilk are pushing hard for boosters because they know what is coming – with no boosters, vaccine failure will become more and more obvious in a matter of weeks.

At the beginning of the pandemic, there was a lot of talk about “herd immunity” but as in the case of any Coronavirus, it is also transmitted through animal hosts and therefore not stoppable. This is simply how humanity has gone through pandemics earlier in history. Studies from Karolinska Institute in Stockholm have shown that immunity from a history of illness lasts considerably longer and is stronger than from a vaccine – there are hardly any known cases of re-infection in the whole world. When enough people are naturally immune, the disease dies out.

With barely anyone vaccinated, Uttar Pradesh in India has seen covid essentially disappear.

Less than 1 case per million people with a test positivity rate well under the rate of false positives.

How did they do it? Not vaccines – natural immunity.[t.co]

— PLC (@Humble_Analysis) September 17, 2021

[freewestmedia.com]

@Krunoslav I thought it was creative word smithing going on but "committee for public safety" sounds awfully familiar.

Bush took office promising to end foreign wars and pull back troops. Obama did the same. Trump got kicked out for doing it.

@Penrodster From what I've heard every since Jimmy Carter, globalists have been running the show, so no matter who you vote for republican or democrat , there was little change in the policy. Trump surprised them as the outsider. They got complacent and after they failed to impeach and smear him they were forced to cheat and install the course instead, for this term, and that is Trump's greatest legacy. Forcing the shadow players to show to everyone just how corrupt the system is.

Trump was impotent to make any actual changes in the system since they control it, but he could draw public attention to things best left quite. Now after Trump, and with opertunity CCP virus presents them , the masks are off and they are going for the finish line. No more hiding.

As for lefty wording, yeah. Orwell talks about this off course...

In George Orwell's dystopian classic 1984, doublethink is the act of holding, simultaneously, two opposite, individually exclusive ideas or opinions and believing in both simultaneously and absolutely. Doublethink requires using logic against logic or suspending disbelief in the contradiction.

The three slogans of the party — "War Is Peace; Freedom Is Slavery; Ignorance Is Strength" — are obvious examples of doublethink. The act of doublethink also occurs in more subtle details throughout the novel.

Faithfully recreated by the technocratic communists of Australia.

Department of Premier and Cabinet Victoria, Australia: Staying Apart Keeps Us Together 15'

@Penrodster Technocracy and the Great Reset. Check out what these psychopaths like Klaus from the World "Communist" Forum are planing? The globalist ideas as they evolved from the 1930's. Watch the video and pay attention to something called: Trilateral Commission.

"The dark horse of the New World Order is not Communism, Socialism or Fascism. It is Technocracy." says Patrick M. Wood

With meticulous detail and an abundance of original research, Patrick M. Wood uses Technocracy Rising to connect the dots of modern globalization in a way that has never been seen before so that the reader can clearly understand the globalization plan, its perpetrators and its intended endgame .

In the heat of the Great Depression during the 1930s, prominent scientists and engineers proposed a utopian energy-based economic system called Technocracy that would be run by those same scientists and engineers instead of elected politicians. Although this radical movement lost momentum by 1940, it regained status when it was conceptually adopted by the elitist Trilateral Commission (co-founded by Zbigniew Brzezinski and David Rockefeller) in 1973 to be become its so-called "New International Economic Order."

In the ensuing 41 years, the modern expression of Technocracy and the New International Economic Order is clearly seen in global programs such as Agenda 21, Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Councils of Governments, Smart Growth, Smart Grid, Total Awareness surveillance initiatives and more.

Wood contends that the only logical outcome of Technocracy is Scientific Dictatorship, as already seen in dystopian literature such as Brave New World by Aldous Huxley (1932) and Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell (1948), both of whom looked straight into the face of Technocracy when it was still in its infancy.

"Does the USA government have stockholders? Absolutely! Global corporations and banks, NGOs and globalist foundations. Furthermore, they expect a return on their investments, namely, privatized “sweetheart” deals that lock out competitors. In many cases, this gives the “private” party a monopoly over the services offered. Citizens are only seen as consumers.

Prior to the 1993 Clinton/Gore initiative, the goal of government was to serve the people. Now the goal is not to serve the people but rather to serve its stockholders. Previously, the goal was to facilitate a price-based, free-market economic system. Now the goal is to facilitate an energy-based green economy predicated on Sustainable Development and Agenda 21 policies.

The bottom line is that our Federal government, as represented by the Executive Branch and all of its agencies, no longer represents the citizens of the nation, and that is why Congress and the Constitution have been effectively neutered. Lastly, we see the clear trail of Trilateral Commission members from start to finish.

eBook: Technocracy rising - the Trojan horse of global transformation, 2014 by Patrick M. Wood

......................................................

The Evil Twins Of Transhumanism And TechnocracyPosted By: Patrick Wood July 11, 2021

The dots between Technocracy and Transhumanism are easily connected once its understood that both sit atop the pseudo-science religion of Scientism, which posits that science is god and scientists and engineers are its priesthood. This article provides the current framework to understand this nexus. ⁃ TN Editor

Technocracy is to the transformation of society as Transhumanism is to the transformation of the human condition of people who would live in that society.

Both are underpinned by a religious belief known as Scientism that says that science is a god and that scientists, engineers and technologists are the priesthood that translates findings into practice.
It is a fatal error to equate Scientism with science. True science explores the natural world using the time-tested scientific method of repeated experimentation and validation. By comparison, Scientism is a speculative, metaphysical worldview about the nature and reality of the universe and man’s relation to it.

Scientism refutes traditional religious views, morals and philosophy and instead looks to science as the source for personal and societal moral value.

As initially stated, “Technocracy is to the transformation of society as Transhumanism is to the transformation of the human condition of people who would live in that society.”

In conclusion, the evil twins of Technocracy and Transhumanism, along with their underlying religion of Scientism, need to be recognized for what they are but most importantly, they must be resisted and rejected with every fiber of our being.

[technocracy.news]