Yeah. I mean if there ever was better evidence that women suck at physical competition with men is whole transformers movement, of worse of males going to elite women sports and whipping the floor with all the females. Across the board. A person would have to be a special kind of idiot to buy into feminist narrative.

@Krunoslav LOL I was thinking from the misogynistic view of those transgender competitors and what it really was saying, it really does set back women's rights to the starting block.

@Weltansicht Stunning and brave. lol

Feminism is absolute cancer. And than it gave birth to Frankenstein monster that is after its creator.

The pejorative term "Misogynist" is a good example of how feminism works. Hypocrisy is in its DNA. Engineering and playing with language is its business.

You would think that discriminating against people based on their gender alone would not something we can all agree on that its not something we want in civilized society. This practice is known as sexism. However in feminist hypocritical narrative, women are always in the role of oppressed and men are the oppressors. So if feminist were to use the word sexism, it would open the discussion where women too can discriminate based on sex and gender. But that is not politically correct, so they pushed for the word Misogynist --- a person who hates, dislikes, or mistrusts women.

That way feminists make sure that sexism only can be used in one direction, and they are free to be as sexist as they want, but we don't use that word anymore.

That is why feminists be like; "I hate racism, sexism and especially straight white men."

This is just one of many example of how feminists use language as weapon. By introducing new terms, redefining well established old ones, and labeling anything that does not fit the narrative as politically incorrect, feminists are doing what communists did. Its the continuation of Marxist ideas, applied in Communists China and Russia. One might say feminism began as marxism in a skirt.

As written in the 1970's Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory
by Catharine A. MacKinnon

"Sexuality is to feminism what capital is to marxism: that which is most one’s own, yet most taken away. Marxist theory argues that society is fundamentally constructed of the relations people form as they do and make things needed to survive humanly. Work is the social process of shaping and transforming the material and social worlds, creating people as social beings as they create value. It is that activity by which people become who they are. Class is its structure, production its conse­quence, capital its congealed form, and control its issue."

The relation between marxism and feminism has not changed since it was first written in 1973, but the argument on feminism itself has. It needed to evolve and it needed to become more and more aggressive, which it did. And like all civil rights movement, it has no end. No matter how much power you give to civil rights activists and how much you compromise , its never enough because that is the point. Its not about social justice its about power. It always has been.

Roger Scruton made a key observation, which is that feminist understood, they cannot win in direct competition with men, so in a sneaky way they saw opportunity in hijacking the language of the society and turning it into political weapon.

"As far back as 1949 the seminal feminist thinker Simone de Beauvoir made this programmatic recommendation: “Language is inherited from a masculine society and contains many male prejudices . . . Women simply have to steal the instrument; they don’t have to break it or try a priori to make it something totally different. Steal it and use it for their own good” (1972, p. 123)."

And indeed they tried to do this with sex and gender. "During the 1970s American feminists seized on the idea of gender as a social construct, and used it to hide the truth about sex as a biological destiny. By replacing the word “sex” with the word “gender” they imagined that they could achieve at a stroke what their ideology required of them – to rescue sex from biology and to recast it as a complex social choice." (December 2002/January 2003, p. 1)

This lead to creation of a monster. Trans movement which now is the enemy of the very same feminists that created it. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the danger of letting politically ambitious people play with language. I mean, what could possibly go wrong?

"The feminist agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians." — Pat Robertson

"Feminism has wreaked havoc on marriage, women, children and men. It is time to redress the disorder it has wrought and that must start with getting the principles and ideals for a new 'masculinism' right." —Family Research Council

"Since 1920, the vast increase in welfare beneficiaries and the extension of the franchise to women—two constituencies that are notoriously tough for libertarians—have rendered the notion of 'capitalist democracy' into an oxymoron." —Peter Thiel

Phyllis Schlafly on Feminism: "The feminist movement taught women to see themselves as victims of an oppressive patriarchy. ... Self-imposed victimhood is not a recipe for happiness. My analysis is that the gays are about 5 percent of the attack on marriage in this country, and the feminists are about 95 percent. Feminism is doomed to failure because it is based on an attempt to repeal and restructure human nature."

.....................................................

Ask someone who believes or supports a trans person to define you what is a man or what is a woman and observe hypocrisy, contradiction in their own logic or downright detachment from reality.

Case in point: How Does the Women's March Define What a Woman Is?

Published on Jan 22, 2020 by What would you say? YouTube Channel.

Joseph Backholm was in Washington D.C. for the 2020 Women's March. The question he poses at the march seems relatively simple, "What is a woman?" but maybe this question is harder to answer than we thought.

@Krunoslav neologism.

I always thought any word ending with 'ism' was to control except for prism, then my kids said prism controls light. So.....

also reminds me of their t-shirts for sale on the interwebs

@Weltansicht Indeed. How true.